Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Trade Up

Can successful Traders have a conscience?

Can successful Traders have a conscience  

7 members have voted

  1. 1. Can successful Traders have a conscience

    • Yes
      4
    • No
      2
    • Not Sure
      1


Recommended Posts

This is a very interesting question, and not one which I have seen mentioned.

 

Can successful Traders have a conscience?

 

When a Trader is in working mode, I do not think that they can afford to have a real conscience, and also be successful. To have a conscience is to deal on emotion.

 

A good Trader will only see a commodity, not the investment itself. They are always dealing on trends / fundamentals, and have no feelings for or against the underlying investment.

 

E.g. they would have no problem dealing in Tobacco or Gambling stocks, to name but a few.

 

I believe that you could give a Trader a number of graphs, and not even price them, or say what they are, and they could make their mind up about a possible trade.

 

What do you think?

 

OBVIOUSLY THIS ONLY APPLIES TO LEGAL INVESTMENTS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont really think that a successful trader can have a conscience.

 

The best traders seem to deal on cold hard information, and not have "favourite" areas of investment.

 

Take "Black Monday" in the UK, when George Soros took on the Bank of England and won. He knew that the facts did not stack up with the reality and gambled on a change in policy by the UK Government. He was right, and he made a fortune.........

 

He dealt on cold hard information, with no guilt about what he was taking away from the Bank of England. A real Trader!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a bit of a loaded question, as to me the comments thus far seem to suggest that a professional trader suffers from a lack of ethics and I simply do not subscribe to that theory at all.

 

I also do not subscribe to the theory that successful traders are emotionless automatons when trading either. There is not a trader alive who is totally emotionless in the heat of trading. The difference is that he or she has learned how to both notice their emotions and control them. There was a study done of professional traders recently, by a prestigious university, that fully supports that belief, despite the common myth to the contrary which most often circulates amongst traders.

 

Also, supposedly everyone has a conscience and although I am certain that includes traders, there are undoubtedly some who choose on occasion not to be guided by what their conscience is telling them. That however is perhaps best left for a spirited discussion about ethics.

 

Happy Trading ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting but hard topic to answer. Traders by nature are very aggressive and thick-skinned. That does not necessarily mean we suffer from a lack of ethics or values.

 

Yes, I am sure you will find unethical traders such as the Enron traders who found it entertaining to shut off California's electrical power. (so they can profit from rising electricity prices)

 

I also saw an interview of a commodity floor trader in the CBOT who made a fortune on 9/11 trading gold. Is this unethical?

 

On the other hand take a look at Warren Buffett who just donated $30.7 billion to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (respect to that man!)

 

I think it would be wrong to judge the entire trading population as unethical people. Just like any profession you are going to find ethical and unethical people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Soul.

 

There are undoubtedly some actions taken by certain parties that members of the general public might find in bad taste or even unconscionable, yet you will often find those self same people who were so quick to judge others taking similar actions on their own that they quickly excuse away as acceptable. There is just no accounting for the way some people treat other people. Their interpretation of the Golden Rule is that those who have the gold make the rules. That is indeed a shame, but a reality of Life nevertheless. Luckily, we don't have to become one of them in order to become and remain a professional trader.

 

Happy Trading ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if I have been a little misunderstood.

 

I am not trying to say that all traders have no ethics or values, just pointing out (like Soultrader said) that traders tend to be more thick skinned than most.

 

Its like the traders who sell airlines short after a crash - now I would not do that, but I know some traders who would. That opens another issue, if nobody acts on bad news then we risk a false market - after all the market is only a reflection of supply and demand.

 

Some people see gambling and tobacco stocks as unethical, but personally that would not stop me trading in these stocks.

 

I hope thats clears up any misunderstanding?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its like the traders who sell airlines short after a crash - now I would not do that, but I know some traders who would.

 

I hope this does not make me unethical but I would disagree with that statement. We have become traders to profit from market inefficiency's. I say this because as a trader, I am looking for opportunities in the financial markets. If a trader can not short a stock because one feels unethical, I find it hard to make any money in the market.

 

Your profit is another man's loss. Is that considered unethical? I do not think it is fair to say traders are unethical since they would short an airline stock that just had an accident. (or other examples) We are trading supply and demand or numbers. When I trade stocks or futures, 80% of the time I do not watch the news. I just trade price action. I will find out any siginificant news on the market after the close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading in general is amoral (setting aside hostile takeovers, pillaging companies, stock scams and the rest). You buy from people that want to sell, and you sell to those that want to buy. Your actions have no impact on the company.

 

If you want to hold stocks for longer terms and don't want to get all icky by associating with tobacco, for example, then remember that shares tend to be a net loss to companies as they pay out dividends. The money raised from a public offering is a one-time affair, and after that the shares just drain money. By holding shares, you are taking money away from a company you don't like. Maybe that eases your conscience. (Of course no one cares who holds these shares and you know someone will, so we come back around to trading being amoral :) )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a simple addition: if you're so magically, supernaturally good as a trader that you know the stock will drop, then by shorting, you are depriving someone from their potential profits. So if you think you're God, you shouldn't trade.

 

Speaking personally, if you think you're God, I would like you to trade. To ease your conscience, why not tell me what you're trading so I can take the other side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some interesting comments, and maybe not the poll vote I had expected.

 

There appears to be some difference of opinion as to what may or may not be ethical, but no matter what we think, the market will always react to different situations and the "true" price will always show through.

 

I think a good trader will just see a situation as that, and not think of the underlying reasons / factors. Follow the Trend has been my main rule since I began trading (with the odd exception of trying to catch a fallng knife), whatever that trend may be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only in the right context. Virtually all business endeavors are based on the notion of providing value, and the profits are the exchange for that value delivered.

 

Gambling and trading do not create or provide value to the one putting in the money. It's a win-lose situation and winner's profits have to come from somebody's pocket. Even the Casinos express their profits in gambler's losses and trading is very analogous.

 

If you're okay with the competitive nature and the fact that it is clear to the prospective loser that he is risking his money on a wager, then no guilt is due.

 

However, if one of your core beliefs is that you wish to make the world a better place by provide value to others, then trading may present a subconscious challenge, as your subconscious knows the win-lose scenario exists here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Colorado

 

I think you just hit the nail in the head. I cound't agree more with your coments.

 

It's unbelievable but there's still some traders/investors outhere who believes that shorting a stock is totally un-american. Sometimes I watch comedy central, you know in order to entretain my self, and this guy....whats his name/ oh ok..Jim Kramer always is buy, bullish, etc. It's unelievable how many people calls that program for advice...oh boy..This is just my opinion please apologize if I offended anyone.

 

Regards

 

Raul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so sorry

 

It's not comedy central...it's CNBC.

 

for some reason I don't understand, I mix CNBC, Comedy Central and Cartoon Network. Maybe there's some sort of subliminal message implanted in my brain, well I don't know. They're not similar rigth??

 

My apologies

 

Regards

 

Raul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One can inject ones views, beliefs and concerns into trading as much or as little as one wants. eg, only long on your countries stocks, only short on opposing countries stocks and futures, no purchases of suspect stocks etc etc.

 

No problem; only two issues. 1. Don't actively trade the beliefs just use them as a filter to remove trading opportunities. 2. Recognize that the beliefs limit some opportunities which may occasionally cause frustration followed by the satisfaction that you're sticking to your beliefs (but the opportunities are nearly infinite anyway).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am so sorry

 

It's not comedy central...it's CNBC.

 

for some reason I don't understand, I mix CNBC, Comedy Central and Cartoon Network. Maybe there's some sort of subliminal message implanted in my brain, well I don't know. They're not similar rigth??

 

My apologies

 

Regards

 

Raul

 

lol.... we might as well have Dave Chapelle come on CNBC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CNBC is Comedy Central LOL! Freudian slip it may be but many ways similarities are uncanny. These "comedians" make us laugh with their "recommedations" one after another and they are out on the line trying to forecast and predict. Worst, the hot fund managers make their money on fees, not from their stock pick wizardry. I prefer to see floor traders whose livelihood depends on their trading. Charts tell me more quickly and honestly than some talking head tooting their own horns and their picks.

 

I used to avidly watched their shows that result in losses before I turned it off and turned a profit. My opinions of their performance was in some ways linked to my past performance: recommendations don't work without your own homework involved.

 

Sorry, back to the question at hand, the rules were set for most. Some started trade without knowing the rules but this is what free enterprise is: as long as you don't break the rules, the world is yours if you can outsmart your competitor to get customers to your door. Some chose to be ignorant and trade until ruin while others go slowly and learn all the rules then trade to become profitable. Most of us chose the ignorant way (I included) but everyone is accountable for their actions to participate or not and their way in participating. So conscience shouldn't exist because the rule applies to everyone and ignorance is no excuse (as cops like to remind infractors of this). I paid my dues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a good and successful trader and i don't buy the crap you are saying. I have got a good conscience and i trade well. They have nothing to do with each other. Your conscience don't in any way affect your trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.