Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

andypap

General Discussion for Components in Strategies

Recommended Posts

this thread has a particular purpose for anyone in the forum intrested.

to open a general technical discusion about 100 % autommated strategies...

no judgment calls at all....

actually it is about what to keep , what to throw whitch might interest a lot of

the participants that try to design their own fully autommated strategies..

 

let me introduce myself.

i am a trader and analyst for 15 years and

i have average or even below avarege easy langauge programming skills.

i persist though so i have managed to

design a lot of my own concept indicators and strategies as well as standard concepts

like comressed timeframes indicators,dynamic adaptive to market conditions averages

divergence studies, forward channel like price projections, autotrendlines ,statistical studies etc.

i have posted many times questions in this forum trying to find programming solutions to

given problem that i was facing...

i am working on my own so this process was and will be consumming a lot of time and effort

so i have dedicated all my free time to it .

 

i will try to be as brief as possible to present my bias and

in order to set a frame in whitch the discussion will be conducted lets

start with the data first..

 

price axis, timeaxis ,O,C,H,L,V and timeframes.

 

to start the controversy i suggest that

 

timeaxis , O , C , and timeframes are holding no information of value at all...

 

the market is a series of transactions each at a given price and the only info of

any value primarily is what price , how much .

 

the open/close of one timeframe is one transaction whithin a bar of another timeframe..

the time stamp of a ceratin transaction is totally arbitrary and depends on many factors..

to decide that a bar will form every n time doesnt represent at all the the flow of the market

whitch is the flow of transactions...

 

so what we are left with is high , low , and volume.

more specificlly derivatives of high and low like support/resictance ,range etc.

 

apart than just suggesting it i also testify that i have backtested a lot of startegies based on

various indicators that derive from calculation relative to the close,multitimefame,divergence and so on

and they were all having random characteristicts.

 

on the other hand strategies(es,forex) based on support resictance , range

and other derivatives of high and low

are performing very consistantly..and some almost fractal

and i am talking about a sample 0f 50000 thousand trades withing 10 years

over 20 trades per day

the equity curve of those strategies doesnt even flicker whether it is an upmarket,downmarket,sideways market

they kind of match the nature of the market

exept one "little" problem....execution(spread between backtested hypothetical executions

and real live execution)

buy that is a topic i would like to discuss later on in this thread

 

if anybody has a different bias or has something to implement in this first topic of this thread is welcomed.

 

the reason why i would prefer this discussion to progress from topic to topic is because it can become quite

chaotic if the conversation drifts out of context.

 

regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's a good preamble.

 

there are as many ways to trade the market as there are market instruments...

 

and the market has as many moods as your wife/gf.

 

if you can figure out your wife/gf, you can surely figure out the market... LOL

 

 

this will be a good discussion.

 

(I mean the market, not your wife/gf)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

strategy devellopment hass many many pitfalls and definetely it is not an easy task..

further more from the perspective of the average trader it is a long term commitment regardless of the reasons that intiated that decision...

one person on his own time and resources will face a very long and hard to travell road with the different aspects of creating and refining a strategy...

 

if someone has advanced programming skills and math education and enough trading experience and works with a group of others of various experties required then he has

the luxury to show up and dazzle us with his super technologie and brilliant algorithms...

 

but the question in hand is totally different from this approach..

 

although required most essential criteria apart from enry,target,stop is adapting in "current market conditions" thus achiving normalized equity graph through time and having an accurately estimated execution in the backtester that will limit slippage in reality ,can that be done with relatively advance programming , standard technical knowledge and simulation of a real trading risk managment

 

i think that this description fits most of the members of this forum that want to create their own strategies...

 

but maybe i am wrong

maybe everybody has a strategy trading his account with no judgment calls and i am the only one in the dark or maybe people are throwning the white towel after a few frustrations and have made up their mind allready that this is too complicated to achive ...

 

summation of the above is that people that have a strategie, not heard about one ,can ensure

the rest of us that this is not a pipe dream and lay general guidelines without revealing their intellectual propertie , while others like me who think that they are close can exchange info revealing as much as they feel like...

 

here is something that i have strong evidence regarding the snp 500 and can be a topic of discussion.

an up market is very different than a down market so one should design these two separetely...

 

regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

here is something that i have strong evidence regarding the snp 500 and can be a topic of discussion. an up market is very different than a down market so one should design these two separetely...

 

regards

 

and there you have the secret

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no need to match an effort to increase productivy and save your self from a lot of headaches with unequal and useless irony and hostility unless everything is quite obvious to everybody at first glance...

 

i was not aware of what i have proposed till recently and i realized it by accident...

i was making a " volatility indicator " to face something that i was involved with at the time

and then i plotted it in spx daily just to see and voila

the market NEVER show a mesurment above a particular threshold unless it was diving down

("" buy the creepers sell the leapers "")

NOT ONLY THAT BYT WHEN THE MARKET WAS EXCEEDING THAT THRESHOLD

AT VERY EARLY STAGE OF THE DOWNTREND.

each and every downrend from 1960 till today.

so i realized that i have a solid threshold for risk measurment

 

i have adjusted my strategies (size,stops targets) and most of all the boldness of the decision making part of the strategy and enhanced the results by multiples ...

 

of course this subject is in the realm of intersest of swing strategie devellopment and the structure of it should simulate a fund behaviour for optimal results and definately has no impact at all to scalping strategies or intraday strategies..

 

but just this fact can lead to another deduction about markets(another topic for discussion).

 

/////////////////////////////////////

two eyes,one brain

what is the level of awareness at all times particulary when you are buried in details and specifications and small tasks...how easily can you drift out of context..

 

 

my experience is that you can wonder in a maze for endless time overlooking the most essential

 

so no secret at all only a reminder whitch i wish that someone would have proposed to me to keep in perspective....

 

there is no harm done here

if anyone is buiding a swing or intraday strategie can exchange info and guidelines with others..

 

i am only trying to initiate the conversation...

if people start posting intersting views and structures i dont mind listening more and speaking less

 

regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL................... :haha:

 

and there you have the secret

 

here is something that i have strong evidence regarding the snp 500 and can be a topic of discussion.

an up market is very different than a down market so one should design these two separetely...

 

regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....i am only trying to initiate the conversation...

if people start posting intersting views and structures i dont mind listening more and speaking less

 

regards

 

here's some of my demi-philosophical veiw...

 

it is difficult to make short money if the ma is trending up...

it is difficult to make long money if the ma is trending down...

 

if you can pick a top/bottom out of the blue, you should have the power to pick 6 numbers in a lottery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.