Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

itzak

How Many Time Frames-es

Recommended Posts

Is there any use in using more than two time frames when watching for retraces on the ES trends. Also what ratio between time frames does anyone recommend?

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is there any use in using more than two time frames when watching for retraces on the ES trends. Also what ratio between time frames does anyone recommend?

thanks

 

I find multiple time frames incredibly useful. I think of it as a forrest-through-the-trees kind of thing. I don't know what ratio is useful, but here are mine:

 

daily

150k vol

30k vol

10k vol

5 sec

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trading NQ, right now....and I'd trade the ES the same way, only on the CVB charts I would multiply them by maybe 10.

 

I've got 5 charts right now that I make intraday decisions from 4 are on my screen at all times:

10K CVB - used to pick S/R the night prior, not on screen during trading

2500 CVB - transfer levels from 10K chart to this one, easier to see swings

1 Minute - gauging trend, trade managment, monitor volume on this

5 Second - Entry Chart w/Volume

60 Min - I just put this up there, as of now I am not finding it useful

 

If I were trading ES( and have before), I would replace the 10K with a 100K chart, and the 2500CVB with a 20K CVB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 multiple is a bit too much.

 

I would try 7, max.

 

 

Also I like to use odd numbers, so that the multiples do not divide into each other easily.

 

The key is to have multiple perspectives of the market;

you want to see the charts sync when the market sings.

If the multiples divides into each other, the charts will sync while the market might not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 multiple is a bit too much.

 

.......I would try 7, max......

 

 

I think that depends on what you are using the charts for. I wasnt suggesting it's a correct/direct correlation.

 

The 10K I'm using is soley for picking out S/R. I've used the 100K on ES for the same reason. And the point of the big bar interval is to get as much data in as possible, while still showing some swings for major S/R.

 

The 2500, I simply use to view how price get towards the S/R. While still being small enough to show swing highs and lows. Cause the 10K really won't show it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're just picking out support and resistance wouldn't it be better to use time charts rather than tick or volume charts? Why:

- if the time is approx same as v or t then same swings show up

- time is invariant if you use channels or trendlines

- you can read volume at the swings for any advantage that might give you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting post - I use 1 timeframe per market being traded. Guess I'm the minority. ;)

 

It is what we would expect bf :)

 

For the record I tend to use two if I'm looking for support and resistance because the S&R on the next timeframe up is the area where "trend" continuation is most likely to meet dispute (next is typically 3-5x this timeframe although I have become taken with the 15m when considering S&R for a 1m chart). However, if I'm trading trend automatically I use one timeframe but have a couple of mas on the chart and, when you think about what they are (an average of a number of bar closes) then they are a lot like adding other timeframes to the chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An article in last month's SFO magazine recommends that you trade the 144 tick chart in the direction of the 2097 tick chart. I tried it, it works where nothing before did (I tried lots of combos).I added the 610 ticks in the middle to give me more entry/exit options, and I'm still experimenting with this (looks promising). I also tested and backtested with 144/400/1200ticks; it looks god too: more profitable (earlier entry) but riskier (too early entry). My additional and most important rule is that I only trade if the ADX tuns up on the 144 (from the lower level the better), signaling the start of a trend. I don't trade countertrends, as they mostly are pullbacks (I trade them when the ADX turns up again = continuation)..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Starborg9,

I took a look at the 144 tick and the ADX indicator. I noticed the ADX indicator is slow.

Try this; Value1 = jtHMA(obv, length);

Plot1(Value1, "FastMA");

You can ad a slower OBV indicator for trend.

That 144 tick is to fast for me.

Best of luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you tweek the DMI/ADX you get a awesome indicator. I chose the DMI settings Length=6 Avg Length=8 and the superimposed ADX are Length=10 Moving Avg Length=4. The result is a clear and visible signal when the top DI jumps over or touches the ADX at the start of a trend. I can handle the 144, but I find it not very profitable, so I'm now playing with the 1200/6000 combo and it looks extremely promising. The concept is good, you have to find your own comfort zone. Good luck to all of us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you're just picking out support and resistance wouldn't it be better to use time charts rather than tick or volume charts? Why:

- if the time is approx same as v or t then same swings show up

- time is invariant if you use channels or trendlines

- you can read volume at the swings for any advantage that might give you

 

Agreed.

 

From a macro point of view timed charts also allow you to run a volatility filter over the market (such as ATR) which will not react as it should on tick/range bars as it is a forcing the market into a defined window.

 

At the end of the day record what you see & it will give you the answer. Was the trade with the x Minute trend? Was it with the Daily trend? And also how you determine what is trend (above/below MA, S/R line, time frame etc)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

During "normal" conditions you can usually find a tick range that will be very similar to a timed chart (ie, match 5M), giving you the same flow of the market, but smoothing out the surges in price action to make them tradable.

 

(that's not really a reply just an observation, sharing is caring :-) )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for sharing. My observation is that It's more than just smoothing.You can't count on "normal"' conditions in trading, and it takes just one anomaly to hurt you badly. I will always prefer tick charts to timed charts. If I used a 5M chart today I would have really been screwed after the FED rate announcement. I find that the most important thing for me is to have a routine well within my comfort/confidence zone. I read that the pros never change their strategy once it's tried and tested, their goal is to be able to trade while half asleep w(hich happens a lot to me, as I live in San Diego).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is there any use in using more than two time frames when watching for retraces on the ES trends. Also what ratio between time frames does anyone recommend?

thanks

 

I do analysis on Daily charts only. I think it is more confidential timeframe. TA works better on this, less noise, more exact TA analysis results. But when decision to open has been made, I can wait for an entering point opportunity based on H1 timeframe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only my opinion, but in my experience, for me, I have found that a longer period chart works better. I use a ten minute chart. It smoothes volatility, I can see the trend better..or lack of one, and overbought and oversold areas (extremes for cci and stochastics) are clear and believable to me. Another thing about a ten minute candle is that you can see the volatility direction within a single candle as it jumps and moves. At the ten minute mark when a new candle starts to form you can quickly tell whether this is a real breaking move.

 

Most new traders use either 3 or 5 minute charts. I think 3 minute charts are a disaster for newbies. Anyway they were for me long ago. Calm yourself, wait for your setups, trade 4 or 5 times a day..or less. Only take the absolute best moves. Don't be fooled to jump in on sudden long candle moves. They usually reverse.

 

Anyway..my two cents.

 

Nick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.