Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Crow

Shorting the Company That I Work for

Recommended Posts

Is there anything illegal or that could get me fired for taking a short position against the company that I work for assuming that the decision to short was not based on insider information? There are legitimate reasons to do this, for example, many companies grant options and restricted stock units that take a long time to vest. If I feel that I have hit a good price, but have to wait a while until I can sell my unvested stock, shorting the stock to lock in the current price would make sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no expert on this, but I think you are missing the point of the restrictions on selling the stock. This is a murky area that could lead to dismissals, unlikely much more than this unless you are a key decision maker in the firm. Best check your employment contracts and seek proper legal advice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are describing something more of a hedge. I have done this for clients a while back and used options instead of shorting the stock. It was a cheaper alternative to putting up the margin on a $4 million dollar position. There is nothing wrong with trading in and out of the stock if the company allows you to take positions. Some companies want you to disclose all positions that you hold to make certain that there isn't a conflict of interest with some of the companies that they do business with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no conflict of interest as I am a software engineer and work for a large tech company. I don't have to disclose any of my positions. But I assume that the SEC is always watching for insider trading even though my position would be purely as a hedge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is there anything illegal or that could get me fired for taking a short position against the company that I work for assuming that the decision to short was not based on insider information? There are legitimate reasons to do this, for example, many companies grant options and restricted stock units that take a long time to vest. If I feel that I have hit a good price, but have to wait a while until I can sell my unvested stock, shorting the stock to lock in the current price would make sense.

 

Hi Crow

I'm confused (that will make mitsubishi smile)

You sell the stock short to buy it back cheaper. What happens if the stock goes up?

If you dont think it will go up, you know something.

And when the company discovers your disloyalty, you are dead meat.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are describing something more of a hedge. I have done this for clients a while back and used options instead of shorting the stock. It was a cheaper alternative to putting up the margin on a $4 million dollar position. There is nothing wrong with trading in and out of the stock if the company allows you to take positions. Some companies want you to disclose all positions that you hold to make certain that there isn't a conflict of interest with some of the companies that they do business with.

 

What about using single stock futures?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is there anything illegal or that could get me fired for taking a short position against the company that I work for assuming that the decision to short was not based on insider information? There are legitimate reasons to do this, for example, many companies grant options and restricted stock units that take a long time to vest. If I feel that I have hit a good price, but have to wait a while until I can sell my unvested stock, shorting the stock to lock in the current price would make sense.

 

You can contact the SEC directly:

 

https://tts.sec.gov/oiea/QuestionsAndComments.html

 

You "feel" that the stock has hit a good price. I would define exactly why you think the stock has hit a good price and document it. Is it because of the economy in general? The industry? Or do you think your company has no more upside? If you have no faith in more upside potential to your company, there must be a reason. Where does the reason come from? Your knowledge of the company, or your knowledge of the industry because you work for a company in the industry?

 

These are the things I would be trying to answer. Personally, I'd want to be able to provide an answer other than I just "felt" the stock price had hit a good price.

 

The company is providing the opportunity for employees to own stock as an incentive to do good work. That's the intent. You do a good job for the company, the company does well, the stock price goes up, you benefit. It's seems that what you are saying, is that the upside to the benefit is in question. Have you lost trust in the company, or the economy in general?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is no conflict of interest as I am a software engineer and work for a large tech company. I don't have to disclose any of my positions. But I assume that the SEC is always watching for insider trading even though my position would be purely as a hedge.
Depending on the timing, I would think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I'm afraid that I know nothing of the legalities of your question.

 

However, one possibility might be if you were able to find another company's stock in the same sector that behaves in an almost identical fashion (ie it is 'highly correlated'), and can be expected to continue doing so in the future. You could then short this stock, rather than short your company's own stock. Even a sector ETF might exhibit a sufficiently high degree of correlation. Hell, if you're working for Apple then you could probably just short the NASDAQ . . .

 

The danger with this tactic is obviously that the instrument you short and the stock price of your company cease to move together - for instance if some news or event were to affect one without affecting the other.

 

Hope that's of some use.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is there anything illegal or that could get me fired for taking a short position against the company that I work for assuming that the decision to short was not based on insider information? There are legitimate reasons to do this, for example, many companies grant options and restricted stock units that take a long time to vest. If I feel that I have hit a good price, but have to wait a while until I can sell my unvested stock, shorting the stock to lock in the current price would make sense.

 

I dont think anyone was interested in this post.

 

 

I also do not think that you have enough money to risk a position of any size.

 

 

#foodstamps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.