Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

tradingwizzard

Dow Jones = 100,000 Target

Recommended Posts

This thread is dedicated to all the bears out there and the forecast is not mine, however, it has been made in the late 1988 when price was where it was, as you can see in the image attached. I scaned the chart from "Masterin Elliott Waves" book, written by Glen Neely, one of the best trading books ever writen.

 

The thing is that the pattern you are seeing there is called a Double Three Running and such a pattern it is ALMOST ALWAYS followed by a third wave extended impulsive move. In order for a wave to be considered extended, it should travel more than 161.8% when compared with the first wave. In this case, the extension tool should start from the absolute low, to the highs at the end of WAVE (I) and to the lows in WAVE (II).

And from that moment on we should look for an extended move.

 

All in all, the chart calls for the 100,000 level to be touched by the year 2060 if we take the time element into consideration.

 

Keep in mind the call was made when Dow was below 8000 points late 1988. No QE's, etc., known at that date, no financial crises and all this crap we are facing now.

 

So.....your opinions please? Crazy? Stupid? Impossible? ....well, as far as I know, impossible is nothing, and in this case, the buy and hold worked just fine.

 

Enjoy.

IMG_20130902_0002.thumb.jpg.c71a738196a9d322257c0e976ea8f36c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You'll have to excuse my complete disinterest in where the Dow will be in 2060.

Quite simply..........................................I fully expect to be dead.

However,if you anticipate being alive around this time you might wanna consider ceasing all trading activities immediately and just buy and hold a few blue chips and go and do something else in the meantime.But i'd check with the author (since you rate his book so highly) and find out how he plans to capitalize on this seemingly useless piece of information(?)

Finally,come back and post half a dozen reasons why we're all missing something here.

Frankly you'll be pushed to find 2 I should think.

 

Hi mits...great to see you're live and well...I was missing your sarcasm :)

 

I named the book as the analysis is not mine...I just scanned the chart and is logical to name the author....but I do think is a freat book as it changed my trading style

 

I would be ok with 80k for Dow Jones, so make it 2040 :).....kidding earlier...probably bears are looking for some technical explanation....well, one is this:double three running and the targets above

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some opinions

1 in 2060 there won’t even be a Dow JIA index … there will be indexes but that one will either be back to really ‘industrial’ or replaced by then.

 

2 theoretically ( in economic and social theoreticals) Glenn’s projections are sound … even if it turns out he’s off by thousands of points and years.

 

3 I’ve said several times herein, the dow, to really be in a BULL right now needs to be much higher than it is… in my ‘numbers’, it needed to be at 18000 five years ago… 24000 to 28000 now…

Look at an index chart priced in gold = bear mkt .

But for you, it’s dressed up like a bull. Yes, often the biggest lies really are the easiest lies... fiat. The (realistic ??? ) ‘bulls’ are going long at “subsidized prices and when they adjust, at whatever point in the future, they [may] adjust immediately and on no volume.”

Ie the financial world is operating on false metrics … yen history of ‘lies’, europeen[sp] history of lies, dollar history of lies, etc. so

 

4 the metrics of 2060 will be different, see 2 above.

 

I can relate to why you discuss it, twiz – but most are going to find it specious…

 

All the best,

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Some opinions

1 in 2060 there won’t even be a Dow JIA index … there will be indexes but that one will either be back to really ‘industrial’ or replaced by then.

 

2 theoretically ( in economic and social theoreticals) Glenn’s projections are sound … even if it turns out he’s off by thousands of points and years.

 

3 I’ve said several times herein, the dow, to really be in a BULL right now needs to be much higher than it is… in my ‘numbers’, it needed to be at 18000 five years ago… 24000 to 28000 now…

Look at an index chart priced in gold = bear mkt .

But for you, it’s dressed up like a bull. Yes, often the biggest lies really are the easiest lies... fiat. The (realistic ??? ) ‘bulls’ are going long at “subsidized prices and when they adjust, at whatever point in the future, they [may] adjust immediately and on no volume.”

Ie the financial world is operating on false metrics … yen history of ‘lies’, europeen[sp] history of lies, dollar history of lies, etc. so

 

4 the metrics of 2060 will be different, see 2 above.

 

I can relate to why you discuss it, twiz – but most are going to find it specious…

 

All the best,

 

zdo

 

hi zdo,

 

finally a good reply to the thread........well, probably the ones in the 90's thought the same.....and here we are 100% higher

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

(

:offtopic:

btw he mentions gov’t “shutdown” , debt ceilings, etc

some thoughts re that

Was the Debt Ceiling Crisis a Lie? | Gains Pains & Capital

 

It should also be noted – in the form of a multiple choice question

The debt ceiling has now been suspended completely for

a) 90 days

b) Forever

c) None of the above.

 

I know , I know , it’s unfathomable how I can be so dam cynical. :missy:

)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stocks rise to fresh record high, yet again.

 

100K ....anyone?

 

In addition to my attempts above to comment that such an advance denominated in USD may really not be that much of an accomplishment…

someone should also note that (and ...understandably, you’ll deny inferring such ;)… but) an underlying tone of your posts is that it’s going to go there straightly, directly and that all one needs to do is ‘long bias’.

 

So - some ‘voice of experience’ to all our overleveraged ‘long bias’ buddies out there ---- I did very well overleveraged and ‘long bias’ in the indexes through the 90’s, but there were at least a dozen times I was ‘right’ in the long term but had I stayed long stubbornly, I would have gone bust…

 

“To inform people is hard slugging.” Paul Craig Roberts

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In addition to my attempts above to comment that such an advance denominated in USD may really not be that much of an accomplishment…

someone should also note that (and ...understandably, you’ll deny inferring such ;)… but) an underlying tone of your posts is that it’s going to go there straightly, directly and that all one needs to do is ‘long bias’.

 

So - some ‘voice of experience’ to all our overleveraged ‘long bias’ buddies out there ---- I did very well overleveraged and ‘long bias’ in the indexes through the 90’s, but there were at least a dozen times I was ‘right’ in the long term but had I stayed long stubbornly, I would have gone bust…

 

“To inform people is hard slugging.” Paul Craig Roberts

 

I'm not saying anything......of course it will not go in a straight line for God's sake.......remember 2008 crisis when Dow dipped that much? ....it was a time to buy......not saying here we're going rocketing to the moon, but pointing the direction....

 

everytime I will see on the news indices made a new all time high, I will just bring back this thread with the question.........anyone?

 

I guess only Buffett is thrilled

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not saying anything

someone should say something.

 

...

 

Back on (an ET thread in TL) topic…

It is my impression that Neely thought ‘growth’ would be a much more significant factor than ‘hyperinflation’ to get us to 100000 dow. Is that your impression?

 

ie …are we @ ‘2007 America’ or @ ‘2006 Zimbabwe’ or @ … ?

A Tale of Two Charts: Are We 2007 America or 2006 Zimbabwe? | John Rubino | Safehaven.com

 

 

“To inform people is hard slugging.” Paul Craig Roberts

 

....observing those inner figures...

when an inner bear has had enough and 'finally decides' to capitulate to the long side ... is generally a good time to be one....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Twiz,

 

bump

 

It is my impression that Neely thought ‘growth’ would be a much more significant factor than ‘hyperinflation’ to get us to 100000 dow. Is that your impression?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Twiz,

 

bump

 

It is my impression that Neely thought ‘growth’ would be a much more significant factor than ‘hyperinflation’ to get us to 100000 dow. Is that your impression?

 

what did he knew back then about QE??? :).....regardless the reason, here we are about to test 16 k ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he definitely knew about 'qe' and eventual 'QE'... still it's my impression that...

 

... btw, now you're putting words in my mouth :)

it's not about "reason(s)"

it's more about 'relative to('s)'

 

...still bumpn the question, twiz ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
he definitely knew about 'qe' and eventual 'QE'... still it's my impression that...

 

... btw, now you're putting words in my mouth :)

it's not about "reason(s)"

it's more about 'relative to('s)'

 

...still bumpn the question, twiz ...

 

I know, I know,

 

thing is I am a real fan of technical analysis....I do think (and trade) based on human behaviour and take time into consideration.......not Gann or anything, but, as far as my IQ goes, I seem to keep a steady line and be profitable.......in the end this is all that matters

 

this pattern Neely shows us here, is a pattern I use in my analysis all the time, on lower time frames of course, like 1h, 4h, etc,.......and it is coming through!.....so.......don't want to be the one who is not considering fundamentals, cause I do, it brings volatility to the markets......but Neely did know something about fundamentals to come when charting this? ...no.....

 

if you look back on ANY chart bigger than daily and see the ups and downs price made through the years, can you pinpoint the FUNDAMENTAL reason that was there?....the answer is no

 

so regardless if it is Europe, Lehman Brothers, 9/11, Greece, Italy, etc.....in the end, technical analysis prevails

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you ask, here is my take on the Dow:

 

We are at the top of the Trading Range, so I´d say a short is legit if the red down wave materialises itself. Initial target is the lower limit of the Trading Range, although price needn't necessarily stop there.

 

If price breaks above the Trading Range, I´d take a long after a retracement.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=37297&stc=1&d=1383252092

dow.thumb.png.d03610e280f4ea59a53f8f9467f5dd22.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since you ask, here is my take on the Dow:

 

We are at the top of the Trading Range, so I´d say a short is legit if the red down wave materialises itself. Initial target is the lower limit of the Trading Range, although price needn't necessarily stop there.

 

If price breaks above the Trading Range, I´d take a long after a retracement.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=37297&stc=1&d=1383252092

 

hi there,

 

to me on the weekly chart there it seems to be a flat, and this one is poised to break higher

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know, I know,

 

thing is I am a real fan of technical analysis....I do think (and trade) based on human behaviour and take time into consideration.......not Gann or anything, but, as far as my IQ goes, I seem to keep a steady line and be profitable.......in the end this is all that matters

 

this pattern Neely shows us here, is a pattern I use in my analysis all the time, on lower time frames of course, like 1h, 4h, etc,.......and it is coming through!.....so.......don't want to be the one who is not considering fundamentals, cause I do, it brings volatility to the markets......but Neely did know something about fundamentals to come when charting this? ...no.....

 

if you look back on ANY chart bigger than daily and see the ups and downs price made through the years, can you pinpoint the FUNDAMENTAL reason that was there?....the answer is no

 

so regardless if it is Europe, Lehman Brothers, 9/11, Greece, Italy, etc.....in the end, technical analysis prevails

 

TW

 

good lord twiz ;) first … I thought it was just me

then… I thought it was just him ;)

either way…now I’m starting to ‘understand’ Mits comments to / about you over in the Fractal thread…

 

...still bumpn the question, twiz ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hi there,

 

to me on the weekly chart there it seems to be a flat, and this one is poised to break higher

 

TW

 

Really? And what makes you think it's poised to break higher?

 

There was a clear rejection of resistance on wednesday and both yesterday and today buyers don't seem to have it in them to make a higher high.

 

To me, this suggests buyers are reluctant towards bidding above the top of the trading range, at least for the time being.

 

Lets wait and see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Really? And what makes you think it's poised to break higher?

 

There was a clear rejection of resistance on wednesday and both yesterday and today buyers don't seem to have it in them to make a higher high.

 

To me, this suggests buyers are reluctant towards bidding above the top of the trading range, at least for the time being.

 

Lets wait and see.

 

Wait and see never made nor lost a dime.

 

Resistance, perhaps, in certain timeframes. But in the timeframes that matter to longer term traders, its all noise in the direction of geometric growth.

 

Higher is the better bet. Any threat of tapering will only increase the volatility. It will not change the direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somebody pls help us out… what does whether this little congestion on the weekly breaks north or south have to do with dow making it to 100000 or not?

 

 

 

 

have a great weekend all.

Edited by tradingwizzard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.