Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

On the IRT chart, if you mean the space between the profile (if it's set to right align) and the price axis, just hover over the tiny black triangle which is on the x-axis(time) next to the y-axis and drag it to where you want it. (if that makes sense! :))

 

Yes but in my case, this does not move the profile-- tell you what, can you post a screen shot of your profile configuration? Mine is also set to 3 period like yours, but yours is acting like my other profiles which are already completed, whereas mine is acting like the "current" profile. I'm sure this makes no sense, but would you mind just posting a shot of the profile config? I would greatly appreciate it :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Excellent and while we were sorting that out, ES has a little move! So what next then?

 

I will buy 49.50, stop 48 to 48.50

 

edit: as of this moment it looks strong enough that it may not come back that far, but if it does, I'm in

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm. Personally, if the market shoots one way then comes back quickly, I wouldn't necessarily take the trade. Really to confirm strength, I think it needs to get back into the upper dev(probably above 52) and maybe break high. If it drops back below 50 from here, I'm not sure that's a good sign. I could of course be absolutely wrong though.

 

One point I should make is talking about trading while you have a trade or are going to take one can be difficult. I think many a trade has been held too long or not taken because of talking to someone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, sorry for distracting you from your trading :) Will "sign off" for now and talk later, good luck my friend

 

No I'm not distracted don't worry :). I was just saying in a round about way, I don't want to affect your personal trading decisions as you trade!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Question is Josh did you take the trade and did you hold it? It ticked the 1247.75 so I'm not sure.

 

I did take the 49.50, and was stopped out at 48 -- then I re-entered long 50.25, but took it off at 52.25. I try to think of the first trade as not a "mistake" but just as a loss which happens. However, given the strength of the thrust down at 12:49, perhaps buying the IB high and putting the stop completely under the consolidation would have been a smarter move, though of course we have no way of knowing these things at the time.

 

The real mistake was cutting the winner short at 52.25, when I could have moved my stop to 51.75, and then closed at 54, which was my original idea. Actually, my ORIGINAL trade had the target at 58, but as we come up to new highs I get quite nervous about losing the profit. As it stands, 58 is looking quite realistic at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These things do happen. You're probably right that taking it off at 52.25 after the area we were talking about held again, was not the best. But hey. That's why I mentioned before about scaling. The other point might have been to get an entry a little closer to the 1248.50 level given the tight stops you tend to use!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The premise was that if 49 could not hold, that the move up from consolidation could be "false", but I thought for sure that if 48 was touched (below the poc) that the chances were even slimmer. Well, the market humbles those who think they know :) But boy do I ever wish I had held the second trade. I was underwater for most of the duration of the trade, yet I gave it room to work, then as soon as it showed some profit I was WAY too quick to get out, probably grateful that I would not have another loser. Mathematically stupid, emotionally sound at the time.

 

Yesterday, I bought 43, just after it moved up from the bottom, and got out at 47.25 ... how's that for an early exit? (though not as bad as today's)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another brief IRT question N :) How do you so cleanly shade the poc and VAH and VAL? My VAH and VAL are shaded but the lines extend beyond the histogram bar to cover the full width of the profile...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What's your point MM? I was trying to point out two things. One, the balance profile's VPOC was 1248.50 slightly out from the 1249.00 Mon&Tues VPOC. This shouldn't really have made too much difference to any trade someone might take. Two, the additional volume which has accumulated between 1241.5-51.50.

 

I didn't say I traded it, I didn't say I didn't. I also posted the update as soon as I saw the reaction to 48.25 and realised the profile was wrong.

 

Making light of the vicissitudes of trading. Mistakes are inevitable and sometimes you can profit from them. No offense intended to you or your trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Making light of the vicissitudes of trading. Mistakes are inevitable and sometimes you can profit from them. No offense intended to you or your trading.

 

No offense taken MM.

 

Another brief IRT question N :) How do you so cleanly shade the poc and VAH and VAL? My VAH and VAL are shaded but the lines extend beyond the histogram bar to cover the full width of the profile...

 

Make sure "current" is unchecked in the profile options just above the POC/VA colour settings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

N, as this market is more easily classified as a bull market than a bear market over the last month and a half, I have a bias towards longs. I tried to buy twice on the way down here and got steamrolled. Obviously the answer is simply to sell when it's moving like this, but what are your thoughts on the subject? I have had some great long trades recently but I have been having a problem shorting.

 

FWIW, I did catch a +3 pointer (38.25 to 35.25) on the second push to 35. But still, so much potential there, none really captured. If you shorted this, do you mind saying where and when? I had this feeling when 48 broke hard that we would see new lows, but the sell side is just a harder side for me to see at the moment.

Edited by joshdance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
N, as this market is more easily classified as a bull market than a bear market over the last month and a half, I have a bias towards longs. I tried to buy twice on the way down here and got steamrolled. Obviously the answer is simply to sell when it's moving like this, but what are your thoughts on the subject? I have had some great long trades recently but I have been having a problem shorting.

 

FWIW, I did catch a +3 pointer (38.25 to 35.25) on the second push to 35. But still, so much potential there, none really captured. If you shorted this, do you mind saying where and when? I had this feeling when 48 broke hard that we would see new lows, but the sell side is just a harder side for me to see at the moment.

 

The market is all over the place at the moment. I think there are generally good moves to be had both sides. As a simulated exercise, maybe try a couple of days where you only go short and a couple where you only go long.

 

When it broke it was fairly hard. Given Europe still being messed up and that there were still some juicy areas to be tested to the downside, I wasn't thinking of fading the move. I shorted 55.50 before the move and IB low(ish) 40.25 on a retest. It didn't give a great deal other than that, which I was happy to take. When a market breaks quickly, you have to be careful and patient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The market is all over the place at the moment. I think there are generally good moves to be had both sides. As a simulated exercise, maybe try a couple of days where you only go short and a couple where you only go long.

 

When it broke it was fairly hard. Given Europe still being messed up and that there were still some juicy areas to be tested to the downside, I wasn't thinking of fading the move. I shorted 55.50 before the move and IB low(ish) 40.25 on a retest. It didn't give a great deal other than that, which I was happy to take. When a market breaks quickly, you have to be careful and patient.

 

Good suggestion on only shorting or longing as an exercise, I may try this.

 

I'm guessing your shorted 55.50 around the 2:38 - 2:40 time frame?

 

My short was just after yours at the bottom; I considered a short at 41 when it retested IBL but the order flow had turned bullish and while it was slowing down, I preferred to enter on a break, which I did just below yours. Sometimes these huge moves down can reverse quickly and that's what I was concerned about. Nothing worse than fading a move and losing a trade, than doing that and THEN going in the direction of the move, but getting run over in that direction too :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting that for the third day in a row, we have a VPOC of 49 (ok 48.75 today but who's counting)

 

Yep, good point. Suggests balance but the break was late so it could still be confirmed today. Early test of around 41.50 might be a good yardstick and if I were not a day trader, I'd like to see a close above the balance VPOC 1248.50 (appropriately extended balance today!;)). I think a close below 1229.75 could be a bad thing and below 20 area would certainly not be good.

 

Still lots of fun news these days and market can turn on a sixpence(or dime)! Not trying to predict today just watching the action.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=26700&stc=1&d=1321538743

ONaction.thumb.JPG.73994969b74872643892eee00bfdc727.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its been a nice day...I am done and thought I would post this example

 

I am using a simple sequencing technique that revolves around a basic reversal setup..

 

The attached chart shows the basic "micro" setup....for today...it works long & short and seems to be consistent...I still read the tape to confirm....othewise its another day in paradise.

5aa710b62eeec_Oneoftodaysreversaltrades.thumb.PNG.5f3e6729739760fa1c7145fda41e5188.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.