Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Duarte

Why S&P 500 will be much higher in 5 years?

Recommended Posts

I'll try to explain why the S&P 500 will be much higher in 5 years.

(It's a guess, not a certainty.)

 

Chart 1 - S & P500 index monthly candlestick chart between March 1964 and January 2013.

 

My guess about what is happening is that the S & P 500 since 2000 is following the path between 1968 and 1983.

This suggests that the S&P 500 may rise in the long term.

 

IhynT.png

 

 

Chart 2 - The following chart shows the Price ROC indicator between March 1964 and January 2013.

 

cLLI2.png

 

The triple bottom pattern that the indicator did in 1994 was repeated between 2011 and 2012.

After the triple bottom pattern in 1994, the S&P 500 rose during 5 years.

This also suggests that the S&P 500 may rise in the long term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll try to explain why the markets will be much higher in 5 years.

(It's a guess, not a certainty.)

 

 

Chart 1 - S & P500 index monthly candlestick chart between March 1964 and January 2013.

 

IhynT.png

 

My guess about what is happening is that the S & P 500 since 2000 is following the path between 1968 and 1983.

This suggests a period up for several years for stocks.

 

 

 

 

Chart 2 - The following chart shows the Price ROC indicator between March 1964 and January 2013.

 

cLLI2.png

 

 

The pattern that the indicator did in 1994 was repeated between 2011 and 2012.

After the indicator having had the pattern in 1994 the market has been up for 5 years.

This also suggests a period up for several years for stocks.

 

Why not ?!

 

I participate anyway!

 

But boom years , are easymony ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting analysis ... but what do you think about the technology and market environment changes since? With HFT and huge hedge funds and the extreme leverage being used, I tend to think we will see more big swings ... volatile ups and downs. However, I do think the next few years will be good for the markets.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now how in the sam hell is the market ...say the ES...gonna be higher in 5 years since we won't begin to get out of this recession/depression/cliff until around 2018? helicopter ben will continue scattering $$$ around and of course that will prop things up for a while but you know sooner or later all bubbles pop. the next big bubble is well you know the $$$ aka as the greenback. when it pops the cow manure will hit the fan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After a long term analysis made, I will adopt a passive strategy of buy and hold.

For this strategy, I will now use 10 000 dollars and, maybe in one or two years' time,

I will use more 10 000 dollars.

 

I'll do this for each of the following risk profiles /ETFs:

 

Higher Risk / UPRO

Medium-higher Risk /SSO

Medium Risk / SPY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
After a long term analysis made, I will adopt a passive strategy of buy and hold.

For this strategy, I will now use 10 000 dollars and, maybe in one or two years' time,

I will use more 10 000 dollars.

 

I'll do this for each of the following risk profiles /ETFs:

 

Higher Risk / UPRO

Medium-higher Risk /SSO

Medium Risk / SPY

 

About the risk:

 

The risk varies according to the leverage of the ETF used.

 

SPY is not leveraged. SPY is designed to have the same gain or loss as the S&P 500.

SSO is 2x leveraged. SSO is designed to have twice the gain or loss as the S&P 500 index.

UPRO is 3x leveraged. UPRO is designed to have thrice the gain or loss as the S&P 500 index

Edited by Duarte

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting analysis ... but what do you think about the technology and market environment changes since? With HFT and huge hedge funds and the extreme leverage being used, I tend to think we will see more big swings ... volatile ups and downs. However, I do think the next few years will be good for the markets.

 

MMS

 

Thanks. As regards the issue of technology and market environment changes, this is a difficult question, I stil think that the long term movements will continue similar to the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sincerely hope you are right and you do make a fairly convincing TA argument, but the fundamentals are a tough pill to swallow. We have the overhanging debt that is going to eat away at the little economic recovery we've been able to muster as of late. The S&P downgrade of the US credit rating to AA was a bad blow in itself, but now there is talk of more credit agencies doing the same.

It is well agreed by many analysts that the fiscal agreement was premature and does not represent a solution to the long-term problem. But they really had no choice given that the impending tax cuts and spending increases were so close and would have led to a double dip recession if the U.S. government failed to act.

The only thing that can really rescue this economy is if Clinton is indeed right and that the Obama policies do take effect as we move further into his 2nd term in office.

There is also a chance of another tech boom on the scale of the one in 90s driving the U.S. economy to new heights; we had a miniature one recently but it's sufficient.

There is a part of me that feels as if the U.S. is taking a step back to move two steps forward because the economy is definitely adjusting to the changes that are taking place across the globe. We need to let the bad jobs go (to China, India wherever) as Obama said and embrace the change to a knowledge economy with high tech manufacturing here in the U.S.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is that the S&P 500 will rise to its resistance line, close to the level of 1575.

 

Chart - S & P500 index monthly candlestick chart between May 1999 and March 2013.

 

df94gwF.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
After a long term analysis made, I will adopt a passive strategy of buy and hold.

For this strategy, I will now use 10 000 dollars and, maybe in one or two years' time,

I will use more 10 000 dollars.

 

I'll do this for each of the following risk profiles /ETFs:

 

Higher Risk / UPRO

Medium-higher Risk /SSO

Medium Risk / SPY

 

In the first months of this year, the evolution of “buy and hold” portfolios was positive.

 

8wMgfuh.png

 

 

6kXtgni.png

 

 

6OOiHeU.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I compared the previous period with the current period, and I came to the conclusion that the S&P500 after reaches its resistance line (key value: 1575) can follow the path 1 or 2, in the first chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why S&P 500 will be much higher in 5 years?

Simple Answer: Cause of Inflation Adjustment...Inflation is only going to go higher in the long term (by long term i mean decade or decades) cause of increase in population, increase in crime, increase in gold,oil,commodities prices...there will be correction and even market crashes in the way bt overall trajectory over long term is only up...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I compared the previous period with the current period, and I came to the conclusion that the S&P500 after reaches its resistance line (key value: 1575) can follow the path 1 or 2, in the first chart.

 

The two paths described remain open as long as the S&P 500 remains below to 1625.

 

If, over the next two months, the S&P 500 remains below to 1575, I think that the S&P 500 will follow the path 1, but if the S&P500 rises above 1625, I think that the S&P 500 will follow the path 2.

 

I will continue to evaluate on a monthly basis to determine the need to change the initial plan.

 

 

79Eypd2.png

 

zEMUWpx.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It wont be long now and the doo doo will hit the fan...

 

What is doo doo? 700 points? 900 points?

 

Is it 60-150 points?

 

The market needs much greater retail representation in order to have a drop that we can call doo doo; otherwise, it is just a fart in the wind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Below are the charts along with brief commentary.

 

The following two monthly charts give a long-term perspective for the S&P 500.

 

I am going to look again closely for the period between 1967 and 1984, as well as, for the period between 2000 and 2013.

In December 1980, the S&P 500 closed above to its resistance line and then fell for 20 months. For that reason, even if the index closes above to its resistance line, the fall will remain possible. On the other hand, if the index rises above 1625 (above 3,17% of its resistance line), it is more likely to go up rather than down.

At this time, the two paths remain open but the very bearish sentiment supports the continuation of the rise.

Let's see what happens. This month and next month will be very important to trace the path for long term.

 

T4ZOzz5.png

 

eYzINOX.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.