Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Measuring Strength of a Move Once in a Trade

Recommended Posts

perfect risk managment strategy,,,

 

Grey1

Actually 'staying' with a third is only perfect "risk management strategy" ::helloooo: for a small subset of systems, good "risk management strategy" for another set of systems, at B.E. for another subset of systems, and disastrous for a sizable subset of systems.

 

More would definitely see the ridiculousness of just throwing up a post like

“The perfect risk managment strategy is to just take three ticks off every entry”

than would see the ridiculousness of

“exit two thirds of my position and let the other third run, and run, and run....”

but they are equally ridiculous as general advice!

 

...not criticizing your posts and intentions in general - just beating the drum some more from my recent posts for TL posters to abstain from discussing exits in isolation from the system behind it... it may seem like it helps others but it doesn't... and it's ET like...

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll say this on runners - they've NEVER worked for me. I'm all-in or all-out. That's just what works for me.

 

+1. I can never rationalize the total Risk : Reward variance in scaling out positions vs. a full stop out... but thats just my personal preference.

 

All in all out forces me to hold trades and stay accountable to my proper exits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with zdo. It depends:

- what you are trading

- what your entry strategy is

- what moves you are trying to capture

 

My personal approach is to test each exit separately. If you then find that the pf on a quick exit is 2+ with a 60% win and the pf on a trailing or trailing+tightening exit is 2+ with a 30-40% win you might choose to combine them to give a result that:

- has an averaged profit factor

- has a smoothed return (and thus all the resulting system stats).

 

Or you might not find that. But only testing will tell. Generally I think the heuristic that the market rewards you for doing what is hard is true ... but ones personal psychology might combine with hard to generate unprofitable in some cases which could also argue for a staged exit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually 'staying' with a third is only perfect "risk management strategy" ::helloooo: for a small subset of systems, good "risk management strategy" for another set of systems, at B.E. for another subset of systems, and disastrous for a sizable subset of systems.

 

More would definitely see the ridiculousness of just throwing up a post like

“The perfect risk managment strategy is to just take three ticks off every entry”

than would see the ridiculousness of

“exit two thirds of my position and let the other third run, and run, and run....”

but they are equally ridiculous as general advice!

 

...not criticizing your posts and intentions in general - just beating the drum some more from my recent posts for TL posters to abstain from discussing exits in isolation from the system behind it... it may seem like it helps others but it doesn't... and it's ET like...

 

you obviously are new to this game,,,very new it seems.. get yourself a Neural net and keep all your inputs constant and optimise your out put ( exit) .. once done that then go back and edit your post above

 

Grey1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes....sorry about the ridiculous advice....I was not specific enough.

While I may take two thirds off and run the last third, it still carries a stop as well. Its just that it does not have a take profit level.

If you view that there are generally three levels/ways to exit, a stop with a loss, a stop with a profit, and a take profit level. I may enter a trade - use a take profit for two thirds of my position, and let the last third run until it is stopped out, by a trailing stop.

For me this actually has noting to do with risk management - thats factored in with the actual reason for taking a trade, the position sizing and stop settings etc;

This is more a physc thing that works for me, and works for when I believe the trade can be a real trender. It allows me to combine both short term trading and longer term trend trades.

Given the thread is about measuring the strength of the move, I hope it would add to the discussion.... basically in that by letting the move occur and me being a part of it without me trying to measure it or judge it allows me to stay on some big moves. I just let the stop take me out, not a profit target.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
+1. I can never rationalize the total Risk : Reward variance in scaling out positions vs. a full stop out... but thats just my personal preference.

 

All in all out forces me to hold trades and stay accountable to my proper exits.

 

There are millions of combinations in scaling out of pos which affects the final P/L out come but one can simulate the out come using Monta carlo ( assuming randon walk as a strategy for simplicity ONLY) and ATR as a means of measuring P/L for both stop and traget to find a reasonable risk managment strategy ,, The best tool I suggest is to optimise using a Genetic adaptive NN

 

Grey1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

grey1, " assuming randon walk as a strategy" ???????????????

... hopefully the noobies, including the quant noobies, perked their ears up on that one after the scent went straight to their hindbrains...

 

My naivite' astounds me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
grey1, " assuming randon walk as a strategy" ???????????????

... hopefully the noobies, including the quant noobies, perked their ears up on that one after the scent went straight to their hindbrains...

 

My naivite' astounds me

 

If I was you I would use a more techncial approach to reply to my posts .. We never get any where if you come up with statement as above ,, they are neither constructive nor mathematical ..

 

Grey1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Like I said, it's a mental game I play w/ myself regularly - the 'what if' game... What if I stayed in all day and just MOC'd. the trade. Then the next day - good thing I got out when I did!

 

Got a few ideas working here, but it's all rudimentary at this point. In the end, my gut says that to just keep doing what I am doing and be happy.

 

Thanks for the feedback everyone. While the exit holy grail probably doesn't exist, sometimes I need to get a thread like this going to reinforce what I've been doing is not half bad.

 

;)

 

bf, sounds like you may be done with this thread but I’ll make a few more comments about the ‘stay - no stay’ decisions that traders must make all the time. Most systems should not have any ‘stay’ type exits, and per system, exits should be target (fixed or % of margin or… etc.), PA, trailing (via 'trend'lines see below or other trailing stop methods) or some combo. The dissonance from missing the occasional great move is part of it – hence your “be happy”. Also, some systems should have a mix of ‘stay’ and ‘no stay’ exits.

 

The main point of all my posts in this thread is that the exit methodology must be matched as precisely as possible with the system itself. Most systems are designed to play for points and that is what they should do via ‘no stay’ exits and they are as you say “not half bad””. Joe Montana had no long ball and he played for points, but he turned sub 30 yard throws into super, etc.

 

A very few systems are ‘stay’ unconditionally period and the number of traders who are sufficiently ‘comfortable’ with systems that reward ‘stay’ unconditionally (with the ‘trend’ btw) is also small. These systems play for position, not points. With full ‘stay’ systems “ … the most important aspect of any trading decision is never the condition of the market, but rather that of your own position. The trick is to be constantly moving toward a position of strength, both within an individual trade and within the marketplace at large. Just like basketball, chess, or any other activity that requires focus, you know you’re in the ‘zone’ of trading when you start playing for position, not for points.” Jonathan Hoenig, CapitalistPig

 

Personally, I can make very good money 'scalping', a little bit of money swinging, sporadically good money breakout trading - but my really homerun years were when I had (just barely) enough stones to ‘stay’ and the seasonal / trend went parabolic. It has taken me nearly 20 years of work to really accept / assimilate / accomodate / routinely include this way of trading as my nature is more suited to ‘start clicking them in and then start clicking them out’. And, btw, this system is still not ‘trend’ trading proper – I still got a ways to go before I’m ready for real trend trading. :(:roll eyes:

 

re the lines... Am currently starting to build a short position in the indexes and as previously discussed will use the right most line (see attached) to determine my ‘stay’. It should be noted that the right most ‘live’ line is extremely mutable - I have changed its angle 3 times in as many days on this half day chart and it may be considerably steeper by Monday. I would not be surprised or disappointed if most of the position is stopped out at the green line and look forward to putting more on at a higher level. I would also not be surprised if this ‘collectively inevitable’ next leg / crash down doesn’t analogue typically (in ndx/usd terms at least), but I do want to be positioned for the possibility.

 

To review - the optimum exit methodology is determined by the system itself. Your bringing up the topic may indicate a need for just a tiny tweak to your exits rather than a need to make a big shift along the ‘stay – no stay’ continuum… hth Have a great weekend all.

StayLines090925AM.thumb.jpg.7ac2427ccaa0e13598f573efbdeca82a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tams - just looking for some ideas, maybe something will spark an idea on my end. I'm not averse to indicators, but prefer to have 'cleaner' charts. To each his own though.

 

 

actually I wanted to tell you all you need is to watch the volume...

but knowing your aversion to the value of volume analysis, I gave you the next best thing.

 

 

 

p.s. channels help too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
actually I wanted to tell you all you need is to watch the volume...

but knowing your aversion to the value of volume analysis, I gave you the next best thing.

p.s. channels help too.

 

I appreciate the assistance. When I find something that shows how to use volume w/ a consistent result, I'll consider it. Till then, I'm going to have to accept it as is b/c I'm sure not going to be drawing crazy lines all over my charts or coloring different stacks of volume with crazy lines on those as well... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bf,

fwiw, I'm 'bloggin' - not specifically about "Measuring Strength of a Move Once in a Trade"

but about whether and how to 'stay' or 'no stay' once in a trade...

It doesn't use volume but unfortunately it does have lines - but only one active line at any given time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I appreciate the assistance. When I find something that shows how to use volume w/ a consistent result, I'll consider it. Till then, I'm going to have to accept it as is b/c I'm sure not going to be drawing crazy lines all over my charts or coloring different stacks of volume with crazy lines on those as well... ;)

 

 

there are more than one way to skin a cat... I won't suggest you to sweat it.

 

 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BF surrendering to indicators ??? my, the World must be changing.

 

 

Here's a little "indicator" that might help:

 

set the look back to 2 bars,

if the price never closed beyond the 2 bars, there is really no reason to exit.

(of course you have to tune to a resolution that does not give you the noise,

or increase the "look back" so that you don't get taken out by a spike)

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/scalpers-hl-bracket-sound-6084.html'>http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/scalpers-hl-bracket-sound-6084.html

 

11041d1243739733-scalpers-hl-bracket-sound-scalper_hl_bracket.jpg

 

 

Hope the idea helps

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/scalpers-hl-bracket-sound-6084.html

Tam

 

Have you got an mt4 version of this Indicatore available

 

 

Barry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a market internal display that gives read out of advance decline and Volume

of NYSE and NASDAQ also measures the amount of ticks and I can tell by tracking these numbers if market is getting stronger or weaker.

It was written in spreadsheet and it tracks live

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I use a market internal display that gives read out of advance decline and Volume

of NYSE and NASDAQ also measures the amount of ticks and I can tell by tracking these numbers if market is getting stronger or weaker.

It was written in spreadsheet and it tracks live

 

Care to share some examples of this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.