Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ptcman

Relation Between Daytraders and Time

Recommended Posts

Hello.

 

I'd like to know which type of relation you guys, daytraders, have with time.

 

Do you consider time more important than price when daytrading?

 

Usually, we say that we trade prices, not time, so time is secondary when compared with price, but let's stop for a moment and think about this.

 

Daytrading, as the name specifies, deals with trades taken only for that day, so like it or not, we are assuming right at the beginning of that trade a stop loss based on time, that is, we must close the position by the end of that trading day.

 

So, aren't we, based on what was said above, put the time factor in front of price? No matter where prices might be, above or below of our entry point, we will close the position by the end of the session.

 

But lets see this by another perspective, lets say we've just open a long position and at the same time we put a stop loss 3 points below of the entry, and at the same time, we also say that if in the next 30 minutes prices haven't broken a certain price, we close that same long position.

 

Again, we continue to put time in front of prices.

 

What about news?

Have you noticed how things really slow down near a news release and explodes right after the release?

Some traders wait for the news to be released to act on it, others prefer to anticipate and others just seat aside and watch what happen.

 

Again, we continue to put time in front of prices.

 

This is what we can typically read on a book related to technical analysis.

What I'd like to know though, is the opinion of you, real daytraders.

 

Best regards,

ptcman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No.

 

What you suggest might be true if my trades took a significant portion of the day which they don't.

 

For index futures they might only be a few minutes. For forex they might take longer but the day doesn't end until the weekend so can be largely ignored.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time & Price are equivalent. If you know how to use time, you gain an edge over participants who only use price and vice versa.

 

As I have already stated in previous posts, there are a number of participants who transact based on "targets". These targets must be hit within the space of specific time periods, if not then those people lose money....as we move through time, the importance of each period becomes apparent (to those who pay attention).

 

There are a number of ways to use time in financial markets. On the simplest level, retail particpants are famous for entering trades "late", while most professionals try to get in "early"

While that is clearly an oversimplification of things, it illustrates a basic tenent, that retail is usually 180 degrees out of sync with what really works in markets and a significant reason for that is the lack of understanding of the significance of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
While that is clearly an oversimplification of things, it illustrates a basic tenent, that retail is usually 180 degrees out of sync with what really works in markets and a significant reason for that is the lack of understanding of the significance of time.

 

Yes, that is one of those truths that are undeniable, but than the one million dollar question is, what is the true significance of time?

 

Are you saying that there is a true pattern in the markets that the retail traders just can't figure out? That all of that talk that says that we make our own market perception is BS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For index futures they might only be a few minutes. For forex they might take longer but the day doesn't end until the weekend so can be largely ignored.

 

But can't those trades that might be taken for just a couple of minutes, be related to time?

 

For example, every time you take a position, your system/strategy says that your maximum gain is during the first 5 minutes of that trade.

Won't you, maybe on a implicit way, take that in consideration and act on it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, that is one of those truths that are undeniable, but than the one million dollar question is, what is the true significance of time?

 

Are you saying that there is a true pattern in the markets that the retail traders just can't figure out? That all of that talk that says that we make our own market perception is BS?

 

No, I'm not say that at all. Read my posts. Its simple and straight forward. There are yearly, quarterly, monthly and weekly "opens"....those are pivots and (some) institutional traders will try to defend them, and to exceed those pivots in order to obtain a bonus at the end of the year...I show a simple example in my thread "An Institutional look at the S&P Market".

 

Its a fact that we all have our own perception, however you have the option of adapting to new data. I suggest you think about how you might adapt yours to this data..

 

The significance of time is also very straight forward. As an institutional trader I have a limited amount of time to get my business done. As time runs out I have to make decisions in order to reach my goals. Its very simple.

 

Good luck

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But can't those trades that might be taken for just a couple of minutes, be related to time?

 

For example, every time you take a position, your system/strategy says that your maximum gain is during the first 5 minutes of that trade.

Won't you, maybe on a implicit way, take that in consideration and act on it?

 

I have no such concern when I transact in the markets and like most of my colleagues I never take a postion based on short term considerations. It seems to me that you need to broaden your education. There are many participants in the financial markets, each with their own agendas and time frames....I suggest you take the time to learn more about this before putting money at risk. One resource that you may want to investigate is Auction Market Theory.

 

Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But can't those trades that might be taken for just a couple of minutes, be related to time?

 

For example, every time you take a position, your system/strategy says that your maximum gain is during the first 5 minutes of that trade.

Won't you, maybe on a implicit way, take that in consideration and act on it?

 

I explicitly do not take time into consideration. If I did I might well be shaken out of a trade that moves, coils for a bit while further accumulation occurs and then moves again. If the price action doesn't say that the conditions have changed I wait for the originally planned conditions to occur before exiting. Patience is a virtue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I explicitly do not take time into consideration. If I did I might well be shaken out of a trade that moves, coils for a bit while further accumulation occurs and then moves again. If the price action doesn't say that the conditions have changed I wait for the originally planned conditions to occur before exiting. Patience is a virtue.

 

I agree with Kiwi.

For me time is not really a consideration, except maybe to say I have found better trades with which to deploy my resources and hence I will cut the trades that are just sitting still.

The only real thing I worry about with time is in relation to - when I trade something and I anticipate it will do something, I usually wish it to do it asap. If not I might get worried.

Now this only applies to the short term trades. The longer term trades, or those trades based on a different persepctive, may require a little more leeway.

One thing I have recently stopped looking at is 5min, 10 min charts. I just follow range bars for short term, and daily for swing trading. So far it does not make a difference to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time is key in how we view price unless you are trading only the order flow/book.

 

Time is what forms our view of S/R levels. Read any book on FX written by somebody who trades multiple timeframes and you will notice they are doing this in order to

- Fiddle with volatility

- Manipulate trend/S&R

- Manipulate price into making their indicator trigger them into a trade or give them an "acceptable" trend to fiddle with their Fib/EW etc to conjure up stop/targets.

 

If you trade order flow only (i don't), then you are simply identifying s/r areas by the grouping of orders, without a direct relationship to time (other than your perception on your trade window, or the effect of time in creating a market OHCL).

 

There are all sorts of studies on time of day measured by volatility, size of market moves, liquidity/volume, etc. How you interpret these (which varies depending on what you are trying to do vs what the author was trying to do) will impact your trading.

 

For example :

One person states "Trade near the news, it moves the market, it's great" - they are a scalper, or "closet scalper".

 

Another states "Trade the wave, let it push your trade to profit/loss" - they are position trading (in my view of the term).

 

Another states "Macro trend doesn't matter as we trade intraday" - Scalper, yes, Position trader, no.

 

As you reduce time you also effect the bias direction price will show in relation to overall trends.

 

I could go on, Noise, Volatility, Psychological/Execution issues, etc. But you get the drift (I hope).

 

If you really want to do your nut in consider that a 144 (or whatever you use) tick chart has 144 possible combinations of OHCL, so the smaller your view of time, the less relevant what you consider the OHCL and S/R areas to be to those in the broader market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all let me thank you all for your insight.

 

If you really want to do your nut in consider that a 144 (or whatever you use) tick chart has 144 possible combinations of OHCL, so the smaller your view of time, the less relevant what you consider the OHCL and S/R areas to be to those in the broader market.

 

I confess that I never had consider that.

 

You guys really know how to open our minds.

 

Thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.