Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Futures I Trade Show & Brooks Book

Recommended Posts

Guest Maletor

That's something I've thought about.

 

Usually they become obvious after the fact and obviously there is no way to tell if the best trade of the day is still to come.

 

I just quantify it by three criteria:

 

how many unique things it has going for it

how dependable each of those things are independently

and how close the setup is to "perfect"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry for asking this here, but it's partly connected to what Brooks says in the book.

 

I trade currencies live, but I'm also demo trading the ES at the moment. What I'm interested in, is swing trading the SPY on 15m+ timeframes, using some of Brooks methods.

 

Could someone please outline what is needed to trade the SPY. I am almost certain to go with IB as the broker, but am unsure if I'll actually be allowed to trade the SPY.

 

Also, is it possible to get a demo feed of the SPY on any charts.

 

Thanks.

 

The pattern day trading rule may be an issue with trading the SPY on a 15m chart if you have a balance less than $25,000. Not sure since I don't trade equities.

You can get a demo from any broker, but most if not all are for 30 days only. The best way around is to open a live account with a broker. Most brokers will give you an indefinite demo account if you have a funded account with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The pattern day trading rule may be an issue with trading the SPY on a 15m chart if you have a balance less than $25,000. Not sure since I don't trade equities.

You can get a demo from any broker, but most if not all are for 30 days only. The best way around is to open a live account with a broker. Most brokers will give you an indefinite demo account if you have a funded account with them.

 

If I recall, a friend of mine had a live demo account with TOS for like 6 months before he ever funded the account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
........ What I'm interested in, is swing trading the SPY on 15m+ timeframes, using some of Brooks methods.

 

Could someone please outline what is needed to trade the SPY. I am almost certain to go with IB as the broker, but am unsure if I'll actually be allowed to trade the SPY.

 

Also, is it possible to get a demo feed of the SPY on any charts.

 

Thanks.

 

Yes , I think mutiple day swings are great way to start and you can even practice live trading using Brook's methods with 1 to 50 shares as Wycoff suggested. You can get into options (with 75 - 80 delta) later as you gain confidence for directional plays. Although I study ,observe and utilize the SPY chart, I don't trade it, too expensive. Here is a list of Ultra and Ultra Inverse (when market slides can buy Inverse shares) index related ETFs. You can check them out for free at FreeStockCharts.com - Web's Best Streaming Realtime Stock Charts - Free.

Leveraged_InverseETFs.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Has anyone figured out how to quantify what the 'best trades' are each day?

 

By that I don't mean setup 1 vs. setup 2 or something, just if you were trying to explain to someone to pick the very best trades throughout the day, how would you do it?

 

I mean wether it be something having to do with how we opened, or using a S/R level somewhere, or whatever criteria you wish?

 

To me the best trades happen, first of all, when the bars are moving vertically rather than horizontally. I avoid all barb wire and tight trading ranges since I know I'm not good enough, at least yet, to trade them. A clear two legged pullback in a strong trend is number one. The second leg of an expected two leg move after a pattern such as a wedge, flag, trendline break, trend channel overshoot, etc. would be number two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Has anyone figured out how to quantify what the 'best trades' are each day?

 

By that I don't mean setup 1 vs. setup 2 or something, just if you were trying to explain to someone to pick the very best trades throughout the day, how would you do it?

 

I mean wether it be something having to do with how we opened, or using a S/R level somewhere, or whatever criteria you wish?

 

 

 

Brooks specifically discusses this. He says it's not possible to select and be a winner as you will pick more bad cherries than good ones. Also - that is why he trades the 5M chart ... it has fewer trades on it, so less chance of overtrading. Finally, implicit in his method is to trade LARGE size and after you're up your goal STOP trading.

 

His pint is - it's better/easier to get 1 point with 100 contracts and make $5000 than it is to tray to make $5000 getting 10 points with 10 contracts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Today's trades : Bar#4 Mtl Fbo Long P/L +4, Bar# 12 Bull Trap Short P/L+4,Bar's#15,16 and 17 Bull/Bear Trap Long P/L+4....:)

 

Why didn't you take the second bull trap short at bar 15?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Maletor

Here is today's chart.

 

Afternoon trading has been abysmal as of late.

 

1 - Huge gap open with a huge bar. Going long felt like buying a top and indeed it came back to 1 tick of my MM stop. In the end worked up to +4

 

2 - Took the outside bar short thinking there were trapped longs on the H2. and it was the technical L2 from HOD. I should have taken the L2 that was after the green bar which was the real second leg down after the trend line break.

 

Was this entry 80% probable?

 

3 - Took long on breakout pullback from the mornings triangle and a 2 bar double top, moved top up, got stopped out and

 

4 - reversed like a buffoon. Quit for the day.

5aa70f051996e_Picture1(2).thumb.png.f1d0f799d9a91cc491e2ea640ac63559.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is today's chart.

 

Going long felt like buying a top and indeed it came back to 1 tick of my MM stop.

Maletor, thanks for posting your charts and more importantly your explanations. Simple question on your 1st trade above - what does MM mean? Didn't see it in Al Brooks' book, have never seen that particular abbreviation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is today's chart.

 

moved top up, got stopped out

 

Still working on that one myself. It seems like the ES loves to go back and hunt for stops. Many times you get 3-4 ticks and then it tests not only the entry price but the signal price and even one tick beyond before giving you the needed 5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is today's chart.

 

Afternoon trading has been abysmal as of late.

 

1 - Huge gap open with a huge bar. Going long felt like buying a top and indeed it came back to 1 tick of my MM stop. In the end worked up to +4

 

2 - Took the outside bar short thinking there were trapped longs on the H2. and it was the technical L2 from HOD. I should have taken the L2 that was after the green bar which was the real second leg down after the trend line break.

 

Was this entry 80% probable?

 

3 - Took long on breakout pullback from the mornings triangle and a 2 bar double top, moved top up, got stopped out and

 

4 - reversed like a buffoon. Quit for the day.

 

 

Nice trades, I still think that the highest probability trades for the day were the inside doji bar 8 setup bar and bar #9 short entry.

Also, bar #12 short, bar #4 long, and counting backwards bar #14 short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's interesting that your traps at bar 4 and 12 were also "implied" H1 and L1 pullbacks, where the single countertrend candles may have been more clearly identified as pullbacks on a faster chart.

 

Another thing I've noticed is that EMA gap plays will sometimes show up on a daily 8:30 to 3:15 chart, but they won't show up on a 24 hour chart in the first hour and forty minutes of trading.

 

For example, the gap pullback 2nd attempt at bar 16. This isn't on a chart that plots 24 hours since the EMA actually plots differently for the first 20 5-minute periods of the regular session. It's one of my favorites.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had this closed out at 94.20 earlier this morning, which I set last night, for +43.

 

What I'm finding from the book, is that I'm more comfortable with setups that I already could in part, see myself before reading the book. Brooks has just clarified the situation and gave me confidence to trade what I see.

 

I'm still looking at his other observations, but for now I'm concentrating on these trendline breaks and pullbacks. The target was where I thought price might stall, at the beginning of the move down yesterday. It's actually gone higher now, but I'm still happy with the result. Other pairs had the same pattern, and I should have actually went with GBP/USD instead.

 

It also highlights something he mentions in the book. The last push down appears to be a fake head and shoulders break. The line across the bottom is where I see the pattern (you can't see the left shoulder on the attached chart).

yen.gif.c525258c2ed092af0ed68610006e77a5.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maletor, thanks for posting your charts and more importantly your explanations. Simple question on your 1st trade above - what does MM mean? Didn't see it in Al Brooks' book, have never seen that particular abbreviation.

 

I am sure he means his Money Management stop. (ie trailing his stop up after netting 4 ticks)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Difficult morning for me. Of course in hindsight it's obvious, just jump in after the break of the opening bar high. Problems were many:

  • the gap was small, only 1.50 pts, and to use Al Brooks' term the market was anything but "overdone"
  • there was over 2 hrs of congestion in that general area from the previous afternoon, and as Al said on pg.305 regarding one of his examples where the market gapped down huge (which is theoretically better), formed an opening bear-trend bar, and yet he didn't short below it: "A short based on the bear trend bar would be risky, since it is in the area of the trading range of the final hour of the day before."
  • a buy above the opening bar with a stop below it would've meant a 2.75pt stop if hit. While not excessive that's a bit steeper than I like to risk, especially with the other problems of the trade listed above
  • on the 9:50 bar the market stalled, formed a bear-trend bar (or largish-bodied doji) and I considered a buy above it. But to that point there had been no big trend bars clearly pointing the way, and serious resistance was right overhead. Entry would've been 955.50 and yesterday's high was 956.75.
  • nice pullback at 10:20/10:25 and in hindsight should've bought above the 10:25 bar. But in realtime I didn't because we had just completed 3 clear legs up and I didn't want to bet on a 4th leg.
  • another nice pullback at 10:40-10:50 which, in hindsight, I should've bought above the 10:50 bar. But this time I would've been betting on a 5th leg. Obviously it worked. Also the 6th leg worked too. Go figure.

 

I did play the 1st pullback to the EMA, but unlike the overwhelming majority of trend days that close at/near their high this one sold off and I was lucky to make 5 ticks.

 

BTW, bakrob99, thanks for the tip re: MM being Money Management. Never heard that one before. Have, of course, heard of break-even (BE) stops, and trailing stops, but never money management stops! Good to know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The gap really didn't matter. We had a failed wedge yesterday up to the high and made two legs down. The upswing at the EOD was just the beginning out of the second leg and this morning was a continuation. The first bar was a strong bar and any trade on either side of a strong trend bar is a good trade.

 

On the 9:50 bar, the market pulled back after all bull bars. This was an inside bar and a low risk long trade, we were only on our first leg up right now and I expected a minimum of two. From here the rally took off. Every pullback after this took off and not a single swing trade was stopped out. The highest risk trade was at the 10:05 pullback as this was 3.75 pts but it still worked. Either way, you could have swung from the previous entry and all would have been good.

 

Bottom line, strong swings like this are far and few and when they show up you should be buying every H1, H2 that you encounter.

 

Between scalps and swings on the morning session there were almost 25 pts to be made and if you refer to all the with trend examples in the book, I don't think that it gets much better then what we saw on the tape today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lessons from Thursday for me. You can look at Wednesday from 10:40 (NY time) on as a big bull flag so buying the first bar bull breakout Thursday was a logical trade. You needed the full 2 point stop but the trade did work. That huge 9:55 bar was apparently a very short term climax and that is why there was such a big pullback before the trend resumed. Situations like that require a bigger stop or waiting for another setup. The rest of the day just required a suspension of disbelief in the trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got the Brooks book yesterday, reading it intently after having gone through this forum and the presentations he's already done.

 

Guys, I have to tell you, risking 4-6 ES ticks to scalp 4 ticks (most of the time) is not my thing because I'm a 2-contract ES player and that's why I feel that if f I'm going to risk 4-6 ticks, then I want 6+ ticks to risk 4 and 12+ ticks to risk 6 on an all-in / all-out basis.

 

Brooks spends an entire book talking about breakouts from 5 min bar ranges based on stop orders a tick outside the range. And this is fine. I think there's a lot of great value in what he's saying. To know what he knows I think can only enhance my trading and understanding of how price action works.

 

But...he's only detailing 1/2 of all good trades. That is, you've got many ranges, built up by horizontal support and resistance which, if not violated by 4-5 ES ticks, will reverse back into the current range for MORE than 4 ticks on average.

 

What you gain in ticks, you lose in winning pct. just as the inverse is true for how Brooks trades.

 

I'm posting this as something to think about as you read (like I) all of this heavy duty analysis of bar-by-bar price action stuff that appears quite complex in real-time to pull off.

 

Now, what's not hard to do in real-time is to buy double/triple bottom and sell double/triple top breakout attempts with a limit order with a 5-6 tick stop. Support and resistance is certainly a subjective matter as well, but *I think* one can come up with some reasonable rules to establish areas which should not be violated by 5-6 ticks in order to hold the S/R and shoot back into the current range (which could consist of multiple "5-min range bars"). I'm also willing to bet that you could get good enough at it, in time, on a 5-min ES chart to nail the turns with a 3-4 tick stop-loss.

 

Here's the kind of thing I'm talking about in a picture of this morning's pre-market on a 5 min 24-hour session chart.

 

I'm using Brooks book to understand how he thinks for breakouts so I can see that other side of the market which he only uses as confirmation stages and come up with 50-55% odds of the breakouts failing and getting 2x the reward for the risk. Emotionally, it's just too tough for me to have to maintain a 70% winning pct. to be successful at scalping. If I fell below 60% winning pct, I won't make it and that would hit me pretty hard emotionally.

 

I've been at this since 2003 and I'm coming to the conclusion that, for me, I'd rather start off knowing that I only have a coin flip's chance of a winning trade, but...that winning trade should pay off for 1.8x to 2x greater than what I'm willing to risk.

 

Anyway, I won't talk about this anymore in this group because it is not my intention to hijack this thread, only to tell you where I'm coming from in reading his book.

5aa70f05f01dd_Anti-Brookspatterns.thumb.PNG.fbfa18df5f1190b4f4daec7957d9aa53.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The first bar was a strong bar and any trade on either side of a strong trend bar is a good trade.

 

On the 9:50 bar, the market pulled back after all bull bars. This was an inside bar and a low risk long trade, we were only on our first leg up right now and I expected a minimum of two.

A couple of problems here. This morning our opening bar was a strong trend bar. Got long on its break at 969.75, and had a choice of a humongous 3.75pt stop (just below the bottom of the bar) or Al Brooks' more commonly recommended 2pt stop. Market went down to exactly 967.75 and immediately stopped me out for a 2pt loss. Then it reversed up. Did I get back in after just losing 2pts? No. Why should I trust it now to the upside after it just made a big bear-trend bar? Realtime and after-the-fact are so different.

 

As to yesterday after the 9:50 pullback, the problem there was you would be entering on the 9:55 bar immediately before the market-moving 10:00am gov't report (Existing Home Sales). That's always risky as there is often wild fluctuations with those reports. Yesterday it would have worked just fine. Again, realtime and after-the-fact are so different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got the book and finally browsed through it. He has a very idiosyncratic lexicon, but it’s obvious he has put in his 10,000 hours…

 

His micro trendline work reminded me of some scalping system development work I did a while back that is functionally similar but isn’t based on ‘other side’ micro TL’s (see attached – shorts only showing on a 1 minute EJ from early this morning) …

 

Was just wondering if anyone has coded up any of his techniques ??

LooksLikeBrooksButItsNot.thumb.jpg.b1ceb6c899290867a2df293338988beb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.