Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Nice to see you're on board bubba, Taz and I were discussing the same pattern in ES, looks to be the same points we're using.

This has moved about 40 pts since yesterday, good trade so far... looks to gap down tomorrow...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to agree with waveslider here. Point 1 is the least important point of the wolfe wave. What I personally do is to look for a clear violation of support or resistance, and give that pivot a tentative point 2. Then I look to see if there are clear pivots for points 3 and 4. If there's a point 5 already, I'll add that to the list. Then, finally, I'll search for a point 1, which (at least the way I do it) can be any major or minor pivot prior to wave 2 that looks approximately right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dang - rebooted that old machine, and there it was.. that gartley indicator is notorious for plotting at times, then not on another..

 

just kinda partial to those patterns where both overlap like that. o well - i was working all day anyways.

NQ3.png.eece08c390f1b5451d8586f4f37a83a9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm

 

well, i would say that simply seeing both in the same pattern adds to the strength of the pattern. of course, i've no statistical log to support my logic. I've not seen that many actually.. maybe they occur frequently..?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

Guys,

 

As far as trading WolfeWave goes, what is your ''good trade : bad trade ratio'' of WolfeWave trades? - 60 : 40, 70 : 30, ... : ... ?

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guys,

 

As far as trading WolfeWave goes, what is your ''good trade : bad trade ratio'' of WolfeWave trades? - 60 : 40, 70 : 30, ... : ... ?

 

Regards

 

What is your definition of a bad trade and a good trade? If you follow your trading plan and rules, there is no such thing as a bad trade. If you mean Profitable:Unprofitable Trade ratio, you know that this ratio is pretty useless by itself without knowing what the risk:reward ratio is as well? Frequency of being right is far less important than expectancy.

Edited by sevensa
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
What is your definition of a bad trade and a good trade? If you follow your trading plan and rules, there is no such thing as a bad trade. If you mean Profitable:Unprofitable Trade ratio, you know that this ratio is pretty useless by itself without knowing what the risk:reward ratio is as well? Frequency of being right is far less important than expectancy.

 

Hi,

 

I will leave risk / reward for later. Can you please estmate profitable vs losing trades?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

Thanks Waveslider.

 

Anyone, any statistics on their WolfeWave trades?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been watching that too. The higher time frames have an andrew's target a bit lower so it looks like it would take out today's lows.

I was thinking this sort of thing might happen as they started rallying it this p.m.

Look at how the 1-4 line is touched 2x on both sides of the pattern. You can see it on bubba's chart, but even better on the 1 or 2 min.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here's another time-frame.. maybe what WS referred to? i dunno.. but seems like a possibility.

another.png.d869c0ee03ce12bfd06a1ba628323dd9.png

Edited by bubba
eek.. thats NQ :) oh well, worth watching, my apologies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
there we go..

hope that helps. the gartley would have worked.. but, i would consider it triggered and completed. should have removed it i guess, for clarity.

 

Thanks, bubba. Turns out I did have my numbering wrong. I was going to start the WW from the pivots of the gartley. Yours looks much cleaner.

 

Geez, we haven't watched a live WW in a while, folks. This'll be interesting to see how it plays out.

 

Taz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That 2nd chart looks more dangerous because at that pt the market is starting to trend. Point #2 should be a major low.

 

We're looking for a quick move back into the range on this one -else a trend could develop. The pitchfork I was talking about is on the half hour chart or higher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.