Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sign in to follow this  
Soultrader

Sector Anaylsis, Fair Value, and Intermarket Analysis

Recommended Posts

Recently, I had an opportunity to talk with the head trader for a big investment bank. I thought I would share some insights.

 

The style of this trading team is 100% discretionary. The head trader's core methodology was market profile, which was very surprising for a Japanese trader trading equities. One of the things he mentioned was that it was impossible to predict stock prices. Price may decline or lift on no news. So why does price move? Fair value in the sense of value area. Simply put, buyers and sellers do not agree on price and will rotate price until it has found balance. Thus, market profile traders call higher/lower value placements a TREND.

 

Now, what I found particulary interesting was his style of trading. He barely used charts or even a market profile chart. He could visualize a MP chart just by glancing at a bar/candlestick chart. He was also more interested in analyzing different sectors. What stayed strong and what stayed weak? Also, the % loss/gain for stocks. He would track approx 700 stocks. His main interest was knowing how much % stocks in certain sectors were up/down compared to stocks in other sectors. From my understanding, he was measuring relative strength/weakness.

 

He was also a hardcore contrarion. For example, he mentioned how the public thought insurance companies would go bust with the incidents of 9-11 and Hurrican Catrina. Insurance stocks did plumment on news. However, these insurance companies must charge a higher rate after the incidents. Hence, leading to profitability. Therefore one of the things he watches for is to buy insurance stocks after an overreaction on bad news.

 

He also mixes alot of intermarket analysis which I had trouble following. He would watch markets in Chile to determine which stocks would get affected in Japan, etc...

 

Overall I found his methodology quite fascinating and advanced. It reminded me of mixture of Dalton, Livermore, and Murphy. One of the things I am interested in learning more about is intermarket analysis. Does any of you use it in your trading? Any resources that I can look into?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a few books around on sector rotation like this one Amazon.com: Sector Investing, 1996: Books: Sam Stovall

 

I can't say I've looked into it much but there are analysts on Bloomberg TV who have explained the theory nicely.

 

On the subject of value and Dalton did you notice how the recent "top" was almost identical to the one that Dalton explained in the seminar we attended a few weeks back? The migration of the POC was up for weeks then we had those few days of overlapping value which is a classic Dalton top, then a classic single-print selling tail then as soon as it went below value the markets went sharply down. I'm not saying we won't come back up but it was interesting to see because I've been using MP more as a longer term tool rather than just a day trading tool. Presumably they're all longer term traders in this investment bank?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting insights Soul. Especially so given my current areas of research.

 

I'm using a derivation of MP where instead of just 'time at value' I'm using 'volume at value'. Time is a function of habit, even for traders, is somewhat less fluid than is the 'commitment to trade'. For instance, it costs nobody anything not to trade and a value can be maintained with no buying or selling, simply through inaction. What constitutes commitment is the proactive/reactive pressures which lead to actual trading, and the extent of that pressure as mirrored in the volume traded. It's looking like abetter match for my trading style than does vanilla MP. As for your trader’s ability to ‘see’ MP just by looking at candlesticks, that’s what first alerted me to the volume angle for MP. Looking at the 5 min volume-candles and the equivalent MP in a second window – I could ‘see’ what it was that was missing informationally from the standard MP.

 

Sector analysis is pretty much a part of standard Dow theory. What stays weak in a strong market or strong in a weak market. I’m less into the sectors than into different markets right now. How currencies and commodities relate to bonds and stocks for instance. Murphy’s work in that area is still the best and serves as my template.

 

This isn’t the first time we hear of pro traders being far more (totally?) discretionary then us TA types imagine. But then, the stats on pro traders success rates needs to be more fully qualified before we all head off down that path. Commissions and other related trading services still, AFAIAA count more to their bottom line than do their pure trading activities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the sort of thing you're looking at TheBramble? I find the Volume Profile superimposed on a candlestick chart very useful.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=1617&stc=1&d=1180282793

 

As for Murphy I'm definitely going to reread the sections of his book on sector analysis and intermarket analysis to see if I can find any new light. Anyone who follows the treasury and stock markets together can see the close relationship between the two.

5aa70dda96e06_YM06-0725_05_2007(5Min)volprof.jpg.595aa51d50d32dd50dce05e6857df175.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • holy war.  why do ppl hate jews? why do ppl hate muslims? (btw my answers aren't 'pretty', pc, or even respectful... better say why before i do   ... just sayin')     holy war...  is there really such a thang?  ... just sayin’
    • NFLX Netflix stock, nice move, hit target 1, https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences stock range breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?NBIX
    • RTX stock, nice close with a flat top breakout above 102.77, https://stockconsultant.com/?RTX
    • Date: 8th May 2024. Market News – Stocks mixed; Yen support still on; Eyes on NFP & Apple tonight   Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   As the Fed maintained a “high-for-longer” stance, stocks gave up their gains with attention turning back to earnings. Chair Powell and the Fed were not as hawkish as feared and the markets reacted immediately and in textbook fashion to the still dovish policy stance. The Fed flagged that recent disappointing inflation readings could make rate cuts a while in coming, but Fed chief Jerome Powell characterized the risk of more hikes as “unlikely,” giving some solace to markets. Stocks traded mixed across Asia, while in Europe, DAX and FTSE futures are finding buyers and US futures are also in demand, after the Fed’s message. Yen: Another suspected intervention by authorities, this time in late New York trading, ran into resistance from traders keen to keep selling the currency. Swiss CPI lifted to 1.4% y/y in April from 1.0% y/y in the previous month. Headline numbers are still at low levels and base effects play a role, with the different timing of Easter this year also likely to distort the picture. That said, the numbers may not question the SNB’s decision to cut rates, but they do not support another rate cut in June. Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex has corrected to 105.58, but USDJPY is already inching higher again, after a sharp drop to a low of 153.04 on Tuesday that sparked fresh intervention speculation. The pair is currently trading at 155.38. Treasury yields plunged and were down over double digits before profit taking set in. USOIL finished with a -3.6% loss to $79.00, the lowest since March 12. Currently it is as $79.53. Gold was up 1.4% to $2319.55 per ounce, reclaiming the $2300 level. Market Trends:   Wall Street climbed initially with gains of 1.4% on the NASDAQ, 1.2% on the Dow, and 0.96% on the S&P500. The NASDAQ and S&P500 closed with losses of -0.3%, while the Dow was 0.23% firmer. The Hang Seng rallied more than 2%, and the ASX also posting slight gains, while CSI 300 and Nikkei declined. Apple’s earnings report is due after the US market closes today, will give investors a better sense of how the iPhone maker is weathering a sales slump, due in part to a sluggish China market. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.