Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

daytrade999

Consistently Losing

Recommended Posts

It is usually a balancing act in your method. The higher the RR, the lower the win% will be. There will be a point within any method where the higher the RR lowers the win% too much that it is not profitable anymore. Also a high RR needs to be realistic and not just set as high because you need it high if you know what I mean. What does you trade log say - How would you trades that you have taken be if you set your targets at N*risk? How would they be if instead you set them at an ATR multiple?

 

In my personal testing of every trading method I have explored over the last 9 years of full-time trading, taking 1/2 off at 1:1 and leaving the rest at BE is a bad idea. It sounds good, it feels good, and it produces worse results than if I had just taken the whole thing off at 1:1. The only exception to this was very short-term scalping in high volatility conditions. Your mileage may vary and that is what your trade log is for - test out the scenario against your real, but historical results.

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

So what would be a good exit plan to employ if the 1:1 method is not going to work in the long run? Should I use a trailing stop or just let it jot the profit target and get out of the whole position ? What do you do?

 

Cheers !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I do is examine my trade log and test out various scenarios to find what is best with the compromise of what I can live with ;) What is best may not be easy psychologically to deal with so you need to know yourself. I highly recommend at least 50'ish trades from the trade log or a couple months of data (whichever spans longest time) before starting to run the scenarios.

 

Its important to use your real-time trade data only rather than backtesting with hindsight bias. Your mind will play evil tricks on you if you do not.

 

This is the best advice I can give - sorry it is not easy to do. An in depth walk forward analysis is a crucial part of my trading, maybe it is helpful to you too.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow thank you to the part on correlations .

 

In its simplest form, the idea would be something like:

 

1) Overall market trend SPX is up.

2) Stock A gives a signal for long entry.

3) Stock B gives a signal for long entry.

4) You decide that a position in Stock A is a better option than a position in Stock B because you know that A is more closely correlated with SPX than B. If SPX continues to rise then A is more likely to follow it than B, which often behaves contrary to SPX.

 

I like to focus on small caps but I'm not sure if the spx is the right one or should I use the Russell ?

 

I can't answer that for you. You will need to find a methodical way to test various possibilities. For smallcaps, you've always got IWC - but is this really a useful filter, as it can't really be considered to represent the broader market?

If you can provide me with a way to learn more about the counter trend trade part in the above paragraph I would be really grateful for that.

 

It's really just extending your own idea of using the SPX as a trend filter. If the broader market is trending up, and so is the sector , and so is the stock in that sector that you want to buy, then a good time to buy the stock is often following a brief sell-off. The sell-off is counter to the broad market trend, the sector trend, and the stock's own trend - there is therefore generally a higher probability that the stock's counter trend reaction will be short-lived, and the prior uptrend will resume.

 

This is known as "buying a pullback" (and can work in reverse, shorting brief rallies in falling markets).

 

It is entirely plausible that any stock will have 3 consecutive down days without there being any real significance attached to this. It is less plausible that a stock will have 6 consecutive down days unless there is some serious weakness.

 

Now, suppose a stock is trending up, and you decide to buy it. You decide you will exit for a loss if the stock suffers 3 consecutive down days.

 

The stock sells off for 3 consecutive days, and you now take a loss . . .

 

I also want to buy the stock (its long term trend is up), but I have waited until it has suffered 3 consecutive down days. I now enter long, and like you I decide to exit if the stock suffers 3 consecutive down days.

 

The stock sells off for a further 3 days, and I exit for a loss.

 

Can you see the difference? At the point you exited, there may have been no real weakness in the stock (3 consecutive down days are fairly inconsequential); by the point that I exited, the stock had suffered 6 consecutive down days, suggesting more significant weakness.

 

If the stock rallied after your exit, you may rightly have thought that you merely got stopped out by a normal adverse excursion or "market noise". If the market rallied after my exit, I would be less likely to feel so - 6 consecutive down days seem like something other than just noise, whatever happens subsequently.

 

This is only one approach, with simplified and imaginary examples, however, and you shouldn't allow other people's thinking to overly influence your own methods . . .

If I am wrong in my timeframe selection please correct me.

 

You cannot be wrong on your timeframe selection - this is something for you to decide.

 

Best wishes,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I will bet that if you were to look closely at your results, you would find that you are at worst a break even trader but you get cut to death by commissions and spreads.

 

 

Haha.i do get eaten up by commissions and I m trying to limit that by not getting in and out so often and trying to widen my stops. But I'm not even sure if this is even a right method to do so. But you're right . Thanks for that .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow thank you to the part on correlations .

 

In its simplest form, the idea would be something like:

 

1) Overall market trend SPX is up.

2) Stock A gives a signal for long entry.

3) Stock B gives a signal for long entry.

4) You decide that a position in Stock A is a better option than a position in Stock B because you know that A is more closely correlated with SPX than B. If SPX continues to rise then A is more likely to follow it than B, which often behaves contrary to SPX.

 

I like to focus on small caps but I'm not sure if the spx is the right one or should I use the Russell ?

 

I can't answer that for you. You will need to find a methodical way to test various possibilities. For smallcaps, you've always got IWC - but is this really a useful filter, as it can't really be considered to represent the broader market?

If you can provide me with a way to learn more about the counter trend trade part in the above paragraph I would be really grateful for that.

 

It's really just extending your own idea of using the SPX as a trend filter. If the broader market is trending up, and so is the sector , and so is the stock in that sector that you want to buy, then a good time to buy the stock is often following a brief sell-off. The sell-off is counter to the broad market trend, the sector trend, and the stock's own trend - there is therefore generally a higher probability that the stock's counter trend reaction will be short-lived, and the prior uptrend will resume.

 

This is known as "buying a pullback" (and can work in reverse, shorting brief rallies in falling markets).

 

It is entirely plausible that any stock will have 3 consecutive down days without there being any real significance attached to this. It is less plausible that a stock will have 6 consecutive down days unless there is some serious weakness.

 

Now, suppose a stock is trending up, and you decide to buy it. You decide you will exit for a loss if the stock suffers 3 consecutive down days.

 

The stock sells off for 3 consecutive days, and you now take a loss . . .

 

I also want to buy the stock (its long term trend is up), but I have waited until it has suffered 3 consecutive down days. I now enter long, and like you I decide to exit if the stock suffers 3 consecutive down days.

 

The stock sells off for a further 3 days, and I exit for a loss.

 

Can you see the difference? At the point you exited, there may have been no real weakness in the stock (3 consecutive down days are fairly inconsequential); by the point that I exited, the stock had suffered 6 consecutive down days, suggesting more significant weakness.

 

If the stock rallied after your exit, you may rightly have thought that you merely got stopped out by a normal adverse excursion or "market noise". If the market rallied after my exit, I would be less likely to feel so - 6 consecutive down days seem like something other than just noise, whatever happens subsequently.

 

This is only one approach, with simplified and imaginary examples, however, and you shouldn't allow other people's thinking to overly influence your own methods . . .

If I am wrong in my timeframe selection please correct me.

 

You cannot be wrong on your timeframe selection - this is something for you to decide.

 

Best wishes,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

 

Thank you for the concise explanations . I'm taking all these information for consideration and putting them l in my plan .

 

I know this is not the right question to ask, but is what I'm doing using the spx as a filter and all th right thing to trade stocks? I just want to get some insights how professionals do it and retail traders do it while making consistent profit. I just want to now if what I am doing is the right path.

 

Thanks again.

 

Cheers !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

...

In its simplest form, the idea would be something like:

 

1) Overall market trend SPX is up.

2) Stock A gives a signal for long entry.

3) Stock B gives a signal for long entry.

 

 

 

 

Now, the question is: What makes SPX go up? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to add my two cents.

 

Trading e-mini futures like the ES and Russell (or Nasdaq and Dow) is simpler than following many stocks, and I believe in the end the commissions are lower. One problem is the minimum account balance necessary for swing trading, the daily margins are usually $500 USD (intraday trading) but the margin for an overnight contract is near $5K. An option would be to trade micro Gold (MGC) with a maintenance margin of $800.

 

Another option would be to trade Nadex weekly binary options which do not require a large account.

 

That takes care of what to trade.

 

In regards to technical analysis, support and resistance, volume, candle patterns (specially reversal patterns). an oscillator and a trend follower indicator. Understand Upthrusts and Springs (Wyckoff).

 

As some have mentioned, BEFORE you enter a trade, know why you are entering a trade and know what to do if things work out or don't, don't even go in if the reward is not larger than the risk, the larger the reward, the larger the stop loss has to be to give it room to work out (the chart will tell you, look at the previous low or high). Don't enter a trade if the stop loss is larger than what your account can handle, some say 1-3% of your account. Some say to not even move the stop loss until you are in profit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would like to add my two cents.

 

Trading e-mini futures like the ES and Russell (or Nasdaq and Dow) is simpler than following many stocks, and I believe in the end the commissions are lower. One problem is the minimum account balance necessary for swing trading, the daily margins are usually $500 USD (intraday trading) but the margin for an overnight contract is near $5K. An option would be to trade micro Gold (MGC) with a maintenance margin of $800.

 

Another option would be to trade Nadex weekly binary options which do not require a large account.

 

That takes care of what to trade.

 

In regards to technical analysis, support and resistance, volume, candle patterns (specially reversal patterns). an oscillator and a trend follower indicator. Understand Upthrusts and Springs (Wyckoff).

 

As some have mentioned, BEFORE you enter a trade, know why you are entering a trade and know what to do if things work out or don't, don't even go in if the reward is not larger than the risk, the larger the reward, the larger the stop loss has to be to give it room to work out (the chart will tell you, look at the previous low or high). Don't enter a trade if the stop loss is larger than what your account can handle, some say 1-3% of your account. Some say to not even move the stop loss until you are in profit.

 

hi Raul,

 

I always like when I see usefull posts and you have one big like from me for this one. I do have two questions if you don't mind:

 

1. Why trading indices (more than one?);

2. If you can share some reading material about Upthrusts and Springs that would be awesome.

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you for the concise explanations . I'm taking all these information for consideration and putting them l in my plan .

 

I know this is not the right question to ask, but is what I'm doing using the spx as a filter and all th right thing to trade stocks? I just want to get some insights how professionals do it and retail traders do it while making consistent profit. I just want to now if what I am doing is the right path.

 

Thanks again.

 

Cheers !!

 

Hi Daytrade999,

 

I have never traded individual stocks (this is a minor lie - I briefly held BP as it began to recover from the deepwater horizon spillage), so I can't provide you with specific advice like this.

 

The general spirit of what I am trying to do, however, is to encourage you to generate lots of ideas and then methodically test them to see what works.

 

In principle, the idea of using SPX as a filter for the broader market trend seems sound. But it all depends on what you're doing and what you want to achieve.

 

Here is an example . . . I have taken a strategy that buys a pullback in the IWC microcap ETF when IWC is in an uptrend (defined as closing above its 100 period moving average). This is the first equity curve attached below.

 

Then I have prescribed that the strategy buys a pullback in the IWC microcap only when both IWC is in an uptrend AND the Spider ETF (broader market) is in an uptrend. This is the second equity curve below.

 

Applying the overall market trend filter in this instance improved the profit factor from 5.61 to 6.73.

 

But it is important to realise that this is just one example and should be treated as such.

 

Hope that helps - go experiment - and do so in an objective and structured fashion!

 

BlueHorseshoe

unfiltered.png.98736787c20abaa4b800163e03ec6bd9.png

filtered.png.ff0c5616184dcf01941664038359b23d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks TW.

 

I have a chart of the ES but I trade the Russell, it usually has a larger range and thus more profits, I have read some articles that show the Russell trends better, less whipsaw, as with everything it's not 100%. On the ES one can see the major turning points and I believe the Russell follows the ES because of the larger volume. Today was very choppy and that is why I like having a chart of Crude Oil and Copper on another screen. While watching paint dry on the indices, crude oil took off and did well over $1k per contract.

 

Unrelated to this thread, copper trends very well on Sunday afternoon (Pacific time) for reasons I don't understand (Asian markets?) so that's a trade to get a jump start on the week.

 

Regarding upthrusts and springs, they are retests of a low or high with partial penetration (higher high or low but not a close) on the second attempt and then a full reversal, I think the same patterns go by other names like 123 patterns, failed or fake breakouts (thus a reversal). The mechanics of why these patterns are repeated have been explained as price manipulation by the professionals, they will buy at the bottom or near the bottom and then start a campaign to push prices higher, with some large orders injected here and there to get it going until the crowds finally join in, the professionals will then sell off partially at the top, prices come down, more retail (amateur) trades join in not wanting to miss out on the bull run, prices go up again but there is no follow up from the professionals (where large volume and money comes in), then the professionals sell off their remaining holdings and the trend reverses to repeat the cycle going down (to trap and milk the retail traders).

 

Recognizing candles showing exhaustion selling or buying is key to identifying reversals - they have very large volume and large effort but poor results - candles with long wicks and small bodies with little progress in price gain - such as a shooting star or hammer. These candles are usually a few candles after a CCI peak (200 level) and well ahead of a MACD crossover. Better probability of a reversal if CCI and MACD are on the same extreme side of the scale (top or bottom). I should mention understanding CCI and MACD divergence also.

Nothing works 100% of the time though, and tops and bottoms are not always easy to pick so wait for confirmation of a reversal or be willing to try again if wrong (use stop loss), one time it took me 3 tries before I got it, so while MACD is the slowest confirmation, it may be the most conservative and safest.

 

I should note that there are large time periods (lunch hour) where trades should be avoided as the indicators are also not accurate due to low volume.

 

Springs and Upthrusts

 

I cannot recommend any books on Upthrusts and Springs as I have read many and it comes down to what I wrote. I purchased David Weis' book Trades About to Happen which explains Wyckoff in a more modern way. There is enough info on the web that it is not necessary to buy a book about these patterns.

Edited by raul
Mispelled last name of author

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks TW.

 

Unrelated to this thread, copper trends very well on Sunday afternoon (Pacific time) for reasons I don't understand (Asian markets?) so that's a trade to get a jump start on the week.

 

 

and there you go I did something I don't usually do......I gave your anwer another like as the info in your post I find it to be extremely useful.......now, I don't want to sound too picky or obvious, but I appreciate your answers and, most important, I appreciate your knowledge

 

Unrelated to this thread.........as you mentioned above.......will you make a thread regarding what you posted above?......I have a coupel of reasons for that:

 

1. I personally find it interesting, as I am a trader (Bob knows what it feels like :doh:....please bear with me here Bob... old sport).........

2. I would like to know if we can find an explanation for that........why it is happening?

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Daytrade999,

 

I have never traded individual stocks (this is a minor lie - I briefly held BP as it began to recover from the deepwater horizon spillage), so I can't provide you with specific advice like this.

 

The general spirit of what I am trying to do, however, is to encourage you to generate lots of ideas and then methodically test them to see what works.

 

In principle, the idea of using SPX as a filter for the broader market trend seems sound. But it all depends on what you're doing and what you want to achieve.

 

Here is an example . . . I have taken a strategy that buys a pullback in the IWC microcap ETF when IWC is in an uptrend (defined as closing above its 100 period moving average). This is the first equity curve attached below.

 

Then I have prescribed that the strategy buys a pullback in the IWC microcap only when both IWC is in an uptrend AND the Spider ETF (broader market) is in an uptrend. This is the second equity curve below.

 

Applying the overall market trend filter in this instance improved the profit factor from 5.61 to 6.73.

 

But it is important to realise that this is just one example and should be treated as such.

 

Hope that helps - go experiment - and do so in an objective and structured fashion!

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

 

Thanks again for these wonderful advices,

 

I want to also know if you or any pros in here put trades on Fridays? Especially during times like this Friday with the news on air strikes and employment numbers and fed meeting comig up. With events like these do you guys lower your risk level and trade smaller or still trade the same as you usually do with say 1-2% of your capital range?

 

Thanks :))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now, the question is: What makes SPX go up? ;)

 

Not a bad question....do you wonder why no one offer to answer?

 

First the technical answer....cash indices (like the SPX) are composed of stocks....the technical reason the SPX goes up or down is straightforward....during the trading day the current price of the SPX is the "weighted" (SPX is "market value" weighted) sum of the last prices of the individual stocks.

 

What you really want to know (I think) is what makes those stocks (the "market") move and there the answer is less straightforward.....it depends on the day....for example...ask yourself what made the market move on Friday.....earnings (nope)....economic reports (nope)....concerns over Russia declaring that it would defend Syria if the US or NATO decides to attack (bingo!!!)

 

Of course later in the day....after the dust has settled, look what happens, as "participants" say to themselves "oh...maybe the world isn't coming to an end, and I notice the stock I used to own is now cheaper....I'll buy it back at a discount"

 

So my answer to your question (to the real question you ask) is on a given day, if you want to know where the market is likely to go....you have to look at the big picture and ask yourself what factor or factors are likely to be pivotal or to have the most significant impact on participants...will it be news, economic reports, or earnings or some other factor....if you can figure that out prior to the open....you have a "real" edge over those who simply show up and watch moving averages wiggle....lol

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not a bad question....do you wonder why no one offer to answer?

 

First the technical answer....cash indices (like the SPX) are composed of stocks....the technical reason the SPX goes up or down is straightforward....during the trading day the current price of the SPX is the "weighted" (SPX is "market value" weighted) sum of the last prices of the individual stocks.

 

What you really want to know (I think) is what makes those stocks (the "market") move and there the answer is less straightforward.....it depends on the day....for example...ask yourself what made the market move on Friday.....earnings (nope)....economic reports (nope)....concerns over Russia declaring that it would defend Syria if the US or NATO decides to attack (bingo!!!)

 

Of course later in the day....after the dust has settled, look what happens, as "participants" say to themselves "oh...maybe the world isn't coming to an end, and I notice the stock I used to own is now cheaper....I'll buy it back at a discount"

 

So my answer to your question (to the real question you ask) is on a given day, if you want to know where the market is likely to go....you have to look at the big picture and ask yourself what factor or factors are likely to be pivotal or to have the most significant impact on participants...will it be news, economic reports, or earnings or some other factor....if you can figure that out prior to the open....you have a "real" edge over those who simply show up and watch moving averages wiggle....lol

 

 

Thank you, Steve!

 

I had the feeling no one understood my question the way it was meant.

 

I would have even been happy with the technical answer you gave as I was focusing on the "method" BlueHorseshoe suggested:

 

 

 

...

 

1) Overall market trend SPX is up.

2) Stock A gives a signal for long entry.

3) Stock B gives a signal for long entry.

 

...

 

 

The technical answer to my question has some implications for the 3 points quoted above...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks again for these wonderful advices,

 

I want to also know if you or any pros in here put trades on Fridays? Especially during times like this Friday with the news on air strikes and employment numbers and fed meeting comig up. With events like these do you guys lower your risk level and trade smaller or still trade the same as you usually do with say 1-2% of your capital range?

 

Thanks :))

 

I am not a "pro" - just a retail trader like yourself who treats trading a small account like an enjoyable and stimulating hobby.

 

I make no distinction between Friday and any other day of the week, but then I'm holding positions for longer than a day. It is totally up to you what special day-of-week considerations you may have - but you should make sure you have some quantitative research to support them - how have employment numbers or air strikes typically impacted upon your strategy's performance in the past?

 

The "2% of capital" rule comes from managed futures, and if you're trading un-leveraged stocks it's not entirely relevant. Do you think that Buffet only invests 2% and leaves the rest in cash? *

 

Say you use all your available capital tomorrow to buy shares of GLD. Now, is 100% of your account really at risk? Is the value of gold actually going to fall to zero at any time soon? The only scenarios in which this might happen are "end of the world" type scenarios in which the value of your shares will be the least of your worries.

 

Kind regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

* I believe this is one of the reasons fund managers often use leveraged products - they have a fraction of their capital funding a postion but still get the same bang for their buck as with an un-leveraged asset, and meanwhile the rest sits in t-bills etc bolstering their returns by a few extra percent each year.

Edited by BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you, Steve!

 

I had the feeling no one understood my question the way it was meant.

 

I would have even been happy with the technical answer you gave as I was focusing on the "method" BlueHorseshoe suggested:

 

 

The technical answer to my question has some implications for the 3 points quoted above...

 

If you wanted to get really smart (referring to my original example), rather than use SPX, you'd use 'KaroshimansSPX' - a bespoke index calculated by netting the price changes of A and B off the SPX.

 

Otherwise . . . Suppose A and SPX exhibit strong positive correlation at all times. A certain amount of the reason why SPX behaves as A behaves is because A is a component of SPX. Though it may be true, the information you have is therefore part tautology, and so not very useful!

 

You'd also want to know exactly how the index is weighted. What happens if you take the APPL component out of QQQ, for example?

 

If you want to discuss any of the other implications you have in mind, please go ahead.

 

Best wishes,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am not a "pro" - just a retail trader like yourself who treats trading a small account like an enjoyable and stimulating hobby.

 

I make no distinction between Friday and any other day of the week, but then I'm holding positions for longer than a day. It is totally up to you what special day-of-week considerations you may have - but you should make sure you have some quantitative research to support them - how have employment numbers or air strikes typically impacted upon your strategy's performance in the past?

 

The "2% of capital" rule comes from managed futures, and if you're trading un-leveraged stocks it's not entirely relevant. Do you think that Buffet only invests 2% and leaves the rest in cash? *

 

Say you use all your available capital tomorrow to buy shares of GLD. Now, is 100% of your account really at risk? Is the value of gold actually going to fall to zero at any time soon? The only scenarios in which this might happen are "end of the world" type scenarios in which the value of your shares will be the least of your worries.

 

Kind regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

* I believe this is one of the reasons fund managers often use leveraged products - they have a fraction of their capital funding a postion but still get the same bang for their buck as with an un-leveraged asset, and meanwhile the rest sits in t-bills etc bolstering their returns by a few extra percent each year.

 

Thanks for the reply,

 

If you don'tjnd can you explain to me about the leverage part in more detail or link me up so I can learn more about that specific topic? Because I'm really interested now that you brought that out . I want to know and understand how fund managers do their job and how they use other people's money to invest .

 

Thanks for your help .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi everyone,

 

I'm having problem with my trading and I want some help . I consider myself a swing trader and my method is following the trend and watching price action as confirmation for entry. My problem is I'm always losing . There are times when ny positions are in profit but I'm just not so sure when to move ny stops and then I get stopped out even when the trade was right. I try to cut losses by closing out positions that are not working the next day and Minot even sure if this is what people say cutting your losses short means. I need help people . Thanks .

 

 

And why is it that you think you should win at this game? What's your trading edge? None, as far as you have described. So you are losing on average on commissions & slippage, plus likely psychological errors.

 

If you want to win (on average, in the long run) in a trading endeavor, you have to identify a trading methodology with enough of an edge to overcome commissions, slippage, execution errors, and then some.

 

It is a long road to become profitable ... paved with hard work, and that hard work is (should be) statistical analysis & backtesting.

 

Can you glean from forums some good ideas? Yes, but you'll have to backtest each one of these ideas to find out which really work, and which don't.

 

If you don't want to do the hard work, but have risk capital for trading, then your best bet is to find a CTA, or hedge fund, to trade your risk capital.

 

I wish you the best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you wanted to get really smart (referring to my original example), rather than use SPX, you'd use 'KaroshimansSPX' - a bespoke index calculated by netting the price changes of A and B off the SPX.

 

Otherwise . . . Suppose A and SPX exhibit strong positive correlation at all times. A certain amount of the reason why SPX behaves as A behaves is because A is a component of SPX. Though it may be true, the information you have is therefore part tautology, and so not very useful!

 

You'd also want to know exactly how the index is weighted. What happens if you take the APPL component out of QQQ, for example?

 

If you want to discuss any of the other implications you have in mind, please go ahead.

 

Best wishes,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

 

BlueHorseshoe, I'm sorry, if you were offended by my post as this was not my intention. It was a hint for daytrade999 to think about the logic for a trading approach before applying it as you just gave an outline of an idea. Maybe I should have directly gave my ideas on this and not just ask a question… my bad. The question was meant to stimulate to think about the logic...

 

If stocks A and B are part of SPX and SPX trended up, didn't A and B participate in the trend if we see a long signal in those stocks? If so, that would mean that we would buy stocks that are not considered very attractive as the market clearly favored other stocks (those that made SPX move up). Hence, the potential for A and B are probably limited (low beta).

 

If A and B participated in the trend of SPX, do we wait for a retracement of A and B (and SPX)? If we see a retracement, how are we "sure" it's a retracement and not a reversal of SPX? etc. etc. etc.

 

Although, I'm a big fan of simple approaches, the logic of any approach has to be understood before applying it. That's what you, daytrade999, have to think about when putting together a trading approach.

Edited by karoshiman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

...

 

The "2% of capital" rule comes from managed futures, and if you're trading un-leveraged stocks it's not entirely relevant. Do you think that Buffet only invests 2% and leaves the rest in cash? *

 

Say you use all your available capital tomorrow to buy shares of GLD. Now, is 100% of your account really at risk? Is the value of gold actually going to fall to zero at any time soon? The only scenarios in which this might happen are "end of the world" type scenarios in which the value of your shares will be the least of your worries.

 

 

 

BlueHorseshoe, you have misunderstood the "2% rule". It relates to the losses that can be incurred by one trade and NOT the capital or margin "invested". It's the same for futures as it is for stocks or the GLD example you give.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the reply,

 

If you don'tjnd can you explain to me about the leverage part in more detail or link me up so I can learn more about that specific topic? Because I'm really interested now that you brought that out . I want to know and understand how fund managers do their job and how they use other people's money to invest .

 

Thanks for your help .

 

Hello,

 

I'd rather not - I'm no expert on any of this. If you hang around long enough you'll pick things like this up. There are regular posters here who have managed funds of considerable size and worked "in the industry". They would be able to give you far more useful and reliable information than I would.

 

There are also books that touch on this kind of thing - anyone any good suggestion?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • re racISM Seek the truth. Confront the lies.   Any white people who are racist are racist out of fear ... any 'supremacy' beliefs are compensatory.  Same with blacks... Seek the truth. Confront the lies.   Contrary to what you've been taught in school and now in culture, white people did not invent slavery.  Nor have they applied the most consistently horrific practices of slave owners, historically or currently.   Contrary to what you've been taught in school and now in culture, in fact, white people have done more to eradicate slavery / humans as property from the face of the earth than any other race - ever.   Seek the truth.  Confront the lies.  If you're white, don’t allow yourself to be guilted.   That just compounds the issues and divisions.   You are not individually or collectively responsible for the exploitation of minorities by a small percentage of psychopaths who happen to also be the same ‘race’ as you are ...  just because black people’s ‘self esteem’  generally needs to rise - especially those ‘trapped’ on the concrete plantations - is no reason your’s needs to fall ... don’t play into ivory tower false dialectic psyops designed to enslave EVERYBODY!   “A man’s rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.”  Frederick Douglass, 1867  civil rights leader in response to post-Civil War segregation laws... my god was that boy and this boy unwoke or what 
    • The intent of this post is to divert your attn. from the lie campaign about the appearance of improprieties by Hunter and Joe Biden...“The emails are Russian” is going to be the official dominant narrative in mainstream political discourse, and there’s nothing you can do to stop it. Resistance is futile. It will likely be too deep for most ‘millennials’  racISM https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/10/12/the_civil_rights_legend_who_opposed_critical_race_theory_144423.html marxISM https://ammo.com/articles/cultural-marxism-gramsci-how-disciples-of-gramscian-marxism-subverted-america
    • EURJPY UPSIDE TRACTION OVERPOWERS BEARS, EYES 124.00 LEVEL   EURJPY Price Analysis – October 16 EURJPY is accelerating from a low of around 123.00 as upside potential prevails over sellers for another session on Friday. The cross has so far managed to hold above the 123.00 level. Given the uncertainty, it would be a mistake to set an end date for the response to the pandemic, European Central Bank (ECB) governing board member said on Friday. Key Levels Resistance Levels: 127.07, 126.46, 125.00 Support Levels: 123.00, 122.37, 119.31 EURJPY Long term Trend: Ranging As noted on the daily chart, if selling momentum picks up additional pace, then the pair is expected to continue to the next relevant area around 123.00, where it sits low in October. Further south, there is critical horizontal support just above the 122.37 level. While the RSI recovery from the near oversold area suggests a further recovery in the pair, a clear break of the 124.00 marks becomes necessary for the EURJPY bulls ahead of the 124.43 level and the weekly high near the 125.00 level. EURJPY Short term Trend: Bearish EURJPY intraday bias remains bearish, with 38.2% retracement from 114.39 to 127.07 at 122.37. A solid break there would confirm a resumption of the entire corrective fall from 127.07 and aim a 61.8% correction at 119.25, close to the pivotal support at 119.31. On the other hand, however, a break of the 125.00 level will bring the upward trend back to retest the 127.07 level. Conversely, a clear dip below the 123.00 level could plummet towards the 120.00 psychological magnets.   Source: https://learn2.trade                   
    • When emotions get in the way of trading success – Part 2 Veterans of the markets generally agree that trading is largely psychological. That is one of the reasons why a trader with suboptimal strategy will trade profitably and another trader with a good strategy will be making losses. The method one trader uses to trader their way to financial freedom is what another trader uses and experiences pecuniary ruin. Why are some people, who have access to excellent trading tools and strategies still struggle with the markets? It boils down to the mindset of the trader. To throw more light on this issue, you can read below a section from an article by Dr. Van K. Tharp, titled “Mental Strategies Versus Trading Systems.” “One of the best traders in the world told me once that he traded a simple trend-following system. He taught other traders how to trade that way and in the process, he claimed that often they developed systems that were more profitable than his! Yet he feels comfortable following his system so he sticks with it. What about the traders he has trained? Most never completed his training but a few found some success — yet none of his students has ever achieved the many years of consistent profits that he has. Why not? Great trading systems do not produce success; great traders produce success! Years ago, I visited the office of another well-known trader to profile him and his colleagues. What struck me was that several of the people in his office were not very successful — even though they were trading the same exact methods that he had used to make hundreds of millions of dollars. Why? In part, his mental strategy was quite different from those of his colleagues. How you trade relates more to your mental strategies than to your trading system. Would you disagree? Then how do you explain the lack of success of some of the people in his office trading the same great system as that top trader… Another well-known trader actually wants to teach people to be as successful as he has been. Thousands of traders have gone through his training yet he claims that only about 10% of his trainees will actually be successful using his methods. And the record seems to support his claim — people go through the training, but few come close to his level of success. Again, we have examples of people who know the rules of a winning system yet aren’t that successful. The reason that these top traders make money while others who use the same systems do not is — systems don’t make money, traders do. Then Do You Need a Trading System? Since the trader, not the system, is responsible for success, do you need a trading system? Top traders use systems so yes, you still need to use a trading system. What then is the purpose of a trading system? My research indicates that trading systems are an essential shortcut for human decision making. You have probably discovered that most human decision-making strategies are complex and slow. For example, think about the last time you bought a car and had to decide on the make, model, color, dealer, price, etc. You probably took several days at minimum to decide. Traders cannot afford that kind of time to make a decision. They need a shortcut or system in order to make quick decisions. Ideally, your trading system should signal an action and you should go through a quick “see/recognize/feel/act” strategy and take the trade. That is, you see the signal, recognize that it is familiar, and because it matches what you are looking for, you feel good about it and act on it. This is the simple mental strategy for action mentioned in the tasks of trading — but most traders cannot do that! They were successful in some domain (engineering, business, medicine, etc.) using a particular decision strategy and they want to continue to use that strategy in the market. As a result, when they see a signal to trade, they use their well learned decision-making strategy to decide if signal is valid and whether or not to act on the signal. Their “normal” strategy that worked well for them for so long does not work well at all in the markets. They end up feeling some emotions when they trade and they lose money…. ….I believe that any trader or investor can win in the markets if he or she uses his or her mind properly. Nothing in my experience to date has given me any reasonable counter examples. Some people just operate at a level that requires a much greater degree of change in their mental strategies than other people. Mental strategies are not the kind of things most traders are interested in normally. They’d much rather learn a new indicator or system. Understanding that mental strategies are a huge edge, however, directs your attention away from external factors and leads you to explore your internal processes. Understanding and leveraging those processes can help you turn any good system into trading success…. Source: Vantharp.com Note: What are the solution? You need to work on your trading mindset and mental strategies. We will explore how to do this in the coming articles. Source: https://learn2.trade 
    • Gann was ahead of his time . Good stuff I hear he's trading with TRO now! LOL Tunneling for pips  Grab that Tro Tunneling radar screen indicator and start tunneling for Bitcoin!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.