Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TL Staff

How Random is Randomness

Recommended Posts

What are your thoughts on this study? Seems like he is overthinking something rather simple, if you ask me!

 

I was just doing a small study on randomness and came across some interesting results and would like to get some reflection from others.

 

Generated 1048576 coin flips ( "ZERO" or "ONE") randomly using ROUND(RAND(),0)

 

I did this 11 different times. In other words, the above formula was dropped in 11 different columns and generated 1048576 coin flips for each column.

 

Now let's assume that each column is an individual stand-alone trading strategy. I wanted to figure out what the worst/best case scenario could be for a strategy that relied on random buys/sells. Worst/best case scenario that I'm defining in this small study is how many times a win/loss occurred Consecutively. In other words, how many times did the coin flip equal heads consecutively.

 

"Zero" (randomly generated by excel) could either be a win or a loss

"One" (randomly generated by excel) could either be a win or a loss

 

The consecutive win/loss for the 11 stand-alone strategies:

 

Strat1 16

Strat2 20

Strat3 17

Strat4 17

Strat5 18

Strat6 17

Strat7 21

Strat8 18

Start9 17

Start10 17

Start11 18

 

Those results do not seem random to me. So can we argue that if I created more strategies and more random coin flips, there could be a strategy that has a million flips that resulted in a loss each time (since for a coin flip at each flip the odds are 50/50).

 

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a little unclear what you're asking, but this is basic probability and you can estimate the expected consecutive losses or wins (there is a formula for this).

 

Perhaps you could explain more clearly what you're asking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thoughts.....

first - a random number generator in excel is not exactly random.

second - a truely random number as seeker says can be worked using a formula for what you expect

third - if the markets are really random and you accept that then no strategy will beat the markets therefore you should adopt a passive style of asset allocation.

forth - yes - even in a truely random universe there will at some stage be 1 million (1 or 0)( heads or tails) (wins/loss) that would occur - that is the nature of probability - its highly unlikely to occur but it is stil possible.

fifth - just cause i like to be filthy with my fifth idea is that if you find yourself in the universe go and get laid because it be fantastic because it the place that really unbeleiveable things happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

there could be a strategy that has a million flips that resulted in a loss each time.

 

 

The answer is 'yes'.

 

And with equal probability there could be a million winning flips in succession.

 

But why does this matter in terms of thinking about trading?

 

I disagree with SIUYA's statement: I think that a market that was perfectly random would be incredibly easy to trade. The probability of long runs of similar behaviour would be incredibly small, and you could bet against the continuation of such events.

 

Unfortunately price clearly isn't completely random, and nor is it completely non-random, hence trading is difficult . . .

 

I am taking the needle off my own stuck record now :)

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Came across this post while browsing some private discussion threads, and found it to be interesting on two levels.

 

1. The topic itself regarding "how random is randomness"?

 

2. That people are obsessed with statistics. :) I think some people overcomplicate trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MARKETS ARE NOT RANDOM!!! The market moves up... it moves down... but for the last %$^&* time it's not random. Anyone who can follow a tick chart / volume chart / depth of market / time and sales can see that it's not random... it's buying and selling.... it's not #$$^&&^^&^%&&^%^& random.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with SIUYA's statement: I think that a market that was perfectly random would be incredibly easy to trade. The probability of long runs of similar behaviour would be incredibly small, and you could bet against the continuation of such events.

 

 

Good point, and i think this is why the whole debate about randomness is missunderstood.

If everyone thought and knew it was random and the odds easily calculated over the long term.....in which case you are right.....you would only be able to trade against those who are simply gambling as everyone would then have perfect information and know they are gambling, therefore over the long run....blah blah blah.....

 

Basically the pricing mechanism for this should be arbed out if everyone knew and thought it was perfectly random.....so in a perfectly random market would still be incredibly hard to trade as it would simply be luck - that is the whole point of a random market.

Even If the odds cannot be calculated over the long term because the randomness is still unable to be accurately measured, captured and traded (by the very nature of the randonmness being unable to be proedicited)

 

In both cases you cant beat the market - therefore you should be a passive investor and not an active one

 

 

or maybe we could amend the old saying "The Market Can Remain Irrational Longer Than You Can Remain Solvent" by Keynes to --- "the perfectly random will still have some series of long runs more often that you can stay solvent" - which is why even Casinos limit some people and bet sizes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically the pricing mechanism for this should be arbed out if everyone knew and thought it was perfectly random.....so in a perfectly random market would still be incredibly hard to trade as it would simply be luck - that is the whole point of a random market.

.

 

That's not something I had considered. In theory, I suppose, arbing out randmoness would lead to . . . non-random behaviour? I should stop visiting threads like this before 9am :)

 

"the perfectly random will still have some series of long runs more often that you can stay solvent" - which is why even Casinos limit some people and bet sizes

 

For anyone who can be bothered with it, there's a detailed explanation of the maths involved in casino limits and long runs in Ed Thorp's 'Beat the Dealer'.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those interested there is some good theory from William Feller - Wikiquote

 

Its all mind fodder and as probability is all about possibilities and probability maybe most debates will never be solved.....

this might be particularly interesting given all the random talk....

 

"It should be noted that this duration is considerably longer than we naively expect. If two players with 500 dollars each toss a coin until one is ruined, the average duration of the game is 250,000 trials. If a gambler has only one dollar and his adversary has 1000, the average duration is 1000 trials.

Chapter XIV, Random Walk And Ruin Problems, p. 349"

 

.......

Blue - yep i often need a coffee before reality kicks in too :)

Thats what makes a good discussion - often what we think seems reasonable until compared to reality, or even better sometimes we accept reality in one form until we see it in a different way. Maybe some one will one day develop a perfect pricing mechanism.

Its an interesting thing particularly when it comes to gambling, rational thought etc and pricing.

You could guarantee even with a purely random market there would be people who would bet against the odds - and in walks lady luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.