Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

The Evolution of Market Profile Theory

Recommended Posts

No point, I've discovered the harmonic is only good to look at after the fact.

 

If your version of the harmonic is only good after the fact then maybe it is missing something. This version usually leads, as shown.

 

V94RawHarmonic.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If your version of the harmonic is only good after the fact then maybe it is missing something. This version usually leads, as shown.

 

V94RawHarmonic.jpg

 

"Usually Leads".

 

The problem is that sometimes it can whipsaw and for the style that I trade, by the time the cross over occurs can sometimes be later then where I would have already entered my trade. I've just found other methods of choosing entries to be superior. One thing, is that it definitely works much better for trending markets then range markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If your version of the harmonic is only good after the fact then maybe it is missing something. This version usually leads, as shown.

 

V94RawHarmonic.jpg

 

"Usually Leads".

 

The problem is that sometimes it can whipsaw and for the style that I trade, by the time the cross over occurs can sometimes be later then where I would have already entered my trade. I've just found other methods of choosing entries to be better suited to my style.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The problem is that sometimes it can whipsaw and for the style that I trade, by the time the cross over occurs can sometimes be later then where I would have already entered my trade. I've just found other methods of choosing entries to be superior. One thing, is that it definitely works much better for trending markets then range markets.

 

By crossover... you don't mean when the plot crosses 0 do you? The trade is at the peaks of the plot.

 

I've seen whipsaw, too, but I haven't applied any sophisticated smoothing to it, so... I haven't really evaluated it properly yet.

 

UB's nicely goes up and down whereas looking at the raw calculation I'm using, it wiggles a lot. Hmm.... which might mean: 1) UB is using some cycle smoothing on it and 2) I already know UB uses a different underlying formula for calculating it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
By crossover... you don't mean when the plot crosses 0 do you? The trade is at the peaks of the plot.

 

I've seen whipsaw, too, but I haven't applied any sophisticated smoothing to it, so... I haven't really evaluated it properly yet.

 

UB's nicely goes up and down whereas looking at the raw calculation I'm using, it wiggles a lot. Hmm.... which might mean: 1) UB is using some cycle smoothing on it and 2) I already know UB uses a different underlying formula for calculating it

 

Even if you look at the peak, there is no way to now when that peak is in. This is something nice to look at, that is about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even if you look at the peak, there is no way to now when that peak is in. This is something nice to look at, that is about it.

 

I'm a little confused... The peak is obvious on UB's charts: velocity changes sign and he has what I assume is a crossover of 2 differently smoothed values.

 

If what you're saying is that you don't have that on your chart, fair enough. I don't either :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UB can you suggest if the velocity considered in Harmonic Indicator are changes in volume domain (ex. in per constant volume bar sell/buy quantity) or time domain bar (ex. changes in sell/buy quantity for timeframe considered)?

 

Thanks

 

Paolo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think UB is posting anymore, but I think we should carry this thread forward, anybody interested? I'm sure many of us have ideas concerning the ,"now," of Steidlemayers work. If so let me know and we can keep this thread alive if that's ok with the moderators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

clmacdougal,

 

What areas are in the"now" of Steidlemayers work right now for you?

Anything in this thread?

What have you gotten from this thread so far? etc?

These are curiosity, not challenge, questions btw.

Thanks.

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I created profiles of the emini S&P 500 for each day and night session independent of each other for three years worth of data. I then divided up each profile by it's construction, using what I thought to be a reasonable and scientific approach. If the upper tail was at least twice as long as the lower tail I labeled the profile as a "b". If the lower tail was at least twice as long as the upper tail I labeled the profile as a "P". And if neither was twice as long as the opposite tail I labeled it as an, "O".

 

So I had the beginnings of a study in price reaction to differing profile structures. Not only that but after a considerable amount of study it became plain to see that if the evening value area was able to fully detach itself from the same days RTH value area, then it became the value area of importance come the next morning. To put it in different terms, if the evening value area was able to migrate/detach itself from the days value area , then it became the value area of choice to trade with in mind come the next morning.

 

Then I divided it up further by deciding upon the trend of the dominant profile by simply comparing the present dominant value area to yesterdays dominant value area. If it had a Lower Low and a Lower High it of course was proof of a downtrending profile and if it had a Higher High and a Higher Low it was of course an uptrending profile.

 

Next I went to a fourth step, Where does price then open ( at 8:30 am CST)? Within what I called the Upper Deviation (a space equal to the value area but above the value area high). Within the value area (between the vah and val). Or within what I called the Lower Deviation ( a space equal to the value area but below the value area low).

 

Fifth, what point does price then first touch after the open, 1st Deviation High, Value Area High, Value Area Low, or 1st Deviation Low?

 

And then finally, after all of this is said and done, the key question "WHERE DOES PRICE THEN MOVE TOWARDS?"

Is there predictability in price movement after all of these conditions had been monitored closely? The answer is yes, but not without both risk and the potential for failure.

 

I have been studying now for 3 1/2 years and I enjoy learning about the markets and market structure. I am in no ways yet successful as a trader, but I'm beginning to learn how to look at the market.............. at least I think/hope so.haha

 

Let me know what you think, any of your own observations would be appreciated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problems I've seen with Market Profile as a central trading ideology is that it's boundaries (areas of price rejection) and it's center (TPO/HVP) are too static.

Any previous understanding of value is almost totally useless by the time price reaches those boundaries again.

It seems like market profile was an attempt to discover support and resistance areas without the need of traditional price action understandings/patterns to uncover those areas.

Imagine the naivety of believing that price will almost always return to it's central Value Area simply because it found itself at yesterdays rejection area.

Everything for sale, with regards to trading information/methods, does not work. You would have to be crazy to sell a trading method/understanding that proved itself useful. You would be throwing away what could be passed down for generations to come in your own family.

When it comes to trading, yesterdays newspaper is the only one you'll ever get a chance to buy. Sit, look at tons of charts and think. So far for me it's been the best way to learn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

your points are all valid -- but you are making a bunch of blanket statements about your interpretation of market profiles 'trading rules'.... I think they are off the mark in that regard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using the profile to determine trading levels in incredibility accurate...proper study

will confirm this...there are many options to using it other than the standard 30 min chart.

I use the profile for levels, and other charts for signals when those levels are reached...

will never trade again without the profile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
your points are all valid -- but you are making a bunch of blanket statements about your interpretation of market profiles 'trading rules'.... I think they are off the mark in that regard.

 

Explain to me what is really offered by market profile outside of an attempting to discern Support and Resistance in a non-traditional manner? Nothing.

Outside of Steidlemayers imbalance to balance statement what truly new concept has been found? That statement itself is what I've found to be the only gold in all the Market Profile writings. The question is can it be applied more effectively than what we've seen in UB's writings?

What is the "now" application of the golden principle discovered by Steidlemayer , in a means keeping with technology while staying true to the concept?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Using the profile to determine trading levels in incredibility accurate...proper study

will confirm this...there are many options to using it other than the standard 30 min chart.

I use the profile for levels, and other charts for signals when those levels are reached...

will never trade again without the profile.

 

Please let us in on what "proper study" you've done. And what "levels" you are referring to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing you say...I guess you haven't observed it enough. The developing structure

gives clues all day long about the market. Including measured moves, stalling to

build places to trade back to creating high and low volume prices...but just watching a 30 min profile has limited use for day trading other than trading the value area. I learned from someone that has studied the profile for 7 or 8 years building charts by hand every day.

Yes, the profile isn't useful if you don't know how to read what it is saying.

There is no question in my mind it's a valuable tool and I apply it every day...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes MP is a tool...and a very good one...but can reveal much more than a bar chart...that's why I use it... understanding how to use and read it is the trick...but like any tool,

there is no magic solution to trading...pick your tools , and learn them well...and quit searching for any holy grail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MP is a tool. There is nothing mystical or statistically significant about it. You can gain much of the same info from a bar chart. Don't expect any trading tool to solve your problems.

 

 

Peace

 

What's the good of a tool if there's nothing statistically significantly about it? I'm afraid I'm of the same mind Mighty Mouse, the chart is the thing. Anything that hides them bars hides the truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What's the good of a tool if there's nothing statistically significantly about it? I'm afraid I'm of the same mind Mighty Mouse, the chart is the thing. Anything that hides them bars hides the truth.

 

 

Well, there aren't any tools that offer long term statistical significance other than trading with inside information. The fact that something worked over the las 3 months or 3 years or 3 decades has no bearing on how it will work tomorrow.

 

You do lose some info when the profile is collapsed against the price axis, but most MP packages allow you to expand the profile and you can view the bars again and still see the VA and POC.Try it, you might like it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MP has it's value...and is a great tool...but most traders don't take the time

to really learn to use it...but that is kind of a conundrum ...there are very few places

that really know how to teach it. It takes screen time like any trading method.

It's easy to reject something if you don't know anything about it. There are new software

products now that allow for the profile to be on candle or bar charts...which can help

you understand the value of this tool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The problems I've seen with Market Profile as a central trading ideology is that it's boundaries (areas of price rejection) and it's center (TPO/HVP) are too static.

Any previous understanding of value is almost totally useless by the time price reaches those boundaries again.

.

 

Hey Cory,

I couldn't resist :)

 

In reply to your earlier comment that MP is static...it's all relative. You can trade off a monthly value area where the state of value is static but you could also trade off a 5 minute or 30 minute profile where value is pretty dynamic and constantly shifting.

 

Here's my 2 cents coming from someone who when 1st introduced to MP realized it was something of great significance but took a very long time to figure out how to make sense of it in a functional way (and I am still learning). I'm going to speak in terms of what I personally need in order to feel in control of my trading and make sense of market activity, for me MP is the answer....to each his own. When I say MP I refer to market profile, auction theory, order flow and volume analysis....as far as I am concerned they all go hand in hand. The profile is my base....everything else builds on it.

 

As Steidylmayer said data arrangement is the basis for control. In order to be in control you need to represent market activity faithfully without distortion. Markets are 2 dimensional...they move vertically and horizontally (or a combo of both). We all know that price is the medium in which the mkt expresses itself but unfortunately a regular bar chart displays price in mostly vertical terms and tends to create a reactive atmosphere. It doesn't reflect the horizontal movement very well....each new bar goes forward exactly the same distance as the last one regardless of the amount of activity in the bar. You can't see within the bar to see exactly where the all important 1st standard deviation (VALUE) is. I don't know about you but I'm not going to any kind of auction without first knowing the value of the object I'm bidding on. (I know I'm speaking in very general terms here)

 

It's late and I'm starting to ramble but it would be great to keep this discussion going. Maybe start talking methodology and posting some charts.

 

And remember...price is the medium of expression, not the expression itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Cory,

I couldn't resist :)

 

In reply to your earlier comment that MP is static...it's all relative. You can trade off a monthly value area where the state of value is static but you could also trade off a 5 minute or 30 minute profile where value is pretty dynamic and constantly shifting.

 

Here's my 2 cents coming from someone who when 1st introduced to MP realized it was something of great significance but took a very long time to figure out how to make sense of it in a functional way (and I am still learning). I'm going to speak in terms of what I personally need in order to feel in control of my trading and make sense of market activity, for me MP is the answer....to each his own. When I say MP I refer to market profile, auction theory, order flow and volume analysis....as far as I am concerned they all go hand in hand. The profile is my base....everything else builds on it.

 

As Steidylmayer said data arrangement is the basis for control. In order to be in control you need to represent market activity faithfully without distortion. Markets are 2 dimensional...they move vertically and horizontally (or a combo of both). We all know that price is the medium in which the mkt expresses itself but unfortunately a regular bar chart displays price in mostly vertical terms and tends to create a reactive atmosphere. It doesn't reflect the horizontal movement very well....each new bar goes forward exactly the same distance as the last one regardless of the amount of activity in the bar. You can't see within the bar to see exactly where the all important 1st standard deviation (VALUE) is. I don't know about you but I'm not going to any kind of auction without first knowing the value of the object I'm bidding on. (I know I'm speaking in very general terms here)

 

It's late and I'm starting to ramble but it would be great to keep this discussion going. Maybe start talking methodology and posting some charts.

 

And remember...price is the medium of expression, not the expression itself.

 

Hey Tommy! Good to hear from you.

UB said something to me in a post alot earlier that stuck, he called what I was doing a "pseudo-science". In effect a false science. I wonder how many trading methods based upon MP are just that and what parts of it conceptually offer a truly fractal (applicable in all time frames) and viable means of studying price action.

Bar charts don't show horizontal rotation, you're right, but who wants to monitor indecision anyway? Rotation is not value, it's simply indecision concerning the direction in which price should head to next. You can monitor value via time (TPO) or volume (HVP) or through (VWAP) and you'll come to the same understanding, all you're uncovering are areas of indecision, not value. In effect the Value Area/POC (however you come about it) is a worthless lean.

Look, here's what I'm saying, tell me how to take the one or two golden principles found in Steidlemayers work and apply it outside of the ways mentioned in the old books.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Tommy! Good to hear from you.

UB said something to me in a post alot earlier that stuck, he called what I was doing a "pseudo-science". In effect a false science. I wonder how many trading methods based upon MP are just that and what parts of it conceptually offer a truly fractal (applicable in all time frames) and viable means of studying price action.

Bar charts don't show horizontal rotation, you're right, but who wants to monitor indecision anyway? Rotation is not value, it's simply indecision concerning the direction in which price should head to next. You can monitor value via time (TPO) or volume (HVP) or through (VWAP) and you'll come to the same understanding, all you're uncovering are areas of indecision, not value. In effect the Value Area/POC (however you come about it) is a worthless lean.

Look, here's what I'm saying, tell me how to take the one or two golden principles found in Steidlemayers work and apply it outside of the ways mentioned in the old books.

 

Hey there my friend,

 

I have to say when I am running on all cylinders 99.9% of my trading plan consists of leaning on value of some degree or another.

 

Although you can say the concept of MP is a science I believe learning and mastering it is more of an art. Kinda like playing a musical instrument if you will. The concept itself is easy to understand but to be able to harness the power of it is another story. On the surface pressing some keys on a piano looks easy...but to produce beautiful sound from one I imagine would be quite the endeavor.

 

Horizontal rotation is caused by traders agreeing on value within a given zone or area. You can't expect traders to agree on 1 exact price for value for any period of time but they will agree on an area. It's a feeling out process to find efficiency or balance. Its all relative to the time frame you are trading. There is always going to be indecision and uncertainty at some level. The degree of indecision is what makes the market Cory. The key for me is comparing the balance/imbalance in the foreground to the balance/imbalance in the background. When I learned to do that I was able to embrace the uncertainty.

 

The question I'm always asking my self...how does the vertical movement/dominance in the FG (foreground) compare to the condition of the BG (background)?

The 2 outcomes to that question are what shape my trading plan:

 

1) the FG vertical movement/dominance gets absorbed by the balance in the BG (for me a winning situation/trade(s))

 

2) The FG vertical movement/dominance changes the condition of the BG (I stop out and evaluate the opportunity to reverse and start the process all over again)

 

Gotta run...I have some value areas waiting to be leaned on. ;)

 

To be continued....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
    • Does any crypto exchanges get banned in your country? How's about other as Bybit, Kraken, MEXC, OKX?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.