Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Bid-Ask Pressure Indicator for Tradestation

Recommended Posts

I know it can be done... i've been trying to do it after seeing almost the exact idea coded into an .eld from the folks at eotpro...

 

Seemed like a hugely impressive piece of information once you weeded out the small and medium sized traders and just stuck with the direction of the big fish.

 

I just don't know how to code it... and as of yet have been unable to find someone who could.

 

Cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't seem to open this .eld file. I'm using Multicharts which should be same as Tradestation. Do you have in word format? Thanks.

 

Mike

 

You are winding me up ????????????????????????????????????????

 

 

 

just scroll up a few posts from yours..................................:o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sorry, forgot to mention that I tried the one that was on the thread but it didn't work. I thought maybe it was specially for TS 2000i and not compatible with Multicharts. If it's same as for current TS then it should've worked. Anyway, just checking if it was different. I'll try again. Thanks for the codes.

 

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i copied the code into Easylanguage power editor but when i try and verify it it doesnt like the

'intrabarpersist MyCurrentBar(0),' code. it highlights MyCurrent bar

error message is word not recognised by Easylanguage. I am using 2000i. Could anyone please help with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't seem to open this .eld file. I'm using Multicharts which should be same as Tradestation. Do you have in word format? Thanks.

 

Mike

 

3 or 4 posts back its quoted in plain ascii text. Cut and paste that into MC's PLEditor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there's seems to be some error in the script because when i compile in PLEditor and try to insert the study on the chart it says the study is not compiled so to check for errors and compile the study

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good idea spyro, Blu-Ray, can this be done? if it can, and if you have time, can you please change the code to reflect spyro reply?

 

If not no worries

 

Thanks

 

Hi Blu-ray,

 

Dont know if this helps with my question above?

 

currentcontracts is a reserved word

 

Value1 = currentcontracts;

 

My problem now is how to get this intergrated with the rest of the Bid/Ask indicator. Hope you can help us out.

 

Many thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blu-Ray

 

I went through the Tradestation forum, and I found this code, please correct me if I'm wrong, I think it dispalys contracts based on users input. Would you mind having a look at it , I've plotted it on my machine, and I think it might do? But it would be better if it was like an oscillator, and color coding it i.e. green/red for buying / selling.

 

 

What do you think?

 

Thanks

 

Inputs: 
Level  (25); 

Variables: 
VolQty  (0); 

if BarType >= 2 then begin 
if Volume >= Level then VolQty = Volume; 
if Volume < Level then VolQty = 0; 
end else begin 
if Ticks >= Level then VolQty = Ticks; 
if Ticks < Level then VolQty = 0; 
end;	  

Plot1( VolQty, "Volume" )

Edited by theman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blu-Ray

 

I went through the Tradestation forum, and I found this code, please correct me if I'm wrong, I think it dispalys contracts based on users input. Would you mind having a look at it , I've plotted it on my machine, and I think it might do? But it would be better if it was like an oscillator, and color coding it i.e. green/red for buying / selling.

 

 

What do you think?

 

Thanks

 

Inputs: 
Level  (25); 

Variables: 
VolQty  (0); 

if BarType >= 2 then begin 
if Volume >= Level then VolQty = Volume; 
if Volume < Level then VolQty = 0; 
end else begin 
if Ticks >= Level then VolQty = Ticks; 
if Ticks < Level then VolQty = 0; 
end;	  

Plot1( VolQty, "Volume" )

 

Hi theman

 

That code won't do the trick, basically what that code is doing is showing volume over 25 for the whole bar, if the volume for the whole bar is less than 25 it will plot 0.

 

I know how to code it up, but have been struggling for time a little bit lately, I'll hopefully get around to doing it at the weekend.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

blu

 

just little another thing

 

if you can and if it not so hard to make the bars fat or thin if it for example more or less then 100 contracts so we can see if it push up hard or low

 

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
blu

 

just little another thing

 

if you can and if it not so hard to make the bars fat or thin if it for example more or less then 100 contracts so we can see if it push up hard or low

 

 

thanks

 

Sorry, I don't get what you're trying to portray, as we'll just be showing contracts over 100 anyway.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think spyro is bascially saying the following:

 

This is from e otpro's site:

 

The size of the dot tells you how much volume is in that particular bar, relative to the last 3 half-cycles. So, a large dot means greater than average volume is flowing into the bar for that type of trade. A tiny dot means not much volume.

 

It was important to split out the dot sizes, because… say you have a big push down from the large traders, and then the dots start drifting back towards the zero line. That drift up could be happening because they are buying, but it could also be happening because they aren’t doing anything. If no volume prints for their size, the dots will tend toward zero from wherever they are. I wanted to differentiate action from non-action. It’s working well to do so, today.

 

And this is the image (its the bottom indicator)

 

splatter1-300x209.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just curious... BidAsk, huh.. realtime... As I understand this it only takes the bidsize and asksize, not the actually trades.

How can this be interesting? What about hidden orders? And what about bids coming and going just to tease or trick the ask-side, viceversa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just curious... BidAsk, huh.. realtime... As I understand this it only takes the bidsize and asksize, not the actually trades.

How can this be interesting? What about hidden orders? And what about bids coming and going just to tease or trick the ask-side, viceversa.

 

No it takes actual trades. It compares volume traded @ bid against volume traded @ ask. Aggressive sellers vs aggressive buyers.

 

Marketdelta.com & Investor RT are the sites to go to find out more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's a sort of the volume/ tick delta indicator? And what's the difference then?

 

And may I then ask why it doesn't work at historic data?

 

The reason for my questions, is that I'm currently working at something similar (maybe) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, as far as I can tell its is a volume delta that has been smoothed with an ema (maybe double smoothed?).

 

The problem with getting it to work with historic data is if you are using say minute bars you would need to build these with tick by tick data for bid ask and trade data to build the delta. Neoticker allows this I believe and Ninja are promising something like this for version 7. Investor RT can probably cope with it somehow but not sure of the details as I have never used it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.