Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

DayvanCowboy

Automatic Order Placement - Timing and Threading Issues

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

I've had this account for a while and have been browsing the forums, but I believe that this is my first post. I'm using Interactive Brokers, and programming in Java, using the TWS Java API. The specifics probably don't matter, since I'm sure these issues arise no matter which platform/programming language is being used.

 

My question is this:

I haven't started trading with actual money yet, and have just been using their simulated trading (which is an excellent feature of IB btw) with good results. Part of my system involves changing a trailing stop loss on fairly short time intervals. When programming the change in stop loss there is a problem. In IB you can only 'update' a stop loss once. In my system I update it many many times while holding a position. So, I'm faced with two options: I can cancel the stop loss and then submit a new stop loss, or submit a new stop loss and then cancel the older one. If I cancel first, then there is a point in time (less than a second, but important in the long run) where I have no protection. Alternatively, I can have two stop orders active for a point in time, during which it is possible that both are triggered, and I end up a holding on the opposite side.

 

Have any of you found this to be a real problem? If so, how have you approached it?

 

Thanks,

Dayvan Cowboy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to be honest I have never really thought about it as I am using an off the shelf system and not the IB API directly.

On that I have noticed that sometimes while manually moving a take profit, it has been hit whilst I was moving it - so I guessed that means it was still sitting live in the market as a limit order until I transmitted it. Makes sense.

 

My guess off the top of my head is that unless the market is really close to the stops then does it make much difference in reality?

 

The best way to test it - and I assume you are doing this automatically- and hence it can make a difference is to see what happens if a stop is hit twice (ie; you stop and reverse the order), v what happens if you increase the slippage.

These two scenarios would most likely closely replicate the two choices you have. :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello everyone,

 

 

...Part of my system involves changing a trailing stop loss on fairly short time intervals. When programming the change in stop loss there is a problem....

 

If so, how have you approached it?

 

Thanks,

Dayvan Cowboy

 

I'm not sure of your trading strategy but I think you refer to the "magic" "Trailing Stop Orders"

http://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/trading/orders/trailingStops.php

 

My broker is not IB I'm with TDW and ATraders + ToS platform to trade and don't use the API but if I can find some time I will learn JS... I've programmed in tha past and just konwing HTML and small amount of JavaScript give me an edge make tools that suit my needs.

 

Let me know if it was a VTSO or Trailing Stop Orders that you look for...

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not sure of your trading strategy but I think you refer to the "magic" "Trailing Stop Orders"

http://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/trading/orders/trailingStops.php

 

My broker is not IB I'm with TDW and ATraders + ToS platform to trade and don't use the API but if I can find some time I will learn JS... I've programmed in tha past and just konwing HTML and small amount of JavaScript give me an edge make tools that suit my needs.

 

Let me know if it was a VTSO or Trailing Stop Orders that you look for...

 

Regards

 

These aren't what I mean, but thanks for the message. I don't think that what I'm trying to exists as a conventional order/stop-loss type.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 📁 Population in 2100, as projected by UN Population Division.   🇮🇳 India: 1,533 million 🇨🇳 China: 771 million 🇳🇬 Nigeria: 546 million 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 487 million 🇨🇩 Congo: 431 million 🇺🇸 US: 394 million 🇪🇹 Ethiopia: 323 million 🇮🇩 Indonesia: 297 million 🇹🇿 Tanzania: 244 million 🇪🇬 Egypt: 205 million 🇧🇷 Brazil: 185 million 🇵🇭 Philippines: 180 million 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 177 million 🇳🇪 Niger: 166 million 🇸🇩 Sudan: 142 million 🇦🇴 Angola: 133 million 🇺🇬 Uganda: 132 million 🇲🇽 Mexico: 116 million 🇰🇪 Kenya: 113 million 🇷🇺 Russia: 112 million 🇮🇶 Iraq: 111 million 🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 110 million   @FinancialWorldUpdates Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • “If the West finds itself falling behind in AI, it won’t be due to a lack of technological prowess or resources. It won’t be because we weren’t smart enough or didn’t move fast enough. It will be because of something many of our Eastern counterparts don’t share with us: fear of AI.   The root of the West's fear of AI can no doubt be traced back to decades of Hollywood movies and books that have consistently depicted AI as a threat to humanity. From the iconic "Terminator" franchise to the more recent "Ex Machina," we have been conditioned to view AI as an adversary, a force that will ultimately turn against us.   In contrast, Eastern cultures have a WAY different attitude towards AI. As UN AI Advisor Neil Sahota points out, "In Eastern culture, movies, and books, they've always seen AI and robots as helpers and assistants, as a tool to be used to further the benefit of humans."   This positive outlook on AI has allowed countries like Japan, South Korea, and China to forge ahead with AI development, including in areas like healthcare, where AI is being used to improve the quality of services.   The West's fear of AI is not only shaping public opinion but also influencing policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. The European Union, for example, recently introduced AI legislation prioritizing heavy-handed protection over supporting innovation.   While such measures might be well-intentioned, they risk stifling AI development and innovation, making it harder for Western companies and researchers to compete.   Among the nations leading common-sense AI regulation, one stands out for now: Singapore.” – Chris C Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • $NFLX Netflix stock hold at 556.59 support or breakdown?  https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • $RDNT Radnet stock flat top breakout watch, https://stockconsultant.com/?RDNT
    • $GNK Genco Shipping stock narrow range breakout watch, also see $GOGL https://stockconsultant.com/?GNK
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.