Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

Traders Laboratory Forex Trading Contest!

Recommended Posts

Aright Mystic.... at risk of sounding like a completely fickle individual, after watching this thread and the way folks are trading, I am a bit sorry I didn't join in.

 

On a further note regarding real money, I know from experience in online poker tournaments that if there is any entry fee, or if people are playing for real money, as little as 1 cent or 2 cent bets, the game is RADICALLY different than if it is played purely for "points", or as a tourney (with prizes) but requires no entry fee.

 

In my very limited experience, offering a prize of any sort increases the amount of "cowboy play" in a tournament if it is a free tournament.

 

Requiring some actual money be put up to enter or participate dramatically reduces cowboy play.

 

Probably the "purest" competition would be to require a real money account to be traded for participation, but give no prizes. Although limiting drawdown as your original intention was whether it is real or paper account probably does something very similar to real money, no prizes.

 

Just thinking out loud here... I will say I am looking forward to the next one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mostly play money contestants. Not many real money contests out there, although the prize money is real, so there is a real incentive to make it to the finish line.

 

Varengold Bank has been one of the few contests that i've seen that actually weighs in the volatility of the % gains throughout the contest without restricting the trader's ability to trade. They call it "risk-adjusted rate of return", which takes a standard deviation of the difference of the daily account balance for each trading day. That's why someone with only 30% gross returns but has low risk trades can still have a high risk-adjusted rate of return and an equal chance to win the contest. Using a flat 'no more than x% drawdown' is a more artificial barrier and does not give certain traders the room to execute their strategies fully.

 

Turns out someone decided to use their brain when determining the yardstick by which to measure results. a risk adjusted ROR is actually a shit hot way of doing this. it keeps is 100% pure without any arbitrary restrictions and yet gives the answer to the REAL question which is: who can make the greatest return with the least amount of risk.

 

For example, the last 4 weeks I'm up about 9% in my account. but my drawdown from any given day end to the following day end is less than 2%.

 

Now, you could take another guy, and he could have a 99% ROI for the same 4 weeks, but if his drawdown day to day is 40%.... well, I would argue that I'm the better trader, even though I made far less than him in terms of ROI. OF course, if he did a 99% ROI with only an 8% drawdown, I'd say he probably is the better trader.

 

I like it a lot. And I think it would be the perfect solution to this situation. furthermore, myfxbook is already equipped to provide those numbers if i'm not mistaken.

 

this idea has got my vote anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Turns out someone decided to use their brain when determining the yardstick by which to measure results. a risk adjusted ROR is actually a shit hot way of doing this. it keeps is 100% pure without any arbitrary restrictions and yet gives the answer to the REAL question which is: who can make the greatest return with the least amount of risk.

 

For example, the last 4 weeks I'm up about 9% in my account. but my drawdown from any given day end to the following day end is less than 2%.

 

Now, you could take another guy, and he could have a 99% ROI for the same 4 weeks, but if his drawdown day to day is 40%.... well, I would argue that I'm the better trader, even though I made far less than him in terms of ROI. OF course, if he did a 99% ROI with only an 8% drawdown, I'd say he probably is the better trader.

The Varengold bank contest winners were actually part 1 of a larger follow-on challenge to trade real money accounts. They used to offer cash prizes, with the 1st place winner eligible for trading a managed account somewhere between 250k-$1m, and they get . The last contest there were no immediate cash winners, but the top 3 were eligible to be flown out to headquarters to trade a large account and they get a % of the profits.

 

The point is that VG want to make sure that the same method used to win the contest will be used to continue winning when the trader migrates to a live account. It was almost like an american idol for trading; the larger goal was searching for real talent.

 

I like it a lot. And I think it would be the perfect solution to this situation. furthermore, myfxbook is already equipped to provide those numbers if i'm not mistaken.

 

this idea has got my vote anyway.

Technically any of the contest hosts can create their own Risk Adjustment (or use the standard deviation model that varengold bank used), but they choose not to. i think the Risk Adjusted ROI of 352% isn't as aesthetically pleasing as gross 12,000% ROI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically any of the contest hosts can create their own Risk Adjustment (or use the standard deviation model that varengold bank used), but they choose not to. i think the Risk Adjusted ROI of 352% isn't as aesthetically pleasing as gross 12,000% ROI.

 

I think this is an extremely profound statement that reflects many of the more "depressing" (for lack of a better word) realities of trading, traders, and the trading industry as a whole.

 

of all the many hundereds (thousands?) of trading contests out there... it's possible that only this one, by varengold bank, is actually interested in "discovering" a serious, professional trader", one who has the experience and skill to be able to trade in such a manner that is stable and consistent enough to actually have real investors trust them enough to invest their real money that they likely expect to grow for many years to come.

 

yet so few "retail traders" even question risk adjusted ROI's, or drawdown, etc.

 

It seems that nearly all people who want to become a successful retail forex trader are essentially only interested in maximum returns, and the fact that so few even question why drawdown would be "capped", or would likely be dumbfounded as to why any competition would be judged based on anything other than absolute return!

 

the most obvious conclusion to me would be simply that contest organizers and the various entities who affiliate or sponser them have actually no interest at all in rewarding or even finding legitimate, consistent traders who are likely to be successful for years. It's really just to excite the cheerleading squad for "team trading!"

 

and whats more.... the overwhelming vast majority of people who attempt to trade at the retail level don't have even the most basic understanding of the skills necessary to even have a chance to make a living at this as a career.

 

And finally, it seems that both the retail trading vendor, and the aspiring retail trader, are perfectly happy with this reality.

 

I guess there is a lot more money selling a pipe dream than being a plumber.

 

and I guess most would rather be excited by a bullshit story, than be excited by the reality of learning how to make a great living from home.

 

oh well. more free money for some of us I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
same oanda, or different broker? different platform (metatrader)?

 

 

The only one I know well enough to administer is Oanda. If you or anyone else knows a platform well enough to host a contest that's fine as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
same oanda, or different broker? different platform (metatrader)?

 

oanda supports mt4 and you can join the contest with that mt4 subaccount

(click on "add account" and then "advanced options")

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
oanda supports mt4 and you can join the contest with that mt4 subaccount

(click on "add account" and then "advanced options")

 

Good to know....although Oanda did a bad job integrating mt4 (compared with most other brokers). Maybe they improved their; i'll have to see.

 

Does oanda still shut down during news announcements?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good to know....although Oanda did a bad job integrating mt4 (compared with most other brokers). Maybe they improved their; i'll have to see.

 

Does oanda still shut down during news announcements?

 

their mt4 is running smooth...cant remember when was the last time I had any connecting issues during news-events...

 

meanwhile, earlier today opened 2 trades, shorted gbp/usd but was too busy to post here..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Dang Mystic, now I really should have signed up for this. I'd be in the lead since starting the myfxbook thing... and actually caught 2ish% for the first two trading days of the month (days not pictured in myfxbook) so I'd be close to 6% up

 

although, I did have a seizure and drawdown 6ish% at one numbskulled moment, so that may have DQ'd me anyway.

 

oh well, next time I will do it, and win. unless that one guy signs up who had 50ish% ROI's and 2% drawdowns in a single month. thats just sick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dang Mystic, now I really should have signed up for this. I'd be in the lead since starting the myfxbook thing... and actually caught 2ish% for the first two trading days of the month (days not pictured in myfxbook) so I'd be close to 6% up

 

although, I did have a seizure and drawdown 6ish% at one numbskulled moment, so that may have DQ'd me anyway.

 

oh well, next time I will do it, and win. unless that one guy signs up who had 50ish% ROI's and 2% drawdowns in a single month. thats just sick.

 

Yes, hindsight is always 20/20. :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like the cream has risen to the top

bobc

Gosh, Bob ... should I be depressed? :embarassed::embarassed:

 

I got in on a swing, and ended up in a position trade - pretty happy with it, and will

end the contest in the black .... or some time next month maybeeee :cool:

 

Are you entering next month?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gosh, Bob ... should I be depressed? :embarassed::embarassed:

 

I got in on a swing, and ended up in a position trade - pretty happy with it, and will

end the contest in the black .... or some time next month maybeeee :cool:

 

Are you entering next month?

 

Hi Ingot

I knew my post would get you out of bed.

The only way you are going to get back in the black is to double your bet.

No . I am not entering your context next month

I dont trade forex. I do follow the $ closely because it affects my fundamentals

Especially Gold.

I also believe that contests can change your live trading, not necessarily for the better.

 

But if there is another contest, I will put up a small PRIZE $100 to the winner.

Kind regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Ingot

I knew my post would get you out of bed.

The only way you are going to get back in the black is to double your bet.

No . I am not entering your context next month

I dont trade forex. I do follow the $ closely because it affects my fundamentals

Especially Gold.

I also believe that contests can change your live trading, not necessarily for the better.

 

But if there is another contest, I will put up a small PRIZE $100 to the winner.

Kind regards

bobc

Send the cheque now, mate - I've been playing possum to give the others a chance.

 

$100? Small? That's generous mate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inlight of a prize being offered I shall of recluse myself from next months competition.
I wouldn't like to see you miss the contest, Mystic. I am certain others would not object to your continuing participation - particularly since you have no chance

of winning.

 

After all we have ForexTraderX and Obsidian to beat ... and of course myself!

 

Everyone can see that I am a late finisher ... :embarassed: Apparently Bob has already mailed the $100 to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.