Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Well 50% / mid-point 1400.5 then CLVN 1401.75..you are htreading the needle...

 

If I were shorting this, and I shorted at 1400, right at the 50%, etc., the market would in 9/10 cases give me some heat, just for trying to pick the top. I have faith that others here doing the same will receive the same treatment as me and that I'll get my 1401.. :D If not, it just proves "they" are out to get me :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I were shorting this, and I shorted at 1400, right at the 50%, etc., the market would in 9/10 cases give me some heat, just for trying to pick the top. I have faith that others here doing the same will receive the same treatment as me and that I'll get my 1401.. :D If not, it just proves "they" are out to get me :rofl:

 

I hope you get it..but "they" are busting your chops...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to "work" for it today.. I was down on the mat on one knee... really frustrating given the range we had... Fortunately it turned into a decent day but it "should" have been a great day... It doesn't take much to get behind...

 

There is no way I anticipated we would get to the NVPOC @ 92.00... today... Just getting to the CLVN @ 94.25 was a reach imho so I went long @ 96.00 & puked and then rebought... YOu only got to drop 2 pts per car a few times and then you are trying to crawl out... I hate when that happens and you got to keep your emotions in check and not try to "get even" with the market... just go with the flow...

 

When you step in front of the train like we did - it can be gut wrenching... it's really hard to tell if it will be a brief bounce or a bottom.. NVPOC was the key..if it went through I'd be moving out :helloooo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When you step in front of the train like we did - it can be gut wrenching...

 

For some reason this week I am being VERY impatient. I can't speak for you, but trying to buy was just plain foolish until the 92 traded and then came back up into 96s.... I just got lucky, would have gotten as good a price, without trying to bottom pick, and taken no heat.

 

Let me rephrase--buying 95/93 was a good buy, where and when I bought it -- BUT, hope caused me to hold and all the while I saw that it was struggling too hard to get up. It should not come back to 95 even once, much less 3 or 4 times... when it did, I should have gotten out at BE or a little better, and waited. Then when 92 traded and it came back up above 95, it was a much more safe buy. I could have made profit, and gotten the same price. Hope is a dangerous thing.

 

I am holding with stop at 94, targeting 1404.75. I don't feel particularly safe here, but will give it a shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am holding with stop at 94, targeting 1404.75. I don't feel particularly safe here, but will give it a shot.

 

Well, 3 ticks from my target of 9.75 points overnight, and it reversed down, and just now taken out at 94 on news. Sometimes that's how the cookie crumbles... frustrating as hell when you're asleep and can't do a thing about it (except I could have set a trailing stop), but nothing to do now but start with a clean slate today.

 

As an aside, 94 is exactly the place I would normally be looking to buy (though don't know if I'd do it premarket today), but I can't let a 9 point in the green trade turn into more than a point loss, so I had to cut it somewhere.

Edited by joshdance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, 3 ticks from my target of 9.75 points overnight, and it reversed down, and just now taken out at 94 on news. Sometimes that's how the cookie crumbles... frustrating as hell when you're asleep and can't do a thing about it (except I could have set a trailing stop), but nothing to do now but start with a clean slate today.

 

As an aside, 94 is exactly the place I would normally be looking to buy (though don't know if I'd do it premarket today), but I can't let a 9 point in the green trade turn into more than a point loss, so I had to cut it somewhere.

 

Oh well. Was this a simulated trade or live btw?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh well. Was this a simulated trade or live btw?

 

These are live -- though occasionally I will throw one on the sim if I feel the need to trade but know it shouldn't be real money.

 

EDIT: in fact, I'm trying out some different ways of managing trades including how I scale in or out, so I will probably be doing a lot of side-by-side sim stuff. Problem is, NT's "advanced simulation engine" can't seem to get things like commissions right. :doh:

Edited by joshdance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, 3 ticks from my target of 9.75 points overnight, and it reversed down, and just now taken out at 94 on news. Sometimes that's how the cookie crumbles... frustrating as hell when you're asleep and can't do a thing about it (except I could have set a trailing stop), but nothing to do now but start with a clean slate today.

 

As an aside, 94 is exactly the place I would normally be looking to buy (though don't know if I'd do it premarket today), but I can't let a 9 point in the green trade turn into more than a point loss, so I had to cut it somewhere.

 

Thanks for your openness and honesty. Its a rare thing!!

Cory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, 3 ticks from my target of 9.75 points overnight, and it reversed down, and just now taken out at 94 on news. Sometimes that's how the cookie crumbles... frustrating as hell when you're asleep and can't do a thing about it (except I could have set a trailing stop), but nothing to do now but start with a clean slate today.

 

As an aside, 94 is exactly the place I would normally be looking to buy (though don't know if I'd do it premarket today), but I can't let a 9 point in the green trade turn into more than a point loss, so I had to cut it somewhere.

 

Well I certianly can't second-guess your trade.. as you know I stepped in @ 96.00 initially and paid for the privelage off CLVN 94.25... it was terrible trade location and my risk was below that NVPOC.. Quite frankly I didn't "think" that NVPOC would get into play... :crap:

 

As far as buying it there @ NVPOC that was "the" place IMHO.. Like you, I was not comfortable that it wasn't rejected.. One thing I had high confidene in was that if we could hang in there that eventual short covering would get us at least into where the stops were and that to me was the high probability play... My thinking was that short covering would lift us into the close - which it did... After that, I did not know if true initiative buyers would come for it - no clue..

 

I think that trade we took was a good trade... Many good trade locations will scare the crap out of you.. especially a potential Responsive one like that.. but we did hit a key number... it made sense to me...

 

The targets on the other hand are something I always fight with.. I abandoned my shorts from up near the HOD yesterday and left a substantial profit on the table... How was I supposed to know the trade potential since it doesn't go in a straight line... I do not have an answer for that - yet..and you all know that is still an open issue for me :doh:

 

Josh: You did a whole bunch right on that trade. You held it longer than I did to the next number up from my exit... Hindsight being what it is...maybe next time you just take it off the table and not carry the risk overnight since your potential for a couple points was not worth the potential risk... but this is hindsight.. and you know that's easy... :2c:

Edited by roztom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think that trade we took was a good trade... Many good trade locations will scare the crap out of you.. especially a potential Responsive one like that.. but we did hit a key number... it made sense to me...

 

The targets on the other hand are something I always fight with.. I abandoned my shorts from up near the HOD yesterday and left a substantial profit on the table... How was I supposed to know the trade potential since it doesn't go in a straight line... I dod not have an anser for that - yet.. :doh:

 

The buying into the close looked strong, but not the kind of strong where I expect to wake up to 1420, or even 1408, so given that, I suppose a more conservative target would have been in order. In globex, though I don't trade it really, I often observe that it will continue, as it did, to shake out any shorts (or longs as the case may be).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem like a possibilty for the market to go responsive today Tom, but then nothing is certain. I think that given the way we are trading at the moment, there's also a good chance of us taking a breather today. So long as trading remains in the bracket on the chart below, that is a possibilty. Where we finish will probably be more telling.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=28218&stc=1&d=1333026586

2012-03-29.thumb.jpg.0bfdad53ba5387c620037752553f8005.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The buying into the close looked strong, but not the kind of strong where I expect to wake up to 1420, or even 1408, so given that, I suppose a more conservative target would have been in order. In globex, though I don't trade it really, I often observe that it will continue, as it did, to shake out any shorts (or longs as the case may be).

 

I did not see it as strong buying..it looked responsive to me and we didn't get back to the IBL even for a test..so I saw it as short covering only... "after the fact."

 

The sell off was Initiative and there was no rotation as N noted..the only real rotation was the short covering... once again in hindsight... I considered your hold very risky but I also considered your target above me also risky... which off course doesn't matter... I like your 1400.00 target better than mine... :roll eyes: There is no way to "know." IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I did not see it as strong buying..it looked responsive to me and we didn't get back to the IBL even for a test..so I saw it as short covering only... "after the fact."

 

The sell off was Initiative and there was no rotation as N noted..the only real rotation was the short covering... once again in hindsight... I considered your hold very risky but I also considered your target above me also risky... which off course doesn't matter... I like your 1400.00 target better than mine... :roll eyes: There is no way to "know." IMHO.

 

Are you guys seeing us as weak then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It looks like we'll get a test of that theory near open if we open up here. Very often the case recently that we open up right on top of a key test area.

 

Currently I see no reason for longs...the market is showing no rejection of the selling so far...

 

I have CHVN 87.75, CLVN 80.25 and the all popular 77.00 ish SUPP..

 

GOd help us all...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Currently I see no reason for longs...the market is showing no rejection of the selling so far...

 

I have CHVN 87.75, CLVN 80.25 and the all popular 77.00 ish SUPP..

 

GOd help us all...

 

Hmm. My view is we are still in uptrend and most of the time what I am seeing is buying come in a logical level below the first level from market. Of course this is so long as there is no liquidation to contend with.

 

If we were to get going to the downside, there are those singles from 3/23 82.50-80.50 to watch for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Currently I see no reason for longs...the market is showing no rejection of the selling so far...

 

I have CHVN 87.75, CLVN 80.25 and the all popular 77.00 ish SUPP..

 

GOd help us all...

 

Similar to you here Tom -- buy zone is 86-88, next is 77

 

Sell area 95-97

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've bought 92.00 for a return back up to 95-97, but will bail and look to short if much lower

 

out 1 at 94, 2nd target 96.50 and will try to add one more here..

 

as to why this long, well, it didn't really seem to want to go down fiercely immediately, and it's a lot of selling just before the open, so at least should try to shake out some of them if it's going to seriously move down

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
out 1 at 94, 2nd target 96.50 and will try to add one more here..

 

as to why this long, well, it didn't really seem to want to go down fiercely immediately, and it's a lot of selling just before the open, so at least should try to shake out some of them if it's going to seriously move down

 

out of this at breakeven on the rest.. yikes, vicious

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.