Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

carltonp

Tape Read (Time & Sales) Strategies

Recommended Posts

I'm hoping that someone like dVL will provide some strategies. All I need is a strategy and then I can go away and program it in Excel.

 

The best strategy is market understanding and the ability to put price in context of the current trading bracket, both long term and short term, along with reading the order flow.

 

The ability to think in probabilities and possible scenarios is something that is completely unnatural - especially for technical people like us. So learning that is a gradual process.

 

I am a discretionary trader first and foremost. But I can't stop myself from creating a mechanical system that builds on my discretionary tools because I am still a programmer at heart. I do have some free stuff for Sierra Chart users that I posted in the SC message board under (Warrior Trader).

 

Regards,

dVL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The best strategy is market understanding and the ability to put price in context of the current trading bracket, both long term and short term, along with reading the order flow.

 

 

dVL

 

I'm working on that mate....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gosu, that I would agree is a problem. One way to overcome that problem is write an excel formula to alert me to the frequency of bids/asks. I understand that when large institutions start to accumulate they do so in small lots. So, I will write a program that will watch for that kind of action. Other than that I have don't know how to deal with that issue.

 

I should add if you have any suggestions as to what I should watch out for I would love to hear them. At the moment I'm just studying the Tape with a simple setup. Once I see a pattern I will write a program for it. I'm just looking for patterns right now.

 

I'm hoping that someone like dVL will provide some strategies. All I need is a strategy and then I can go away and program it in Excel.

 

I have no suggestions as to how to overcome the problem of hidden volumes on the bid and ask. GLOBEX allows orders to be shown that do not reflect the actual size being bid or offered; e.g., a bid of 1 contract at a certain price could actually be 1000 contracts. That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.

 

Another thing to consider regarding the usefulness of the bid/ask volume as a trade signal is that at any given time there are potential market orders that can overwhelm the inside market without first being bid or offered. In my view, potential volume from "invisible" market orders far exceeds that of the limit orders visible on the inside market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have no suggestions as to how to overcome the problem of hidden volumes on the bid and ask. GLOBEX allows orders to be shown that do not reflect the actual size being bid or offered; e.g., a bid of 1 contract at a certain price could actually be 1000 contracts. That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.

 

I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

Another thing to consider regarding the usefulness of the bid/ask volume as a trade signal is that at any given time there are potential market orders that can overwhelm the inside market without first being bid or offered. In my view, potential volume from "invisible" market orders far exceeds that of the limit orders visible on the inside market.

 

Ditto the above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gosu, that I would agree is a problem. One way to overcome that problem is write an excel formula to alert me to the frequency of bids/asks. I understand that when large institutions start to accumulate they do so in small lots. So, I will write a program that will watch for that kind of action. Other than that I have don't know how to deal with that issue.

 

I'm not trying to discourage you, but big institutions hire very smart, highly educated people and pay them well to write complex algorithms that are designed solely for the purpose of hiding their intentions. It's not as simple as "a bunch of 1 lots means someone's buying big." Now, we may see large volume come into the market and base a trade decision on that information--I do this a lot. However, it is pretty safe to say that it's impossible for you to write a program that will discern the intention of a large buyer or seller, whether it be accumulation or whatever you want to call it. Some algos operate on a sub-second time frame; others on a minute, or hourly basis. There are simply too many variables, and the orders far too complex, for you to "figure out" what's going on. And this has nothing to do with reading the tape by the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

 

 

Ditto the above.

 

Josh, is it possible to determine if a transaction has been executed at bid or ask, realtime?

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Josh, is it possible to determine if a transaction has been executed at bid or ask, realtime?

 

Cheers

 

Open up a time and sales window, and look at the preferences for that window. You should see the option to color transactions executed at the bid and at the ask separately. Most people will color the transaction executed at the ask green, as this represents a market buy, and at the bid red, as this represents a market sell. This window will show every transactions. The time and sales window is "the tape." This is what people are looking at when they talk about tape reading.

 

What software do you use?

clts.thumb.PNG.03a33a291d8d09fe0d081324bbbb0679.PNG

tsprops.PNG.5dbbb7ace085d835ce397a993c7936ac.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Open up a time and sales window, and look at the preferences for that window. You should see the option to color transactions executed at the bid and at the ask separately. Most people will color the transaction executed at the ask green, as this represents a market buy, and at the bid red, as this represents a market sell. This window will show every transactions. The time and sales window is "the tape." This is what people are looking at when they talk about tape reading.

 

What software do you use?

 

Thanks Josh,

 

I use Esignals advanced a charting software.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Open up a time and sales window, and look at the preferences for that window. You should see the option to color transactions executed at the bid and at the ask separately. Most people will color the transaction executed at the ask green, as this represents a market buy, and at the bid red, as this represents a market sell. This window will show every transactions. The time and sales window is "the tape." This is what people are looking at when they talk about tape reading.

 

What software do you use?

 

Josh, I think I've been bit of a numpty (British term for what Americans call a Putz).

 

Do you remember when Gosu said 'That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.'

 

What is exactly what I was doing, when it actual fact I thought I was doint what you thought I was doing when you said I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

It's still possible to write a formula for that, just going to require a little more thought....

 

Thanks mate....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I did not watch all of this video, or the subsequent ones, but this explanation on the first part of the video where the software vendor offers "proof" is laughable. Sure, one example where heavy selling leads to price moving down--hardly a proof. If it were this simple, you sell when you see lots of red, and you will always win, right?

 

The quote should be altered to, "volume always leads price, you just don't know which direction price will go." Sure, volume is required to move price. A transaction must occur for the last traded price to update. But it's not that simple. This is basic stuff here, but in the first attached chart you will see first an example of heavy selling (that's the delta on the volume at the bottom) led to an immediate move up, and second where heavy buying led to an immediate move down. In fact, these were great trade opportunities. The other chart shows just one example in many that occur every day where selling is heavier over a period of time (in this case 1 minute), yet price was higher at the end of that period than at the beginning of that period.

 

If someone reading this wants really good and logical volume information, see Wyckoff. He was the man, and still is.

cl1.thumb.PNG.c6914645702b401492ea46c1893a223f.PNG

cl2.PNG.78d71c6b86d1180cc6b2852a2a2cfee9.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... is it possible to determine if a transaction has been executed at bid or ask, realtime?

I'm a little late to this thread, but I thought I would chime in. I am pretty much where carltonp is, that I am attempting to use automation to read and act on order flow. I was a professional programmer before becoming a full time trader. I am well aware, as joshdance points out, that I am competing with the smartest and best-financed traders in the world at their game. I also have many years' trading experience.

 

Thanks to gosu for pointing out that "GLOBEX allows orders to be shown that do not reflect the actual size being bid or offered; e.g., a bid of 1 contract at a certain price could actually be 1000 contracts.". I knew that was common in stocks, but I had not heard that about GLOBEX.

 

I have heard that GLOBEX is now aggregating trades. I'm not sure if ECBOT is doing that too, but I would not be surprised if they are or will be soon. The problem is bandwidth and transaction volumes.

 

That's also something I wonder if carltonp is aware of. While IB's data is aggregated, it has less lag, especially during busy times, than more complete data feeds. You can have completeness or you can have timeliness ... take your pick. I use IB's data. There are some things about IB's data that don't seem to be widely known. For example, we can now get live volume together with price in the same update, along with a timestamp. Pair that with DOM, and we have a pretty complete and timely picture of what is happening at a rate of well over 100 updates per second.

 

By way of clarification, we need two things to be able to trade off order flow: the limit order book (which shows bid/ask but not trades) and the tape (which shows trades, not bid/ask). This thread got to be pretty confusing about that.

 

Regarding carltonp's question above, it comes down to identifying whether a trade removed size from the bid or ask. I believe you can guess, and you will be right most of the time. But what I really wonder is: How useful is that information?

 

[rwk]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Josh, I think I've been bit of a numpty (British term for what Americans call a Putz).

 

Do you remember when Gosu said 'That policy would seem to make suspect any trade decision based on what's showing on the bid and ask at any given time regardless of the flawlessness of the data itself.'

 

What is exactly what I was doing, when it actual fact I thought I was doint what you thought I was doing when you said I think carlton is talking about transactions that have been executed, not orders in the book.

 

It's still possible to write a formula for that, just going to require a little more thought....

 

Thanks mate....

 

It seems to me that you are looking to design some type of a poor man's HFT algorithm to trade a retail account. My experience is that the "micro" level of the market is not the optimum place for a retail trader to operate. There is so much gamesmanship at that level that you really need to secure your bearings as to the right side of the market from less transitory elements and then zoom in when an action is required.

 

Indeed, once you know the right side, you will find that the best action points are fading the "fake outs" on the micro level and not reaching for prices after the move is underway. By "best" action point I mean an entry that can be "washed" easily if the need arises and an exit that extracts the bulk of the move--after the "swoosh," if you will.

 

You will be operating on another level when you no longer wait for "confirmation" but hit the transmit button to fade the micro spike on the stall because you KNOW that is the right side. Capturing the spread is just icing on the cake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The T/S and DOM is a crazy place that is for sure. To be able to see Iceberg and other institutional orders is a big help with any trading method.

 

I have created Software that works with Ninja Trader and plots these orders on a chart in real time. I have been a trader for 11 years and have always looked at the order flow on the DOM and T/S but a lot of orders have become way to fast for the human eye or are hidden in tiny lots. I have examples and screen shots to help explain. This will help anyone that is trying to understand the market by tape reading.

 

My website is Tradewithvolume

 

Have a great day!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

I find this topic quite interesting and I should say I am one of the programmers who use Excel to automate trading decisions.

 

My excel macro simply tries to do things described here, and from this thread I got an idea as to what an always-winning (or mostly-winning) algrorithm should be.

 

Is this thread dead already before sharing my observations and experince with you guys?

 

I also wonder what developments have happended over the past 10 months.

 

I will update my excel function to create a signal after 20 seconds of recording HOD and LOD and crossing any one of them with enough volume increase within the next 10 seconds and will share the results shortly. This is what I come up with after all reading the discussion here.

 

Does it sound a good algorithm for you professional traders?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carltonp,

 

Where are you at the moment, I mean your progress on the matter, that is developing an Excel function using Tape Reading technique?

 

I don't see my posts listed here, but it might be a matter of time...

 

I will be checking for any response...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @MightyMouse,

 

It does not look good for the infamous always-winning strategy then. Does it? Perhaps there is nothing such a thing...

 

What Carltonp has done is exactly what I should do, in fact. At least my mom thinks so. I got stucked with all this algorithm stuff and set apart my social, personal and professional life for over the past 1.5 years. And yet not so much success in stock markets. I feel like I am on the wrong course.

 

In this respect, well done Carltonp!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.