Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Futurestrader

PBF Squeeze Replica For Tradestation

Recommended Posts

Many have asked what the differences are between the PBF-Squeeze indicator and the other popular and well-known Squeeze that's been out there for years, which is retailed at $496.

The simple answer is:

  • THIS is much faster and way more precise.
  • THIS Squeeze indicator has absolutely nothing to do with the other Squeeze except for the name and similar formation (lines, dots, histograms, green, red, what else can you do?)

 

The idea and calculation behind our Squeeze is brand new. It does not employ the Momentum or CCI indicator, which are okay but not precise and responsive enough for our tastes. The "traditioinal" Bollinger Band/Keltner Channel idea that plots the middle line is kept alive if you choose 2 for "style" under "format technical analysis", but we no longer use it in our trading. This idea sounds very attractive in theory, but if you really think about it and examine the charts, both Bollinger Band and Keltner Channels are lagging indicators. By the time the Bollinger Band moves inside the Keltner Channel, the market would have been moving sideways for at least a few bars.

What's worse is when the Bollinger Band moves outside of the Keltner Channel, the market has been moving for at least a few bars. If you enter positions then, that means you are a few bars too late.

For this reason, we have re-designed the middle line, which has made tremendous differences in our trading, especially in the counter-trend mode.

 

PBF-Squeeze.JPG

PBF-SQUEEZE.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are some trading ideas for the PBF-Squeeze Indicator.

Use a EMA48 and EMA89 to get the Middle line or use the jtHMA to get better results. This line gives you the trend direction.

Take CT Trades only if you have a divergence in the PBF-Squeeze.

TheSqueezeUpgrade4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks good. Can't wait to try it.

 

I've installed it but it needs to be adjusted in the "style" tab... it just looks like a line bar and the squeeze dots are REALLY small and they don't seem to react the changes in the style tab to make them wider... suggestions?

 

260xzef.jpg

Edited by daedalus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate the post... but this doesn't work in TS...

 

Heres screens showing the changes to both of them, and the resulting chart from the changes.

 

307s3mo.jpg

2cz9b2a.jpg

292tu2t.jpg

 

The only changes that take effect are changing it from line to histogram... None of the width changes seem to take effect.

 

Don't know how much you can do since you use the MC platform, but if anyone else tries this on their TS i'd like to know if you're having the same issues.

 

Thanks again for posting the indicator regardless!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am using MC too, but there are two SetPlotWidth lines in the code, which means they are hardcoded and your changes will have no effect. Try to comment them out and see if this helps to have your settings take effect.

 

The lines are:

 

SetPlotWidth(1,7);
setplotwidth(2,7);

 

Or copy and paste the code below where I have commented the lines out already to a new indicator and verify:

Inputs: Price(Close), price2(close),Price3(H/3+L/3+C/3),
 Length(20),
 Length2(13),
 Length3(21),
 Length4(9),
 Style(1),
 nK(1.5), 
 nBB(2), 
	 AlertLine( 1 ),
 BuyColor1(blue), BuyColor2(darkblue),
 SellColor1(red), SellColor2(darkred),
 NormalColor(Red),AlertColor(Blue),
 CounterTrend(true); 

vars:FastVal1(0), SlowVal1(0), Diff1(0),
    FastVal2(0), SlowVal2(0), Diff2(0),
    FastVal3(0), SlowVal3(0), Diff3(0),
    FastVal4(0), SlowVal4(0), Diff4(0),
    AvgDiff(0), AvgDif(0), poles(4),
    CCIValue(0),DownCT(0),UpCT(0),SDev(0),ATR(0),LHMult(0),Denom(0),BBS_Ind(0);

if Style = 0 then begin
{Zero Line - BB Squeeze}
if ( barnumber=1 ) then 
Begin
  If minmove <> 0 then
    LHMult = pricescale/minmove;
end;

{-- Calculate BB Squeeze ----------------------}
ATR = AvgTrueRange(Length);
SDev = StandardDev(Price, Length, 1);

Denom = (nK*ATR);
If Denom <> 0 then BBS_Ind = (nBB * SDev) /Denom; 

If BBS_Ind < Alertline then
  SetPlotColor(1, NormalColor)
else
  SetPlotColor(1, AlertColor);

{-- Plot Index & Alert Line -------------------------}
Plot1(0, "Squeeze");
end;

if Style = 1 then begin
{Zero Line - Gauss filter}
value1 = Gauss(Price3,Length3,3);

if (Value1) > (Value1[1]) then 
SetPlotColor(1, BuyColor1);
if (Value1) < (Value1[1]) then 
SetPlotColor(1, SellColor1);
//	SetPlotWidth(1,7);
Plot1(0, "Squeeze");
end;


{Histogram} 
FastVal1 = Gauss(price, 8, poles);
SlowVal1 = Gauss(price, 21, poles);
Diff1 = FastVal1 - SlowVal1;
FastVal2 = Gauss(price, 13, poles);
SlowVal2 = Gauss(price, 34, poles);
Diff2 = FastVal2 - SlowVal2;
FastVal3 = Gauss(price, 21, poles);
SlowVal3 = Gauss(price, 55, poles);
Diff3 = FastVal3 - SlowVal3;
FastVal4 = Gauss(price, 34, poles);
SlowVal4 = Gauss(price, 89, poles);
Diff4 = FastVal4 - SlowVal4;
AvgDiff = (Diff1+Diff2+Diff3+Diff4)/4;

plot2(AvgDiff,"DiffHisto") ;
//setplotwidth(2,7);
if AvgDiff > 0 then 
 if AvgDiff > AvgDiff[1] then 
   setplotcolor(2,BuyColor1)
 else
   setplotcolor(2,BuyColor2) ;

if AvgDiff < 0 then 
 if AvgDiff < AvgDiff[1] then setplotcolor(2,SellColor1)
else
 setplotcolor(2,SellColor2);



{+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++}
{ Counter Trend Mode}
if CounterTrend = true then begin
CCiValue = CCI(13);

Condition1 = ccivalue[1] > 50;
Condition2 = CCivalue < 50;
Condition3 = CCivalue[1] < 100;
Condition4 = CCiValue > 100;
Condition5 = AvgDiff > 0;
Condition6 = AvgDiff[1] > 0;
Condition7 = AvgDiff[2] > 0;
Condition8 = ccivalue < 100;

if Condition1 and Condition2 and Condition5 and condition6 and condition7 then begin
  setplotcolor(2,SellColor2);
  DownCT = 1;
end;

if DownCT = 1 and AvgDiff < 0 then DownCT =0;

if DownCT = 1 and Condition8 and Condition5 then setplotcolor(2,SellColor2);

if DownCT = 1 and Condition3 and Condition4 then begin
  setplotcolor(2,BuyColor1);
  DownCT = 0;
end;

Condition11 = ccivalue[1] < -50;
Condition12 = CCivalue > -50;
Condition13 = CCivalue[1] >- 100;
Condition14 = CCiValue < -100;
Condition15 = AvgDiff < 0;
Condition16 = AvgDiff[1] < 0;
Condition17 = AvgDiff[2] < 0;
Condition18 = ccivalue >-100;

if Condition11 and Condition12 and Condition15 and condition16 and condition17 then begin
  setplotcolor(2,BuyColor2) ;
  UpCT = 1;
end;

if UpCT = 1 and AvgDiff > 0 then UpCT =0;
if UpCT = 1 and Condition18 and Condition15 then setplotcolor(2,BuyColor2) ;
if UpCT = 1 and Condition13 and Condition14 then begin
  setplotcolor(2,SellColor1);
  UpCT = 0;
end;

end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks sevensa - when I try to verify i get a message say that "The word end was expected before the end of the file"

 

Sorry, I guess TS doesn't like // characters to comment out lines and you have to include the text between {} if you want to comment the lines out.

 

Glad you got it working though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for your version of this, it seems that you have modifed my code that I realased on here under the "various indicators" title.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

 

 

Blu-Ray,

 

do you think the code for PBF_squeeze will work for sierracharts. Im trying to find what they are using to create this indicator.

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no. it has its center line "squeeze" signal modified somehow.

 

Its actually pretty interesting. Throw both this and a "old" squeeze on a chart and compare. You get more signals and get better entries usually. Just find a good way to filter them and manage them and you might just have something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
no. it has its center line "squeeze" signal modified somehow.

 

Its actually pretty interesting. Throw both this and a "old" squeeze on a chart and compare. You get more signals and get better entries usually. Just find a good way to filter them and manage them and you might just have something.

 

daedalus,

 

Do you use the PBF_squeeze,

 

Does anyone have the code for Pbf_squeeze for sierracharts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dunno.

for the histogram, people have said its similiar to a TRIX. look at a 4-8 perod TRIX. I dont think Bbands or KChannels are used at all in the new one.

 

compare TRIX with different settings against the original one and see if it's close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

After importing this indicator, it refuses to plot as a histogram with 'thicker' lines and I have exhausted what little knowledge I have.

 

I have attempted to change its attributes using 'Style' with no success.

 

Is anyone else experiencing this problem?

 

I'm running TS 8.4 (1688).

 

Many Thanks

 

for any suggestions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.