Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Db,

 

I couldn't recognize it even in hindsight until you mentioned it. It's not in my plan but I'll attempt to keep an eye on it for future induction.

 

It is one of the weirder set-ups. The end result is remarkable though.

 

Gringo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Db. Next time I will first use the search function :roll eyes::)

 

Won't do you any good. In this case, the word's too short. So this particular setup will be the Wyckoff Forum's little secret.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know if this is a wyckoff set up but it's a setup i've been playing with over the last week and seems to fit in with reversals.

 

It's a failed thrust, the opposite of a failed shakeout. You can Ctrl+F both in the course for more examples.

 

Your chart also includes the WTF entry just after 16:06 on your chart. Note the volume. The volume is essential to this particular setup.

 

BTW, re your notes on your chart, be careful of the "would have". This is how people get into curve-fitting and begin a long and slippery slope to ruin. You say you've been playing with it. Back- and forwardtest it. Maintain a record of stats. See what works and what doesn't. Then try it in real time. What looks good in hindsight doesn't always look so good in real time.

 

Db

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Db I seem to have made a mistake thinking that the WTF trade was the one I showed in my chart but I can see where it is now, I haven't been looking at volume at all, in fact when I pay attention to it it seems to cause more trouble than good. I only have it on the chart as I like how it makes the price chart stumpier.

 

I have been watching the 1 tick since you posted on the 90 minutes thread about not trading and just watching, it's true after a while it all becomes clearer.

 

edit:

I have just read your last comment, thanks for the heads up, I have been watching the 1 tick and making detailed notes on the 60-90 minutes while I watch in RT. After I have 4 weeks worth of recorded days, I am going to go over them thoroughly and see what I can see and what is worth using, I will then go back over and backtest all the days that I have tick data for, which should be 90 and see if I can see the same setups, after this I am going to test it all on sim.

 

I have just started doing it this way after 3 years of watching charts and not really having any structure to my trading and it's only since treating it like a full time job that things are starting to click.

Edited by blocp
more to add

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Db I seem to have made a mistake thinking that the WTF trade was the one I showed in my chart but I can see where it is now, I haven't been looking at volume at all, in fact when I pay attention to it it seems to cause more trouble than good. I only have it on the chart as I like how it makes the price chart stumpier.

 

I have been watching the 1 tick since you posted on the 90 minutes thread about not trading and just watching, it's true after a while it all becomes clearer.

 

That's okay; I understood what you meant. Fortunately, your chart shows both the failed thrust and the WTF, each with volume (which is useful now and then). A keeper.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw your add-on above. Sounds like a plan. However, if the 90 days are consecutive, keep in mind that whatever you learn may apply only to that timeframe. If your results are encouraging, select days at random from the past year once you have the tick data, whether by accumulation or by downloading it from somewhere (if there's a user forum for your feed/program/whatever, somebody there might have the data you need; it's just a matter of uploading the file to you). If the results still look promising, you can be more confident that the setup applies to all the annual cycles.

 

I've also altered your chart somewhat to show both your failed thrust and the WTF setup. This isn't the thread for it since these setups can't be seen in advance. But what the hell.

 

Db

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=31959&stc=1&d=1349980418

Image2.thumb.png.76f8dfe45881057cac823f13db912a46.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Db,

 

How does a failed thrust add value? Thrust is from TR meaning the failure takes the price potentially to the bottom of the TR, doesn't it? Why is it any different from a normal range BO failure?

 

Gringo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A recap on the Dow:

 

1- Yesterday it broke the DL that Gringo shows on his chart with decision.

 

2- The down bars are very wide and they close at the low, showing strong selling pressure and very little buying.

 

3- Price yesterday made a Lower Low, indicating the start of a potential down trend.

 

4- So Now we wait for the rally, and if it shows weakness, we have a LL, followed by a LH which is a downtrend, and a reason to go short. One could place a stop 13661, which is a double top.

 

Gringo, I know you mentioned 14000 as the longer term Resistance, but sellers are clearly asserting themselves right now, and there is no guarantee that price will ever test 14000.

 

I believe the 4 points above, plus the analyss of the wave strucure could lead to a nice short.

 

I look forward to reading other thoughts on this.

DOw.jpg.2eb3564bbede66e910ac0836bfb4acb1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the addition DB, I guess it all depends now on how price reacts at 13338, the S level you show on your chart.

 

Something else to add to the equation is the AD, which by the way shows a divergence. The Dow double topped, however, the AD line made a slightly Lower High.

 

So as I said in my previous post, I will wait for the rally. If the spread is narrow on the way up and price struggles, this would confirm the hypothesis that the strength balance has shifted from buyers to sellers, and one could go short, anticipating a LL that would confirm the beginning of the downtrend.

5aa71159a23e8_ADline.JPG.d1067b107af6f71d5e16d358c3397659.JPG

Edited by tupapa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here are my levels for today, i have noticed on the 10 minute chart that the 2723-27 area has been traded around over the last few days so maybe it might have some activity today. saying that price has strugled to get past 2721 so far.

10_12.2012-13_54_06.thumb.png.8874ee3ff0de39c83b07b2efcb01fd0f.png

10_12.2012-13_54_17.thumb.png.251bd0b1afe6cfbc8ac97db8af5a4f66.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In this msg http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/wyckoff-forum/13708-trading-journal-trading-log-3.html#post161709 you mentioned : "...I suggest that you're trying to apply the wrong strategy to the wrong instrument. If you're trying to trade RETs, REVs, and BOs, then whatever instrument you're trading ought to have at least some regard for S&R. This one has very little of that..." answering to a poster trying to trade rets and revs off S/R in Bund.

 

Regarding futures, are stock indexes more "respectful" with S/R and then more suitable to trade with a Wyckoff approach? What about currency futures? CL? Could you please elaborate on this and what futures do you think regard the most support and resistance levels?

 

In the same msg you also mention gaps as if they were problematic. Could you also please elaborate on this ?

 

Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is where testing comes in. Practically any setup will work if it's applied correctly to the right market. But there's no way of knowing whether or not you've got the right market to begin with if you don't test the setup (all of which is covered in the TBP thread). Support and resistance, for example, apply everywhere since they are functions of demand and supply. However, a given trader might find that the zones in a particular market or instrument are way too soft, that the stops required are much too wide, that the incursions into the previous swing high or low are much too deep. The individual trader has to determine for himself what he's willing to deal with. So I'm afraid you're going to have to find all of this out for yourself since no one but you knows what your risk tolerance is, what your objectives are, what you're willing to put up with.

 

As for gaps, besides the fact that they can blow S/R levels all to hell, we found in '99 that stocks that gapped overnite tended to drift sideways during the day. This made daytrading particularly frustrating. The B&Hers -- or at least those who traded off daily charts -- were the winners during the '98-'99 period, though they got completely screwed thereafter. Trading futures avoids all of that.

 

Of course, lots of people love trading gaps, and it's not my place to rain on anybody's parade, but given a choice between easy trading and difficult trading, I'll take the easy. Who needs the grief?

 

Db

Edited by DbPhoenix
Add link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This post looks at different approaches to exiting in a trending market. In this particular instance the price exhibited the below behaviour repeatedly:

 

  • Drop
  • SL break
  • Drop and stall
  • Drop

 

Although, the trend is down, the stalling and SL breaks caused multiple exits and entries and I found trading this trend quite a challenge. This stalling may not be after every drop but in RT I started to see it as such. I did notice the price not going above the LSH and re-tried the replay leading to an ace in one kind of trade.

 

This lead me to examine further the advantages and disadvantages of exiting at SL break or LSH. The below points summarize the tradeoffs:

 

  1. SL exit: is fast efficient and one gets to keep some profit off the bat. Re-entry is an issue as more engagement is required to keep up with the trend. Emotionally it's the easiest one to handle. Management vise it's a bit tougher.
     
  2. LSH exit: gives some space to the price to breathe. Seems to catch most of the trend but the exits are farther from the lowest point. Emotionally it's tougher because of the price at times backing up quite a bit leading to emotional unease. Management vise it's the easiest. (Another problem is that in RT it is not known whether the trend will continue and if the trend is not long enough or consistent enough the profits evaporate)
     
  3. Combination of both approaches: With multiple contracts the best of both worlds could be used with partial exits at SL break, S/R, and LSH leading to a more controlled behaviour.
     
  4. Circumstantial use: Meaning under certain conditions SL is used and under others SLH? What are those conditions and how do I determine and test them? Doesn't it become arbitrary then?

 

I have also contemplated drawing SL somehow differently but they have served me well in the past. Changing them for a price behaviour that may not occur that often doesn't seem appropriate. Besides, the whole point of the SL is to show the supply/demand dynamics in RT and alert to possible changes.

 

Below are the charts that lead to this inquiry. Two use SL exits (I tried to play with SL a bit), one uses LSH exits, and the last one is for those who wish you show how they would have done it.

 

Gringo

5aa7115b6a946_NQ12-11(1Min)07_11_2011SLbreakexit.thumb.jpg.c4abe6fb20423f07c331227679fecc5c.jpg

5aa7115b73ced_NQ12-11(1Min)07_11_2011SLexit.thumb.jpg.92701d05ef9d5270a7f2436c01864d05.jpg

5aa7115b7bc04_NQ12-11(1Min)07_11_2011LSHexit.thumb.jpg.1f4a77e538418de04d0f0ccfa7b0e781.jpg

5aa7115b84737_NQ12-11(1Min)07_11_2011Clean.thumb.jpg.7591171dae51055311c67bc29130d104.jpg

Edited by Gringo
grammar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
    • By millonmethod
      Hello everyone!
      I am an advanced trader, with many years of experience (about 15 years - 10 living exclusively from this)
      I am going to give you some tips that you must know:
      There are going to be many people who tell you that trade is easy, that with only crossiing a line  with another one you will win a lot of money.... and that´s not true.  No, Sir, reality is far away from that. Many people who start arrive here with the hope that someone "gives them" a free method, they watch youtube videos thinking that this will give them the "strategy" and in a few days they realize that it does not work for them - they lose money - and then They go looking for a new one ... and so on. YES, IT´S TRUE YOU EARN IN TRADING, A LOT. BUT THINK: for a few to win (10% + any BROKER) many others must lose (90% people). YOU MUST HAVE A MONEY MANAGMENT FORMULA ( you can email me) People study so many years to live on this, not because they are dumb, but to know what they do, when, and have absolute effectiveness. It´s very easy to get lost here: do not disperse, jumping from one to another strategy WILL NEVER give you money, it will only waste your time and make you nervous when trading. PEOPLE WHO CHANGE THEIR METHOD CONSTANTLY : LOOOOSE ALWAYS.   If you have the knowledge to develop it, take your time and do it.  Always try it first on DEMO for at least 2 weeks! If not: search to buy a solid strategy (no you tube videos pleassse ! Avoid losing money! ) This is like any business, it requires some capital to start (capital = money in the broker + solid made /purchased strategy) If you are lost: I RECOMMEND YOU NOT TO WASTE TIME IN YOUTUBE, JOIN PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCE AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO BUY A METHOD ... PLEASE !!!! DO NOT BUY 10 BAD AND CHEAP METHODS, SAVE MONEY AND BUY ONLY 1 BUT EXCLUSIVE AND MUST ALLWAYS HAVE SUPPORT !!!!!  Do not buy Signals! They never keep up with constant profits! One week will win and the next will lose. Nothing that does not depend absolutely on you will give you the money you are looking for. And if you do not have a strategy (made or purchased) do not even try PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: DO NOT USE REAL MONEY! AT LEAST 2 WEEK DEMO FREE HELP HERE!!!!!  IF YOU FOLLOW MY ADVICE YOU WILL BE PART OF THAT 10% WINNER, email me.
      Have a nice trading day
       
       
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.