Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Futurestrader

PBF Squeeze Replica For Tradestation

Recommended Posts

The latest iteration not only corrected the histogram bar width problem, it performs beautifully overall.

 

Thanks To All Involved!

 

**

Which is the latest version?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for your version of this, it seems that you have modifed my code that I realased on here under the "various indicators" title.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

What are the differences between yours and this one BR?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Format it to show on a subgraph. When you first add it its applying itself to the data and not a subgraph which is causing it to "kill" your charts.

I have the same issue and my charts are formatted for subgraphs lower 15%, upper 10%.

 

Furthermore, the BR squeeze works fine.

 

Any ideas to solve the problem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have the same issue and my charts are formatted for subgraphs lower 15%, upper 10%.

 

Furthermore, the BR squeeze works fine.

 

Any ideas to solve the problem?

 

use the one i attached on the first page... :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
use the one i attached on the first page... :confused:

There are two versions here, one with V 2.0

 

The one on the first page doesn't paint any bars or dots, just a flat line and what looks like a moving average in red and blue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Format it to show on a subgraph. When you first add it its applying itself to the data and not a subgraph which is causing it to "kill" your charts.

Im finally getting around to this.

 

Can you show a screenshot of the proper scaling of Sub-graph margins for TS?

 

This is the only indicator that doesn't want to seem to load on the chart correctly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, i'm testing multicharts with IB and when i importe the indicator and i compile it, i've this message :

Study: "PBF-Squeeze" (Indicator)

Please wait ....

------ Compiled with error(s): ------

unverified function is used

errLine 48, errColumn 10, errLineEnd 48, errColumnEnd 15

causal study: gauss (Function)

Can you help me please, i don't understand what happens

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

------ Compiled with error(s): ------

unverified function is used

errLine 48, errColumn 10, errLineEnd 48, errColumnEnd 15

causal study: gauss (Function)

 

 

 

you need to compile this function first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response, when i do this :

Build started: ------

Study: "Gauss" (Function)

Please wait ....

------ Compiled with error(s): ------

Compile error

errLine 0, errColumn 0, errLineEnd 0, errColumnEnd 0

???????

Any ideas ?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for your response, when i do this :

Build started: ------

Study: "Gauss" (Function)

Please wait ....

------ Compiled with error(s): ------

Compile error

errLine 0, errColumn 0, errLineEnd 0, errColumnEnd 0

???????

Any ideas ?

Thanks

 

 

I don't know what caused this problem.

the function compiled fine with my MultiCharts.

 

what version of TS are you using?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response, maybe it's because i'm using a trial version ?

You want to know my TS version ? TS like tradestation ? the indicator i've downloaded is : PBF-SQUEEZE.ELD

Thanks you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, TS = TradeStation.

 

I should have asked you what program/version you are using.

 

If you are using the trial version of MultiCharts, it should not make a difference because the trial version is just a time-limited full version.

 

Try to download the ELD again, then open it with the PowerEditor.

On the bottom left corner of the editor, check "Compile on import".

 

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

go to PowerEditor and select File>Open,

you should see the "Gauss" file under the "Function"

There should be a green check mark next to it.

if you do not see the green check mark, then

-- load the file,

-- click the Compile button to compile it.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10125&stc=1&d=1239457892

 

 

if you do not see the "Gauss" file, then

you should re-import the ELD

you will see this in the PowerEditor import screen.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10124&stc=1&d=1239457892

PBF-SQUEEZE.gif.22407e393831c89930537f9cc62b9aef.gif

Studies.gif.cd4a0fd3d088d2100983086df6a4de0f.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks you

the probleme is with the compilation of Gauss or any indicators or functions, when i import with compile check there is error, when i try to compile after importing : error, i've reinstall and install teh beta version : error !!!

I've found a lot of messages from people didn't manage to compile so i think there is a probleme with multicharts !

For this example i've the Gauss function imported automatically with the BR-Squeeze indicator but no way to compile it ...

Thanks you, if someone have the response maybe with the support of MC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt the problem is with MC,

MC would not selectively have problem with "Gauss", but not other studies.

 

 

just to be sure we are on the same page, this is the code of the "Gauss" function.

pls check to see if yours is the same.

 

 

{Gaussian Filter}

Inputs: Price(NumericSeries), iptPeriod(NumericSimple), iptPoles(NumericSimple);

variables: aa(0), b(0), w(0), x(0), y(0), y1(0), y2(0), y3(0), y4(0),
       a_1(0), a_12(0), a_13(0), a_14(0), a2(0), a3(0), a4(0), Pi(3.141592654),
       sqrtOf2(1.414213562), Period(2), poles(0);

if (iptPeriod < 2) then 
Period = 2
else
Period = iptPeriod;

// Number of filter poles must be between 1 and 4, inclusive
if iptPoles < 1 then
poles = 1
else if iptPoles > 4 then
poles = 4
else 
poles = iptPoles;

// initialization - performed only for first bar
if CurrentBar = 1 then
begin
   w = 2 * Pi / Period; // omega
   w = 180 * w / Pi;    // in degrees

   b = (1 - cosine(w)) / (power(sqrtOf2, 2.0/poles) - 1.0);

   aa = -b + squareroot(b*b + 2*b);
   a_1 = 1.0 - aa;
   a_12 = a_1 * a_1;
   a_13 = a_1 * a_1 * a_1;
   a_14 = a_12 * a_12;
   a2 = aa * aa;
   a3 = aa * aa * aa;
   a4 = a2 * a2;

   y1 = Price;
   y2 = y1;
y3 = y2;
   y4 = y3;
end;

{ Calculate your indicator value here }
x = Price;

if (poles = 1) then
y = aa * x + a_1 * y1
else if (poles = 2) then
y = a2 * x + 2 * a_1 * y1 - a_12 * y2
else if (poles = 3) then
y = a3 * x + 3 * a_1 * y1 - 3 * a_12 * y2 + a_13 * y3
else if (poles = 4) then
y = a4 * x + 4 * a_1 * y1 - 6 * a_12 * y2 + 4 * a_13 * y3 - a_14 * y4;

y4 = y3; // delayed by four bars
y3 = y2; // delayed by three bars
y2 = y1; // delayed by two bars
y1 = y;  // delayed by one bar

Gauss = y;

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.