Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

walterw

Walters Aproach

Recommended Posts

I completely agree, as will everyone else here, in your R/R. I, however, have a different question :)

 

You mentioned in a post in the Forex Room about using investor r/t and the VB indicator. This is how I trade as well, working mainly off of market profile levels and pivot points. Would you mind sharing how you're using IRT and the VB indicator? I'd love to see some charts too!!

 

THanks Walter,

 

Chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Chris I must admit that I am experimenting with delta... I am very new to it and must say that from an intrinsic concept it does make sense... I do trade delta divergence setups, you can see them at charthub... with names er_110t also er_22T and some other experiments (green background) I was very inspired by the charts of "5pillars" (elitetrader) also lots of charts from him on charthub as es_317_VB he trades es ... My hardtime on this is that I am more a "Trend Trader" and delta divergence trades are countertrade... so it makes it hard to detect when market shifts from trending to cycling and viceversa... actually Delta Divergence Trades (DDT) realy work fine on cycling markets.... but will make you get run over on trending situations.... I am working in a method to "clearly" detect the change from trending to cycling... maybe we could aboard that topic on this thread.... I would like to interact on the issue, I believe that if you have a clear method to detect those shifts on the market stage would be very great... I did look your post here Chris and I find them very nice stuff... mp levels are so predictible.. combined with delta... you got a powerfull combination... hope we can keep interacting.... cheers Walter.

er_22T_5.thumb.png.4b8b355b89fc1937fe9029d749354a16.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Walter! 22T chart, huh? That's a fast moving chart, especially on ER2. :) Chris, 5P, was the one who got me hooked on it too! hehe, funny. He was a wealth of information and gave me some great tools to step up my game.

 

Let's definitely talk more about this...I'm about to leave to catch a flight home, though...so can't write more. I'll catch up maybe tomorrow with this.

 

Till then!

 

Chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I want to make some comentaries on this thread topic I did start some days ago on RRR (Risk Reward Ratio). On my personal experience, and I think most traders have the same tendency, we get to much enthusiastic about a technical aproach and become some how very "loyal" to it... the true fact after 11 years on trading I came to the sad conclusion that just about any trading aproach has 50/50 technical performance... there is no such 70 or 80 % performance as some "gurus" tell they have... when you trade with the real thing you come up with 50% success and 50% non-success trades... if you are having less than 50% success, then you are on "School mode" yet... you need the 50/50 to consider yourself a good trader... now, dont be mean on yourself trying to get that fantasy 70 or 80 % success... you will loose precious time... the key is RRR applied to the 50/50 performance, thats my story, and I can say now that I am happy with my 50/50 performace...

So... what REALLY is this RRR thing ?... well in my experience its not just a ratio, its more than that... its a STRATEGY that has to be embeded on your technical aproach.... where in simple words you have tight stops vs long runs.... so we are talking about "closing positions" more than opening.... HA¡¡¡ dont you spend hours thinking and studing how to "open positions" ? well thats fine but after you got a plan you say in lets say 10 minutes : I will close my position such and such... or I will see as it happens... well there you go... thats where any "analist" work goes to the toilet... well, this trader NEEDS a change of mind, when you study so many hours where you are going to "open" your position you MUST include in this study "simultaneosly" where are you going to place your stop and where is your aproximate target... thats more than chart reading or a simple RRR math... it is formulating a Strategy on your trade that will keep you alive during this very dangerous journey of being a trader.... where your fellow traders are big dinosaurs with thousands time more money than you, with greater technology and the worst.... they DO have a technical aproach with real RRR on action.... so RRR should be the center of your ecuation... doesnt care what technique you use, if its trendwise or countertrend, if its based or not on indicators, if it uses old fashion stochastics or new fantastic deltas.... doesnt matter, ALL of them eventually have a 50/50 performance... RRR inside your technique will make the diference to make you profitable...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tin, it's proven at least from testing trading systems that if you have more winning trades than losing trades, the avg win vs avg loss is smaller. If you have a larger avg win than the avg loss, the winning number of trades are higher. This is to assume your strategy is a winning strategy. It's rare, but not impossible, to find a strategy that has higher percentage of wins over losses AND a greater avg win over avg loss. If you have it, you got the holy grail!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi pismo...I'd love to know more about why you think the win % would drop if you expect to win more from your winning trades than you expect to lose on the losing trades?

 

 

 

I agree with that comment as well. It just make sense to me. If I'm going for 4 pts on the es, the chances of price traveling 4pts w/o my stop being hit ( where ever that may be, thats an entirely different topic:) ) is a lot less likely to deliver when comparing it to a smaller 2pt profit target.

 

So its a trade off in my view. A bigger profit objective and lower win % or smaller profit objective with a higher win %. You could have the best RR ratio, but if the reward is hardly hit then what you have a just a theoretical RR ratio since your targets aren't generally hit. So what might start of as a 2 or 3 RR ratio, might just turn out to be a 1 or below by the time the trade is said and done.

 

Therefore, a trader would need to compare the initial RR ratio with what actually happened. I found that my targets were ambitious. When I put the trade on I was happy since I had a 2 or even 3 RR ratio. But watching price move in my favor and then retracing back so I get 1 or 2 ticks, reality sets in that my actual RR ratio isn't the same as my theoretical or initial RR ratio.

 

So I brought in my targets, my initial RR ratio is lower, but the targets are being hit more often. In turn, my actual RR ratio is congruent with the initial or theoretical RR ratio.

 

I thought about RR ratios from a lot of angles. I hope this helps, and not confuses anyone:cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it makes sense to me now. I was thinking pismo was saying that if you expect to win more points on winning trades than lose on losing trades, your win % would drop. It was just a little confusing for my tiny brain, but I'm all straight now.

 

Thanks guys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the bane of the day trader.

 

If you position or swing trade, you do not have to win more than you lose.

 

Suppose you have a system that wins only 4 out of 10 times, or 40%. On those winning trades you win 2000 each. Now on the other 6 times you lose 500 per.:

 

4 wins @ 2000=8000

6 losses@ 500=3000

net amount=+5000

 

You can be wrong more than you are right and still make money. Most of the "market wizards" fall into this camp. Long term position traders who don't have high winning percentages, but know how to keep losses small in comparison to winners. One thing that separates them from the newbies, and those that fail, they are willing to take that 5th signal even after the last four failed. By this time, the newbie is already looking for a new secret indicator or method to beat the market.

 

For the day trader things are inherently more difficult. The percentage of winners needs to be higher than the percentage of losers. This is basically because the wins will tend to be smaller and the amount of trades taken will increase. Which of course really means more opportunity to put capital at risk. Successful day traders have to have a better than 50% win ratio. If you position trade, yes you could basically throw darts at a board. As long as you had the ability to cut the losses and let the profits ride (sometimes a cliché is a cliché because it's true). As a day trader that number has to be around 65-70% winners. For scalpers it is even higher. Which is why so few people make it as scalpers.

 

While I would agree that most technical analysis does not work, I find it hard to believe that nobody can do better than 50/50. That is no better than flipping a coin. If you are a long term position trader that would be okay. Short term traders need more. That short term traders do exist and can achieve success would imply that it is possible to reach a higher percentage. 80-90%, well that's for the system vendors and holy grail hucksters..........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pivotprofiler : My personal experience actually its a 50/50 performance on my technical aproach.... every 10 trades I normally get stopped 5 off them and the other 5 are succesfull, what keeps me alive and growing its that I am having quite tight stops "in the argument" and long lived trails that give me a very nice positive difference... I could still even have more stops and still be positive... the key is taking trades that will risk 1/4 off your normal positive trail average... if you dont have that RRR in view... I prefer not to take the trade... To establish this "potencials" I use S&R type studies... The truth is that very few good trades make me succesfull... the rest are just part off the promediating game... the most hard part for newbies its the psicological toll this takes... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.