Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Szymon

How Do I Get an Angle from an EMA? Multicharts Software

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Can someone point me in the right direction.

 

I am looking for a function or script where I can measure the angle of a EMA on a chart. This is similar to the built-in function in Ensign.

 

Anyhelp will be much appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

Simon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been looking into this can someone tell me if there is a ACOS function in Multicharts.

 

Here is the definition.

 

ACOS function

 

The ACOS function returns the arc cosine of a specified number.

The specified number is the cosine, in radians, of the angle that you want. The specified number must be a DOUBLE PRECISION number.

 

* If the specified number is NULL, the result of this function is NULL.

* If the absolute value of the specified number is greater than 1, an exception is returned that indicates that the value is out of range (SQL state 22003).

 

The returned value, in radians, is in the range of zero (0) to pi. The data type of the returned value is a DOUBLE PRECISION number.

Syntax

 

Regards

 

Simon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't use that software but I know where you're going with this. I've looked into it before. I didn't have full success with my experiment. Here's what I had to settle on: using the standard of deviation of the ema...which is all a bollinger band is. Different stddevs generally produce standard angles. Let me know how it goes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the function that I am going to try out for my project. I think that is the closest I can get using the multicharts software.

 

____________________________________

 

TLAngle (Function)

Disclaimer

The TLAngle function returns the angle of a trendline.

Syntax

TLAngle(StartPrice, StartBar, EndPrice, EndBar)

Parameters

Name Type Description

StartPrice Numeric Sets the price of the trendline start point.

StartBar Numeric Sets the bar number of the trendline start point.

EndPrice Numeric Sets the price of the trendline end point.

EndBar Numeric Sets the bar number of the trendline end point.

Returns (Double0

A numeric value representing the angle of the specified trendline.

Remarks

To calculate the angle, the function requires that you specify the start and end bars for the trendline as well as the start

and end prices. The inputs StartPrice and EndPrice are the start price and end price, respectively, of the

trendline. They are usually replaced by values such as Close, High, Low, and so on, or are replaced with numeric

series type inputs.

Also, you must offset the Price by its corresponding bar number. For example, if you want the trendline angle for a

line drawn from the Close of ten bars ago to the Close of the current bar, replace the inputs StartPrice,

StartBar, EndPrice, and EndBar with the values Close[10], 10, Close[0], and 0 respectively.

The inputs StartBar and EndBar refer to the bar numbers of the starting and ending points of the trendline. These

inputs must be replaced by positive whole numbers or be replaced with numeric simple type inputs.

The formula used is a simple rise over run calculation to obtain the slope; the formula then takes the arctangent of that

slope. In fact, you can obtain the same value as the TLAngle function by taking the ArcTangent of the TLSlope

function.

Example

Plot1(TLAngle(High,1,High 9);

See Also

TLAngleEasy

 

____________________________________

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Szymon,

 

this gives you the angle

Input: Price(Close), NumBars(1), MA_length(20); 
variable: MA(0), slope(0); 

MA = average(price, MA_length); 
slope = arctangent((MA - MA[NumBars])/NumBars); 

plot1(slope, "slope"); 
plot2(0,"Zero");




If you need the the degrees instead of the radians change 

slope = arctangent((MA - MA[NumBars])/NumBars); 

to  
slope = arctangent((MA - MA[NumBars])/NumBars)*180/3.141592654; 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Insideday,

 

Thanks for this function. I will try this later today to see if there is any difference between TLEasyAngle function which is builtin inside multicharts and your one.

 

Here is a description of this function.

---------------------------------------

 

TLAngleEasy (Function)

Disclaimer

The TLAngleEasy function returns the angle of a trendline with one price input.

Syntax

TLAngleEasy(Price, StartBar, EndBar)

Returns (Double)

A numeric value containing the angle of a trendline.

Parameters

Name Type Description

Price Numeric Specifies which bar value (price, function, or formula) to use.

StartBar Numeric Sets the bar number of the trendline start point.

EndBar Numeric Sets the bar number of the trendline end point.

Remarks

This function is similar to TLAngle, except that you cannot specify different prices for the start and end points. This

function uses the same price on the start and end bars.

The formula used is a simple rise over run calculation to obtain the slope; the formula then takes the cotangent of that

slope. In fact, you can obtain the same value as the TLAngleEasy function by taking the ArcTangent of the TLSlope

function.

Example

Plot1(TLAngleEasy(High,1,9);

 

----------------------------------------

 

 

Regards

 

Szymon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Insideday,

 

As I said my platform doesn't provide this function, but the formula I ended up with basically mimics yours. It's basically a pythagorean expression where the length of the adjacent angle is your "NumBars."

However, I found that an easier way to all of this is simply to look for bars outside of the bb (standards of deviation). The StDevs in essence create angles for you and a bar that exceeds the bb exceeds that angle. I hope that makes sense. Not to detract from those of you who are doing it this way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Insideday,

 

As I said my platform doesn't provide this function, but the formula I ended up with basically mimics yours. It's basically a pythagorean expression where the length of the adjacent angle is your "NumBars."

However, I found that an easier way to all of this is simply to look for bars outside of the bb (standards of deviation). The StDevs in essence create angles for you and a bar that exceeds the bb exceeds that angle. I hope that makes sense. Not to detract from those of you who are doing it this way.

 

Hi Insideday,

 

Thanks for the formula and your help.

 

Tell me what platform are you currently using?

 

Szymon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.