Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

firewalker

Off, Yet on Topic

Recommended Posts

Why, do you think they hold less importance?

 

 

Yes, on the larger TF's at least. Supply and demand alone are plenty to decipher the dailies with a high statistical rate adn tell enough and actually see TL's as a hindrance and waste of good moves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, on the larger TF's at least. Supply and demand alone are plenty to decipher the dailies with a high statistical rate adn tell enough and actually see TL's as a hindrance and waste of good moves.

 

:shocked:

 

A lot of the time trend can be seen by the naked eye though, but trendlines are a nice way of following momentum.

 

I definitely wouldn't call them a hindrance though, unless you use them for something which they are not intended for?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:shocked:

 

A lot of the time trend can be seen by the naked eye though, but trendlines are a nice way of following momentum.

 

I definitely wouldn't call them a hindrance though, unless you use them for something which they are not intended for?

 

Later I will post a couple of examples where a few examples of missing out near 800 points in a week as waiting for the trend to finish rather than taking rejections of supply/demand levels.

 

Here is an example of the last 24hrs where S/R on large then small enables adding and getting the best price based on supply and demand alone.

gj.thumb.gif.476fce87a37da5ef91f9fdbaa9a9e98d.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:shocked:

 

A lot of the time trend can be seen by the naked eye though, but trendlines are a nice way of following momentum.

 

I definitely wouldn't call them a hindrance though, unless you use them for something which they are not intended for?

 

 

Here is the chart I posted during the week.

 

With the trendlines in orange (1st 3 candle = TL basis) you would have had no losses (!) since December 2007 but would have missed, and had to accept, some would retrace BIG and that would take some big kahunas!

 

Mind you, with those TL's, not a single loss all year........... hmmmmm... :hmmmm:

 

Maybe I have the holy grail!

5aa70e7005d8e_totrendornot.thumb.gif.d076234eb0ab1b8ae9d1d167e63bd377.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Later I will post a couple of examples where a few examples of missing out near 800 points in a week as waiting for the trend to finish rather than taking rejections of supply/demand levels.

 

Here is an example of the last 24hrs where S/R on large then small enables adding and getting the best price based on supply and demand alone.

 

On this chart, are the light grey lines H1 S/R, & the dark grey lines H4 S/R?

 

On the daily chart, are those lines H4 or daily S/R levels?

 

Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the first chart (showing trendline vs S/R) they are all daily S/R.

 

On the next one, the back chart (daily) is daily S/R and the smaller (front) chart are 1 hour S/R.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is the chart I posted during the week.

 

With the trendlines in orange (1st 3 candle = TL basis) you would have had no losses (!) since December 2007 but would have missed, and had to accept, some would retrace BIG and that would take some big kahunas!

 

Mind you, with those TL's, not a single loss all year........... hmmmmm... :hmmmm:

 

Maybe I have the holy grail!

 

Depends on where you have the entry ...

Your way of drawing lines is interesting as they aren't really "trend"-lines... I mean you reverse direction on each and every swing. Take for example blue dot = entry, purple = exit. That's breakeven or a small loss...

 

How do you draw a line? You need at least two points to draw a line. But by then some of the candles are already formed, no?

 

The way you draw those lines is probably something you manage to do intuitively. But you could for example also see it this way:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6870&stc=1&d=1212437071

wasp_tl.thumb.GIF.45c29cb855370673f6d19640fe0424d1.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The way you draw those lines is probably something you manage to do intuitively. But you could for example also see it this way:

 

I think thats what makes a big difference. I work with what works statistically best and fit myself around the market in question and as I have never read a trading book in my life, I probably couldn't give you a text book definition.

 

I se why you have drawn the lines and entry and exits you have and they do differ greatly from mine.

 

Its all about perception really and how you, or wycoff (sic.), or anyone else percieve charts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...and a bloody god job too!

 

I knew that 206.25 was going to be a thorn in my side and could not decide if it would screw me again or hold. It held. I was one step ahead. Up yours GBPJPY! :evil tongue:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much do you factor it in.

 

Thankfully as I got called away from the screen yesterday, I took profit at the highs but, I would rather know I can fish than to catch one occasionally and the fact that had I stayed, one key level which I did not include as it was more of a burden in the past, meant I would have given back all yesterdays, missed todays drop and alot more if it breaks the current level.

 

Like Firewalkers call but non traded short yesterday, it doesn't matter how perfect a plan can be and obvious things are, sods law has such a cunning little way!

 

Now I'm back I can re-enter into this short if it breaks (albeit now 200 pips late and the R:R is off the wall) but its 200 to the next key area, or not. Obviously, the opposite to what I do will happen!

 

All down to one line that would have caused me 5 losses prior meant I missed a possible 400 now!

 

I'm going down the pub, sod this. :doh: ;)

5aa70e70c55c6_sodslaw.thumb.gif.04554e39f1a535d56e274ee95669edc3.gif

5aa70e70cbade_sodslaw2.thumb.gif.a813c21e3a6c7cbb013bad9a3c91998c.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going down the pub, sod this. :doh: ;)

 

Perhaps that's a better way of handling the frustration than what I do (banging my head against the wall). Although both actions have a similar outcome: a great headache ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps that's a better way of handling the frustration than what I do (banging my head against the wall). Although both actions have a similar outcome: a great headache ;)

 

It is just so frustating ay! 1 little thing can mean the difference between a few grand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is just so frustating ay! 1 little thing can mean the difference between a few grand.

 

You don't need to tell me! Because I moved my stop to breakeven +1 instead of breakeven I missed out on a huge fall :doh:

 

Shared misery...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well, well, that doesn't happen very often! It actually bounced of the support and I don't feel so bad now.

 

That said, it throws up the key level issues still which is like snapping my fishing rod! (analogies again)!

 

Thanks GammaJammer!

 

Oh and btw GJ, which bank are you at again...?! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also GJ, Trendie, I mean myrtle asked how much attention I paid to 00 levels as key levels and before I didn't really till now and notice how they are close to my levels.

 

Anyhow, spill some insights on how you bank boys play it..........!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Also GJ, Trendie, I mean myrtle asked how much attention I paid to 00 levels as key levels and before I didn't really till now and notice how they are close to my levels.

 

Anyhow, spill some insights on how you bank boys play it..........!!

 

In theory 00 levels (and 25, 50 etc) are psychological levels only (if you're a pure chartist) but the fact is that the market (well, FX at least) is dominated by humans, not robots still, and as such it still has a part to play (Corps etc will on occasion hang their hats on these levels) but to be honest I think the influence of 00 is diminishing over time.

 

One thing to consider however is that barrier options talked about in the market are still predominantly found at '00 and '50

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You don't need to tell me! Because I moved my stop to breakeven +1 instead of breakeven I missed out on a huge fall :doh:

 

Shared misery...

 

That is SODS LAW!

 

Minor details like this will make all the difference from time to time. This shows us that some aspects of trading come down to the luck of the draw and our beyond our control. Therefore, there's no point banging your head against a wall. Just take a few deep breaths!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is SODS LAW!

 

Minor details like this will make all the difference from time to time. This shows us that some aspects of trading come down to the luck of the draw and our beyond our control. Therefore, there's no point banging your head against a wall. Just take a few deep breaths!

 

I wouldn't say "beyond our control", because it was my decision to move my stop to there... in all fairness I think I should slap myself even harder, because the plan was to move the stop to breakeven. Not +1. :crap:

 

Taking deep breaths only increases the suffering! Doctor told me not to do so because I have some bruised ribs :boxing: (don't ask how I got them!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In theory 00 levels (and 25, 50 etc) are psychological levels only (if you're a pure chartist) but the fact is that the market (well, FX at least) is dominated by humans, not robots still, and as such it still has a part to play (Corps etc will on occasion hang their hats on these levels) but to be honest I think the influence of 00 is diminishing over time.

 

One thing to consider however is that barrier options talked about in the market are still predominantly found at '00 and '50

 

I think thats the same with fibs too. Both 00's and fibs are coincidential too the key areas of S/R but S/R always comes first imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pychological levels -

25 & 75 do often act as S/R, and to a larger extent 50 & 100 levels.

 

I used to trade breakouts beyond 00 & 50, and get what i could.

 

As with any trade, the problem is the level may trigger a continutation or reversal, leaving you on the right or wrong side of it.

 

Now. if i am looking for a breakout beyond an S/R level, and price hits the 00/50 level, and that price is beyond an S/R breakout line for example, i may enter on that level, in the hope of getting in early (before the candle closes) to what will hopefully become a decent breakout beyond the 00/50 level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 📁 Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division.   🇮🇳 India: 1,533 million 🇨🇳 China: 771 million 🇳🇬 Nigeria: 546 million 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 487 million 🇨🇩 Congo: 431 million 🇺🇸 US: 394 million 🇪🇹 Ethiopia: 323 million 🇮🇩 Indonesia: 297 million 🇹🇿 Tanzania: 244 million 🇪🇬 Egypt: 205 million 🇧🇷 Brazil: 185 million 🇵🇭 Philippines: 180 million 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 177 million 🇳🇪 Niger: 166 million 🇸🇩 Sudan: 142 million 🇦🇴 Angola: 133 million 🇺🇬 Uganda: 132 million 🇲🇽 Mexico: 116 million 🇰🇪 Kenya: 113 million 🇷🇺 Russia: 112 million 🇮🇶 Iraq: 111 million 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 110 million   @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • $RDNT Radnet stock flat top breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?RDNT
    • $GNK Genco Shipping stock narrow range breakout watch, also see $GOGL https://stockconsultant.com/?GNK
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.