Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Thanks Josh, Happy Holidays to you (and to all)

 

I will keep my hand in the game through the week. Historically this has the potential to be profitable...and fairly low risk (except for the possible news event).

 

Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Easy couple of points on a nice little basing pattern....scan left and you see the (unsuccessful) probe down to try to find sellers...generally speaking I am going to enter right after that little move down fails.....

 

Thin trading today so I will be in small size but I expect a continued move up as long as the Italian bond news stays low key...

5aa710bde68a5_Todaysopeningtradereversal.thumb.PNG.7261dc7bbc7fa75ac2be3ee4fe4c14e6.PNG

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and here we are tagging 1263.....bringing the markets back to their (institutional) target for 2011

 

"Grus gott" to my mates in the Zurich HTGS office...nice job boys and girls.

5aa710bdef73e_markettags1263.thumb.PNG.d10dcd7f2370d93abf19eaf10aeac5df.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gratifying to me that if you read my initial posts on "An Institutional look at S&P Futures"...there were several negative comments from folks who thought the idea of "time based pivots" was nonsense....and that the concept of professionals "marking the market up" was comical...wonder if any of them are trading anything more substantial than girl scout cookies now....I am sure they would suggest this is just random chance....whatever it is, if you used it to trade, you made money...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy New Year! Opening up in low volume of recent activity and clearly above end of year trading. I feel it's important to not jump right back in until we see what the lie of the land really is. ISM at 10am est and FOMC minutes at 2pm could give us a better idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very very lame so far. Not unsurprising though. 2pm FOMC minutes looming.

 

Yeah 6.75 range... blah. I did take what I think was an A+ long, 77.25, at VWAP / prior R / 50% ... held onto it hoping it would break the 80 and blow some stops, but I got out for 1 tick after it failed near the high... not much conviction for the bulls.

 

My calendar shows 2:15 .. yours different?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday was pretty poor overall imo. There were some opportunities but the range was under 10 points. Volume has picked up a little overnight so we could see better trading today. Yesterday there was a poor high as well as a poor low yet the focus would probably be on failure to push up despite gap higher on open. On balance, given that Friday is NFPs I'd be leaning towards a further test of the gap at least before the release. Other than that, there are some well established levels below for the market to test. IF we were to move up, given the time of year and relative position, I'd think the market would be gunning for the psychological 1300 mark. I haven't really annotated the chart much just so you can get a feel without anything getting in the way!

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=26968&stc=1&d=1325686454

2012-01-04.thumb.jpg.da10351c5abdbc0a01f3f2946c9b7f06.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Waiting to see how the market will react at yesterday's low (if we test it now)... opened below yesterday's range, selling strong into the close yesterday, close on the lows. If low holds as resistance, perhaps we are in for a gap fill down to the 50s, last week's close. Just my :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Waiting to see how the market will react at yesterday's low (if we test it now)... opened below yesterday's range, selling strong into the close yesterday, close on the lows. If low holds as resistance, perhaps we are in for a gap fill down to the 50s, last week's close. Just my :2c:

 

Yeah that worked well. As did the 64's. Which price do you have for the gap close though? I have 1253.00.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah that worked well. As did the 64's. Which price do you have for the gap close though? I have 1253.00.

 

Yeah I have 52.50 as last week's close for a fill, but anywhere from say 52 to 54 would do it for me. As it tested 70.25, I fully expected a rejection, and then one more test, and that second test failure would be my trigger for a short. We never got that and now we are lazily down 7 points from there. I think I'm still a little out of sync from the holiday volume, though today almost feels like a holiday still with this activity. I would have entered short immediately but I got no good volume confirmation. So, I sit here and watch my idea work without me in it :missy:

 

With the nature of this action right now I'm not sure we have the pressure to push all the way to 53, maybe only 60s. I have a zone marked from 59.50 to 60.75 but don't know why I marked it (I like to delete my profiles and such after marking the zone so I don't have to re-think why I marked it every time I look at it). But buyers still not really showing up much yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

27.2% ex on IB. Often means move hasn't really got legs and could show a decent move back. We did have an auction opening type in fairness although even though this action is fairly expected, it's still a bit lame so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27.2% ex on IB. Often means move hasn't really got legs and could show a decent move back. We did have an auction opening type in fairness although even though this action is fairly expected, it's still a bit lame so far.

 

Agreed, quite lame... I'm finding the volume to be very difficult to read. Almost as if the market says, "let's just reverse here, or not, doesn't really matter" ... not much conviction, and hence not clear enough footprints for me to observe. Trends have been clear once they began (down after first half hour) but not much indication I can see regarding timing.

 

EDIT: then again, I have been not very focused as I would like to today so far, so perhaps it's crystal clear, and my focus is off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just step back then. I would say that given we tested a decent profile low volume price then yesterday's low and couldn't get back into its range, we might have expected a bit more of a push, especially once 64's were taken out. Not a great deal of expansion of the IB range before a break back into it. Could mean sellers aren't that confident or just aren't there right now. Same could be said for buyers although they will try to move it higher until any opposition pressure comes in. I suspect this may end up being a neutral day already although time will tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.