Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Enigmatics

Is It Better to Trade a Basket of Stocks or Individual?

Recommended Posts

Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately you will then walk into another problem by having more instruments....that of correlation when you are wrong.

I dont know if there is one correct answer.

Previously I preferred to have multiple stocks - for largely the same reason you suggest - diversification.....however I also found it worth while putting a limit on how many of these you a....scanned and looked at and

b...hold or trade at any one time (I often found I had too many open and had to limit myself)

 

Alternatively a friend went the opposite way and he went a bit harder at the one he liked the most, and just kept plugging away at improving his "choosing" skills.....and had to just satisfy himself often he choose poorly.

(ultimately he still had more than one trade on at once usually but he preferred to concentrate)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

 

 

Best way is to trade a large folio of ETFs and use the cointegrations for hedging.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the sounds of it, you should trade more than one stock. If you can't do it economically, then you are better off trading an index instead of trying to call a market with 1 stock.

 

An index won't give you the benefit you might get from selecting weak stocks. However, your weak stocks don't have to go down in a weak market either. Your experience with 1 stock will be duplicated with multiple stocks from time to time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on how you trade obviously. However, a decent scalper can make a living off just one good stock like GOOG, AAPL, PCLN, AMZN, NFLX, and many others. I did it for many years before switching to fiutures in 2008; I know other traders that are doing it right now. I think it is far easier to trade just one instrument, but most aspiring traders love to complicate what should be a simple task. Which is just one of the reasons for the high failure rate among active retail traders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It depends on how you trade obviously. However, a decent scalper can make a living off just one good stock like GOOG, AAPL, PCLN, AMZN, NFLX, and many others. I did it for many years before switching to fiutures in 2008; I know other traders that are doing it right now. I think it is far easier to trade just one instrument, but most aspiring traders love to complicate what should be a simple task. Which is just one of the reasons for the high failure rate among active retail traders.

 

I believe much of what you're saying as well. Some of the guys I've bounced ideas off of over the last few years have moved entirely into futures. They find technical analysis to be much more reliable in that market.

 

The leverage scares me a little though with $50 a point on the /ES (which is what they trade).

 

But if I'm not in futures, then I'm trying to finally figure out the best thing to do here. Some days I feel like it's spreading my risk. Other days it seems sticking to AAPL options would be the way to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason futures seem risky, is that to a large extent you can determine your own level of risk and leverage, much more so than with equities. Just because many futures firms offer $400 intraday margins on ES contracts, does not mean you should take advantage of it. They are attempting to attract the next group of low budget amatuers with those margins; they count on these under funded wanna be traders for business. I believe you should have at least 4k per ES contract that you want to trade. Even if you are an experienced trader, if only for psychological reasons. Look at this way, 1 point on the ES is $50 as you know. There are 4 ticks that make up that point, each worth $12.50. When I used to trade the ES, I knew that I needed 8 ticks to make my living each day. That's all you really need to be able to do each day. Trading 5 contracts you can pay your bills, trading 10 contracts, you are comfortable. Notice that I said contracts, I see a lot of pretend traders on the internet calling them cars. I have never known any full time futures trader who called a contract-----a car. It makes me laugh when I read this stuff. I have been a member here for a while, but I admit that I mostly come here for the comedy.

 

Here is something to consider. I have been trading full time since 1996. I know many people in the industry, many floor traders, etc. I have never met a single person who trades options for a living who is not on the floor, not a single one. I doubt there is a single person who trades options for a living on the retail end that can prove it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience has been that trading a single stock works best for me... several reasons:

 

1. The ATR, volatility, and liquidity mates up well with my trading system... once I have found that proper fit I'm going to trade it well consistently. Why trade anything else?

 

2. Trading the same stock day-in-day-out helps to develop a sense of "feel" for the way it trades. I notice that when I choose to trade something else that I will struggle for a few days until I pickup that "feel" again.

 

3. I may trade the same stock for weeks or even months. This cuts down on the amount of maintenance involved with trading from a basket... it's easier.

 

Trading from a basket can put you into the hot mover for the day or week... I had some success with trading this way, but my earnings were streaky. I'm far more consistent and my trading is more relaxed... like carrying on a conversation with someone I know and like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just trade the futures but I've been interested in trading a basket of stocks. For example, sorta like you're saying.. I can predict the entire market direction -- that's strategy but then there are "tactics". So, there is strategy and tactics.

 

Tactics is how we implement the strategy.. One idea with tactics is to minimize the cost of being wrong. There are a lot of possibilities in stocks that I don't have in just trading the futures.

 

You might pick the 5 strongest stocks to go long based on fundamentals or relative strength.

 

A lot of possibilities.. I think the line of thinking you are on has promise.

 

 

Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To the OP, I recently came across (and signed up for) what seems like a legit new way of trading a basket of similar stocks at single issue prices. Both crazy, absurdly common sense, actually a "Why didn't I thing of that?" new idea, it would seem to provide a superior way to trade a basket of 30 stocks. Commis. of .33 an issue, $9.99 per basket, I mean duh! Anyone got any counter-arguemen after examining their offering?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My Strategy is somewhat different bt less risky (atleast for me)..

It involves trading with 2 accounts . One is a Current account (Marginless and only for going long) , the other is the Margin account for only going short..

I go long only with my marginless account and put a sell limit order on the stocks (no matter how much time it takes to trigger the sell limit since there is going to be no margin call) while i short highly inflated stocks in my margin account and give them a buy-limit order (bt in this case i do have a stop-loss as there could be a margin call )..

I trade a bundle of stocks on both sides which kinda makes it a little bit of a hedging (though not much) and works well....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

 

I would rather say its always better to trade a basket of securities rather than an individual stock if you are risk aversion investor / trader because the risk is diversified in basket of securities and you can easily earn above average return.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Best way is to trade a large folio of ETFs and use the cointegrations for hedging.

 

Rare to see someone say "Cointegration" on this board. Happy to see it

 

How do you calculate Cointegration Tommaso ?

 

or do you just trade the spreads according to the ETF as the peg?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just curious what everyone's opinion is on this subject.

 

I've gotten to the point where I've grown tired of trading individual stocks at a time. I commonly found myself in a situation where'll I find 3-4 stocks thru my scan for the next trading day, have the market direction pegged, and then end up in the 1 stock that decides not to participate. In the last two days I've passed up what would've been an average of +110 ticks or so if I took positions in all of them. Instead I chose the bad apple and stopped out for losses.

 

BTW, yes I do have a methodology and setup that I trade every single time. However, just because one setup looks like a previous one I had success on, that does not guarantee success. Beyond the impact of market direction, all these stocks have different behaviors, betas, etc.

 

What's been successful for you guys?

 

I wouldn't trade a stock in isolation, period. All things are correlated to one another. The real money is in determining leads and lags. How would you determine leads and lags for your chosen basket... By performing a backtest.

 

Could you share with us what stocks are currently in your basket?

 

Happy to see your looking into this!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rare to see someone say "Cointegration" on this board. Happy to see it

 

How do you calculate Cointegration Tommaso ?

 

or do you just trade the spreads according to the ETF as the peg?

 

 

I use the SCX index

 

See here:

Metrics for Algorithmic Trading by Tom Gastaldi

 

and also here:

G-Bot Algorithmic Trading Project - Strategies

 

 

You need to invest in "essentially different" price moves. Or else you are just "overloading" the same investment (and can easily blow up without even realizing it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.