Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Chart 1 : Daily

We have come back to the lower end of the Large Trading Range, having failed to take out the previous swing high.

I have marked a line in an area where price has touched several times. Price has also made excursions below this line - the purpose is to indicate a general area of interest, not necessarily a specific level.

 

 

Chart 2 : Overnight Session

We see price fell below previous day low (cyan line) before forming a range prior to the pit open.

The ON low is formed between 8.5800/8.6000 & there are a couple of slightly larger volume bars going into the low and coming out.. I didn't notice these on this chart in RT at the time of printing. Only later in day & may be (in)significant ?

 

Chart 3 : 15 Second

First trade: Long above red line. At this point we were still in the pre open range indicated on previous chart..Violation of my plan as I should have waited to see which which out of that range we moved.

Stopped for loss on break of demand line(mental, not drawn) and Lower Low.

Second trade : Short on break of minor consolidation. Stopped for loss on pullback (error printing chart)

 

Chart 4 : 15 Second

I've shown my long entry here, break above green line (printed as quick as I could in RT) but maybe the most interesting aspects are my thoughts/observations behind it in RT as opposed to the actual entry/exit,

 

- We are in a general area where there "may" be an attempt to provide support.

 

- The DOM : . Wheat generally has about 15 > 30 contracts shown at each level on the DOM.

As price was falling from 8.6350 I noticed about 150/200 contracts bid at 8.6000.Price initially bounced of 8.6025 (the bids stayed at 8.6000).

 

Price bounced, came back and filled the large bid. There was a a nice bounce before again coming to re-test the lows.

 

This time price went through, found more volume & then reversed

 

AFTER this reaction & we got back to the 8.6000 level there were still bids in the DOM of 120/130 contracts layered at 8.5975 / 8.5925 / 8.5875.

 

I don't know, or need to know the motives behind the bids - could be exiting previous shorts or opening new positions... We DO know that we are in a possible low of day / reversal area & that higher than average bids have already been filled in this area, and there are still unfilled bids for more. Also in approx area of ON low, where there was slightly higher volume ON as per chart 2 comments

 

- Following the "spring" off the low, we test the previous reaction high.

At this point I'm thinking how the person(s) who were bidding for a further 400 contracts at the lows is thinking...How bad do they want them...Does another point or two matter to them ?....Will they be given a 2nd opportunity at the low? ..Will they get aggressive ?

 

From the reaction high we consolidate briefly. .This makes me think as we havent (yet) retested lower. may move higher, but I have to wait for the market to show its handr.. Price takes out the previous 2 reaction highs = Long

 

Chart 5 : 20 change / complete day

This chart shows just shows where the above took place in relation to how the remainder of the day played out. The lines have been transposed from my 15 sec shown and dont show everything I was thinking, my movement SL/DL lines etc.

 

As Db recently mentioned, it depends how involved one wants to be , but there were further opportunities for those who wanted to hang around, add etc.

 

Cheers

5aa711517ce62_ZW3Oct2012.thumb.png.157614f39d55f458f672dc397f62dd40.png

5aa7115181613_ZW3Oct20122.png.8e9ea9c8fad0830f111d475d9ab90bbe.png

5aa7115185fcb_ZW3Oct20127.png.fec6c6a4c6588093cb3c260dc24af66c.png

5aa711518b361_ZW3Oct20129.png.dc4bef0db011345dbf4b656097112899.png

5aa71151910f5_ZW3Oct201212.thumb.png.9e6b9aff917cb40ee375c0e800cc7cb7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I rarely say so because most people who take this seriously figure it out on their own, but a thorough backtest ought to cover at least a year. The comfort level that a trader attains by having backtested all market conditions is impossible to reach any other way. August does not trade like November does not trade like March does not trade like June. A couple of weeks, needless to say, just doesn't cut it. Those who try to get away with the minimum end up changing their trading plans to accommodate every curve ball that the market throws their way. In a few months, they have a real mess on their hands, so many rules that they wind up unable to act at all.

 

A thoroughly-backtested trading plan will cover the vast majority of contingencies. The market can and will come up with completely unexpected behaviors, but the trader who has backtested a year's worth of contingencies will recognize the unexpected for what it is and either stand aside or try to make the best of it. He will not alter his trading plan to accommodate something that may never reoccur.

 

There is also the forward test, which too many beginners skip, thinking that RT trading is pretty much the same thing and will accomplish the same objective. It isn't and it doesn't. Those who skip it will experience far more failures in RT trading and end up having to rewrite their plans again and again, which they will likely do rather than go through the backtesting again, which is what they ought to do instead.

 

The process created in the first post was not created casually. Every step has its purpose. Those who take shortcuts will take far more time becoming a profitable trader -- if they ever do become a profitable trader -- than they would have had they gone through the process as outlined.

 

This is not directed toward anyone in particular. I don't know how extensive or thorough any of your backtests were. But I see a lot of re-examination of plans and even re-writing of same, and much of this may be unnecessary, unless of course the backtest was given short shrift. If that's the case, I suggest further backtesting, not re-writing plans every time the market comes up with something new and unanticipated.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

04.10.2012

 

Good Morning.

 

34 range – R @ 2807-2808 breached yesterday, R @ 2821 tested twice after a nice pullback (all this in pre-session today), overall there is an uptrend from the S @ 2778

21, 13 range – pre-session test of R, pullback and re-test are more clear, notice the LH…. and no major HH

 

144 Tick - a hinge is forming

 

 

Areas of interest

R @ 2821

 

Will try to play the hinge at the open.

 

If I notice LH and break of the pre-session TL I will be looking for shorts (taking into account the previous R we broke yesterday as a potential S)

If I notice HH and pre-session TL holds I will look for long (no visible R up to 2853 area)

I'll try to keep it simple and really avoid the R @ 2821 area today

 

Tomer.

5aa711524823f_NQ12-12(34Range)04_10_2012.thumb.jpg.917a6fdfaaf9d967efc8d4c9bb1ef706.jpg

5aa7115252cad_NQ12-12(21Range)04_10_2012.thumb.jpg.6ab47e1c23eb467bd74ec68b89c1515a.jpg

5aa711525d498_NQ12-12(13Range)04_10_2012.thumb.jpg.2a3b18cbfe528c1832d803748499e7cc.jpg

5aa711526641a_NQ12-12(144Tick)04_10_2012.thumb.jpg.b66fa5fba786d21ffdeb86f07f0d65a0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Important levels for today: 2826 and 2819 with midpoint at 2823.50.

Premarket levels of importance: 2816 and 2814.

2819 is a longer term S/R and price breached this level in premarket. I would expect market to test the upper range of the new mini s/r at 2826 if it has strength.

 

PDH: 2826

PDL: 2790

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=31798&stc=1&d=1349356773

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=31796&stc=1&d=1349356773

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=31797&stc=1&d=1349356773

 

Gringo

5aa711526c423_NQ100(Hourly)20121004090346.png.363f2aaf8e8c7a9c313197821664e8a5.png

5aa7115273acd_NQ100(5Minutes)20121004091220.png.7b46ee41dfa3999bb6a3c7af6164c69a.png

5aa7115279926_NQ100(5Hours)20121004090215.png.eff6f0b1b178a3a3b5c709d8811c2c4f.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have reverted to back testing. It is a tedious process but must be done properly to have consistent success. I had confused/mixed back testing with forward testing and forgotten the real purpose of both.

 

Even with a weak plan I have more or less stopped losing much in the RT. With proper back-testing and the kinks ironed out it doesn't seem too outrageous to believe consistent profitability might actually become a reality. I am getting far ahead of myself here. The grunt work lies ahead.

 

I am going to be active in the RT thread as the points raised there actually do help in identifying weaknesses and strengths. Still, I no long am paper-trading and only observing price behaviour.

 

Gringo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How could we tell? S/R tell us whether it's a RET or REV, but they are everywhere.

Gringo

 

Edit: The fact that price wasn't able to go up after 2812 to above 2816 tells it's not a REV but a RET?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some may not have traded that "REV" as a RET due to the proximity of R at 16. But that shouldn't stop you. The fact that price returned there suggests that the R wasn't as strong as supposed. So the proximity of it shouldn't stop the long trader from giving it a shot. If it doesn't work, go back into REV mode.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How could we tell? S/R tell us whether it's a RET or REV, but they are everywhere.

Gringo

 

Edit: The fact that price wasn't able to go up after 2812 to above 2816 tells it's not a REV but a RET?

 

No, the fact that it held at 10 then broke the SL at 14. Note how $ reacted at 10.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
    • By millonmethod
      Hello everyone!
      I am an advanced trader, with many years of experience (about 15 years - 10 living exclusively from this)
      I am going to give you some tips that you must know:
      There are going to be many people who tell you that trade is easy, that with only crossiing a line  with another one you will win a lot of money.... and that´s not true.  No, Sir, reality is far away from that. Many people who start arrive here with the hope that someone "gives them" a free method, they watch youtube videos thinking that this will give them the "strategy" and in a few days they realize that it does not work for them - they lose money - and then They go looking for a new one ... and so on. YES, IT´S TRUE YOU EARN IN TRADING, A LOT. BUT THINK: for a few to win (10% + any BROKER) many others must lose (90% people). YOU MUST HAVE A MONEY MANAGMENT FORMULA ( you can email me) People study so many years to live on this, not because they are dumb, but to know what they do, when, and have absolute effectiveness. It´s very easy to get lost here: do not disperse, jumping from one to another strategy WILL NEVER give you money, it will only waste your time and make you nervous when trading. PEOPLE WHO CHANGE THEIR METHOD CONSTANTLY : LOOOOSE ALWAYS.   If you have the knowledge to develop it, take your time and do it.  Always try it first on DEMO for at least 2 weeks! If not: search to buy a solid strategy (no you tube videos pleassse ! Avoid losing money! ) This is like any business, it requires some capital to start (capital = money in the broker + solid made /purchased strategy) If you are lost: I RECOMMEND YOU NOT TO WASTE TIME IN YOUTUBE, JOIN PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCE AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO BUY A METHOD ... PLEASE !!!! DO NOT BUY 10 BAD AND CHEAP METHODS, SAVE MONEY AND BUY ONLY 1 BUT EXCLUSIVE AND MUST ALLWAYS HAVE SUPPORT !!!!!  Do not buy Signals! They never keep up with constant profits! One week will win and the next will lose. Nothing that does not depend absolutely on you will give you the money you are looking for. And if you do not have a strategy (made or purchased) do not even try PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: DO NOT USE REAL MONEY! AT LEAST 2 WEEK DEMO FREE HELP HERE!!!!!  IF YOU FOLLOW MY ADVICE YOU WILL BE PART OF THAT 10% WINNER, email me.
      Have a nice trading day
       
       
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.