Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tams

Monkey Economy

Recommended Posts

Laurie Santos: A monkey economy as irrational as ours

 

Laurie Santos looks for the roots of human irrationality by watching the way our primate relatives make decisions. A clever series of experiments in "monkeynomics" shows that some of the silly choices we make, monkeys make too.

 

About Laurie Santos

 

Laurie Santos studies primate psychology and monkeynomics -- testing problems in human psychology on primates, who (not so surprisingly) have many of the same predictable irrationalities we do.

 

click here to see the video

 

 

Do you see any monkeys in you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The one good thing about human irrationality is that our irrationality can be measured, and we can in fact be reliably predictable in our irrationality.

 

A good related read is "Predictably Irrational" - Dan Ariely

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

It is hard now-a-days for humans to behave rationally. Most of us belong to a caste of slaves.

 

My example (typical European):

 

Let's assume I earn $100 per month, then I have to pay / deduct form my salary:

- 30% income tax

- 24%of social and health taxes

(jointly 54%)

I am left with $46, i.e.(i) 46% of initial income and with (ii) pretty non-existing Ponzi-like wellfare scheme.

 

Okay, I have $46 in my pocket. Is this all? No! All goods I buy are more expensive because of 22% VAT. From initial $100 I now have only $35.88.

 

From this I have to deduct roughly 10% for other taxes like excise on petrol and other stuff, import taxes that make the goods I buy more expensive + real estate tax + all goods are a few cents more expensive because companies also pay income taxes that must be calculated in goods' prices and the companies' owners pay dividend taxes and to make both ends meet they have to ''hide'' their needs in the prices of goods. I am left with $32.29

 

Is this all? Not really.

 

1. If I am to spend the money for a pencil this means that:

 

(i) a timber man who cut the tree also had to pay 54% of income tax and social welfare; he also paid VAT on petrol, he also paid excise on petrol;

(ii) the guy who make the pencil graphite had to pay all these taxes + real-estate tax for the land on which his factory is placed, etc...

(iii) the guy who assembles the pencils also had to pay all these taxes....

(iv) the shop assistant also has to pay his taxes

 

2. The shop assistant who sold me the pencil has to go to a dentist:

(i) the dentist has to pay these taxes as well

(ii) the dentist uses equipment which was made by people who also have to pay taxes...

 

You are beginning to see the pattern... I hope. The pattern goes 4.36 times down deep (statistically).

 

From original $100 I am left with $9,37, ergo my purchasing power would have been 10 times higher if there were no taxes.

 

In feudalism people have to pay 10% to their master.

We now-a-days have to pay 90% to your master (the state).

 

In ancient Rome a slave had the right to retain 10% of the earnings.

Now-a-days we have the right to retain 10% of your earnings as well, which makes as slaves, whether we like to admit the reality or not.

 

Humans now-a-days have liberties similar to those of the monkeys' put in a lab cage.

 

 

The problem I have with Laurie Santos' research is: monkeys in cage are slaves as humans are now. Both humans and monkeys tend to behave irrationally during certain decision making prcesses (always or only when enslaved?)

 

I wonder what the outcome of the research would be, if tested were (i) non-slave monkeys in an African jugle and (ii) non-slave humans of 18th century.

 

Would her conclusion be that our irrationality is the heritage of million years evolution or is it just a result of recent enslavement?

 

Just curious...

Edited by Tresor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The interesting part was that monkeys seem to engage different means of making a decision when the focus turns to potential loss, rather than the focus being on gain. The behavior of not wanting to accept loss, and being very bad at rational decisions to minimize loss, seems to be "hard wired" in both monkeys and humans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.