Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

AgeKay

Why Does Support Turn into Resistance and Vice Versa?

Recommended Posts

I think it started sometime back in history with some valid basis - like value of stock based on company performance where once the price crossed the 'resistance' no one was willing to consider a price lower to sell.

 

Ever since tech analysis has become mainstream i think it is the stops that more or less drive it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The basis is supply and demand. When price returns to a prior resistance pivot more supply comes into the market. If the market pushes it higher through the resistance then once it returns to this prior reistance point there "should" be less supply therefore it turns now to support. Note these support/resistance areas are zones and not exact levels.

 

See following IBM chart as an example of resistance turning to support which now on Friday returned to resistance. Also the close on Thursday had already showed react to this zone. This area was also S/R back in May/July/Aug '08.

IBM.png.bf933a222568c89b28ad5d5f31d27130.png

Edited by SunTrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It depends on the market. In the bund, S/R is accurate to the tick.

 

Hmmm ... most times yes. But it remains a market with many traders and big volume.

 

Sometimes it proceeds like a communcation protocol, price moves to S as a message, climbs a little distance as an ACK,

comes back as a message asking for confirmation, climbs agains as ACK or falls thru as NAK.

 

So traders may be communicating to each other using price as a channel and R/S as a protocol.

Edited by Marko23
Added some thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm ... most times yes. But it remains a market with many traders and big volume.

 

Sometimes it proceeds like a communcation protocol, price moves to S as a message, climbs a little distance as an ACK,

comes back as a message asking for confirmation, climbs agains as ACK or falls thru as NAK.

 

So traders may be communicating to each other using price as a channel and R/S as a protocol.

 

hahaha - think the algos are feeling each other up :0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The main reason for supports/ resistance not holding is the pattern recognition algo's used by block traders... These algo's once confirm a trending down / up in a major index then no longer use their oscillator based module to trade and hence support or resistance becomes far far less effective in their exit strategy . ( hence going through support )

There was a very strong support on GS @ 160 but there was over 12 block trades ranging from 1.2mil to 5 mil last past two trading days to cut through the 160 level like hot knife through the butter,,,

 

hope this makes sense

 

Grey1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some people will not like this way to think about “S/R” but perhaps it may be helpful to others:

 

Assume that S/R is a valid concept.

(Perhaps even “to the tick” as was posted here)

 

Then it would be trivial to design a highly profitable strategy from it:

- When price is going down and approaching support: Position a buy order with size X (less than 50% of the buying power of the account) at support.

- If price goes up after touching support stay in the position until your profit target is reached (or exit at break-even if price is moving back down)

- If price breaks support (going further down) reverse position to short with size 2*X. Then stay (at your discretion) in the position until the loss vanishes (break-even) or ride the downtrend to the next lower support.

 

If it would be safely possible to spot S/R the outlined strategy would be fail-safe and it would at worst break even, never loose.

Therefore it would be easy to make nearly unlimited amounts of profit using this strategy.

 

 

Since we know that this does not work so simply some other idea might be considered:

 

“Support” and “Resistance” are concepts that work sometimes but only on a rather statistical basis and they are in many cases just expressions of random processes.

(Please do not think that I am adherer to the random walk hypothesis of the markets – I am certainly not. Just quite skeptical about the validity of S/R).

 

So trying to answer the question “why does S turn into R?”

S and R are not really well-defined.

At least much worse defined than people think.

And mathematical logic says that it is impossible to answer a question in which the words of which it is constituted are not clearly defined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it would be safely possible to spot S/R the outlined strategy would be fail-safe and it would at worst break even, never loose.

 

You're always risking at least 1 tick (2 ticks if you use stop orders) whenever you enter a position. Just because S/R breaks, does not mean that it will move far enough to make it worthwhile. And I don't know what market your trading but the bund does not always move in discrete steps. If you check today's chart, you can see that it literally jumped from 123.41 to 50 at 11:17am CET.

 

“Support” and “Resistance” are concepts that work sometimes but only on a rather statistical basis and they are in many cases just expressions of random processes.

 

I agree. I my opinion, S/R is less about how often it works (accuracy) but more about finding good entries. If you're S/R is broken, you know you're wrong.

 

S and R are not really well-defined.

At least much worse defined than people think.

 

I agree that many people use it very broadly. For me, S/R are prices where a price move has reversed repeatedly.

 

For example, if you look at today's chart of bund, between 9:07 and 9:45 CET, the bund bounced off of 123.26/27 exactly 29 times and then another 3 times off of 123.25. If this wasn't Support that I don't know what is. During the same time, it bounced off of 123.29/30 also 19 times. So that was the corresponding Resistance which later on (13:40 CET) turned into support and then after climbing 14 ticks bounced off of 123.44, of which it bounced off of earlier twice (12:12 and 12:32 CET).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the ultimate slap in the face, the price action definition of a breakout.

 

Imagine Resistance being the Bear and the Bull approaches him says right to his face you are now one of us, and the Bear joins the Bull to become one.

 

Nemesis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got an email this morning asking me why I had not not been back in a while to the forums. Then I stopped back to see if any interesting discussions were happening and spotted this thread. I read the entire thread and then realized why I hadn't been back for a while.

 

There were a few traders stating that "Support becomes Resistance and vice versa . . . to the tick" but no one posted a chart to show this interesting phenomenon. Seeing that it NEVER happens consistently, how could anyone use this as a trading tool?

 

Support and Resistance are the fundamental building blocks to every chart. It is not only critical that your charts create readable Support & Resistance but you understand how to recognize those points on your chart. What is consistent is that the creation of Support will ALWAYS be followed by the creation of Resistance which will ALWAYS be followed by the creation of Support which will ALWAYS be followed by the creation of Resistance which will ALWAYS be followed by the . . . . forever and ever and ever.

 

Support and Resistance points are proof that price action is cyclic but what is important is the cycle itself not that the cycle has a specific duration (which they do not) nor that specific cycle tops become specific cycle bottoms which does not happen with any useful consistency.

 

Once you understand that Support & Resistance are constants (if your charts are built without the variable aspects of time) then trading becomes as simple as trading from established and confirmed Support toward established and confirmed Resistance and trading from established and confirmed Resistance toward established and confirmed Support. You can take it a step farther if you understand there are 2 distinct levels of Support and Resistance, Prime & Minor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Take away the indicators, the moving averages, and the colored bars. In fact, take away the bars and the entire idea of a graphical representation and what are you left with? A price. A value placed upon some underlying object (or paper, or contract), determined by who will or will not pay a particular amount for it. That is it. Nothing more or less. ...

 

EDIT: Also, I highly recommend reading DbPhoenix's write-up on this topic.

hey hey lookie who is here :) arent you dbphoenix himself? disguised as a common man!

 

p.s. i always knew phenix is russian :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The behaviour of markets in general and price in particular can be viewed as a search for liquidity. The reason that these areas are visited and re visited is that they are areas where liquidity (orders) might be found.
yeah, cant agree more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting discussion -- the real question, it seems to me is how to find support and resistance. A quantifiable solution exists and is more reliable than just eyeballing a chart.

 

If you've ever looked back in time on any chart it seems that price reacts to the same levels over and over -- what was support/resistance 2 years ago is likely to hold in the present.

 

My two pennies. . .

Champ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have come to the realization that it might actually be my explanation b) after looking at the DOM for some time. There are certain prices that everyone is watching, e.g. high and low of day. And since S/R are good entries, you usually see a lot of volume transact at these prices. The winner of those battles then immediately post huge bid/offers to prevent the losers from getting out break-even of their positions. Everyone who is on the losing side wishes they were on the other and since breaks of important S/R signify trend changes, no one wants to be on the losing side any more and the previous S/R looks like a good price to go with the new trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There were a few traders stating that "Support becomes Resistance and vice versa . . . to the tick" but no one posted a chart to show this interesting phenomenon. Seeing that it NEVER happens consistently, how could anyone use this as a trading tool?

 

The gold is not found in the consistency, such consistency will only be found in strong trends, the gold in this lies in that they do act as mini pivots, allowing you to enter with minimal risk and landing a winner should you be right on direction; which is for the most part, the key to trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a live example not in hindsight.

 

Expect the first tests to hold, whatever happens next, it's anyone's guess, but the fact that we approached precisely this level just before new earning seasons is far from a coincidence. If you were long, as you should had been, this level was a magnet.

SPY.Weekly.thumb.png.e9e2026fc2e9653cf7b438dce6e3c159.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There were a few traders stating that "Support becomes Resistance and vice versa . . . to the tick" but no one posted a chart to show this interesting phenomenon. Seeing that it NEVER happens consistently, how could anyone use this as a trading tool?

 

You won't see it on bar charts or candle stick charts. I developed my own time chart where it does show up consistently, but I am not going to post it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's a live example not in hindsight.

 

Expect the first tests to hold, whatever happens next, it's anyone's guess, .......

I'm sure you are not meaning the posted chart's exact point but I look for a "zone" of support or resistance, especially when it involves a bar with a spike bottom or vice versa top. A daily chart for that zone shows weekly high/low and how price and volume reacted just prior to and into big selloff in Sept/Oct '08.

SPXdaily.png.11c2c395589479bf5ee03d327694baad.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm sure you are not meaning the posted chart's exact point but I look for a "zone" of support or resistance, especially when it involves a bar with a spike bottom or vice versa top. A daily chart for that zone shows weekly high/low and how price and volume reacted just prior to and into big selloff in Sept/Oct '08.

 

Yes, it's an area not an exact number, particularly in a chart as big as this (weekly).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You won't see it on bar charts or candle stick charts. I developed my own time chart where it does show up consistently, but I am not going to post it.

 

Keep that grail secret.

 

The whole idea is that once the level that the longs entered positions at is broken, they are still in losing trades or had their stops taken out. Now, some of these longs will want to get out at break even, so they exit once price returns to the broken support, creating resistance. Also, the shorts who missed the first wave enter on a retest and some prior shorts add. Either way, the only thing that causes support to become resistance (and vice versa) is traders. They can act as buyers or sellers.

Edited by martinguitar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The whole idea is that once the level that the longs entered positions at is broken, they are still in losing trades or had their stops taken out. Now, some of these longs will want to get out at break even, so they exit once price returns to the broken support, creating resistance. Also, the shorts who missed the first wave enter on a retest and some prior shorts add. Either way, the only thing that causes support to become resistance (and vice versa) is traders. They can act as buyers or sellers.

 

Exactly. That's what I was trying to say with my post although your post describes it much better than mine and yours is easier to understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.