Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

So what next today?

 

Note:While I was doing the picture, we did just push a little lower.

 

When you said "band tested" you mean the VAH? (i'm assuming that's the little green line on your friday profile)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I meant the band which I highlighted previously was fully tested in the first move. The band corresponded more than anything to a visual inspection of the long term volume profile(green) and it was denoted in the chart by the two thin red lines at 1147.50 and 1132.75.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, so what's happened over the last 3 days? Basically balance has been found between two areas of longer term importance. 1163 and 1118 (ish). The picture attached shows the 3 day balance along with a long term profile which excludes specifically said 3day balance volume data. So quite clearly the volume is trading around the two previous areas and forming a double distribution. So what then? Well, I'll be viewing ES and noting whether it can develop further in these areas and the 3-day balance as a whole. Important areas are fairly clear. As always, must see what happens when it gets to them.

last3days.thumb.JPG.e4fbd8fa5e6e896665711a344319dd3e.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Negotiator

 

I'm finding you analysis method very useful in helping me work on my approach to the markets. I'm wondering, do you only consider technical factors or do you take fundamental data e.g. COT into account.

 

CFTC Commitments of Traders Report - CME (Futures Only)

 

What I find quite interesting is the commercials are essentially balanced long and short with little change since last week, while the non commercials have dropped their longs by 30% from last week and increased their shorts.

 

Any thoughts?

 

 

Thanks

iwshares

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi IWS,

 

I don't use it myself. I'm not saying you should or shouldn't do so. The question is though, if you want to use it, how would you use it? As a specific trade parameter or would you use it as background information?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi IWS,

 

I don't use it myself. I'm not saying you should or shouldn't do so. The question is though, if you want to use it, how would you use it? As a specific trade parameter or would you use it as background information?

 

For position trading I can see the benefits of using COT, as for short term I had the following ideas over my afternoon coffee:

 

As background information you could use it as a "heads-up" on market sentiment for the following week e.g. with a big net short position amongst the non coms, I'd expect we'd hit a support this week, so I'd keep my eye towards the bottom of the daily range to buy support. This would correlate with the 1115 ish support we've seen so far.

 

As for trade parameter, I saw one "buy my expensive guaranteed to make you a million for $495" indicators and from what I could deduce from the grainy screenshot it was a moving average of the commercials/moving average of the non-coms crossover system. This could be incorporated into a system of price of volume to be:

 

IF com>non-com

 

buy daily low

 

OR

 

com<non-com

 

sell daily high

 

or even a divergence filter so gap has to be X before you take a position in either direction

 

With stop losses and profit targets set however you choose.

 

This is assuming that in the e-mini S&P future commercial positions drive price (something I have not tested/researched yet). Of course if the commercials are just buying in preparation for a bounce back up in a 3 months time this wouldn't be very helpful in the here and now of day trading. I'll have a look at this if I get a chance.

 

 

iwshares

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that's got to be the prerequisite for any application of any method used. It has to be researched and researched thoroughly. Otherwise, it's easy to trick yourself into negative or positive belief about the usefulness of the item in question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So here's a chart looking at yesterday and the current balance which now spans 4 days.

 

(I think I need to get one of those graphics drawing tablets to annotate these charts!)

 

So yesterday tested the whole range give or take. A note on the charts is that any discrepancy between the profiles right and left is down to the fact the right hand chart is 0.5 points per volume bar.

 

Mechanically I felt it worked nicely yesterday and responded well to points of interest. The VPOC for the 3-day profile was 1140 but had changed to 1138 before that double test you see on the chart(this was also the IB high).

 

For today, I'll be watching those points marked on the right hand chart with particular interest. At this point, we are still in balance until activity and price says otherwise. Lots of news and uncertainty and some eco releases of note fri.

wednesday.thumb.JPG.9d8de0a65783df1d8a6743d71aa7cb2b.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry again for the rubbish annotations!!

 

So the chart below is what we've done so far.

 

1) Pushed on yesterday's high, pulled back then blasted through.

 

I'd say as we were pretty close to the 1163 area it wasn't unexpected that we'd show some strength on a break here.

 

2) Failed to break through 1174.50 high volume and get to low of prior balance area at 1177.50.

 

Considering the manner in which the move was happening, this was a little surprising and longs clearly won't be too happy about it. It was pretty clear at the time that supply was coming in when watching the action though.

 

3) A test of the 1163 area initially showed promise.

 

4) Failure to push on after the 1163 test saw a further flush push lower.

 

5) Currently, ES is holding above yesterday's closing price and developing more in the high volume zone.

 

This may give longs some hope if it can hold and build later on.

 

Edit: We just broke through yesterday's close, so the current low of the day is next up and then the prices marked up on the last chart.

5aa7109c731fc_Thedaysofar.thumb.JPG.ebd052e1d1a1aa57306a3bd768c7ce4f.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point we are in short term vertical distribution and searching out previous areas. Lots of news coming out. Berkshire to invest 5bil in BAC looks to have just caused a pop. The big G is apparently surrounded by rebels. Tomorrow is clearly an important speech by the big B.

 

Could be some movement. If we really start to motor I'll post another chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty similar to yesterday early on here where move up was followed by selling. It's important though not to lose perspective as to where we are and the magnitude of recent moves. Bernanke's speech tomorrow is important and given the swing to higher prices, the selling here could be more to do with taking some risk off the table. But who knows. We'll have to see as always what the market DOES.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jackson Hole and GDP, rumours, news and fun fun fun! Well maybe. Just realise that there is so much going on that you have to be on your toes and adapt your size accordingly. If you can't do this, maybe sit back and watch the show!

 

Anyway, my chart for the day has a wider view just in case we really move. If not, then short term references I have already mentioned are still valid.

 

Happy trading!

Fridayandthehole.thumb.JPG.bfcd889267a8609a1a294895d1d9f692.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried to get this chart off quickly but we've moved while I was doing it!! Here's the chart anyway.

 

Basically that high was top of yesterday afternoon move up at around 2:20pm EST. If it takes it out, I'd suggest that we'll attempt 1168,1171 and then 1177.50 and see if er can hold in that previous range above. If not, can we hold above 2-day low 1153??

storysofar.thumb.JPG.0b1d9caa4f25e77f4c148dbdd7e14410.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, I hope everyone is fine given the weather over in the US! Friday did show some good strength with volume migrating upwards. Although there wasn't the strength to move to test 1190, we did see a close above the 1174.50 high volume. Given that we are already at 1190 o/n and may be around here on open, I'd like to see what happens in this upper distribution(1184-1207) and if there is any selling early on, can ES hold above Friday high/vpoc? O/n session is very light volume compared to recent activity and given the weather this is not surprising. There are plenty of reasons the markets could move today though so if you are in and trading, as is the routine currently- be on your toes!

 

Here's the chart for anyone who is about:-

Monday.thumb.JPG.2f67c8401c11bd92f5d6b5a931dc1d42.JPG

Edited by TheNegotiator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Markets are quite upbeat. We'll see how the home sales data impacts that positivity.

 

Edit: Not that this affects me all that much, but it's disheartening to see our markets reduced to what we have now. All the "market moving participants" do is watch world governments and trade off of what they think the possibility of aid will be. This recent move downward was due to the discontinuation of QE2 with no mention of QE3, not the shitty economic data we experienced. Now that we're more positive about the possibility of government intervention, bad economic data doesn't dent the markets, even though after a run up like this a bad economic number of this importance should at least create a dip to be bought.

Edited by sdoma

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way is up? Doesn't feel like big players are really pushing this. Just too small a range so far. Not to say that couldn't change later on. Gotta keep an eye on whether or not this turns into a grind up type of day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.