Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

simterann22

Klinger-Goslin ATR Indicator

Recommended Posts

Here is a 'squeeze-like' indicator I converted from some very good code. Trend39 from the TS forums converted the Klinger and Goslin together adding an ATR factor to it.

 

Here are the links to the originals:

 

http://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=26841

http://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=26605

http://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=37624

 

 


[LegacyColorValue = true]; 

{_KlingerVolume Function}


{KlingerOsc}
value1 = KVO_rd(34, 55);
value2 = Summation(value1, 1);

if 1 <= 1 then begin
_KlingerVol = value1; end
else _KlingerVol = value2;  

 


{KVO Function}

Inputs: 
  FastX(Numeric), 
  SlowX(Numeric); 
Vars: 
  FXAvg(0), 
  SXAvg(0);

FXAvg = XAverage(VForce_rd, FastX);
SXAvg = XAverage(VForce_rd, SlowX);  {Samll change made to Vforce_rd to make volume smaller)}
KVO_rd = (FXAvg - SXAvg);  

 


{V-Force Function}

Vars: TSum(0), Trend(0), DM(0), CM(0); 
TSum = High + Low + Close; 
DM = High - low;

IF TSum > TSum[1] Then
Trend = 1
Else
Trend = -1;

IF Trend = Trend[1] Then
CM = CM + Range
Else
CM = Range + Range[1];
IF CM <> 0 Then
VForce_rd = Volume * AbsValue(2 * (DM/CM) -1) * Trend * 0.01;   {0.01 works great too; original version had * 100.   
Made smaller to decrease the plotted size of volume}

 

 


[LegacyColorValue = true]; 
{Volume Flow Indicator + Klinger Volume Indicator + ATR Summation

Trend39 compiled into one indicator

Simterann22 made changes below:Zeroline turns red when Klinger is below trigger line and green when above trigger line.
Klinger Histogram shows volume increasing or decreasing}

Inputs:
ATRLength(21),
Trigger(13),
SmoothATR(1),
Smooth(5),
UpVolColor(green),
UpVolColor2(darkGreen),
DnVolColor(red),
DnVolColor2(darkRed);

value1= summationif(close > open,truerange,ATRlength);
value2=summationif(close < open,truerange,ATRlength);
value3= value1-value2; {Sum}
value4 = average(value3,SmoothATR)*.5;


value5= Average((_KlingerVol+ Value4)*1/2,Smooth);
plot1(0,"Zero line");
plot98(0,"Zero Line BG");//Aesthetic
plot2(value5,"Klinger+ATR");
plot3 (average(value5,Trigger),"Trigger");

//Histogram

If Plot2>0 and Plot2>Plot2[1] then
setplotcolor(2,UpVolColor);
If Plot2<0 and Plot2>Plot2[1] then
setplotcolor(2,DnVolColor2);
If Plot2<0 and Plot2<PLot2[1] then
setplotcolor(2,DnVolColor);
If Plot2>0 and Plot2<PLot2[1] then
setplotcolor(2,UpVolColor2);


//ZeroLine

If plot2>plot3 then
begin
setplotcolor(1,UpVolColor);
setplotcolor(98,UpVolColor2);//aesthetic only: must plot thicker and darker color than plot1
end;
If plot2<plot3 then
begin
setplotcolor(1,DnVolColor);
setplotcolor(98,DnVolColor2);//aesthetic only: must plot thicker and darker color than plot1
end;

5aa70ef482718_Klinger-GoslinATR.thumb.jpg.bb894d594bceab4cc85c134aeaadd0d2.jpg

@SK_KLINGER GOSLIN ATR.ELD

TradeStation Forum - Klinger Oscillator.pdf

TradeStation Forum -KLINGER VOLUME.pdf

Edited by simterann22

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you have this code for Esignal or Amibroker?

 

 

This is a mutual relationship.

You can start by sharing your Amibroker indicators...

and this would encourage others to do the same.

note: when I say "sharing", I don't mean copying indicators from the Amibroker site.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great indicator!!....just loaded it & found that a input setting of (8,13, 1, 5) was a little fatser in the turns of 116tk(=1min) charts for daytrading the NQ/ES, in backtesting, fyi, imo. Great look on the ta!! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome. I'm happy you're testing these guys out and even happier you're sharing your results. I'm still essentially a newbie trader so although I can see the potential in indicators I often do not know how to really tweak them. Thanks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awesome. I'm happy you're testing these guys out and even happier you're sharing your results. I'm still essentially a newbie trader so although I can see the potential in indicators I often do not know how to really tweak them. Thanks :)

 

yes..... is relative easy to test them out. What I do is take the original, like this one, then make a copy chart of my trading chart (116tk), one can use any chart you use as an entry chart of any time or tick frame....then backest it over a day or three, of trading by advancing one bar at a time & see how my trades & entries stack up with the new indicator. If is mirrors or is betta than what I do, I leave it alone. If it lags a bit, the I tweek with the input values & make 2-5 charts of the same chart, with each one a different input setting, then advance thru a time in the day I made trades & see which one see's it faster in the turns!!!!....the slow ones I delete, then keep the fast ones. Then will then make more charts of the fast inputs & make slight variations to them either side of the good input values....the one that is the quickest in the turns is the winner!!

 

I usually keep all my input values in Fibonacci vlues (3,5,8,13,21,34, 55,etc) & work with these first. Then if it is close to the fastest one, will then go a half a Fib distance between Fib #'s on either side of it to find THE fastest one in the turns....this to keep the Fib Universal ratio in tact.....generally find that either a whole or half Fib number value/combination works the best every time for any indicator!! My whole system is Fib # based & one of the reasons is so effective for me.....all inputs are Fib #'s & all charts are fib #'s too in time/tick frames.

 

So, try that in backtesting....takes times, like hours of backtesting for just one indicator, but as in all things, nothing good is easy & takes time to get it right. Hope that helps.... :)

 

ajax

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I could not get this indicator to verify in tradestation or multicharts. I have been unable to figure out what the problem is. Could smeone give me a hand?

 

thanks

 

This would be difficult for anyone to help you if you don't give a description of what the issue is. At least the error message you get and the steps you have followed would be needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Use this. Go to File/new/window/easy lang/indicator and then past this.

 

{ Klinger+ATR Bollinger Band

Source: tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=5 9409&PAGE=3?? }

Inputs:

ATRLength(10),

Trigger(13),

UpColor(green),

DwnColor(magenta),

BandColor(Blue),

SmoothATR(1),

Smooth(1),

 

LengthBB( 20 ),

NumDevsUp( 2 ),

NumDevsDn( -2 ),

Displace( 0 ) ;

 

variables:

PriceBB(0),

Avg( 0 ),

SDev( 0 ),

LowerBand( 0 ),

UpperBand( 0 ) ;

 

PriceBB = (Average((_KlingerVol+ Value4)*1/2,Smooth));

 

Avg = AverageFC( PriceBB, LengthBB ) ;

SDev = StandardDev( PriceBB, LengthBB, 1 ) ;

UpperBand = Avg + NumDevsUp * SDev ;

LowerBand = Avg + NumDevsDn * SDev ;

 

value1= summationif(close > open,truerange,ATRlength);

value2= summationif(close < open,truerange,ATRlength);

value3= value1-value2; {Sum}

value4= average(value3,SmoothATR)*.5;

value5= Average((_KlingerVol+ Value4)*1/2,Smooth);

 

If Displace >= 0 or CurrentBar > AbsValue( Displace ) then

begin

 

 

plot1(value5,"Klinger+ATR");

plot2 (0, "Zero Line");

Plot3[Displace]( LowerBand, "LowerBand", BandColor ) ;

Plot4[Displace]( UpperBand, "UpperBand", BandColor ) ;

Plot5[Displace]( Avg, "MidLine" ) ; end;

 

If Plot1>Plot1[1] then begin

plot1[1](Plot1[1],"Klinger+ATR",upcolor);

plot1(Plot1,"Klinger+ATR",upcolor);

end else begin

 

If plot1<plot1[1]then begin

plot1[1](Plot1[1],"Klinger+ATR",dwncolor);

plot1(Plot1,"Klinger+ATR",dwncolor);

end; end;

 

If plot1>Plot2 then begin

plot2[1](plot2[1],"Zero Line",GREEN);

plot2(plot2,"Zero Line",Green);

end else begin

if plot1<plot2 then begin

plot2[1](plot2[1],"Zero Line",red);

plot2(plot2,"Zero Line",red); end; end;

This was poster by a really nice doctor.

I could use some help converting a long strategy from this into a short strategy. It is awesome.

 

Trade with the trend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.