Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

audreybrine_mba

Algorithmic Trading for Individual Investors - a Survey for My Course Paper

Recommended Posts

Hi Friends,

 

I am an MBA student who is preparing a paper on "Algorithmic Trading for individual investors". I need to get a pulse on the popular tools, platforms, strategies etc. so that I understand what resources are available to an individual investor today. For this I have prepared a survey of a maximum of 13 questions (all multiple choice questions) and would be really grateful if you guys could participate in it. The survey is anonymous since the intention is just to understand what is available today for the average investor to jump into the algorithmic trading space.

 

Please click on the survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/WQBLG3Z Thank you in advance.

 

Cheers!

Audrey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This survey is an inappropriate solicitation. I was spammed with an email notification of it's existence because I automate strategies and chose to subscribe to the Automated Trading subsection of this forum. Here's how I score our moderator's choice to leave this topic up.

 

+ Eyeballs viewing this spam contribute to revenue while spam remains.

 

- Sincere topics and replies vanish because I choose quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This survey is an inappropriate solicitation. I was spammed with an email notification of it's existence because I automate strategies and chose to subscribe to the Automated Trading subsection of this forum. Here's how I score our moderator's choice to leave this topic up.

 

+ Eyeballs viewing this spam contribute to revenue while spam remains.

 

- Sincere topics and replies vanish because I choose quality.

 

Hi onesmith,

 

This is a community and everyone is entitled to their opinions and preferences. And there might be some people who would like to help a student out and take his survey. No harm done is there? If you don't want to take the survey just ignore the thread.

 

thanks,

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Will you be sharing the results with respondents?

 

Howard

 

Hi Howard,

 

Yes, I will surely share my findings on the sites where I have posted this survey. I am aiming for around 500+ hits to get a feel of the "real" world which is interested in algo trading.

 

Right now I have got about 100 results, and the most striking point I found so far is that despite the fact that quite a few people are interested in algo trading, there are not too many dedicated platforms for algo trading. For example, so far about 85% of the respondents say they build their own platforms via own database, historical data subscriptions etc. Most of the popular trading platforms do not focus as such on algo trading; they are just general trading platforms with support for a specialist who would like to do algo trading. A one stop shop is missing!

 

I will keep you updated with the detailed results. And thanks to all those who filled out the survey so far.

 

Cheers,

Audrey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Audrey,

 

It might be helpful if you could define what you mean by 'algorithmic trading'. Technically, anything that involves a specific series of sequential steps could be considered 'algorithmic', such as starting my car, or making my favourite cocktail, but the term has generally become synonymous with High Frequency Trading.

 

Assuming that you have the latter in mind, you may wish to reconsider the topic of you thesis. HFT is dependent upon a distinct technological advantage that costs tens of millions of dollars. The maintanence of such a system, let alone its development, requires the input of dozens and dozens of people with world-class specialist experience and skills. In short, it's not something you can do in the back of your garage on a laptop, and the notion of an 'individual algorithmic trader' is nonsense.

 

I hope that this post comes across as constructive and is not just dismissive of your request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Audrey,

 

Assuming that you have the latter in mind, you may wish to reconsider the topic of you thesis. HFT is dependent upon a distinct technological advantage that costs tens of millions of dollars. The maintanence of such a system, let alone its development, requires the input of dozens and dozens of people with world-class specialist experience and skills. In short, it's not something you can do in the back of your garage on a laptop, and the notion of an 'individual algorithmic trader' is nonsense.

 

I hope that this post comes across as constructive and is not just dismissive of your request.

 

You should start with that quote.... I suppose it depends on definition. Check the SEC definition of HFT and you will be starkly suprised. I was suprised to find out that a system that I designed is considered a HFT system. And I designed it by myself, on X_86 gear. A $500 system that I now make a living off of. Preparing the paperwork now for a fund launch, so it is possible. I designed it in a garage, with a server running in a closet. lol

 

Check out Tradebot Systems in KC Missouri, they pocket $50k a day. Their solo designer started in a basement (no BS) with a $10k investment.

 

I think the big reason that individuals can do this now is solely because of technology. We have access to brokers and DMI. The Primes are still tough, but the small primes and mini primes all offer apis to connect. I think they all offer market data and pretty effecient order routing. Obviously, the primes have the the best algo's but you can't get an account with them without $1B(I think, it's up there) in assets. Government got this one right with reg NMS that actually helped out the little guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You should start with that quote.... I suppose it depends on definition. Check the SEC definition of HFT and you will be starkly suprised. I was suprised to find out that a system that I designed is considered a HFT system. And I designed it by myself, on X_86 gear. A $500 system that I now make a living off of. Preparing the paperwork now for a fund launch, so it is possible. I designed it in a garage, with a server running in a closet. lol

 

 

If what you're saying is true, then it would appear that I stand corrected! However, I'm assuming that you'd agree that you're in a very small minority of those who posess anything like the skill base to do so. To save me trecking away to read the SEC's definition, would you provide a summary? And, if you're willing to divulge the information, with what frequency your own system trades, and what type of instruments?

 

I'm guessing the paperwork involved in setting up a fund is as much hassle as setting up an HFT system, isn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
a very small minority of those who posess anything like the skill base to do so.

 

Thats the thing too, languages are getting easier. And you can use easier higher level languages anymore. I bet the trend continues. I've seen people using excel to trade, or a matlab, or an R plugin, that's a lot easier to learn than c++.

 

To save me trecking away to read the SEC's definition, would you provide a summary?

Well, it keeps changing... lol. One of the best reads and a must for anybody who hasn't read it is the concept release from the sec "concept release on equity market structure"

(1) the

use of extraordinarily high-speed and sophisticated computer programs for generating, routing,and executing orders; (2) use of co-location services and individual data feeds offered by exchanges and others to minimize network and other types of latencies; (3) very short time-frames for establishing and liquidating positions; (4) the submission of numerous orders that are cancelled shortly after submission; and (5) ending the trading day in as close to a flat position as possible (that is, not carrying significant, unhedged positions over-night).

 

 

And, if you're willing to divulge the information, with what frequency your own system trades, and what type of instruments?

I don't do a lot of fancy. I do a portfolio, which is different from a lot of the HFT guys. But I can still do a couple hundred trades a day.

 

I'm guessing the paperwork involved in setting up a fund is as much hassle as setting up an HFT system, isn't it?

Hassle is other peoples money. It's a regulated industry, so you have to pull your pants down in front of Barack to invest for other people... up to a certain point. I'm going the RIA route now.

 

Getting started you can trade a retail account which is easy to set up, but day trading restrictions are a gotcha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thats the thing too, languages are getting easier. And you can use easier higher level languages anymore. I bet the trend continues. I've seen people using excel to trade, or a matlab, or an R plugin, that's a lot easier to learn than c++.

 

Thanks for the resonse. I disagree with you about the languages aspect - I'm a perfectly proficient programmer in several languages, and pretty confident that I could teach myself C++ if I wanted. But I think the main barriers to HFT are broader technical issues - for example, I wouldn't have a clue about how to go about obtaining the low latency order routing that the HFTs enjoy. And I think that most people at the large HFT firms would be equally ignorant - it's my understanding that they tend to be made up of specialist teams, each of which only really understand their own job.

 

Anyway, as I said before, its impressive that you've managed to get such a system off the ground single-handedly, so good luck for the future and for your capital management enterprise!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Algorithmic is not HFT. Traders have been trading algorithmically for years and thats been available to retailers for probably since the computer came out. As stated, HFT is distinguished by requirement for co-location,automation, and speed.

 

Some of the early definitions that came out originally wanted to say anyone who was a day trader was an HFT trader but that misses point completely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.