Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

gifropan

Does Traditional Trading Advice Work?

Recommended Posts

Certainly I will concede that there is a difference between a trend and a trend trading system. My focus is on the latter, and my statement to be more precise is that the common trend trading systems (MAX, MACD, B/out) do not yield positive returns on daily equity index data.

 

I also agree that you can with optimization find positive results- simply reversing slow and fast variables in MACD will do it, but that is hardly trend-trading..

 

I'm catching a flight now to a conference (not trading) and won't be able to respond further until Monday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
..... my statement to be more precise is that the common trend trading systems (MAX, MACD, B/out) do not yield positive returns on daily equity index data.

 

Now that I will likely agree with, the key word being "system".

 

Beginners attracted to this thread should understand that practically any idea -- whether rocket science, not rocket science, or downright harebrained -- can be made to appear profitable, whether by accident or by design, in a backtest. A more meaningful test is a properly-conducted forward test. And the most meaningful of all is a real-time test, preferably with real money.

 

Belief or the absence thereof is not pertinent. The account balance is the final arbiter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now that I will likely agree with, the key word being "system".

 

Beginners attracted to this thread should understand that practically any idea -- whether rocket science, not rocket science, or downright harebrained -- can be made to appear profitable, whether by accident or by design, in a backtest. A more meaningful test is a properly-conducted forward test. And the most meaningful of all is a real-time test, preferably with real money

 

Yes , the forward test proves the results and it is not easy to follow, but I disagree again with the notion " can be made to appear profitable". That is not what I do. I put in not only time but effort and it costs money as well. Because the data does not work on a daily timeframe doesn't mean the idea / strategy is not profitable. One has to find what is . One has to look. One does not make it profitable, one just has to test it. Otherwise how the hell would one know whether they are on the right track or not. I"ll leave you's alone now..........

good trading to you's

 

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Remember to keep an open mind and try all timeframes and different combination of ma's.

 

erie

 

Some would argue that is curve fitting. :D All mechanical systems are prone to stop working. Some even start again. Some would also argue it requires quite a lot of skill and discretion to keep a system running well.

 

Personally if I was going to approach something like this I'd be inclined to take something that is more based on market structure as a starting point. Maybe a Donchian channel or something....hmm that sounds familiar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is one of my trades from yesterday, long SWN.

 

I put MACD on the chart. MACD would have had you in then out then in then out, rather than rising the trend until the market reversed.

 

Profitable for brokers, not so much for traders.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70ee5cd2ca_6-11-2009SWN1.thumb.jpg.ade7ce2d76f3384bb4d1e371851c8862.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

I put MACD on the chart. MACD would have had you in then out then in then out, rather than rising the trend until the market reversed.

Profitable for brokers, not so much for traders.

Best Wishes,

Thales

 

 

MACD is an Oscillator.

 

An Oscillator is never meant to be used by itself.

 

An Oscillator is always used as a complement to another indicator,

e.g. a Trend indicator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Some would argue that is curve fitting.

 

Which is not necessarily intentional, which is why beginners so often go astray with this sort of testing.

 

If one is testing something, he has to do more than just "look". He has to do more than just "find what is". One has to do more than "just test it". Testing requires inputting data, which requires making choices. If the results are unsatisfactory, different choices are made and the testing begins again. And again. And again. Until one either quits or finds something that appears to be profitable.

 

Which is why backtesting can do no more than provide clues for further research. The sort of backtesting results posted earlier that demonstrate profit are meaningless, much less demonstrate that a moving average crossover system "works".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MACD is an Oscillator.

 

An Oscillator is never meant to be used by itself.

 

An Oscillator is always used as a complement to another indicator,

e.g. a Trend indicator.

 

 

I beg to differ, my Good Tams. I may not use indicators any longer but I studied and tried most of the common ones and a good number of the more obscure ones. In fact, I could fund several decent small starter accounts with the money I have spent on various software add ons etc. as I made my way through the 38 steps that DbPhoenix has posted here at TL.

 

MACD is certainly presented by Gerry Appel, its developer, as a trend indicator. In fact, chapter 8 of his Technical Analysis is entitled, "Advanced Moving Average Convergence-Divergence(MACD): The Ultimate market Timing Indicator." He argues that across multiple time frames, from monthly to intraday, MACD can be applied in the analysis of market trends, "frequently capable of producing precise entry and exit signals" (Appel, p. 165).

 

He also suggests that while MACD "oscillates" above and below a zero line, that it is not best to utilize it as an overbought/oversold indicator, but that its real value is in its ability to "use divergence to recognize the most reliable signals" (Appel, p. 171). Since divergence accompanies the most reliable signals, then that in and of itself would bring into question the indicators use as an overbought/oversold indicator. Think of it this way: the signal would occur when the indicator is less, rather than more overbought/oversold, but at a price level higher/lower than the most extreme reading. In other words, using MACD as an ob/os oscillator could prove hazardous to you equity.

 

Furthermore, MACD is constructed of moving averages. Moving averages are themselves trend indicators and not indicators of overbought or oversold conditions.

 

Also, the origin of this part of the discussion in this thread was a claim that trend trading "doesn't work," i.e. it is not profitable, and the example used was a system based upon trading MACD signals.

 

So, while I have the greatest respect for you, Good Tams, I must nonetheless respectfuly disagree with your characterization of MACD as an oscilator and not a trend indicator, as well as your suggestion that MACD needs yest another iindicator to, I imagine you would say, "filter" the signals.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Edited by thalestrader
spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

May I address you Good Thales? ;-)>

 

 

You are correct in ALL counts.

(and thank you for the references.)

 

 

MACD does show trend.

 

I call MACD an oscillator because it varies around an equilibrium point.

Calling MACD an oscillator does not mean to say that it does not show trend, nor not trend related.

 

At the same token, not all oscillator must show OB/OS.

 

 

A bounded oscillator may deem OB/OS when it is at its boundaries, when complemented with a trend indicator.

 

I would not suggest interpreting a boundless oscillator (e.g. MACD) the same way as a bound oscillator.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Until you are making decisions from your own experience and not trite sayings you won't be able to trade profitably. How do you get to that point? Putting in your time making real time trades and taking your lump$!!!!!!! Just view it as paying your tuition. Play small until you can start to define who you are. Your way won't be my way grasshopper! One thing I can state with certainty is that you can not win at this until you conquer your emotions and you must trade real money real time for quite a while to discover how to accomplish that. Good luck and remember always lick your wounds and summon the courage to face tomorrow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a quibble with the "learn from your experience" school of trading.

 

1. Methods that work for a beginning trader in the short-term may very well not work longer term. Almost every good system has losing months. Almost every bad system has winning months. My point here is that you cannot trust short term personal experience.

 

2. There are good methods. Some have been shared. Find them. Following them may very well lead to better results than personal experience. In addition, trying to adapt them and improve them will often be a better use of time than looking at your own trades.

 

3. I favor the "scientific" school. Learn the pitfalls of testing- there are some good books and articles on this. But then test. Use multiple systems. Keep detailed records. Trade scientifically. Retire young.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with anything windsurfer says. I should have qualified my remarks by saying experience comes after and during constant study and testing. There is no need to try and reinvent the wheel but we cannot underestimate the human factor in trading. I feel that our human tendencies can be our greatest impediment and until you feel and learn how to control them you will be in for a difficult time. Was it Kipling who said "if you can keep your head while all the other traders are losing theirs you will make alot of money my son.." or something like that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In a more practical vein let me share today's rather unpleasant lessons. I have been having some success in the last several weeks by fading moves to either pivot points or the support/resistance lines that develope during the day when accompanied by a divergence in or extreme reading in the tick. Very few held and twice they broke down so quickly that the trade cost me more than I had expected. Are we entering a downtrend where this method won't be profitable for awhile, at least at support levels?Should I only take them at resistance. Just giving you a glimpse into the workings of a fledgling trader's brain? Hope it helps and if anyone has the answers to "life's most persistent questions" I'm all ears.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Was it Kipling who said "if you can keep your head while all the other traders are losing theirs you will make alot of money my son.." or something like that

 

Or, as some have suggested, "if you can keep your head whilst all the other traders are losing theirs, you have no idea what's going on." :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In a more practical vein let me share today's rather unpleasant lessons. I have been having some success in the last several weeks by fading moves to either pivot points or the support/resistance lines that develope during the day when accompanied by a divergence in or extreme reading in the tick. Very few held and twice they broke down so quickly that the trade cost me more than I had expected. Are we entering a downtrend where this method won't be profitable for awhile, at least at support levels?Should I only take them at resistance. Just giving you a glimpse into the workings of a fledgling trader's brain? Hope it helps and if anyone has the answers to "life's most persistent questions" I'm all ears.

 

It sounds like a good system. I wouldn't try to guess long or short as long as you're not fighting the trend of the day. Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys i feel these tradional things dont work.coz they tell contradictorythings for eg:

1)let your porfits run.

2)you dont lose ur shirt booking profits.:doh:

how can be both true.

if these things worked then 95% traders wont be losers.

the only way is to develop a mechanical system and follow it strictly.

i dont think u can make money provided u are required to take decisions during trading hours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rajatheroyal

 

I don't understand your statement; both can't work because i don't understand the u shirt statement.

 

but 95% of traders fail because the don't have the discipline to follow their plans or they don't have the skill to put together a good plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi guys i feel these tradional things dont work.coz they tell contradictorythings for eg:

1)let your porfits run.

2)you dont lose ur shirt booking profits.:doh:

how can be both true.

if these things worked then 95% traders wont be losers.

the only way is to develop a mechanical system and follow it strictly.

i dont think u can make money provided u are required to take decisions during trading hours.

 

raja,

 

They can both be true - because market truisms are system specific (and this applies across 'discretionary', 'mechanical', and 'automated' systems btw)

 

Some systems you got to stay in or be ultimately doomed

Some systems you got to get out quickly or be ultimately doomed.

Some systems you got to do both - making each of the opposing truisms true to its proportionate degree for the particular system.

 

The spouters of truisms usually just spew them out without qualifying the type of system it applies to - omitting or not realizing that their truism is not general but instead is very system specific.

 

Most traders who never followed automation to near its limits never realize how far their exit strategies are off from optimal... ie how they are based on truisms and / or on neurological comfort zones, etc...

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zdo

 

I think you get it. I said it like this at my website; trading-seminar.com

 

Why No Specific Plans Here?

 

Plans are all personalized. What works for me would not fit your personality. Example; I'm don't have patience, so I day trade, waiting for grass to grow and watching trades go negative for a day or two just does not work for me.

You have to understand the plan too well. You can only get that from doing it yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
raja,

 

They can both be true - because market truisms are system specific (and this applies across 'discretionary', 'mechanical', and 'automated' systems btw)

 

Some systems you got to stay in or be ultimately doomed

Some systems you got to get out quickly or be ultimately doomed.

Some systems you got to do both - making each of the opposing truisms true to its proportionate degree for the particular system.

 

The spouters of truisms usually just spew them out without qualifying the type of system it applies to - omitting or not realizing that their truism is not general but instead is very system specific.

 

Most traders who never followed automation to near its limits never realize how far their exit strategies are off from optimal... ie how they are based on truisms and / or on neurological comfort zones, etc...

 

zdo

 

Yes sir what u said is absolutely correct when u say about systems coz anybody who has a good system will survive but many many discretionary traders dont even have a system.

They completely trade on discretion some time they book profit taking in mind " you dont lose ur shirt rule"(when time is to stick with ur positions) some times they " let their profits run(when its actually time to book the profits) so i told that it wont work for them.

For those who follow systems,they dont even have to care about these these traditonal trading advices.

for example they say never trade against the trend

then what are mean reversion systems for ?

Edited by rajatheroyal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to build your rules ONE AT A TIME, and then stick to them.

 

For instance for my long trades, I use rules like these:

 

Average Daily Trade Range % (14) > 5 [means the stock moves at least 5% a day]

Current Price is at least 5% < yesterday's close price [means only buy after a 5% drop]

Current Price > 20 Day Simple Moving Averge [means it is still in a long-term uptrend.

 

I simply get more winners than losers and make at least 5% on every trade.

Keep it simple and ALWAYS stick to your rules!

 

On another note, Beware of fund managers doing window dressing for the next few days as we approach the end of the month!

 

Don't get caught too Long when the market tumbles!

 

I don't believe this run-up is real for a second.

 

I've changed my automated traders to not be in more than 5 long and 5 short positions at any time.

 

Keith

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Goodbye mutual funds Hello CoolTrade Robotic Traders

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.