Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Greetings: Hope everyone had a good holiday. I was traveling yesterday... Loking at yesterdays action was not suprising though trading it I can't say... hindsight and all. One hting that was high probability was that the late sellers would get stuffed since the obviously play is almost always obviously wrong easy $ - sure..

 

SO after absorboing selling on the open the long side was the way to play as the shorts got squeezed... the was a lot of room above us to rotate without changing the bearish structure...

 

the sell-offin the close was evidence that we only had responsive buying yesterday.

 

Looking at this it appears we will either continue on the downside or at lerast test that important low made Friday morning GBX & probably take it out... When? Otherwise chop...

 

ACH right...

 

Just :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is just one idea and we have to monitor for activity and be responsible for our own trading choices. I'm not recommending it and have several scenarios myself.

 

Considering that we were probably expecting a selloff anyway, both yesterday and overnight, did we really do such a great job? Well, maybe not. First off we hardly tested lower, although I would note that the low wasn't at a particularly significant location imho. We did sell hard into close but it kind of rolled over rather than rejected, before it went into selling mode. In the end it didn't even make new lows though (I believe the RTH day candle is called a gravestone and often does occur at or near a bottom). Overnight we haven't had a continuation to the downside from that important 82.50 upper balance marker price. We've just balanced within Monday's range.

 

You could argue that the market was like this due to holiday related inactivity, yet Europe hasn't reacted so far today.

 

So one possibility is that we are not ready to correct further and it could be a chance to secure a good long location. A test down to levels such as 71.75 or 70.50 might be interesting. Of course subsequent reversal action would have to be watched and if it could break back into Monday and hold, we could get a rally.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=28418&stc=1&d=1334062538

2012-04-10.thumb.jpg.6d58bb40f187fe3dfa114b5dce63bfa1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is just one idea and we have to monitor for activity and be responsible for our own trading choices. I'm not recommending it and have several scenarios myself.

 

Considering that we were probably expecting a selloff anyway, both yesterday and overnight, did we really do such a great job? Well, maybe not. First off we hardly tested lower, although I would note that the low wasn't at a particularly significant location imho. We did sell hard into close but it kind of rolled over rather than rejected, before it went into selling mode. In the end it didn't even make new lows though (I believe the RTH day candle is called a gravestone and often does occur at or near a bottom). Overnight we haven't had a continuation to the downside from that important 82.50 upper balance marker price. We've just balanced within Monday's range.

 

You could argue that the market was like this due to holiday related inactivity, yet Europe hasn't reacted so far today.

 

So one possibility is that we are not ready to correct further and it could be a chance to secure a good long location. A test down to levels such as 71.75 or 70.50 might be interesting. Of course subsequent reversal action would have to be watched and if it could break back into Monday and hold, we could get a rally.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=28418&stc=1&d=1334062538

 

agree: The short side while waving a flag to jump on the wagon is IMHO where many could get the shaft..why? It is an obvious play.On the other side...yesterday was the obvious day to fry the late shorts so today "might" continue down no clue.

 

I have been on sell signals today coming out of GBX but unless we rotate up I don't have a "SET UP." (Josh) and will have to wait... We might just consolidate ahead of earnings...I am going to be trading 2/3 of usual package today unless there is evidence of signifigent OTF activity...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can we have a meaningful drop (from here) with AAPL making new all-time highs?

 

Not meant as a rhetorical question. But...

 

NQ is stronger than ES in general at the moment. AAPL is nasdaq listed I believe. So NQ could hold up a over ES, but I'd think that we'd need to have all the indices moving down to get a decent drop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NQ is stronger than ES in general at the moment. AAPL is nasdaq listed I believe. So NQ could hold up a over ES, but I'd think that we'd need to have all the indices moving down to get a decent drop.

 

If you took APPL out of the NQ the actuall gain would be about 5% for last qtr.. It is distorting the Inx..not sure if it is relevant.. but it sure looks like the public is chasing a comet..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we are going to reject that lower balance, I wouldn't really want to see a foray too far into it. I would think somewhere around 65 balance vpoc would be the lower limit to signal that we aren't necessarily going to accept/explore lower prices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If we are going to reject that lower balance, I wouldn't really want to see a foray too far into it. I would think somewhere around 65 balance vpoc would be the lower limit to signal that we aren't necessarily going to accept/explore lower prices.

 

Agree.. 62.00 HVN looks like a drop dead dividing line...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, I'll just say that I was totally hypnotized as the market designed -- I was looking to short, but was looking to do it at 79.50 -- I thought there was a bit more upside, hence my long. My original thought was short, but the location did not match what I expected, so I fell into the trap... small loss but I was dead wrong on this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
numbers in 1min .

 

Wish I had full package on..but I had that bad location..so it was just as well... Took a point ona scale and did not scale at 72.50 which would typically be my next scale point... targeting 67 - 68.00 but might be a reach unless we get RE ... :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is where I spin a bit... TO scale against 72.50 looking for rotation or just hold and then add on rotation... ?? I don't have a definitive answer for that since I don't know if or how far market might rotate - a conundrum... especially with my location so I will see how it develops... just holding at the moment tgartget NVPOC 67.50.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So we're either going to get a ORR (reject reverse from high) or an OAIR (open auction in range) if it gets back above 73.25 and holds.

 

74.75 looks like current line in the sand.imho current low vol area and seperation in distributions.. :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you guys drawn any conclusions about which is more signifigent? CLVN or NVPOC's?

 

I "assume" it it CLVN's since they are low vol vs NVPOC's. What are your thoughts?

 

BTW: Do you guys show a 69.25 CLVN?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
74.75 looks like current line in the sand.imho current low vol area and seperation in distributions.. :2c:

 

Maybe, but initially I want it above yesterday's low which was also the first test low today. I would think for a continuation trade that might be a good location otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Quantower
      The main goal of this thread is to show what Power Trades is and how it works in different markets. We will show some patterns on the ES and NQ futures, as well as discuss possible improvements to this functionality.
      What is Power Trades?
      Ok, first we will consider what the Power Trades is and how it finds zones.
      Power Trades shows the zones with the execution of a large number of orders in a very short time, which will affect the price change with a high probability.
      Here are a few examples of how it looks like


      How it finds zones?
      There is a continuous process of placing, changing and executing orders in the market. All this affects the price change and the expectations of traders regarding the future price.
      When a large order appears at a certain level, the price is more likely to come to this order and it will be executed because the market is always looking for levels with liquidity. This already applies to the order flow and the mechanics of orders matching, so we will omit the principles on which the orders are matched.
      It is only important to understand that "abnormal events" occur in the market at certain times. Execution of a significant volume of orders in a very short time is one of such events.
      The Power Trades Scanner has several important settings that directly affect the results:

      Total Volume — the minimum value of the volume that should be traded during the specified time interval
      Time Interval, sec — the time over which the Total Volume should be traded
      Basis Volume Interval, sec — this parameter shows how much % took the traded volume in the total volume for the specified time.
      Zone Height, ticks — this parameter will show only those zones where the height is less than or equal to the specified value (in ticks).
      Level2 level count — the number of levels that are involved in the calculation of Imbalance and the Level 2 Ratio column in the table of results.
      Filter by Delta,% — the parameter will show zones that have a delta value greater than or equal to that specified in the setting. The value must be specified by the module, so the table will show both positive and negative delta values. We recommend paying attention to the zones with the delta above 50% (taking into account the specifics of each trading instrument).
      For example, let's set the Total Volume of 2000 contracts and Time Interval in 3 seconds on the E-mini SP500 futures. This means that the scan will be based on the available history and will show on the chart only those zones that have such a volume for the specified time.

      Additionally, it is worth to set a delta value to filter out the zones with one-side trades. The more delta value, the high probability that the price will reverse.

      So, as a starting point about this scanner, I think this information will be enough
    • By makuchaku
      Hi everyone,
      This is my maiden analysis using volume profile - so please don't hesitate to share your feedback.
      As per the attached analysis, I think that SPY is primed for a short - for many reasons
      - Multiple strong rejection of long positions exist at Resistance R1 and R2 : seems like sellers defending their positions
      - Very strong short volume seen at R2 : further signifying sellers who are ready at that level
      However, once the price reaches Support S1, there seems to be a strong buying sentiment which has rejected previous shorts. You can see trading ranges & pullbacks to S1 where buyers and sellers seem to agree on a price range, often leading to a buyer dominance.
      What do you think?

    • By TraderJoe
      Hey All,
      does anyone sell Volume Profile Indicator for NT8.
       
      Regards
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.