Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

suby

How to Calculate the Odds of Your Trade?

Recommended Posts

Recently finished reading "The Education of a Speculator" by Victor Neiderhoffer which I highly recommend to everyone.

 

He constantly stresses the comparisons of sports betting and trading

 

My question is How do you calculate the odds of your trade?

 

Suppose your looking for the odds to be stacked in your favour 60%, how would you calculate something like this on a chart?

 

Does anyone do this? If so I would love to learn more/see some examples of this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Recently finished reading "The Education of a Speculator" by Victor Neiderhoffer which I highly recommend to everyone.

 

He constantly stresses the comparisons of sports betting and trading

 

My question is How do you calculate the odds of your trade?

 

Suppose your looking for the odds to be stacked in your favour 60%, how would you calculate something like this on a chart?

 

Does anyone do this? If so I would love to learn more/see some examples of this

 

I'm not entirely clear I fully understand your question - do you mean the historical percentage win rate?

 

(Number of Winning Trades / Total Trades) * 100

 

Whether your future win rate will reflect your hypothetical win rate with historical data is another matter.

 

And percentage win rate is fairly irrelevant to net profitability; it's not good winning $10 for 90% of the time if you lose $100 10% of the time. After 100 trades you will, on average, be down by $100.

 

The very best illustration of this kind of high win rate net loser trading that I can think of is none other than . . . Victor Niederhoffer.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not entirely clear I fully understand your question - do you mean the historical percentage win rate?

 

(Number of Winning Trades / Total Trades) * 100

 

Whether your future win rate will reflect your hypothetical win rate with historical data is another matter.

 

And percentage win rate is fairly irrelevant to net profitability; it's not good winning $10 for 90% of the time if you lose $100 10% of the time. After 100 trades you will, on average, be down by $100.

 

The very best illustration of this kind of high win rate net loser trading that I can think of is none other than . . . Victor Niederhoffer.

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Hey BlueHorseshoe,

 

I guess what i'm referring to if you could imagine, suppose an instrument like the ES is mean reverting and bouncing around certain levels, how could you assume the odds/probabilities of a what the success rate may be on the spot in relation to the mean/peg.

 

In other words, just as you were to place a bet on a horse race and the odds are already predetermined before you bet on the horse, how could you assign something like that or determine that in the world of trading based on things like support/resistance or pivot points?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey BlueHorseshoe,

 

I guess what i'm referring to if you could imagine, suppose an instrument like the ES is mean reverting and bouncing around certain levels, how could you assume the odds/probabilities of a what the success rate may be on the spot in relation to the mean/peg.

 

In other words, just as you were to place a bet on a horse race and the odds are already predetermined before you bet on the horse, how could you assign something like that or determine that in the world of trading based on things like support/resistance or pivot points?

 

I would imagine, only based on historical simulation. If you're doing it with enough regularity then you could aslo track how well subsequent reality conforms to your historical projections, and arrive at some kind of 'confidence quotient' for your probability calculations.

 

It's very difficult to take in more than a fraction of the complex tapestry of information which may or may not affect the probabilities of a particular outcome.

 

If you're asking more specifically about the ES, it is 'mean reverting' and it is possible to find directional edges around this behaviour, especially in higher timeframes. You can typically fade any move to support or resistance using limit orders, for example, and expect to be right more often than you're wrong. You could then refine this - probabilites for fading S/R in an up/downtrend, on a second test of S/R, a third test, on high volume, on low volume, on a low volume second test following a high volume first test . . . The possibilities (and probabilities) are endless.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey BlueHorseshoe,

 

I guess what i'm referring to if you could imagine, suppose an instrument like the ES is mean reverting and bouncing around certain levels, how could you assume the odds/probabilities of a what the success rate may be on the spot in relation to the mean/peg.

 

In other words, just as you were to place a bet on a horse race and the odds are already predetermined before you bet on the horse, how could you assign something like that or determine that in the world of trading based on things like support/resistance or pivot points?

 

Suby, sounds like you're making some great strides in your trading.

 

Keep in mind, horses area measured against one another, where the probability of one of the horses winning is 1.0. But a well setup spread trade could be represented in this fashion.

 

But a vague probability calculation could be made given your historic expectancy or the edge, your discretional ability to recognize and implement your strategy in real time, expected volatility, and risk vs reward of the individual trade.

 

But risk vs reward of the trade tends to be a good jumping off point as for most traders it would represent a the likely outcome of their trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting...this is very basic math

 

For my system I keep records of each type of entry as a separate entity.....i.e. all entries based on a test of the previous high, the previous open, the previous low....each category has its own data set....

 

I know for each category, and for each time period (yearly, quarterly, monthly, weekly), how many of these entries were winners, and how many were losers....

 

I view each type of entry as a profit center....doing it this way I can tell whether a specific type of entry is "likely" to be a winner or loser based not only on historical data, but on specific time periods...again for example....entries based on tests of the previous open may not be performing well over the last 60 days....knowing that I might want to trade that opportunity using a smaller size position..conversely if a specific type of opportunity is performing very well, it may be wise enter a bigger size position...

 

In some instances the benefit of this type of data management becomes evident right away...for example I recently implemented what I believe to be, an improved method of preparing for the open by identifying long & short targets (pivots actually) just prior to the open. I started to do this two (2) months ago....already I can see the improvement in my data...so now all I have to do is to confirm that this initial result is NOT due to chance (this takes about 400 data points to confirm)....requires patience and discipline but it really pays off if you take the time to do it...

 

The math is as Blue Horseshoe suggests...

 

Good luck

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BlueHorseshow, ADDChilds and Steve,

 

I cannot thank all three of you for your wise words into this topic enough. I extremely appreciate the insight and help in regards to this! I hope the trading week has been treating all of you well and will finish nicely tomorow at the close

 

Good Luck Tomorrow and once again thank you all!!

 

Suby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Youve got to put this in context...

 

Victor is/was an options trader. Options trading is very maths orientated. For example, an options delta is *supposed* to give you a % of the option expiring ITM. So, if you compare an options Gamma and Delta, you may come up with some kind of figure that will tell you if the option is over/under priced against the underlying.

 

Take Victor with a pinch of salt. He doesnt believe in the idea of trends apparently. Thats why he blows up all the time. The trends dont revert in time (hahahaha). Maybe he doesnt believe in global macro differences either?

 

Trying to come up with a probability on an out right position is a fools errand if you're considering a single trade. Remember the law of large numbers.

 

As for the horse racing, remember the bookie places his odds against his risk exposure. Nothing to do with what horse he thinks will win - thats the punters game. It's also why you should never bet on the favourite - the pay out will be lowest, and just like trading, the crowd is usually wrong. The bookie has an edge irrespective of what horse comes in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • also ... and barely on topic... Winners (always*) overpay. Buying the dips is a subscription to the belief that winners win by underpaying - when in actuality winners (inevitably/always*) win by overpaying... it’s amazing the percentage of traders who think winners win by underpaying ... “Winners (always*) overpay.” ...  One way to implement this ‘belief’ is to only reenter when prices have emphatically resumed the 'trend' .   (Fwiw, While “Winners (always*) overpay.” holds true in most endeavors (relationships, business, sports, etc...) - “Winners (always*) overpay.”  is especially true for auctions... continuous auctions included.)
    • re:  "Does it make sense to always buy the dips?  “Buy the dip.”  You hear this all the time in crypto investing trading speculation gambling. [zdo taking some liberties] It refers, of course, to buying more bitcoin (or digital assets) when they go down in price: when the price “dips.” Some people brag about “buying the dip," showing they know better than the crowd. Others “buy the dip” as an investment strategy: they’re getting a bargain. The problem is, buying the dip is a fallacy. You can’t buy the dip, because you can't see the total dip until much later. First, I’ll explain this in a way that will make it simple and obvious to you; then I’ll show you a better way of investing. You Only Know the Dip in Hindsight When people talk about “buying the dip,” what they’re really saying is, “I bought when the price was going down.” " ... example of a dip ... 
    • Date: 19th April 2024. Weekly Commodity Market Update: Oil Prices Correct and Supply Concerns Persist.   The ongoing developments in the Middle East sparked a wave of risk aversion and fueled supply concerns and investors headed for safety. Hopes for imminent rate cuts from the Federal Reserve diminish while attention is now turning towards the demand outlook. The Gold price hit a high of $2417.89 per ounce overnight. Sentiment has already calmed down again and bullion is trading at $2376.50 per ounce as haven flows ease. Oil prices initially moved higher as concern over escalating tensions with the WTI contract hit a session high of $85.508 per barrel overnight, before correcting to currently $81.45 per barrel. Oil Prices Under Pressure Amid Middle East Tensions Last week, commodity indexes showed little movement, with Oil prices undergoing a slight correction. Meanwhile, Gold reached yet another record high, mirroring the upward trend in cocoa prices. Once again today, USOil prices experienced a correction and has remained under pressure, retesting the 50-day EMA at $81.00 as we moving into the weekend. Hence, despite the Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran, sentiments stabilized following reports suggesting a measured response aimed at avoiding further escalation. Brent crude futures witnessed a more than 4% leap, driven by concerns over potential disruptions to oil supplies in the Middle East, only to subsequently erase all gains. Similarly with USOIL, UKOIL hovers just below $87 per barrel, marginally below Thursday’s closing figures. Nevertheless, volatility is expected to continue in the market as several potential risks loom:   Disruption to the Strait of Hormuz: The possibility of Iran disrupting navigation through the vital shipping lane, is still in play. The Strait of Hormuz serves as the Persian Gulf’s primary route to international waters, with approximately 21 million barrels of oil passing through daily. Recent events, including Iran’s seizure of an Israel-linked container ship, underscore the geopolitical sensitivity of the region. Tougher Sanctions on Iran: Analysts speculate that the US may impose stricter sanctions on Iranian oil exports or intensify enforcement of existing restrictions. With global oil consumption reaching 102 million barrels per day, Iran’s production of 3.3 million barrels remains significant. Recent actions targeting Venezuelan oil highlight the potential for increased pressure on Iranian exports. OPEC Output Increases: Despite the desire for higher prices, OPEC members such as Saudi Arabia and Russia have constrained output in recent years. However, sustained crude prices above $100 per barrel could prompt concerns about demand and incentivize increased production. The OPEC may opt to boost oil output should tensions escalate further and prices surge. Ukraine Conflict: Amidst the focus on the Middle East, markets overlooking Russia’s actions in Ukraine. Potential retaliatory strikes by Kyiv on Russian oil infrastructure could impact exports, adding further complexity to global oil markets.   Technical Analysis USOIL is marking one of the steepest weekly declines witnessed this year after a brief period of consolidation. The breach below the pivotal support level of 84.00, coupled with the descent below the mid of the 4-month upchannel, signals a possible shift in market sentiment towards a bearish trend reversal. Adding to the bearish outlook are indications such as the downward slope in the RSI. However, the asset still hold above the 50-day EMA which coincides also with the mid of last year’s downleg, with key support zone at $80.00-$81.00. If it breaks this support zone, the focus may shift towards the 200-day EMA and 38.2% Fib. level at $77.60-$79.00. Conversely, a rejection of the $81 level and an upside potential could see the price returning back to $84.00. A break of the latter could trigger the attention back to the December’s resistance, situated around $86.60. A breakthrough above this level could ignite a stronger rally towards the $89.20-$90.00 zone. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou Market Analyst HMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past perfrmance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 18th April 2024. Market News – Stock markets benefit from Dollar correction. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Technical buying, bargain hunting, and risk aversion helped Treasuries rally and unwind recent losses. Yields dropped from the recent 2024 highs. Asian stock markets strengthened, as the US Dollar corrected in the wake of comments from Japan’s currency chief Masato Kanda, who said G7 countries continue to stress that excessive swings and disorderly moves in the foreign exchange market were harmful for economies. US Stockpiles expanded to 10-month high. The data overshadowed the impact of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East as traders await Israel’s response to Iran’s unprecedented recent attack. President Joe Biden called for higher tariffs on imports of Chinese steel and aluminum.   Financial Markets Performance:   The USDIndex stumbled, falling to 105.66 at the end of the day from the intraday high of 106.48. It lost ground against most of its G10 peers. There wasn’t much on the calendar to provide new direction. USDJPY lows retesting the 154 bottom! NOT an intervention yet. BoJ/MoF USDJPY intervention happens when there is more than 100+ pip move in seconds, not 50 pips. USOIL slumped by 3% near $82, as US crude inventories rose by 2.7 million barrels last week, hitting the highest level since last June, while gauges of fuel demand declined. Gold strengthened as the dollar weakened and bullion is trading at $2378.44 per ounce. Market Trends:   Wall Street closed in the red after opening with small corrective gains. The NASDAQ underperformed, slumping -1.15%, with the S&P500 -0.58% lower, while the Dow lost -0.12. The Nikkei closed 0.2% higher, the Hang Seng gained more than 1. European and US futures are finding buyers. A gauge of global chip stocks and AI bellwether Nvidia Corp. have both fallen into a technical correction. The TMSC reported its first profit rise in a year, after strong AI demand revived growth at the world’s biggest contract chipmaker. The main chipmaker to Apple Inc. and Nvidia Corp. recorded a 9% rise in net income, beating estimates. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Date: 17th April 2024. Market News – Appetite for risk-taking remains weak. Economic Indicators & Central Banks:   Stocks, Treasury yields and US Dollar stay firmed. Fed Chair Powell added to the recent sell off. His slightly more hawkish tone further priced out chances for any imminent action and the timing of a cut was pushed out further. He suggested if higher inflation does persist, the Fed will hold rates steady “for as long as needed.” Implied Fed Fund: There remains no real chance for a move on May 1 and at their intraday highs the June implied funds rate future showed only 5 bps, while July reflected only 10 bps. And a full 25 bps was not priced in until November, with 38 bps in cuts seen for 2024. US & EU Economies Diverging: Lagarde says ECB is moving toward rate cuts – if there are no major shocks. UK March CPI inflation falls less than expected. Output price inflation has started to nudge higher, despite another decline in input prices. Together with yesterday’s higher than expected wage numbers, the data will add to the arguments of the hawks at the BoE, which remain very reluctant to contemplate rate cuts. Canada CPI rose 0.6% in March, double the 0.3% February increase BUT core eased. The doors are still open for a possible cut at the next BoC meeting on June 5. IMF revised up its global growth forecast for 2024 with inflation easing, in its new World Economic Outlook. This is consistent with a global soft landing, according to the report. Financial Markets Performance:   USDJPY also inched up to 154.67 on expectations the BoJ will remain accommodative and as the market challenges a perceived 155 red line for MoF intervention. USOIL prices slipped -0.15% to $84.20 per barrel. Gold rose 0.24% to $2389.11 per ounce, a new record closing high as geopolitical risks overshadowed the impacts of rising rates and the stronger dollar. Market Trends:   Wall Street waffled either side of unchanged on the day amid dimming rate cut potential, rising yields, and earnings. The major indexes closed mixed with the Dow up 0.17%, while the S&P500 and NASDAQ lost -0.21% and -0.12%, respectively. Asian stock markets mostly corrected again, with Japanese bourses underperforming and the Nikkei down -1.3%. Mainland China bourses were a notable exception and the CSI 300 rallied 1.4%, but the MSCI Asia Pacific index came close to erasing the gains for this year. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business. Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar. Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding on how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE! Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi Market Analyst HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.vvvvvvv
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.