Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Technical Analysis: Is it voodoo? Or does it work?

Recommended Posts

Not all market participants make instant trading decisions so to say price instantly reflects all known events is just silly. News takes a while to digest and price takes a while to reflect the new fundamentals. The post-FOMC market reaction is a good example. Market participants were reacting to the statement at least 30 minutes after it was released.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Like it or not, if you use TA you are assuming that EVERYTHING THAT IS KNOWN ABOUT A STOCK, COMMODITY, INDEX, OR CURRENCY IS REFLECTED IN PRICE.

 

If by IS you mean its there NOW then No. It takes time for the markets to adjust to information so although peoples reactions to information will be reflected in price, there is a time lag and opportunity for both fundamentalists and trend followers on various timescales as a result.

 

Key points from a trading perspective are that there is lag and that what is reflected in price is peoples reactions to information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... I totally regret starting this thread :) What I really meant was price patterns. I actually had this debate in a few other places and I came to a conclusion not to bring it up. Yes all of you are right. MP, Pivots, etc... are all TA.

 

I should of clearly stated price patterns ONLY which I think are total crap but once again some traders make money off it so they must work for a few traders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So double tops and double bottoms are total crap? One of your trading methods is a test of the low at lower volume which is just trading a double bottom with the addition of volume analysis (which is how most people trade double bottoms). Now I'm confused. :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So double tops and double bottoms are total crap? One of your trading methods is a test of the low at lower volume which is just trading a double bottom with the addition of volume analysis (which is how most people trade double bottoms). Now I'm confused. :confused:

 

To me thats simply support and resistance. Or take a look at a head and shoulders... to me its just simply a lower high (right shoulder). When I look at price.. it never really occurred to me to spot a pattern and be like "Hey, looks like there is a ascending triangle. Why not play the breakout?" Instead.. its just "Okay, there is resistance above. Perhaps wait to see if there is price acceptance on the breakout."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Like it or not, if you use TA you are assuming that EVERYTHING THAT IS KNOWN ABOUT A STOCK, COMMODITY, INDEX, OR CURRENCY IS REFLECTED IN PRICE."

 

wrong

 

this is not a valid conclusion

 

price gives information. that is why people can trade successfully using TA.

 

it does not encompass ALL information, which is why people can also trade successfully using fundies.

 

your conclusion does not follow from the evidence, and it uses the exact same logical error that efficient market hypothesis people use

 

two sides of the same coin. neither is true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soultrader, your approach is the same as my approach and probably the same approach as most people who successfully use technical analysis. The pattern is just a convenient way of spotting the underlying price action.

 

I think you're a closet TA trader. :p :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Soultrader, your approach is the same as my approach and probably the same approach as most people who successfully use technical analysis. The pattern is just a convenient way of spotting the underlying price action.

 

I think you're a closet TA trader. :p :D

 

hahaha.. I like that notouch. Good one ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:eek: A closet TA trader, come out and say it man!!! Be yourself and admit you like TA and you live and breathe TA.

 

Patterns are a convenient way to categorize certain price action that is repeated over and over through time. It's basically price action doing the same thing it always does. Using these patterns help dumb traders like me get a better understand on the market structure.

 

James, you sure shot yourself on the foot here LOL!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:eek: A closet TA trader, come out and say it man!!! Be yourself and admit you like TA and you live and breathe TA.

 

Patterns are a convenient way to categorize certain price action that is repeated over and over through time. It's basically price action doing the same thing it always does. Using these patterns help dumb traders like me get a better understand on the market structure.

 

James, you sure shot yourself on the foot here LOL!!!!

 

 

Yep I know.... I thought I burried this thread. lol Okay how about measured moves for exit targets? Does this make any sense to traders? Magic?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Like it or not, if you use TA you are assuming that EVERYTHING THAT IS KNOWN ABOUT A STOCK, COMMODITY, INDEX, OR CURRENCY IS REFLECTED IN PRICE."

 

wrong

 

this is not a valid conclusion

 

price gives information. that is why people can trade successfully using TA.

 

it does not encompass ALL information, which is why people can also trade successfully using fundies.

 

your conclusion does not follow from the evidence, and it uses the exact same logical error that efficient market hypothesis people use

 

two sides of the same coin. neither is true

 

Well Soul, although we still do not have a definition of "WORK", we see two major reasons why TA fails in the hands of some:

 

1. They do not understand the fundamental premise of TA: That ALL infromation is reflected in Price. The very thing TA looks out. Even planet aspects assume price reflects all known quantities which includes the motion of the planets.

 

2. People do not believe in the premise of the very thing they are using. It is hard to see WHY price will fall if RSI goes above 70, if you do not believe price has factored everything already. Of course, indicators do not drive price so this is felonious on more than one level, but if you use it, Shouldn't at least BELIEVE in its essence?

 

Now, one may not believe the essence and still use it. But that person is saying from the start that TA is flawed. If that is true, then poor results neccessarily follow....and should be expected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's move back to Auction Market theory. The sole purpose of the market is to find that place where there is a disagreement on value and an agreement of price.

 

If there are some traders that know something and are thus bullish, PRICE WILL reflect that bullishness. We are talking about traders IN THE MARKET. And if they are in the market then their bullishness creates a disagreement on value, but that disagreement on value is matched at a point where the bear agrees on price.

 

There is a buyer for every seller. So if the bulls know more than the bears, it must be reflected in price even before the information is known to all.

 

What does that mean?

 

* There is no such thing as Bullish/Bearish consensus. Price already reflects the values of the bullish traders in the market and the bearish traders. So all those reports on such are simply bogus. Any number that states the bullish consensus is 85% simply has not asked enough bears. It must be 50%/50%

 

* There is no such thing as overbought or oversold. Each price is a two sided transaction. The market functions to find that place where the two come together. By definition this is an equilibrium. Certainly not stable , but equilibrium none the less.

 

So using TA to find overbought or oversold conditions is felonious from the start. One is attempting to measure something that does not exist. Price is where it is at, because it is supposed to be there; and price is supposed to be there because that is where it is at.

 

Price is king. Hence whatever says price should be doing something else is irrelevant (note necessarily wrong, just irrelevant). Price may head down from point x, but it has nothing to do with the fact your Fibonacci vortex said it should. Price simply does not move down because RSI is in "overbought" territory. INDICATORS DO NOT DRIVE PRICE.

 

* There is no such thing as "price over-reacting". Price is where it is at because it is supposed to be; and it is supposed to be there because that is where it is at. Those that say, "the market over-reacted and moved too far..." are speaking in code. What they mean is," Price has moved further than I thought it would......"

 

Does the market at times move 100 points in one day and then move back down 100 points the next? Clearly. BUT EVERY PRICE ALONG THAT WAY WAS A VALID PRICE BECAUSE A TRADE WAS FACILITADED THERE. That's the definition of price.

 

Those that embark on TA to tell them what the market should do, rather than the reality of what it is doing, are walking on a tenuous path. Indicators are derivatives of price and therefore have lag. Lag does not have to be a bad thing. But as indicators are derived from price, they cannot Drive future price action. Herein lies where most people come into trouble.

 

Price is reality.

 

1. Price is not driven by Technical

 

2. Price is the best instrument for gauging future price direction. That is, what price is doing now is the best "prediction" of what price will be doing in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pivotprofiler, i make an excellent living using TA so don't tell me what fails

 

your premise is false

 

repeating it ad infinitum will not change that

 

i will continue to use fundamentals for investments (and some trades) and TA

 

because i know that all information is NOT reflected in price

 

and i will continue to daytrade futures using TA. cause i know that TA works.

 

because ENOUGH information is encoded in price history to give me an edge

 

the bottom line doesn't fail

 

tell warren buffet that all information is encoded in price

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes true, Price drives indicators and not oposite, that doesnt mean indicators are not good helpers to understand price... some times make your life easier... no alergia to indicators, yes alergia to indicators idolatry... if you feel unconfortable with a price derivative (indicator), you will also most probably feel unconfortable with price himself...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

personally, on an intraday time frame, i don't use any lagging type indicators (MACD RSI) etc. iow indicators that give readings based on past price readings over a given series

 

i do use stuff like key reference areas - pivots of all sorts (market profile, globex etc.), tape action, TICK etc.

 

whatever works for you.

 

i love to use lagging indicators on daily weekly charts.

 

i also find fundamentals to be VERY useful for investments, not so much with shorter term trades

 

whatever works for you...

 

i hate the fact that so many people are polarized into either the (fundamentals are the best way, and TA is voodoo OR all info is priced into the chart) two camps, when reality clearly shows that there are edges in fundies, edges in TA, and edges in intermarket analysis, etc.

 

to clarify, it's ok to be a TA only or fundies only trader. it is illogical to think/claim that your way is the "only" way or the best way.

 

imo

 

 

it's ALL good.

 

many many many ways to skin the market cat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.......... tell warren buffet that all information is encoded in price

 

Just because all information is reflected in price that does not mean ALL participants will come to the same conclusion. THAT'S WHAT MAKES A MARKET.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

James,

 

Its time for you to start some new threads. I suggest that the following threads will reveal peoples true natures (and some beliefs that will amaze others).

 

Trend following is for losers

Scaling In doesn't work

Scaling Out is inferior behaviour

Moslems are better than Christians

 

etc etc. And don't you have a presidential election we could apply technical analysis to?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i hate to sound like a broken record, but all information is NOT priced in

 

this is the EXACT same fallacy that led to efficient market hypothesis (which had the added fallacy that all market participants were rational, and all information was INSTANTLY reflected in price).

 

if you go out there and pound the pavement, or if you have good insight (through experience, training, or whatnot) you have information that most people do NOT know, and is therefore NOT priced into the market

 

that's why there are many edges, and why information is not ALL priced in.

 

cause information is not perfectly or completely disseminated AND people have different abilities to interpret the information and apply it to the stock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must admit these type of topics are no more than mental masturbation. LOL

 

Now:

 

1. If You (Dalby) know more about something than I do, we will have different perceptions of value, the price we trade at will reflect that. It will reflect what you know and what I do not. But it reflects it all.

 

2. If we both know the same thing, we do not have to come to the same conclusions about how that information affects value.

 

There is nothing that says all information is equal nor interpreted equally. One trader seeing a push towards Ethanol will value corn and be willing to buy at higher prices. He values corn more than the money he has. The trader on the other side, does not have to be a farmer. But his focus may be on the large amount of corn being planted. More over, he may see ethanol as just the next "green issue fad". The price at which this trader sells corn (short) reflects his value to have the money now. So we have disagreement on value and an agreement on price.

 

This is immediately reflected in the market.

 

Simply, not everyone has to know everything. But what one trader knows effects his perception of value and thus the price at which he trades. ERGO price must reflect all that is known. Mis-information therefore would still be reflected in price until the correct information is known.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

except it's an invalid conclusion. the premise is decent, but the conclusion does not logically follow.

 

1) people do not (always) trade rationally. thus, even if they KNOW "X", they do not trade that way many times out of fear, greed, hope, panic euphoria. we have all experienced this in our OWN trading, and the rest of the world is exactly the same

 

2) again, you are ignoring DD. i use all sorts of unconventional indicators (i'm not talking electronic price indicators - i'm talking groups of people's habits, store managers, etc.) when i research, and that price is not known to many, if not most people. many people who DO know it, don't trade at all, so that information is not reflected in price.

 

etc. etc. etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys this TA thread is numbing my brain. I'm going crazy now. I've just finished reading every single post on this. You fellows are the most exacting insane detailed people EVER.

 

 

 

I thought we were all just gamblers :)

 

(And TA is a way to stay objective so we don't blow our plot)

 

Can someone answer my limit down question when they get a chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I admit I am wrong on this one. At the point of starting this thread, I was in a debate with a fellow trader on price patterns. My argument was that one can not be successful just relying on chart patterns. I know a few other traders who will agrue the same and state "Take a look at chart pattern traders and their P&L. It will show how unsucessful it is."

 

HOWEVER, as many of you here has argued... traders use whatever works for them and it is absolutely wrong to say something does not work. Alot of you here made extremely valid points and I will take my agruement back. I can not possibly go on to state this if I rely on pivots in my trading. :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guys this TA thread is numbing my brain. I'm going crazy now. I've just finished reading every single post on this. You fellows are the most exacting insane detailed people EVER.

 

 

 

I thought we were all just gamblers :)

 

(And TA is a way to stay objective so we don't blow our plot)

 

Can someone answer my limit down question when they get a chance.

 

hahaha. Yea... TA is no rocket science. What I did find fascinating was to really understand the psychology behind price behavior. Would it be totally off track to say that price action is trader psychology? Or did I just pull another mistake there...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed since some of the new traders usually lose money in start and some loses more while chasing their lost money and eventually ends up blaming to their brokers part.
    • The crypto market are also in phase of maturing like the forex and other trading assets so we can do much more accurate analysis than before since early days it was purely a luck if the investments in crypto bears results because most of the coins or tokens never come to fruition. Some early birds were also able to make profits on these tokens or coins. e,g., like turtle coin starts with 1 satoshi and go up to 7 sathoshis, quite good rewards. another token lmgx now hovering at 10 started from 1, 
    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.