Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

StevenSJC

Why the S&P E-Mini Stinks

Recommended Posts

I never was attracted too much by the ES. I was trading the Russell long before the ICE took it over. Look at the ES on a 1min chart or lower (tick chart) and all you will see are a bunch of dots and specks. Look at the same period on the TF and you would have a hard time telling the difference between say a 65 tick chart and a daily or weekly chart in terms of bar structure. If your system is pattern specific the ES blows on short time frames. The TF is the only market that suprised me when I went real time in terms of my fills. Do you find that the ES fills your limit orders 60% of the time when they are just touched

( 2 lots)? The TF does!! Try it for a day and you will be suprised. Also factor in the revised margins rates from the ICE $2900 for overnight!! Contrast that with the ES which is still $5600 I think that the ICE is trying to lure people away from the NQ and ES. That's not to say that you cannot make money with the ES I just think that the TF is a much easier market to trade. I've seen trades that were profitable on the TF that would have resulted in a loss on the ES just because the ES was not volitile enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting thread everyone. I have been trading the ES Emini for quite some time and have consistently heard the argument made that it cannot be traded or that it isn't the best market for trading.

 

You are not getting the point that is made in this thread!!!

 

Nobody is telling you that it is impossible to make money trading the ES! All we are saying is that if you CAN make money in the ES you can probably make MORE and EASIER, trading other future markets!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't say you cannot make money with the ES, I said and I quote "That's not to say that you cannot make money with the ES I just think that the TF is a much easier market to trade."

 

And as for the "Stop saying that you don't get filled that's stupid" comment I didn't say that you don't get filled I said that 60% the of the time trading Russell I get filled on my limiit orders trading 2 lots when they are just touched and not traded through. Not so with the ES. With the ES you would have to hit the bid and ask buttons more often than not as compaired to the Russell when your limit order is not traded through.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys are talking about ES the way most futures traders talk about Nat Gas or Wheat.

 

The ES is a choppy, mean reverting instrument due to all the algos and arbitrageurs that trade it. If you compare it to other indexes, however, they all track each other intraday. So, some systems would still work on it, choppy or no, and the advantage of the ES is that you can scale your system up like a mother if it works.

 

For example, if you like to fade moves intraday for several ticks, the ES would be an instrument I'd advise you to look at. If you like to ride trends or trade wild markets, I would advise you to stay away. You also have to develop the judgement to know when you need to lift the offer or hit the bid to get in, as AuctionMarket said. The nice thing about the ES is that you could lift in with 100 if you needed to. Try that on the YM and see where it gets you.

 

I'm not advocating that people go and trade Spoo, I just think it's funny that people think it can't be traded, or that all the best traders trade it. Some people who are very good at trading ES would get their ass kicked trading crude, or soybeans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are not getting the point that is made in this thread!!!

 

Nobody is telling you that it is impossible to make money trading the ES! All we are saying is that if you CAN make money in the ES you can probably make MORE and EASIER, trading other future markets!

 

 

 

Easier markets to trade is relative to the individual. An easy market for me is not necessarily an easy market for you and your easy market is not necessarily an easy market for another trader. That is what I am saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Technical in the sense that they adhere to the same technical setups each day. When the trend fails you can have confidence trading in the new direction because the setups are reliable. (A 15-min chart is my preference).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know it's probably sacrilege around here to insult the vaunted S&P e-mini but I'm willing to bet it blows up more traders than any futures market.

 

If more people would start trading the Russell vs. the S&P I guarantee failure rates while high, would be lower.

 

Agreed. Moreover, if everyone learned to trade the currencies (easily the best trending markets on the planet, and way easier to trade), the exchange could just retire the sacred cow altogether...

 

 

Luv,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are some very compelling reasons why some people I know prefer to trade e-mini YM to stocks (off the top of my head).

 

- can day trade without needing $25,000+ in the account

- Comissions are decent $4/round turn trip on the YM

- As I dont have to wake up at 6am and scan for stocks to trade

- Tax Reasons - You don't have to list every sale on your return! (for people in the USA)

- The $5/tick range of the YM makes for lower slippage(ES, ER too volitale=bad slippage)

- The spreads are never going to be huge like they can get on stocks

- Focusing on one instrument day in and day out is less complicated and more productive

- It's liquid enough. Market orders are instant. No weird fills

- Share size allocation is easier. I trade from 3-8 contracts depending on the setup

- I've held a stock that plunged 20 pts due to random company event. While econ reports move the futures. It's never been THAT bad

- There are always shorts available

 

If anyone has any more to add??

 

mslk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mslk - i dont think anyone would argue futures arent a better day trading vehicle than stocks. well ok then, some people would, but there we go.

 

i say tom-at-oh, you say tom-aye-toe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mslk- most of the benefits on that list encompass futures as a whole not just the /YM. Multi-item futures offer superior tax treatment and accounting benefits for sure. I also find those markets to adhere to technical systems better than some individual stocks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I'll bite... Why does this subject slam the ES? Of course there are reasons to trade futures over stocks, but after a long time trading them both, I think the ES is a superior instrument over the YM (for funded, experienced traders). Both products have personalities, but they are different. Traders must know the characteristics of their preferred products. To do otherwise will only make you a DONOR.

 

I liken it to hunting... know your prey, know it's habits. Stalk it patiently, and with a plan. Take your prize and get on with your life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well as a newbie trader myself, i'm looking for the 'most probable' market to make money in. if my daily target is $250, thats only 5 points x $50\point - easy right? well no, as the mini S&P only moves 20 points or so a day so I'm trying to capture 25% of the daily movement ... which has been tough! but the currency futures move much more and so it appears there is more opportunity to capture the equivalent points trading fx vs. emini. is this correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually like the ES for the most part......very stable with LOTS of liquidity and LOTS of commercial (not retailers) participation. The more commercial participation the better for using Cumulative Delta Volume as a proxy to track the ongoing open interest.

 

I think one reason many developing traders have problems with Equity Index instruments like the ES is not paying attention to Equities action (during US cash session and during EU cash session hours). For example, during US cash session hours Equities BUY and SELL program activity tugs the ES around most of the day. The large liquidity participants holding open interest in the ES then have to constantly adjust/react to this Equities action. Traders that do not understand how to track this process then get perplexed by the price action. When Equities action is dormant, the ES is a range bound chop fest. When Equities is pounding BUY or SELL programs, the ES can trend into great runs of covering action (large liquidity participants dumping out of held inventory) dominating the order flow.

 

Find a way to track the cycling of the Equities BUY and SELL program activity and you will get a much better perspective into the ES price action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Fulcrum, I look at the NYSE and NASDAQ Breadth, AD Line, Tick, and Trin throughout the day when I trade the ES. Acts as a great barometer for what's really going on 'under the hood' with the markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I trade the ES almost exclusively. A lot of people say it is the hardest market but I like it: it is easy for me. Honestly, most of the markets are correlated now and so it doesn't matter what you trade, if you can call direction.

 

I've only just started trading the crude. From my personal experience, the ES tends to trend more clearly and throughout the day whereas the crude likes to jump around and make some violent moves. You just need to find a market/style that suites you. If you like selling at the open and holding to the close (selling/buying) then the ES is a pretty good market. If you like buying an intraday sell off then you may like crude better or for scalping.

 

Having said that, day trading in a bull market can be difficult because the moves occur overnight and then you are left with a tiny range. For DAY TRADING only then I don't like stocks but it would be hard to deny that there is probably more opportunity in stocks.

 

One aspect about the ES that makes it popular is that I feel it is fairly level playing field. I am not so sure that the playing field is as level when dealing with commodities or Forex for that matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one of the initial remarks in this thread was that it very often seems your order is only filled when the price breaks through. It seems that there is always a lot in front of you and you are always last in line. Not sure if front running is possible. I do not trade ES at the moment. My system automatically sends orders to the market but I send the last price as the limit price. Often I have to wait fro the order to get filled. ES gives far more problems than for instance TF, EMD and CL even though ES is far more liquid. Anyway, this is my observation. I guess front running is not possible but I do not use L2 so did not study it. With stocks they front run for sure using these fractional prices like 25.2400001. ES does not have these fractional prices as far as I know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya I only have it happen every so often (getting filled at the bid/ask without it trading through). Sometimes have my order or a handful of contracts will fill at the bid then it trades through and the remainder is filled. It has everything to do with your data connection and where you are in line (FIFO) First in First Out.

 

You can also setup 'market if touched' orders instead of using a straight limit order.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's very difficult at times to get a fill unless price moves through your price. It is quite subjective because your system might hit target but you won't so what do you do?

 

Read this whole thread, and no one mentioned this, ironically other than the OP: there's also more volume. Create a rough ratio of TradeVolume:BestBidorAskVolume and compare. Below I used very rough estimates of the best bid/ask sizes, keep in mind I only trade the ES so that's what I'm most familiar with. TradeVolume is today's average volume on a 5min chart from 9:30-12:00est. The numbers below look very close if you consider statistical noise. Furthermore, given that the numbers don't include slippage (ES never has a spread greater than 1 tick in the day), ES looks better.

 

And no, I don't feel like a badass trading the S&P, maybe if I trade it in the pit or trade CL/6E (controlling 125000 euros yo).

 

ES:

26k/400 = 65

 

TF:

1500/30 = 50

 

YM:

1500/25 = 60

 

NQ:

3100/40 = 78

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.