Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

I am currently working in honing my context definition skills:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34107&stc=1&d=1358518401

 

I am using the 15m and the 60 m charts as DB suggested but I am having difficulty getting a convincing definition to use as a base for decision making.

 

What i see is current weakness after the failed BO at the top of the current TR.

 

But the 60 minute tells me that right now we are approaching an important level (28-34) and still within the context of an uptrend towards the top of the TR.

 

This could either mark the continuation of the down move all the way to the bottom of the TR at 05 or a reversal at the MP of the TR towards the top.

 

Any suggestions?

 

P.S. In the 15 min chart SDS means Stronger Down Swing

context.thumb.png.61f280d33933d2cefe7a893a7e201dc7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am currently working in honing my context definition skills:

 

I am using the 15m and the 60 m charts as DB suggested but I am having difficulty getting a convincing definition to use as a base for decision making.

 

What i see is current weakness after the failed BO at the top of the current TR.

 

But the 60 minute tells me that right now we are approaching an important level (28-34) and still within the context of an uptrend towards the top of the TR.

 

This could either mark the continuation of the down move all the way to the bottom of the TR at 05 or a reversal at the MP of the TR towards the top.

 

Any suggestions?

 

Perhaps you're paying too much attention to levels and lines and too little to what traders are doing. The ZigZag in particular is most likely a bad idea in that the point of keeping an eye on the waves is to provide you with a greater sensitivity to the flow, i.e., who's in control. To reach that you needn't draw anything. You can tell by the way the movements look whether buyers or sellers are in control or traders are just "keeping busy" waiting for something to prompt them to act.

 

The range here is 50 to 00. If you didn't short 50, then you're faced either with surfing or with waiting until you see something actionable that you recognize, such as that hinge that formed between 0930 and 1030 this morning. I suggest you get rid of all the lines and zones and so forth and back up to focusing on price movement. If you can't be there to trade the extremes and you don't want to surf and you don't see anything that screams Trade Me, then I suggest you do nothing. The opportunities will come. Your primary task is to stay awake so that you can take advantage of them when they do.

 

Otherwise, when does your trading session begin? end?

 

Are you in front of the screen throughout your trading session?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The range here is 50 to 00. If you didn't short 50, then you're faced either with surfing or with waiting until you see something actionable that you recognize, such as that hinge that formed between 0930 and 1030 this morning. I suggest you get rid of all the lines and zones and so forth and back up to focusing on price movement. If you can't be there to trade the extremes and you don't want to surf and you don't see anything that screams Trade Me, then I suggest you do nothing. The opportunities will come. Your primary task is to stay awake so that you can take advantage of them when they do.

 

 

Db, as always thanks. I am trading intraday only, and not holding positions after the end of the trading session (11:00 in my case) so I can only take advantage of what happens between the open and the end of the session, so essentially I have to surf for the time being. My plans for the future are to start taking longer term trades, but that will have to wait until I am proficient with intraday.

 

The problem I think am having is that when I actually reach a mayor S/R level during my session, I trade it as a minor S/R and end up with a 10 point trade at best, when I could get 50 points if I just sit on my hands.

 

Will give that a thought to see what solution I can come up with.

 

Now, regarding that hinge you mentioned, I did not see it as I was focused on the hinges found on the 30 tick chart (looking at the trees again) but I think I would have not trade that hinge as the short entry was too close to my S level at 30.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34119&stc=1&d=1358529522

 

Anyway, thanks for your comments I will take them into account.

5aa711a418895_NQ03-13(1Min)18_01_2013.thumb.jpg.c87dd3b0119ca5f383395f5208a30610.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now, regarding that hinge you mentioned, I did not see it as I was focused on the hinges found on the 30 tick chart (looking at the trees again) but I think I would have not trade that hinge as the short entry was too close to my S level at 30.

 

Which brings us back to your lines. First, support is only support if it provides support. Price has crossed back and forth over 30 repeatedly for two weeks. But even so, if you had taken the short and been stopped out by a rally off 30, what's the worst that could have happened? While you're waiting for opportunities that are in your forecasts, you're ignoring those that are being presented to you in the moment. Forecasts are possibilities, even probabilities. What's in front of you is a certainty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Db, I am a little lost then.

 

The TIF levels are traced according to past TRs, some of these TRs are old and the S/R levels found through them have been crossed, anyhow, when watching PA around those levels one can see a change in pace in the tick chart and usually around those levels I have been able to find interesting setups (hinges, DB, LH, HL, etc)

 

What I understand from what you are writing is that I have to find S/R in RT via PA (Without tracing lines), and then check the history to see if that level corresponds to an extreme or MP of a BOX?

 

Now, I understand that we are in the middle of a TR between 0 an 50, but within that large TR, there are smaller TRs and S/R levels, so how does one take this levels into account in RT, or one should not pay attention to those minor levels and focus on PA to define current S/R levels in order to surf.

 

Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not suggesting that you have to do anything. However, based on your recent posts, you do seem to be in the weeds, which is a place in which we all find ourselves now and then. By focusing on what might happen and where it might happen and when it might happen with regard to multiple levels of potential support and resistance, you're not focusing on what's happening in front of you. You're looking to the future rather than the present.

 

Therefore, if I have anything to suggest, it is that you forget about support and resistance for a while and insinuate yourself into the rhythm of the movement. Are buyers or sellers in charge? For how long? To what extent? If the minor TRs and S/R levels are so minor that they yield little more than ticks, why bother with them? Either surf price or wait for more substantial opportunities.

 

Remember that tiny patterns and tiny movements yield tiny profits, if any. Unless you're trading commission-free, the trades just aren't worth it.

 

We can't always know in advance what we're going to do. There is a TR here between 00+/- and 50. Traders seem to find 30 an attractive level for trading. Beyond that, you may just have to wait until you're ready to open up your screen and wait for whatever opportunities present themselves.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Copper has formed a hinge over the last few months and it looks like it will soon be exiting it.

I am opening the thread to discuss how this develops and how one might trade it:

 

We can anticipate an explosive move from this price compression but we don't know if it will take place to the upside or to the downside. Above price we have resistance at 4.55 and below price there is support at 2.8

 

Just because the lines are drawn, doesn't mean they are used as targets, much less for reversing a position, but it is useful to monitor traders behavior if/when they approach the level.

 

I read somewhere in the Wyckoff forum, than hinge breakouts should take place two thirds of the distance between the base and the apex, if not, it will most likely lead to choppy range. Breakout or not, this week we should have a resolution.

Copper.png.1999cdad7035970ff470cb9857378ea6.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Db, regarding this Oil hinge, which line do you take into consideration for the breakout, the solid or the dotted? Or do you just wait for the expansion in volume?

 

Any further material upside progress will lead to an upside breakout of the dashed hinge tomorrow.

Oil.png.08be4a4e960eab0016abb04d2a50fecb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-

 

The bottom of what has acted as a trading range appears to have altered its trajectory. This makes trading support a greater challenge. Therefore, I suggest that, barring a breakout from the top of the range, the trader focus on intraday springboards, whether lateral or triangular, such as the hinge shown in the second chart down. If he prefers and has the skill and psychological fitness, he can also choose to surf (see Trading in 90m).

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34167&stc=1&d=1358778398

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34168&stc=1&d=1358778395

nqd.png.1d6d2d82b1f6c767d43ed35dce788011.png

nq1.png.fa18ed53bb0028045f1f7164ac4a8720.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi db

I actually meant your state of mind while trading , like peak performance

Flow state or trading in the zone . Do you experience such a state of mind

While trading ?

 

Thnx

 

No. More like follow the yellow brick road. It's much more difficult if one is trying to follow "the book" and DOM and indicators and so forth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Db,

 

Many thanks to you and all the others who have contributed to this thread. I only came across it yesterday and so far have managed to read upto page 43, but I thought I would put my two-pennies-worth into the mix.

 

From what I have read so far it appears as though the advice (to better understand the market's price action) is to have open a tick chart or (at the most) say a one minute time chart.

 

Speaking personally I have to say watching 'the tape' ie small timeframe charts not only tires me out but makes me dizzy. But more importantly I think concentrating on the market's tick by tick movement makes me lose sight of the 'bigger picture' which is the key question: is this market going up, or is it going down or is it range bound?

 

I absolutely believe that markets (sadly) do not follow a clear mathematical pathway -- if only they did, a trader's life would be a lot easier. But rather they move from one 'extreme' to the next 'extreme' and since markets are 'fractal' in nature these 'extremes' look different when the market is viewed in charts of differing timeframes.

 

On the ES, I tend to look at the 200,000 vol chart for the 'big picture' and the 100,000 and 25,000 vol charts for my trading. I find 'volume charts' brilliant for identifying market turns (or pivot points if you prefer) but something like the 15 minute or 30 minute chart to give a better perspective of 'speed' or 'market urgency' as it moves from the one extreme to the next. These 'market turns' I have highlighted on my charts with 'ellipses' and you will see that on the 25,000 vol chart there are more of these 'pivot points' than there are on the 100,000 or 200,000 vol charts.

 

Any chart, on any timeframe will show areas of 'congestion' (where a lot of 'to and fro' trading has taken place, within a relatively narrow price band). And often markets 're-visit' or 'retest' those areas before 'breaking out' beyond the 'congestion area'.

 

However until this 'breakout' takes place, those areas of congestion can and do act as 'regions' of potential support or resistance which means that they become price levels where you the trader has to make a call: be that an entry or an exit or a decision to remain on the side-lines.

 

Am I to be consigned to the 'dust-heap' because:

 

(a) I personally like a simple 10 period moving average on my charts?

 

(b) Or because I only look at charts that are usually never shorter than a 15 minute or a 25,000 vol chart?

 

© Or because I do look for 'patterns' (simple ones only) or trendlines (are they acting as support or resistance) or simple 1-2-3 reversals (in good old Dow Theory these were called 'swing failures') as denoting a possible change in the market's direction (or trend if you like)?

 

http://www.sierrachart.com/userimages/upload_2/1358864167971.png

 

http://www.sierrachart.com/userimages/upload_2/1358864305103.png

 

http://www.sierrachart.com/userimages/upload_2/1358864491737.png

 

Our current 'range' lies between ellipse 8 and 9. How we react at those levels will determine whether we break out of this narrow price band. We are presently drawing out on the 25,000 vol chart what appears to be a 'coil' (or triangle) how that pans out will determine what happens next

 

I look forward to comments.

 

Cheers,

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I look forward to comments.

 

Cheers,

 

David

 

I don't know that reading the thread is going to be of much if any benefit to you unless you've read the course, or at least the part of the course I've designated as Wyckoff Lite.

 

To begin with, the markets are not fractal (and trendlines don't act as support or resistance, but then neither do MAs). Beyond that, however, Wyckoff's approach is based on price movement. If one is focused on bars, whether they be tick bars or volume bars or price bars or whatever, then he is not focused on price movement. That's why a tick chart or a T&S display (with price, time, and volume only) is necessary to understand the context (a 1m chart can be used in a pinch if one is watching the price move in real time; otherwise, one is watching price move up and down within a bar, like a bird whistle). If one doesn't want to study price in this way, then he won't be successful with this approach.

 

It's easy to overlook the fact that there were no intraday bars until fairly recently. There were ticks. And the total of these tick movements from the open to the close made up a daily bar. If one understands how this bar was created and that it did not spring fully-formed from some sort of pod, he sees it differently and interprets it differently. If he doesn't, then it becomes just a bar, and candles and color-coding become reasonable, even though they have little to nothing to do with price movement.

 

If none of this makes any sense, I suggest you scroll back and look at the charts I posted yesterday. One of the most common problems I've found amongst traders, beginning and otherwise, is that they can't tell up from down. This is particularly true amongst those who focus on "order flow". If the trader can't tell up from down without the use of indicators or some other extraneous aid, then his profit potential will most likely be limited.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To begin with, the markets are not fractal (and trendlines don't act as support or resistance, but then neither do MAs). Beyond that, however, Wyckoff's approach is based on price movement. If one is focused on bars, whether they be tick bars or volume bars or price bars or whatever, then he is not focused on price movement. That's why a tick chart or a T&S display (with price, time, and volume only) is necessary to understand the context (a 1m chart can be used in a pinch if one is watching the price move in real time; otherwise, one is watching price move up and down within a bar, like a bird whistle). If one doesn't want to study price in this way, then he won't be successful with this approach.

 

Db,

 

I shall whilst we are on holiday in February (sunny Florida in place of cold and wet London) look at the Wyckoff course (or at least your 'lite' version).

 

I don't know what sort of intraday charting capability existed in Wyckoff's days ... was that why he needed to watch the 'tape' in order to get a 'feel' for the price action within the entire day? Point is today we are able to see that by means of the charting we all have access to.

 

Conceptually I find it difficult to comprehend how the way price 'winds' its way through the day on a tick by tick basis gives a swing trader a better idea of where the actual support and resistance levels make themselves felt.

 

But anyway let me revisit this forum after I have read more about Wyckoff and his methods.

 

It is coming up to 11:45 EST as I am writing and my 25,000 vol chart shows that we are still stuck within a rather narrow range (quiet before the coming storm, perhaps?) and now infact the 'minute range' is bounded by the purple horizontals I have drawen in on the attached chart.

 

http://www.sierrachart.com/userimages/upload_2/1358872977481.png

 

Cheers,

 

David

Edited by DbPhoenix
Correct formatting error

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It is coming up to 11:45 EST as I am writing and my 25,000 vol chart shows that we are still stuck within a rather narrow range (quiet before the coming storm, perhaps?) and now infact the 'minute range' is bounded by the purple horizontals I have drawen in on the attached chart.

 

 

It looks like a hinge.

Edited by DbPhoenix
Correct attribution

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
    • By millonmethod
      Hello everyone!
      I am an advanced trader, with many years of experience (about 15 years - 10 living exclusively from this)
      I am going to give you some tips that you must know:
      There are going to be many people who tell you that trade is easy, that with only crossiing a line  with another one you will win a lot of money.... and that´s not true.  No, Sir, reality is far away from that. Many people who start arrive here with the hope that someone "gives them" a free method, they watch youtube videos thinking that this will give them the "strategy" and in a few days they realize that it does not work for them - they lose money - and then They go looking for a new one ... and so on. YES, IT´S TRUE YOU EARN IN TRADING, A LOT. BUT THINK: for a few to win (10% + any BROKER) many others must lose (90% people). YOU MUST HAVE A MONEY MANAGMENT FORMULA ( you can email me) People study so many years to live on this, not because they are dumb, but to know what they do, when, and have absolute effectiveness. It´s very easy to get lost here: do not disperse, jumping from one to another strategy WILL NEVER give you money, it will only waste your time and make you nervous when trading. PEOPLE WHO CHANGE THEIR METHOD CONSTANTLY : LOOOOSE ALWAYS.   If you have the knowledge to develop it, take your time and do it.  Always try it first on DEMO for at least 2 weeks! If not: search to buy a solid strategy (no you tube videos pleassse ! Avoid losing money! ) This is like any business, it requires some capital to start (capital = money in the broker + solid made /purchased strategy) If you are lost: I RECOMMEND YOU NOT TO WASTE TIME IN YOUTUBE, JOIN PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCE AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO BUY A METHOD ... PLEASE !!!! DO NOT BUY 10 BAD AND CHEAP METHODS, SAVE MONEY AND BUY ONLY 1 BUT EXCLUSIVE AND MUST ALLWAYS HAVE SUPPORT !!!!!  Do not buy Signals! They never keep up with constant profits! One week will win and the next will lose. Nothing that does not depend absolutely on you will give you the money you are looking for. And if you do not have a strategy (made or purchased) do not even try PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: DO NOT USE REAL MONEY! AT LEAST 2 WEEK DEMO FREE HELP HERE!!!!!  IF YOU FOLLOW MY ADVICE YOU WILL BE PART OF THAT 10% WINNER, email me.
      Have a nice trading day
       
       
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.