Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

GhostofLivermore

FX Training - Let's Share the Cost

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone

 

I was recently referred to a man here in Toronto that has been a professional FX Trader for the last 3 years full time.

 

I actually went over to his home and met his family and saw his workstation and saw his monthly PnL Statements.

 

With a 20,000 FX account he has averaged $4000 per month for the last 3 years pretty consistently.

 

He was referred to me by a personal friend that took his training 3 months ago and was thrilled with the results.

 

I worked out a deal with him for training and I asked him if he would mind if I found a partner to share the cost with and he said he didn't mind at all, so long as I teach them separately from our time.

 

What I am looking for is for someone to share the cost $2000 of the $6000 Training fee and I will teach you everything that he teaches me.

 

His training is 2 nights a week for 2 hours for 4 weeks total.

 

So 16 hrs.

 

Once he teaches me I will get on the phone / computer and teach you everything that I learned during the session.

 

If anyone is interested please pm me and let me know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello EveryoneI was recently referred to a man here in Toronto that has been a professional FX Trader for the last 3 years full time.I actually went over to his home and met his family and saw his workstation and saw his monthly PnL Statements.With a 20,000 FX account he has averaged $4000 per month for the last 3 years pretty consistently.He was referred to me by a personal friend that took his training 3 months ago and was thrilled with the results.I worked out a deal with him for training and I asked him if he would mind if I found a partner to share the cost with and he said he didn't mind at all, so long as I teach them separately from our time.What I am looking for is for someone to share the cost $2000 of the $6000 Training fee and I will teach you everything that he teaches me.His training is 2 nights a week for 2 hours for 4 weeks total.So 16 hrs.Once he teaches me I will get on the phone / computer and teach you everything that I learned during the session.If anyone is interested please pm me and let me know.

 

So he has made 250% per year for 3 years and hasn't figured out how to leverage that to more than $48k per year. Sure. And you are going to teach anybody anything in 16 hours? Sure.

 

ANYBODY with those kind of results could EASILY leverage that to 7 figures a year.

 

Here fishy, fishy. No wonder 95% go broke and go broke very fast.

 

Ghost of Livermore? LOL.

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:confused:Not even sure where to begin with this... Good luck to you and anyone that learns from the guy that just got taught.

 

Those who can trade, those who can't create new magical indicators. LOL

 

Not to belabor punctuation but wouldn't that be better said:

 

"Those who can, trade and those who can't create new magical indicators. LOL." Plus in your case I might add "and those who can do neither, knock those who can do both."

 

Browns, you have made over four thousand posts, over eleven hundred per year and not once have you ever posted any original technical material - and yet, you knock those that do? LOL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...not once have you ever posted any original technical material...

 

Who says one has to be an original trader to be a great trader? (I'm not saying brownsfan is original or great...I have no way of knowing...I'm just responding to the quote).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Who says one has to be an original trader to be a great trader? (I'm not saying brownsfan is original or great...I have no way of knowing...I'm just responding to the quote).

 

Or perhaps more importantly, who says that someone who creates new and effective indicators, "can't" trade? Study, preparation and originality are not a sign of weakness, that's what it takes to be out in front of the crowd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Or perhaps more importantly, who says that someone who creates new and effective indicators, "can't" trade?

 

Your point is valid and I agree with you, although I would propose that your question is perhaps of equal importance.

 

Different strokes for different folks...there's no "truth" in the markets...the truth is what works. No one has THE way, etc...

 

However, I would only propose that creating "new and effective indicators" is generally unnecessary/often isn't really anything "new" at all. I want to refer to thalestrader's great post here (post #29) on the subject, as he has articulated the point better than I ever could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not to belabor punctuation but wouldn't that be better said:

 

"Those who can, trade and those who can't create new magical indicators. LOL." Plus in your case I might add "and those who can do neither, knock those who can do both."

 

Browns, you have made over four thousand posts, over eleven hundred per year and not once have you ever posted any original technical material - and yet, you knock those that do? LOL.

 

So we going to start this again Pat?

 

Maybe you and tresor should start a 'we love to hate on Browns thread' and you guys can just hang out there.

 

And I've posted plenty on this site for free with plenty of valuable information.

 

For example, you can check here and here to see what a blotter looks like. Something you've NEVER produced once. Funny how a guy that has all these tools and wonderful after-the-fact charts cannot produce a blotter or two to show that he actually does this in real-time.

 

And there's the Candlestick Corner, as well as chatting with some off site including doing a lot of work with a particular trader from this very forum.

 

All for free BTW.

 

 

For kicks, here is today's oil blotter for a 1 ct account. How have you done today? LOL. Let me guess, there's a million reasons why you can't produce that (again)...

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=21855&stc=1&d=1280412333

5aa710215f26c_ThisiswhatablotterlookslikePat.png.b82f9418b987258766583ae53bc1158d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...here is today's oil blotter...

 

While I don't doubt your success and have nothing against you, brownsfan, let's be honest...blotter snapshots like that are fairly easy to manipulate...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=21856&d=1280413182

5aa71021622c1_This20is20what20a20blotter20looks20like20Pat.png.0c876cfe207861f165ff81ff01d782f1.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Candle Stick corner - now that's a real contribution and some real state of the art stuff, LOL.

 

Like I said - not one piece of original work anywhere. Just a lot of noise about other peoples work.

 

Sure you have made a lot of posts, over 4,000 of them and you made them for free. How could you charge and who would pay you for other people's work?

 

I have hundreds of requests to buy my indicators and one of them is from you. You have none becasue you have nothing to show that is your own = pretender without portfolio.

 

The more you post the more you lower the intellectual common denominator on this board.

 

Candlestick corner, LOL, I am surprised Golldman is not all over you for your ground breaking work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
While I don't doubt your success and have nothing against you, brownsfan, let's be honest...blotter snapshots like that are fairly easy to manipulate...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=21856&d=1280413182

 

Right on Wizard. Most everybody has excel and can create the same buschwa. You are kinder than me, I call his "blotter" BS.

 

I have talked to this guy on the phone and regardless of his many years and thousands of content free posts I found his market and technical understanding to be very dated, based on no original method, concept or technology and generally at or below novice level. Hence he brags about "CandleStick Corner."

 

Candlesticks - now that's some heavy stuff. And all of this in a thread on retail FX trading, LOL.

 

cheers

 

UB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GhostOfLivemore, why don't you just solicit 99 traders at $60 each and cover almost all your costs? :2c:

 

 

PS...

Noobie trader quiz

Your time is limited. If you had to choose one - Would you be better off reverse engineering the character of BF or reverse engineering the indicators of UB ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GhostOfLivemore, why don't you just solicit 99 traders at $60 each and cover almost all your costs? :2c:

 

 

PS...

Noobie trader quiz

Your time is limited. If you had to choose one - Would you be better off reverse engineering the character of BF or reverse engineering the indicators of UB ?

 

 

1) What about non disclosure and on selling clauses???

2) I would have to see their PL and risk reward profiles to make an informed decision and no one is playing that game.....:haha: Can I get the best of both of them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aint the Net great. Here is a dog who is famous in his own mind. Woof Woof Pat.

 

 

Funniest thing is that he's a paranoid dog. Accuses Brownsfan of attacking him (but wait, he was the attacker). Paranoid. Delusions of Grandeur. Hmmm ... I guess you can post from the hospital now.

 

 

Candle Stick corner - now that's a real contribution and some real state of the art stuff, LOL.

 

Like I said - not one piece of original work anywhere. Just a lot of noise about other peoples work.

 

Sure you have made a lot of posts, over 4,000 of them and you made them for free. How could you charge and who would pay you for other people's work?

 

I have hundreds of requests to buy my indicators and one of them is from you. You have none becasue you have nothing to show that is your own = pretender without portfolio.

 

The more you post the more you lower the intellectual common denominator on this board.

 

Candlestick corner, LOL, I am surprised Golldman is not all over you for your ground breaking work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't say I know much of what Brownsfan has taught or passed along, but I have certainly benefited from how UB has pushed the envelope in trying to understand the markets today.

In fact he's done the very thing which Kevin Koy only wished were possible in his day. Check out pg. 14 of his book "Markets 101". In it he wished he could have created a "spectrum of timeframes" by which to read the markets.

UB did just that in order to understand market bias, not bad if you ask me! And just in case you're wondering who Kevin Koy is he co-wrote Steidlmayers greatest work in my opinion "Markets and Market Logic" well worth a read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't say I know much of what Brownsfan has taught or passed along, but I have certainly benefited from how UB has pushed the envelope in trying to understand the markets today. In fact he's done the very thing which Kevin Koy only wished were possible in his day. Check out pg. 14 of his book "Markets 101". In it he wished he could have created a "spectrum of timeframes" by which to read the markets.

UB did just that in order to understand market bias, not bad if you ask me! And just in case you're wondering who Kevin Koy is he co-wrote Steidlmayers greatest work in my opinion "Markets and Market Logic" well worth a read.

 

Thanks for the very kind words.

 

I remember our phone conversations and am very glad you found them to be of value.

 

Kevin was still working with Peter when I first started studying their work. Peter was always the brains of the partnership and I remember Kevin as a prissy little thing that rumor has blew out their trading account while Peter was out of town and that broke up their partnership.

 

Later when I spent those weeks at Peter's ranch in Butte Meadows, Kevin was nowhere around, the breakup was kind of nasty with Kevin, in my opinion, acting like a little girl scorned.

 

About that same time Jim Dalton started his writing and giving sminars on the profile and I thought then and still do that Dalton did a better job of explaining the profile and its use but that if you could get around Peter's unique way of expressing himself, that he was the man for the nuances in his theory.

 

That was over 25 years ago and at the time very exciting work and very much the state of the art. I believe it was about then that Peter was chairman of CBOT so when we made trips to Chicago to work with him it always included an inside look at the floor and some great drinking and war stories with some of the floor/pit traders.

 

Now almost all of the technical development work we do at the small, private, closed hedge fund that I founded and now manage is based on the theory I learned from those guys waaaay back then. The theory is great and has legs with regard to time but the profile itself cost me a lot of money until I started to develop certain technologies, some of which I have demonstrated here.

 

At the time I was working for Boyd Jefferies, the founder of Jefferies & Co, after Boyd made me an offer I couldn't refuse to leave a small retail NASD Broker/Dealer that I had founded in Hawaii Kai on Oahu. I got to Hawaii on the boat shown below which was paid for by trading the brand new, very high premiumed options on the then brand new CBOE - long before any index options or index futures.

 

Any way, thanks again for the kind words and the trip down memory lane. Give me a Skype sometime and catch me up with what you have been doing.

 

cheers

 

UB

 

1stboat.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The last post and the lick-spittle make the point.

 

 

 

.

 

I had to look up the word "lick-spittle" on line to figure out your post, I never knew such a phrase/word existed up til now. Kiwi, I'm not feigning my appreciation for UB's work, it simply helped me to see beyond the dated Market Profile works in print and carry forward my studies and understanding of the market.

The debate regarding UB usually hinges on the differences between invention and evolution. UB himself has never claimed the theory for his work started with him, he openly credits Steidlmayer for that, but the evolution of it's application was in desperate need.

It's simply the difference between the model T ford at it's invention and any new car on the road today. We all benefit from the evolution of someone else' work/invention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RESULTS and UPDATE:

OK it's been about 8 weeks since I started to demo trade the method and I am super happy with the results.

 

I started with a 5k account and it is now $6,350 (I can show all the trade details to anyone interested)

 

I've been around this business along time and this is one of the best approaches to trading I have ever used.

 

I am still trying to build my live money account so I am happy to share this with ONE person still if anyone is interested

Snap1.jpg.b80eb17a7c233b2a3ef7ada11570706a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.