Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Trading Psychology with Jason Jankovsky

Recommended Posts

For those of you that missed it. Check out the interview on trading psychology with Jason Jankovsky through our TL! Audio. It's given me new insights on my trading. What fascinating is his setups are based on trader mistakes. I have yet to completely organize my thoughts but will keep this thread updated on some new ideas and trading strategies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Listening to that made me remember that I've thought in the past about developing a strategy to take the opposite side of common losing trading strategies. We all know that a lot of traders will use MA crossover strategies on 5 minute charts and that these strategies are always losing strategies. A consistent losing strategy is just as good as a consistent winning strategy as long as you buy when the strategy is telling you to sell and sell when it's telling you to buy. It's difficult to find a way to incorporate that into a trading strategy though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jason Jankovsky is the man!

 

Mark Douglas' stuff is great as well!

 

JAJ has three great CBOT webinars.

 

its scary to hear JAJ took 10 years to understand this stuff.

 

Just survive the learning process everyone the end of the tunnel is your pot of gold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish he would have shared something more specific on how to exploit what he was talking about. He basically said losers move the market (a variation on JC's "the market's move because they have to"), but he didn't say anything on how to know when this is happening. I sensed this frustration in the interviewer as well.

 

Is the answer in his book?

 

 

I'm not sure I buy his point about zero-sum markets either. The cash market is not zero-sum, the futures market is. But the index futures market is based on the cash market. If trade SPY or I trade ES I'm trading essentially the same price movement. So if I'm trading SPY is it not zero-sum and if I trade ES it is zero-sum? If I buy an index mutual fund or a future contract and keep rolling it over I'm basically doing the same thing. Is one zero-sum and the other not? That makes no sense.

 

Technically an index future contract is "zero-sum." But it's based on something which is not. The whole zero-sum thing is a carnard. Everyone gets something out of the markets. The winners get money and the losers get lessons. It's win-win if you want it to be. The problem is losers don't gain anything from losing, that's why it seems like an ultimate loss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps we can ask him the next time he stops by in the chat room. I am also very interested in picking up his book as I have not yet read it myself. I have decided to take a deeper look in understanding the psychology behind price action. I am slowly starting to realize that all these pivots, fibs, etc.. may not be the ideal way to trade. They only work because of the imbalance of supply vs demand at these levels. I figured the heck with them... might as well keep a chart naked with volume only and determine supply vs demand and the psychology behind the losers. (of course I am not ready to do so yet but perhaps in the near future?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the chapter names of his book, its mostly pretty standard stuff. Solid, but nothing spectacular.

 

Soul, see my points about zero-sum below and tell me what you think if you are of a mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps we can ask him the next time he stops by in the chat room. I am also very interested in picking up his book as I have not yet read it myself. I have decided to take a deeper look in understanding the psychology behind price action. I am slowly starting to realize that all these pivots, fibs, etc.. may not be the ideal way to trade. They only work because of the imbalance of supply vs demand at these levels. I figured the heck with them... might as well keep a chart naked with volume only and determine supply vs demand and the psychology behind the losers. (of course I am not ready to do so yet but perhaps in the near future?)

 

He sees the light, sort off.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wish he would have shared something more specific on how to exploit what he was talking about. He basically said losers move the market (a variation on JC's "the market's move because they have to"), but he didn't say anything on how to know when this is happening. I sensed this frustration in the interviewer as well.

 

Is the answer in his book?

 

Its an intangible skill in my opinion.

 

If you've ever had a losing trade get out of hand, you'll know what he's talking about. If you've never had one trade get out of hand, you'll never understand what one goes through mentally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be interested to hear what he has to say

 

I am a bit confused because I thought he did use fibs and MA's and S/R etc. etc. in his trading.

 

Is this just to get an idea of what everyone is looking at?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looking at the chapter names of his book, its mostly pretty standard stuff. Solid, but nothing spectacular.

 

Soul, see my points about zero-sum below and tell me what you think if you are of a mind.

 

I honestly do not know GCB. I mean what about ETF's as well? Is that a zero-sum game? I understand what you are getting out in terms of everyone is getting something out of the market. But I do think Jason was referring in monetary terms. One loses money while one gains money.

 

This is definitely not a new concept to trading but has me thinking in a very new way. Strategies can be based on trader psychology. The shorter the timeframe, the more we see the shift in trader emotions. (through the constant swings in the markets) If traders buy at VAH for example but price fail to lift, those traders must sell to limit their losses or from the pain of loss. This will create selling presuure in the markets hence a short opportunity exists through their mistakes. Thus we see more probability of price cruising to VAL. Or if short term buyers exist at S1 and lifts price, they will need to sell eventually before the close to lock in profits or if they have hit their specific exit point. Which means we are expected to see sell orders by these traders in the near future. Hence, when they sell is a good time to short. Price will only lift further when new market participants step in to buy. So we need to see fresh buying either from the short term buyers or long term buyers. I know this sounds extremely simply with the basic concept of supply vs demand. But I have never fully incorporated trader psychology 100% into my trading. It was always about price action in terms of "market is making a higher low" or "buying volume exists at S1" but never entirely thinking about the traders who bought/sold earlier and will need to liquidate/bail. I truly believe that once I am able to master the trader psych side in price, I will be much better spotting out better trading opportunities. I hope this makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But I do think Jason was referring in monetary terms. One loses money while one gains money.

 

This is definitely not a new concept to trading but has me thinking in a very new way.

 

But I have never fully incorporated trader psychology 100% into my trading. It was always about price action in terms of "market is making a higher low" or "buying volume exists at S1" but never entirely thinking about the traders who bought/sold earlier and will need to liquidate/bail. I truly believe that once I am able to master the trader psych side in price, I will be much better spotting out better trading opportunities. I hope this makes sense.

 

It does indeed help to know that emotions are driving the buying and selling, because that's the only way to make any sense of it. I'm just never sure which emotions are at work in what combination and why they continue for the time periods they do. What for example, happens on those days when the market sells off and just keeps selling off all day? How come hardly anyone steps in and buys? And what about reversals days, just why do buyers step in? And what about reversal days that reverse twice? Why the heck is going on? Well, in a sense it really doesn't matter. It's really just people freaking out back and forth. He's right about that.

 

I'm not trying to be the devil's advocate. The market does what it does. It's really like a flock of demented birds, everyone just follows everyone else. It keeps going in one direction until it doesn't go that way anymore. The trick is to get in the move early. Takes nerve and a bit of insight, and the discipline to manage whatever happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jankovsky does say in his book that 80-90% of price movement in the markets is just losers liquidating their positions. This is a startling statement, but worth considering.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zero sum game was a term invented under the umbrella of game theory and it has very specific meaning

 

the futures market IS zero sum. it HAS to be. the structure of the market determines that

 

the cash market is NOT zero sum. it cannot be. the structure of the market again determines that.

 

it is true that spy moves in concert with ES. But one MARKET is not zero sum. The other is.

 

I came to trading with a love of game theory.

 

What you have to understand about the term zero sum is it refers to the SYSTEM as a whole, not an individual traders experience. That is key. If you are trading Spy, you are not trading within a zero sum game system. If you are trading ES you are.

 

This says nothing about YOUR trading. It merely is a description of the structure of the system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jankovsky does say in his book that 80-90% of price movement in the markets is just losers liquidating their positions. This is a startling statement, but worth considering.

 

 

It might be so, however:

 

1. We know from Market Profile that those short covering moves don't last, there is no real demand behind them.

 

2. We also know that it is precisely 80-90% of market movements and trades that don't amount to anything better than a total of zero, while the whole positive impact comes from the remaining 10-20%.....so.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.