Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

johnjohn1hew

Price and Volume Trading - Hindsight and Real

Recommended Posts

I don't know where to post this so i thought here would be fine.

 

Price hit resistance at 77.5, is rejected and supply significantly overwhelms demand and drives price down to 81.25 (a short-term support level that i did not have marked). 81.25 is rejected and the test is unable to make it to the low on low volume, indicating the supply required is not coming in. I took this trade and was stopped out around 88. I did not have as sound a reason for taking this trade as i have outlined here, but i had an idea that price was rejected at 81.25 and the test was a weak one.

5aa70f4ed81b7_NQ12-0904_11_2009(5Seconds).thumb.jpg.87549d69dada5403ab7635b3a3a9a341.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the 98 to 99 level that i had marked, price offered an opportunity to go long. At 96.25 price was being supported and went up from there. Supply drove it down a few times with each time on less volume. Then at 97.00 supply ran out and the buyers had a great opportunity. This is where i could have entered. But i didn't since my ninjatrader was not open and i was in a psych101 lecture. Price tested this point again, and was supported. This could have been another entry point if i had missed the first one. I might not even have noticed these points in real-time, so it is impossible to say what i would have done. That is why i need to develop a trading plan, so that i know exactly what to look for and what i am going to do.

 

For one of my actual trades of the day i got in around the 1712.00 zone of resistance i had marked. Price hit the level, retraced to the previous swing high and was met with higher volume, so support came in. I took the long based on this action. I was stopped out around 1713.00. My reasoning for placing my stop here was because i thought it was a supporting point. But in hindsight it actually wasn't. Price just died off because of a lack of supply and not because of demand. After this happened, price took off, which leads me to my second trade of the day.

 

For my second trade i got in around 1716.75, but it was not at any important level of S/R (that i had marked anyways) so i really should not have taken it. My reasoning was because of the pullback after the sharp rise was fueled by drying up supply and demand was starting to come in. So i took a long. I watched price go up to about 22.00 and then right back down to where it hit my stop at 18.75. In hindsight, at the 22.00 high, demand wasn't coming in on the test. This could have been a signal to exit. Also, i had not noticed a possible level of S/R in the 22.00 to 24.00 zone. This could have helped in my exit as price would have been just at the bottom of this zone and demand would not have appeared to be sufficient to push price farther.

 

Do not be too critical of what i have laid out here. Most of this reasoning is in hindsight, so i need to work on applying it in real-time. I also need to start developing a trading plan.

5aa70f4f63c94_NQ12-0905_11_2009(5Seconds).thumb.jpg.5c287eb301c3444306698e36baaec4af.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Low volume test of 13.25 (top of S/R zone i had marked) had me take a long and i got 14 as my entry. My first stop was around 13.25 and then i progressively moved it up under supporting points. When i was in the long trade, my stops weren't hit, so i didn't exit....as simple as that. I ended up being stopped out at 25.00

 

The short trade thrusted upwards on low volume and appeared to be unable to hold, so i took a short and got in around 30.75. I had placed my stop just above the tail end of the thrust at 32.00. I then moved it down to break even and then to the top of the S/R zone i had marked at 29.75. My stop was then hit and price eventually made a test of the high.

 

Edit: i did not get a chance to take a screenshot of the short trade when i got stopped out.

5aa70f508216e_nqtrade.thumb.jpg.842f864882c02315b8d7f3c77f24b2f4.jpg

5aa70f50874e9_nqtrade2.thumb.jpg.888e7ed17b3168407a0925d87d780b2e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nice charts

 

can you put some labels or descriptions as to what the lines represent?

 

or notes on which lines are strategical and which lines are tactical?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I used the 30 second chart and Yesterday I used the 5 second chart. I do not have any other reason for using these intervals other than that they are what I chose to use - the 30 second shows more than the 1 minute and less than the 5 second... I don't know. Note that I am just starting out and I have a lot to correct and develop in my strategy. So far, I know to find S/R levels to have for the next trading day; to watch price movements and volume at these levels of S/R; to not over-analyze the market; and to let winners run and hopefully they will be larger than my losings that I cut short when trying to get a good entry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Took a short around 48.75. Demand did not appear to be sufficient to overcome the supply that was coming in right below a marked resistance level (a lot of activity, little progress). So i took the trade with a 3 tick stop. Stop was hit, position was closed.

5aa70f525e109_NQ12-0909_11_2009(30Seconds).thumb.jpg.cac6755181b0aea0cf4919b2131540a3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ya, i was reading something about that today. Easier to remember?

 

IMO for whatever psychological reason, it's easy for traders to gravitate to the round numbers. You see this especially on stocks.

 

Again, just an observation, maybe it can be used in conjunction w/ what you are doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Took one trade at the breakout of 77.50 and was stopped out break even. This breakout was on little activity so i should have waited for a possible retest. When the retest came, i assumed it was short covering given the substantial increase in volume, so i shorted at 77.75 with my stop above the bar that broke resistance and continually set my stop above resistance points and was eventually stopped out at 75.00 after price had failed to successfully break below 74.00 support.

 

Now price is just chopping around at the midpoint of the 77.5-74.00 zone. Most likely because it's lunchtime.

5aa70f55b71b8_NQ12-0911_11_2009(5Seconds).thumb.jpg.db401dc15f79fc2f446fe235264b9a64.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right now price is at 1771.00 in-between s/r levels i have marked at 1774.00 and 1768-69. Based on price action, looking at a larger timeframe, i would think that price would continue to decline maybe opening around the 62.00 area tomorrow?

 

Plan:

 

I will trade breakout pullbacks with the breakouts being on higher volume (more interest in the direction of the breakout) and the pullback being on lower volume (little interest in the direction opposite of the breakout). My stop will be below the s/r level that price breaks out from. This is what i will trade tomorrow if an opportunity does arise. Until s/r is approached i will stand aside and observe the behavior of the relationship between price and volume.

 

So, if price nears 68-69 and 62.00 i will more closely observe the price and volume and their on the way to these s/r levels and if a breakout occurs, i will wait for the pullback.

5aa70f57c2322_NQ12-0912_11_2009(30Seconds).thumb.jpg.b6b0c38c77f33b60950229694fa9a3eb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At around 10:20-21 there was a breakout, but i missed it and it would have stopped me out anyways. Other than that, the market gave me no opportunities to trade...so i didn't.I noticed that sticking to a planned setup for the trading day rids my trading of directional bias. I have no idea where price is going to go the next trading day, and neither does anyone else. We can guess, but in the end...it's just a guess. I would rather have price do something and then base my trading decision on the behavior of that movement and then look for an opportunity to enter, not try to predict where price is going even before it points the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How's about other crypto exchanges? Are all they banned in your country or only Binance?
    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.