Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Completing a bell curve. Maybe a test back to the 73-74.00 area?

 

2012-04-25_0755 - slick60's library

 

slick60

 

I don't know. What I want to see is where and how we open, then how the auction progresses. We tested the minor development within the 4/9-4/20 RTH balance (now 4/9-4/24) on Monday and didn't hold. Tested the next on Tuesday and it looks like we won't hold that either. So if we open in the top dev, do we develop some more or start moving to previous higher value? I'll be looking for early direction and any responsive or initiative type activity at the upper balance extremes/balance VPOC.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=28702&stc=1&d=1335355866

2012-04-25.thumb.jpg.1e4a0ddbeb25f39d05899e5d87ff30b4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that it means anything here - but I gotta agree with you there "N". I wonder though if we will fail at the 88.75 level. That may possibly be a number for failure and completion of a pattern. Good day for slick to go golfing. Off to the links shortly.

Bounce from 74.00 says 88.75. I know - no number calling! Gives me something to look at in development for my reasons that I have followed for years and years.

Have a good one folks.

 

slick60

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Out for a 2 handle loss, not a good way to start :/

 

I did the same Josh but got out. Didn't like the look of what it was doing in front of the open. Plus I'm looking at what happens at 86.75. In fairness though, we basically have an OTD so gotta be a little more careful shorting now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I did the same Josh but got out. Didn't like the look of what it was doing in front of the open. Plus I'm looking at what happens at 86.75. In fairness though, we basically have an OTD so gotta be a little more careful shorting now.

 

Bingo, did not get my fill at 86 but got 85.50 when it came back up. Looking for 80.50, hoping for 77, praying for 72.25 ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bingo, did not get my fill at 86 but got 85.50 when it came back up. Looking for 80.50, hoping for 77, praying for 72.25 ;)

 

I should note that 83s is an expected area to buy here, but given the way it's come back fairly quickly and without much effort on 2nd push to highs, it may very well be that we've seen the HOD, and only down from here, depending of course on FOMC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Added one back short here at 84.50 ... the market does not look very strong IMO

 

Looking to scale at 80.50 still, and then 77.50, and will still have a unit in case FOMC surprises to the downside.

 

On the other side of the coin, I will be out if it decides to make new highs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the other side of the coin, I will be out if it decides to make new highs.

 

Change of plans, I will be out at near BE on the rest at 85.25, if it decides to go there, and will re-enter short if the opportunity is right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Change of plans, I will be out at near BE on the rest at 85.25, if it decides to go there, and will re-enter short if the opportunity is right.

 

Still short, but scaled another at 82.25 ... it broke to 81.50, unfair LVN, and traded back above 82, which it really should not do. Could be a fake, but I took the scale. Market acting a bit funny, maybe because it's "da fed" day.

 

As it stands, I'll probably be flat at 77 if it makes it that far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh we do love those 82.75's don't we. I have to say, I'm not that sure if we're going anywhere before the fomc, but then the release is in 1 hour and we have plenty of time until the actual speech. Who knows for sure. If the low doesn't hold I think there is quite a long way down to go. I'm less keen on the 77's than I was a few days ago, yet they are still there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I added one short here at 83, vpoc and vwap.

 

Gut says new lows unlikely before fomc, so I scaled the 83 off at 81.75, gives me a little more room on my base short. 77 still a target.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
77 still a target.

 

Given all this "work" I've been doing here, I'll set my sights a little lower towards 74, in the event of a nice selloff. This is Friday's low, where it left off before the Sunday selloff (well, Sunday here in the US). It is one of my pre-market areas of interest, and so I'll stick with that, at least for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Given all this "work" I've been doing here, I'll set my sights a little lower towards 74, in the event of a nice selloff. This is Friday's low, where it left off before the Sunday selloff (well, Sunday here in the US). It is one of my pre-market areas of interest, and so I'll stick with that, at least for now.

 

Will stopout at 84.50, breakeven on the remainder. Finding buyers at the lows here but still unable to clear Friday's high. If it does, see no reason why it should not at least retest highs, possibly 92.50

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.