Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

True about the 56.50. As for the software, well each to their own I guess. Personally I don't find anything especially inconvenient about greenshot and will support its development by using it. I do think snagit is a rip-off (at least for what I would use it for). Would you buy a beer for $50 if there was no other pub open at the time or maybe it was just an unfamiliar place to you?

 

Beer for $50 -- probably not. But $25-50 is a "normal" price for software of this type. I wouldn't pay $50 for a beer, but if it was my favorite kind and I really wanted one, sure, I'd pay $15 (about twice as much as usual) :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I had a buy limit initially at 43 for a blind buy, looking at the 43.50 high vol same reasoning as you ...

 

Looking to sell 56 now... it's the reaction point from before, and also happens to be the 50% of the entire up to down move. Should find enough confluence there to make it a good sell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually I had a buy limit initially at 43 for a blind buy, looking at the 43.50 high vol same reasoning as you ...

 

Looking to sell 56 now... it's the reaction point from before, and also happens to be the 50% of the entire up to down move. Should find enough confluence there to make it a good sell.

 

Are you talking about the full globex session now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I thought so. Just one thing I'd note right now. The approach to the 56/56.50 is not clean. I'm not sure and would have to see when it gets there, but really when it's this close and trading like this I feel it could well shoot straight through. In which case I'll take a look at the 59's

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it concerns me slightly that sellers just pushed pretty hard here at 53 -- if they win, I'm not in it; if they lose, bulls have more stops they can run, and that might push it through 56. But 56.75 is multi-day POC, 50%, should at least put the brakes on.. we haven't had any really pullbacks of significance since the low. At some point they will have to at least feed the fire. My long term look is up--my premise was that as long as it held above 40s, that I'd be looking for longs. Yet, I'm not interested in getting long at this point or at 56, so a short to catch a 56 given the above reasons seems a reasonable trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that's something back right? When it approached 56/56.50 I knew it wouldn't hold I'm afraid. The action looked like it had cleared a bit but a lot of bids came in and delta did increase quite a bit. Opposing action didn't really have any chance of holding it and got steam rolled to the next level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well that's something back right? When it approached 56/56.50 I knew it wouldn't hold I'm afraid. The action looked like it had cleared a bit but a lot of bids came in and delta did increase quite a bit. Opposing action didn't really have any chance of holding it and got steam rolled to the next level.

 

Yes I'll take it -- down 0.75 then for the day so far. I'm afraid to say I knew it too... I've had to re-learn the lesson the hard way many times, that volume tells me where to go, and it didn't appear until 57... had I waited for that, even a predictive short at 57 would have survived with a 2 point stop.

 

I'm considering another short at 58, depending on how it looks. Perhaps 57.50 is the high of the retest and it will go down from here, but it does not appear it will break the high, IMO. But this time I will wait to see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shorted 58, stop 59, let's see if we can get 53 on this

 

EDIT: stop to 57.75 .. heavy bids and really should go from here... stop should be 59 but don't want to risk it.

Edited by joshdance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shorted 58, stop 59, let's see if we can get 53 on this

 

EDIT: stop to 57.75 .. heavy bids and really should go from here... stop should be 59 but don't want to risk it.

 

Buddy for your sake let me just point out that your stop is 1 tick above the high.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

out at 56.25 for +1.75

 

I know I'm early and it will likely go to 53 or so, but boy the bids are just strong.

 

edit: got lucky -- 57.75 actually went offer when it traded 57.50, but no takers... after that I eased it up to 58 but definitely lucky I wasn't ticked out.

Edited by joshdance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning everyone! It being roll, my continuation charts have back adjusted now so you'll see a difference in price.

 

What was interesting was that it didn't break lower than the 1238 area(1244 on dec 11). Then, although it was looking heavy, it did break higher to test the week high and pushed through a bit, but found sellers. Given all the news and the roll, I will probably be fairly cautious in my approach today. Some of the action was a little forced to me and so I'd like to watch what happens today.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=26839&stc=1&d=1323351197

2011-12-08.thumb.jpg.1fecf1db06324cf584712a318d3862c8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
These crazy moves are down to ECB President Draghi's Q&A answers in the ECB press conference.

 

Hmm Mario Draghi, sounds too similar to Bini Smaghi :rofl:

 

What is the gist of his comments, do you know? I am too fundamentally unsavvy to interpret anyway...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bini Smaghi was a guy who during the early part of Trichet's presidency would come out and say stuff in the media which wasn't especially sensitive to the market's insecurities should we say. He was(is until 2012 I believe) a member of the exec board of ecb which makes the rate decisions. He is also Italian.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The concerning comments were that ECB wouldn't circumvent EU treaty by lending to governments and going through IMF is a legal minefield. Also that decision to cut rates was not unanimous. Plus a whole heap of other crap the market will need to digest.

 

My view is don't try to trade off it, just recognise the volatility it may cause.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.