Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

mikew

Why is MP Graphic Based on Time?

Recommended Posts

Forgive me, I'm new and just reading through Mind Over Markets now.

 

I don't understand why you would want to construct a market profile graphic by using time (half hour periods) as the unit to determine where to place the letters. How does time hold any value? It seems that the bell curve is determined by the DURATION of time spent at a certain price. But why is that even relevant? It could have spent the most time at a certain price, but maybe not many contracts had traded there. It seems like its much more useful to use volume of price to construct the graphic instead of time.

 

Sort of like what dbphoenix was showing here:

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/blogs/dbphoenix/537-getting-down-cases.html

 

Can someone clarify for me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Put your mind at ease. There is no good reason for using 30 minute bars for the tpo's and there is also no good reason for using volume.

 

It might help a bit to not think of the distribution from an academic perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's because when Market profile was first devised, volume was not available to traders in real-time. It was reported every 30mins (I am not absolutely 100% on this so if someone knows with absolute certainty that would be good!). The profile was an estimation of volume.

 

I'd point out that whilst a volume profile is more accurate in many cases, time is an important variable for many participants. If the market spends lots or little time in an area, that has impact just as the amount of volume traded there does. Also, the fact is that a volume profile does not show when a price has been touched and on how many separate occasions. This is all useful information.

 

If you want to use MP with or over VP, then you can choose any length of time per TPO but it is probably best to use 30mins at least to begin with. Much of MoM is not MP dependent and is about auctions so it's still very useful imho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's because when Market profile was first devised, volume was not available to traders in real-time. It was reported every 30mins (I am not absolutely 100% on this so if someone knows with absolute certainty that would be good!). The profile was an estimation of volume.

 

I'd point out that whilst a volume profile is more accurate in many cases, time is an important variable for many participants. If the market spends lots or little time in an area, that has impact just as the amount of volume traded there does. Also, the fact is that a volume profile does not show when a price has been touched and on how many separate occasions. This is all useful information.

 

If you want to use MP with or over VP, then you can choose any length of time per TPO but it is probably best to use 30mins at least to begin with. Much of MoM is not MP dependent and is about auctions so it's still very useful imho.

 

I thought volume was either available at the end of the day or the end of the week way back.

 

The profile is still a great tool to estimate volume in, say, currencies where there is no volume available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought volume was either available at the end of the day or the end of the week way back.

 

The profile is still a great tool to estimate volume in, say, currencies where there is no volume available.

 

Yeah absolutely. I think it was available too every 30mins but could not be absolutely certain. Definitely a good point for the currencies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Negotiator is correct.

 

As for the reason for the 30min periods, well my *guess* is that an institutional trader is more likely to look at a 30min chart than a 5 min chart which will be considered noise. Especially given the days when the pits were open and a 5min wouldnt be as accurate or available as a 30 min.

 

the floor i used to trade on used to have time codes for each 15min block of time. each 15min period had its own time code like 'AF'. These codes were supposed to be written up on trade cards to help trade matching. maybe the chicago floors used 30min sessions not 15min?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I wasn't absolutely certain was that a bell was ringing in the back of my mind saying cbot had 15mins blocks for reporting periods. That could be wrong too though, or it could have changed from 30mins at some point. Not sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's because when Market profile was first devised, volume was not available to traders in real-time. It was reported every 30mins (I am not absolutely 100% on this so if someone knows with absolute certainty that would be good!). The profile was an estimation of volume.
If memory serves - By the mid 80’s, the Chi Board of Trade sold what they called Liquidity Data Bank (LDB) data which the licensed MP dealer used to build the graphical profiles etc. For the first few years, hardly anyone used it for trading anything but 30 Yr bond futures, whose volume at the time dwarfed all other volume on all the exchanges including the spooz.

Steidlmayer and Koy, for whatever reasons, settled on and taught MP using 30 minute time frame… most likely because that was a practical / ‘sweet spot’ time frame for building profiles by hand – which most serious MP traders did then.

A short time later live volume was included in real time feeds but… through the years, legal intellectual property threats kept many charting providers from developing more user defined / flexible ‘profiles’, etc... emphasis on If memory serves :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.