Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

Truths of a Forex Junkie!

Recommended Posts

The purpose of this thread is to discuss the truth about trading.

 

This will not be a thread about methods. I will not be discussing my methods. I want to discuss the true fundamentals of trading. The important things that are never discussed.

 

I will be adding to this thread once or twice a week as I have time. I trade London and live on the east coast of the US so time is sometimes tough for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First truth.

 

 

The trader must learn to take losses.

 

If you as a trader are unwilling to take a loss you will eventually take the mother of all losses. If the trader is unwilling to take a loss he or she will be forever closing trades with tiny gains that will never overcome their losses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno about that.

 

If you are trading with very low costs and scratch every trade UNLESS it pops a couple of ticks immediately you get filled,you will probably end up with 60% scratch trades, 24% small wins, 14% small losses - that also go against you immediately (1 tick max) and 2% of trades that dont look back and make big money. My % are approx. This is just an example for purposes of illustration. It is however a basic concept/theory of market making before you start to look at other markets to hedge against v place in queue etc.

 

Can you think of ANY other business that doesnt go all out to avoid losses at every possible opportunity? Trading, at its heart, is no different from any other business.

 

Id be interested in why you think otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dunno about that.

 

If you are trading with very low costs and scratch every trade UNLESS it pops a couple of ticks immediately you get filled,you will probably end up with 60% scratch trades, 24% small wins, 14% small losses - that also go against you immediately (1 tick max) and 2% of trades that dont look back and make big money. My % are approx. This is just an example for purposes of illustration. It is however a basic concept/theory of market making before you start to look at other markets to hedge against v place in queue etc.

 

Can you think of ANY other business that doesnt go all out to avoid losses at every possible opportunity? Trading, at its heart, is no different from any other business.

 

Id be interested in why you think otherwise.

 

I posted a study somewhere here at TL about other businesses.....its summary from memory was that (surprise surprise) about 90% of startup businesses fail to get bigger (so they loose money and fail, stagnate and eventually fail, or just stay small usually as its only marginally profitable). For most of those that survived it was because they had enough money to survive the first poor strategy decision. ie; risk of ruin etc.

Most businesses treat losses as expenses, but the principal is the same.....survive by cutting your losses. Enough management books teach and MBA students will learn this and yet how often to companies continue to throw good money after bad - ie; they dont take their losses.

Market makers still have to take losses.

Plus retail trading is very different to market making as we both know......if it had not become a technology race, equity option market making for me was about minimising losses (time decay) through small scalps, a theoretical edge and gamma trading - waiting for the big moves.....I would think FX is much the same, unless you are short vol then its hoping against big moves and collecting time decay.

 

I think the point is very valid - i just dont like the word truth (I have noticed the wife starting to say it more and more).....its going to be another list of arguments.....bring it on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok maybe Im being pedantic.

 

Let me put it another way - I dont like to focus on losses. 'Careful for what you wish for' as the saying goes.

 

Learning to take a loss? I want to avoid loss at all opportunity. OK sure a loss is a fact of life, but if you learn to avoid them rather than live with them, I think we'll be in a better position (excuse the pun!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dunno about that.

 

If you are trading with very low costs and scratch every trade UNLESS it pops a couple of ticks immediately you get filled,you will probably end up with 60% scratch trades, 24% small wins, 14% small losses - that also go against you immediately (1 tick max) and 2% of trades that dont look back and make big money. My % are approx. This is just an example for purposes of illustration. It is however a basic concept/theory of market making before you start to look at other markets to hedge against v place in queue etc.

 

Can you think of ANY other business that doesnt go all out to avoid losses at every possible opportunity? Trading, at its heart, is no different from any other business.

 

Id be interested in why you think otherwise.

 

 

LOL... I used the word Truth because I thought it would be eye catching. I could just as easily used " Ramblings of a Forex Junkie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally got more upset with the word Junkie! than I did Truths

MF, please don't be a Junkie! :)

Junkies ignore / deny / distort the risks

... which removes any chance of leveraging any real Truths

 

yours, ever pedantic,

 

zdo

Edited by zdo
you should have seen how I spelled pedandic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I posted a study somewhere here at TL about other businesses.....its summary from memory was that (surprise surprise) about 90% of startup businesses fail to get bigger (so they loose money and fail, stagnate and eventually fail, or just stay small usually as its only marginally profitable). For most of those that survived it was because they had enough money to survive the first poor strategy decision. ie; risk of ruin etc.

Most businesses treat losses as expenses, but the principal is the same.....survive by cutting your losses. Enough management books teach and MBA students will learn this and yet how often to companies continue to throw good money after bad - ie; they dont take their losses.

Market makers still have to take losses.

Plus retail trading is very different to market making as we both know......if it had not become a technology race, equity option market making for me was about minimising losses (time decay) through small scalps, a theoretical edge and gamma trading - waiting for the big moves.....I would think FX is much the same, unless you are short vol then its hoping against big moves and collecting time decay.

 

I think the point is very valid - i just dont like the word truth (I have noticed the wife starting to say it more and more).....its going to be another list of arguments.....bring it on.

 

First post. I am constantly told women make the best traders! .why because they manage risk. The path to success in trading is after all physiology ! The topic or post needs a bucket of water poured on it. I think it's goner continue for a long time! Thanks Beachmaster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 more thing for me (especially for forex traders) , Always put the money in forex or be it any other asset that u dont need ..first try to keep aside some extra money from ur income . once it reaches a level that can be invested then go for it..i had put all the money i had in my first forex account and all that money got dumped with a month with some losses..next few months were the struggle to keep up with the daily and monthly expenses....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.