Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

will dare to post a trade for the sake of criticism of big felas here :missy:

 

No need to worry on criticism on this thread. I post trades all the time and expect/want criticism. good way to learn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like both the ES and the NQ have poked above their trading ranges but, at the moment, have failed to hold there. So, they may try again, or they may make a round trip to S (note both found S at their midpoints):

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=30537&stc=1&d=1344859862

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=30538&stc=1&d=1344859863

5aa7112b1afcf_SPX0812.jpg.e459dddc20d14db7464683c9a132f205.jpg

5aa7112b21507_NQ0812.jpg.c22cce69c0808cad0720ff31f3fe016c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like both the ES and the NQ have poked above their trading ranges but, at the moment, have failed to hold there. So, they may try again, or they may make a round trip to S (note both found S at their midpoints):

 

Those balances in terms of RTH volume profiles:-

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=30539&stc=1&d=1344861393

2012-08-13.thumb.jpg.c46b99b5bb9eaa9ccfafec54ceabf6aa.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like both the ES and the NQ have poked above their trading ranges but, at the moment, have failed to hold there. So, they may try again, or they may make a round trip to S (note both found S at their midpoints)

 

Those who have been following my posts know the drill: breakout/retracement, reversal/retracement. In these cases, however, the retracements occurred before the demand lines were broken. So, one can either wait for the next op or assume the additional risk and take the rets before the demand lines are broken, assuming they break. In this case, they both have.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Those who have been following my posts know the drill: breakout/retracement, reversal/retracement. In these cases, however, the retracements occurred before the demand lines were broken. So, one can either wait for the next op or assume the additional risk and take the rets before the demand lines are broken, assuming they break. In this case, they both have.

 

Db

 

For ES, the overnight high is at a low volume price. RTH high last Tuesday was only broken by 3 ticks and Thursday by just a tick. Indications could be that we get some sort of pullback, but then you just don't know what might happen in quiet holiday-type markets. Nothing really of any note due today either so we just will have to see. I'd be interested if we do move lower, whether or not we get any reaction at the 4-day balance vpoc now at 97.75 then if not, whether the balance starts to get tighter with a higher low. Of course the third scenario for a push lower will be a break of the balance low with 87.50(/86.00) important below.

 

If we were to either hold the balance vpoc or just carry on up regardless, next up beyond the overnight high would be 1407.00, 09.25, 11.25 & 12.50.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possible buy area for me is 97s, overnight lows. Or more likely, 92.50 - 93.50 -- see profile of last 5 days for reference. I will consider a short if get up to overnight highs and things look right for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1397 long back up to 1400.50 ... giveing it a shot.

 

tight 5 tick stop

 

Will adjust profit target based on price action and length of time in trade.

 

Update: stopped, just a bit too early probably. Needed another test of IBL .

Edited by bakrob99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Those who have been following my posts know the drill: breakout/retracement, reversal/retracement. In these cases, however, the retracements occurred before the demand lines were broken. So, one can either wait for the next op or assume the additional risk and take the rets before the demand lines are broken, assuming they break. In this case, they both have.

 

Db

 

Db,

 

What happens in case like the attachment where the supply line broken, yet no retest of the supply to consider the long?

5aa7112bc787e_example1.thumb.jpg.f950c64f2d14f700237ade531ac8d827.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Db,

 

What happens in case like the attachment where the supply line broken, yet no retest of the supply to consider the long?

 

I don't know what all these lines are, but the supply line is broken twice. The first time it fails to exceed the previous swing high, so you have a choice of staying in and hanging on to see if that level is breached or exiting the trade and re-entering the short if that level is not breached (the latter would have the advantage of earning extra points).

 

The second time you have the same options, though in this case you're only two points from S, so you could just exit, collect the money, and take the rest of the day off.

 

The stochastic isn't going to help you in either case.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The second time you have the same options, though in this case you're only two points from S, so you could just exit, collect the money, and take the rest of the day off.

 

The stochastic isn't going to help you in either case.

 

Db

 

Thank you,

 

Which second time price are you referring to? Which S?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking at the balance (probably now 5-day balance) and thinking about the distribution. It looks like quite a bit of the volume has been done above the VPOC at currently 97.50. We've traded ~5m contracts in the balance. The VPOC migrated lower on Friday from 99.25 to 97.75 and today 97.50 although it could easily change back by close. Looking at the volume further, ~60% has traded above the VPOC and ~35% below (VPOC is ~5% on its own). Although overall the way the market is trading has me thinking that there's a decent chance of an upside break, it's also quite clear from the data that sellers are active in this balance. Now what their objectives are and whether or not there are enough of them to really make too much difference remains to be seen. What is clear is that we are building for a break one way or another and despite the summer trading, the break could be pretty decent. In the mean time however, is it not most sensible to trade the market as a range until it actually shows signs it's ready to break?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In the mean time however, is it not most sensible to trade the market as a range until it actually shows signs it's ready to break?

 

I agree. Even though we came close to the bottoms of the ranges, sellers just couldn't push it down that far, and goodoboy picked up on the long signal.

 

As for the volume, I noticed when I drew those first charts that the bulk of the trades in each range were above the midpoint, not evenly distributed above and below. This suggested that we were going up. But that pitiful little thrust didn't amount to beans, and the short signal came quickly thereafter. Now, we'll just have to see.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.