Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ValueTrader

Peak Volume Price

Recommended Posts

I tried to add the PVP code (OEC EL) that POPSTOCKS kindly posted on TL, however it failed to compile.

 

I tinkered with the 'Counters' as this was where the error message was pointing to.

 

I can now get it to run, but it appears to be giving me the PVP of each bar.

 

When i compare it to my Volume @ price histogram it returns a differnet value.

 

Is this because it is giving me the Peak volume Price from when the indicator is added / enabled, and is only of use in real-time?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

Vars: Counter(0),
Op(0), 
Ct(0), 
hh(0), 
f(0),
mintick(0);

Array: v[800](0), p[800](0);

mintick=minmove/pricescale;

If 1 = 1 then Ct =1+Ct;
If Date > Date[1] or Ct = 1 then begin
Op = Open-100;

For Counter = 1 to 800
begin
p[counter] = 0;
v[counter] = 0;
End;

End;

For Counter = 1 to 800
begin
p[counter] = (counter*mintick)+Op;

If Close = p[counter] then v[counter]= volume+v[counter];

End;

hh = highestarray(v,800);

if hh> hh[1] then f = close;

Plot1(f);

Edited by ValueTrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

please wrap the code with code tag. That's the # key at the top of the message window.

Unwrapped codes are difficult to read (and debug).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the expediant reply Tams.

 

I see what you mean, I've checked back and all POPSTOCKS PVP codes, and other TL users veriants use it, but what it does i have no idea.

 

I'm learning EL as i go, and my only programing knowledge is BASIC from when i was a kid (20 years ago). I looks like a loop of some kind.

 

I've removed the line you hightlighted,

 

the PVP line follows the current price bar, and is not giving the correct signal.

 

I have a volume histogram on OEC, but this is set to the day volume and is not user adjustable (from OEC tech support)

 

So the VOL@price histogram give a rough PVP, but isnt session accurate a volume traded befor the cash open is also diplayed. Besides i find it distracting having to keep update a PVP line manually on my chart.

 

Thanks VT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I tried to add the PVP code (OEC EL) that POPSTOCKS kindly posted on TL, however it failed to compile.

...

 

can you supply a link to this reference?

there is no use re-inventing the wheel,

any discussion there will help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to my PVP Problems, I tried out the another code from the TL site..

vars:         MyVolume(0),
	PriceDiff(0),
	StartPrice(0),
	PVPPrice(0),
	PVPVolume(0),
	V2VolLevel(0);	

Array:
	PVPVolArray[10000] (0);

MyVolume = Volume;

if date > date[1] then begin
	StartPrice = AvgPrice;
	For Value1 = 0 to 10000 Begin
		PVPVolArray[Value1] = 0;
	End;
	PVPVolArray[5000] = MyVolume;
	PVPPrice = AvgPrice;
	PVPVolume = MyVolume;
end;

If date = date[1] And StartPrice > 0 Then Begin
	Value2 = AvgPrice - StartPrice;
	V2VolLevel = 5000+(Value2*(1/(minmove/pricescale)));
	PVPVolArray[V2VolLevel] = PVPVolArray[V2VolLevel] + MyVolume;

	If PVPVolArray[V2VolLevel] > PVPVolume Then Begin
		PVPVolume = PVPVolArray[V2VolLevel];
		PriceDiff = 5000-V2VolLevel;
		PVPPrice = StartPrice - (PriceDiff*(minmove/pricescale));
	End;

End;

Plot1(PVPPrice, "PVP");
Plot2(PVPVolume, "PVPVolume"); 

 

I've turned off the tick-by tick update option, else the pvp line seems to follow the last price.

 

My question is, is this reliable? The reason i question it is that my volume histogram shows the price with the most volume traded at different level. Am i missing somthing here? i've Demo traded using it before running it live, and some signals using the code seem to be correct, then at other times it appears my histogram peak volume is the correct one!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Further to my PVP Problems, I tried out the another code from the TL site.....

 

you should always provide a link to your source...

1. give the original author credit

2. so that ppl can understand the background... instead of starting from nowhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That looked mightily familiar for some reason. Mind you I wrote a big chunk of the PvP indicator for DBtina... actually I took a big chunk and made a small perfectly formed chunk :)

 

This works for me without ADE. It averages the data across the bar so you do not update it every bar (like Ensign and Jerry's original stuff) it does a couple of other funky things too like variable number of days, old pvp. It has some comments but was kind of 'lazy' code maybe that will help you get a handle

//
//	PvP Averaged across bar. Set update at end of bar true.
//	See PvP Tick Precise version also
//

Input:
	PlotOldPvP (false),
	NumberofDays (1);

vars:
	n(0),m(0),
	StartPrice(0),						// Price corresponding to first element of  array
	PVPPrice(0),
	PVPPrice1(0),
	PVPPeakVolume(0),
	PVPIndex(0),							//Index of the peak (highest) volume array element
	PVPArraySize(3000),						//Set to Array Size
	PVPArrayMid(1500);						//Set to Array Mid Point
Array:
	PVPVolArray[3000] (0);					//Make sure this matches Array Size


if BarNumber = 1 then n = NumberofDays - 1;			//Make sure to reset on first bar
if (date > date[1]) or BarNumber =	1  then begin			//initialise
	n = n + 1;
	if n = NumberofDays then		
	begin	

		For Value1 = 0 to PVPArraySize Begin
			PVPVolArray[Value1] = 0;
		End;
		StartPrice = l;
		PVPPrice1 = PVPPrice;
		PVPPrice = StartPrice;
		PVPPeakVolume = 0;
		PVPIndex = PVPArrayMid;
		//PVPVolArray[PVPIndex] = Volume;
		n = 0;
	end;
end; 

Value2 = l - StartPrice;				//price in relation to starting price
value2 = value2 * (1/(MinMove/PriceScale));		
Value2 = PVPArrayMid+Value2;
value3 = (h-l) * (1/(MinMove/PriceScale));       // number of ticks l -> h				
Value1 = Round(Value2,0);				//shouldnt be needed as not adding to average price 
for m = Value1 to value1 + value3
begin
	PVPVolArray[m] = PVPVolArray[m] + Volume / (value3+1);	// +1 as as zero ticks should be vol/1 one tick vol/2 etc.
	If PVPVolArray[m] > PVPPeakVolume Then begin		// new peak volume? save it
		PVPIndex = m;
		PVPPeakVolume = PVPVolArray[m];
		PVPPrice = StartPrice - ((PVPArrayMid - m)*minmove/PriceScale );
	end;
end;

Plot1(PVPPrice, "PVPavg");
if (PVPPrice1 > 0 and PlotOldPvP) then Plot2 (PVPPrice1, "PVP Yesterday");	


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That looked mightily familiar for some reason. Mind you I wrote a big chunk of the PvP indicator for DBtina... actually I took a big chunk and made a small perfectly formed chunk :)

 

This works for me without ADE. It averages the data across the bar so you do not update it every bar (like Ensign and Jerry's original stuff) it does a couple of other funky things too like variable number of days, old pvp. It has some comments but was kind of 'lazy' code maybe that will help you get a handle

//
//	PvP Averaged across bar. Set update at end of bar true.
//	See PvP Tick Precise version also
//

Input:
	PlotOldPvP (false),
	NumberofDays (1);

vars:
	n(0),m(0),
	StartPrice(0),						// Price corresponding to first element of  array
	PVPPrice(0),
	PVPPrice1(0),
	PVPPeakVolume(0),
	PVPIndex(0),							//Index of the peak (highest) volume array element
	PVPArraySize(3000),						//Set to Array Size
	PVPArrayMid(1500);						//Set to Array Mid Point
Array:
	PVPVolArray[3000] (0);					//Make sure this matches Array Size


if BarNumber = 1 then n = NumberofDays - 1;			//Make sure to reset on first bar
if (date > date[1]) or BarNumber =	1  then begin			//initialise
	n = n + 1;
	if n = NumberofDays then		
	begin	

		For Value1 = 0 to PVPArraySize Begin
			PVPVolArray[Value1] = 0;
		End;
		StartPrice = l;
		PVPPrice1 = PVPPrice;
		PVPPrice = StartPrice;
		PVPPeakVolume = 0;
		PVPIndex = PVPArrayMid;
		//PVPVolArray[PVPIndex] = Volume;
		n = 0;
	end;
end; 

Value2 = l - StartPrice;				//price in relation to starting price
value2 = value2 * (1/(MinMove/PriceScale));		
Value2 = PVPArrayMid+Value2;
value3 = (h-l) * (1/(MinMove/PriceScale));       // number of ticks l -> h				
Value1 = Round(Value2,0);				//shouldnt be needed as not adding to average price 
for m = Value1 to value1 + value3
begin
	PVPVolArray[m] = PVPVolArray[m] + Volume / (value3+1);	// +1 as as zero ticks should be vol/1 one tick vol/2 etc.
	If PVPVolArray[m] > PVPPeakVolume Then begin		// new peak volume? save it
		PVPIndex = m;
		PVPPeakVolume = PVPVolArray[m];
		PVPPrice = StartPrice - ((PVPArrayMid - m)*minmove/PriceScale );
	end;
end;

Plot1(PVPPrice, "PVPavg");
if (PVPPrice1 > 0 and PlotOldPvP) then Plot2 (PVPPrice1, "PVP Yesterday");	


 

Can somebody help me .....

 

This indicator was working just fine for weeks on my charts. All of the sudden it won't work when I use it on my AAPL chart. It still works fine on the SPY. Anyone got an idea how to fix this?

 

zHqiOBD.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can somebody help me .....

 

This indicator was working just fine for weeks on my charts. All of the sudden it won't work when I use it on my AAPL chart. It still works fine on the SPY. Anyone got an idea how to fix this?

 

zHqiOBD.png

 

Above code works fine ; format window , chart properties 10 , 15

Check for a bad workspace problem

5aa7121534a37_AAPL-PVP3-25-14.thumb.jpg.13dd09e0bf51b86bf67c160a78141727.jpg

5aa712153983a_ESM14-PVP3-25-14.thumb.jpg.f3d1c2b872ad1df7bafd507336b42738.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.