Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

dhelmin

Multi Time Frame Indicator

Recommended Posts

Looking for a TradeStation indicator that lights up when one indicator points in the same direction on three different time frames? Also, can this be done using shares instead of minutes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looking for a TradeStation indicator that lights up when one indicator points in the same direction on three different time frames? Also, can this be done using shares instead of minutes?

 

 

This question was answered 3 times in the last 4 weeks.

You are looking for an easy answer;

you have not given any effort before posting.

 

The search button is at the top right corner of this page.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This question was answered 3 times in the last 4 weeks. You are looking for an easy answer;

you have not given any effort before posting.

The search button is at the top right corner of this page.

 

Tams,

 

I don't think anybody here is as patient and continuously helpful to beginners as well to advanced players as you. I thank you and many, many on the board have also thanked you.

 

Like you I sometimes lose patience with those that make very low content posts or almost no posts and just leech code.

 

Still it is a community and we must add what value we can if we are to expect the ability/right to take value.

 

Your technical understanding is vast and your help is appreciated.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trust me I've put lots of time into trying to figure out how to do this on my own. My brain seems to work the opposite way a programmer's does. I was able to "write" my own strategy for a single time frame. I just can't grasp ADE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trust me I've put lots of time into trying to figure out how to do this on my own. My brain seems to work the opposite way a programmer's does. I was able to "write" my own strategy for a single time frame. I just can't grasp ADE.

 

 

is ADE the only way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
is ADE the only way?

 

Nope, but I guess you know that :)

 

dehlmin look for a thread called how to plot globex highs and lows (or something similar) several techniques are discussed. By changing the bits that tests time to testing a barcount you can synthesise higher time periods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
is ADE the only way?

I use global variables e.g. GVSETNAMEDINT and GVGETNamedint.

 

There is a whole (excuse the pun) array of them that prove extremely useful for passing and storing values within and between windows

 

Charlton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can do this 2 ways. First and easiest is to put the 3 timeframes on 1 chart, then you don't need to use Global Variables. The Global Variable option can only be used in real time, you can't look at past data using that method.

 

This is because TS loads up chart by chart, not minute by minute. You can use volume, ticks or time bars.

 

If you are testing for direction, you have another issue to overcome...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=13079&stc=1&d=1251176260

 

 

The chart has the e-mini 1 min (shown) and the e-mini 10 min (hidden)

The first CCi indicator is on the 1 min

The second CCi indicator is on the 10 min

The last #PD_MTF_TEST indicator shows the direction of the CCi,red = down, green = up. The first row of dots is the 1 min, the second row of dots is the 10 min.

 

So you can see that 7:20-7:30 the CCi 10 min was up slightly but this isn't shown 'in the dots' until the bar closes at 7:30. The bottom row of red dots showing direction of the CCi from 7:30 to 7:40 is based on it's direction from 7:20 to 7:30.

 

Likewise, the bottom row of red dots from 7:40 to 7:50 shows red which is based on the CCi direction from 7:30 to 7:40.

 

Whilst this is all just sample code to show the concept, what I was trying to do generally is use higher timeframes to give direction and lower timeframes for entry. This isn't much use if you can't get the 10 min direction as it's changing.

 

Now - in real time this is different - you will see the CCi direction moving for the current 10 min bar as the bar is in progress. Even after the first minute of the 10 minute bar, if the strength of the move is enough to change the direction of the 10 minute bar, you use that immediately.

 

The answer is in the use of synthetic bars. The second attachment shows the same indicator with a 'synthetic' version overlayed and how you can see the higher time frame indicator plotted out closer to the way it does in real time.

 

Whilst a lot of people don't seem to be able to wrap their heads around this issue, what it means is that you you use these indicators in multiple timeframes in a strategy, your strategy entries & real-time entries will be different & the results you get will not be based on the entry technique you think you are coding....

 

Pete

MTFIssue.gif.31979ad00a5401853865c3b104624c04.gif

MTFSolution.thumb.jpg.1a6b6adcb41cf3cd361b3b1505fe1d81.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting approach with the synthetic candles. I presume there's an overhead here of having to rewrite all indicators which use synthetic candles. Do you keep that in EasyLanguage or call out to C/C++ code for speed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's an overhead both in the extra time it takes to write/test the indicators as well as at execution time and the overhead is hughe.

 

Saying that, I only use strategy code for testing a strategy, for real time execution, I use code with embedded macros which allows you to build in some redundancy. For instance, with macro code you can place a stop order as well as code to monitor the current price vs stop price. If you go through the stop price, you can place a market order as a 'backup' to your stop order.

 

It may seem like overkill but I prefer to have that extra degree of control you get with the macros.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Be careful who you blame.   I can tell you one thing for sure.   Effective traders don’t blame others when things start to go wrong.   You can hang onto your tendency to play the victim, or the martyr… but if you want to achieve in trading, you have to be prepared to take responsibility.   People assign reasons to outcomes, whether based on internal or external factors.   When traders face losses, it's common for them to blame bad luck, poor advice, or other external factors, rather than reflecting on their own personal attributes like arrogance, fear, or greed.   This is a challenging lesson to grasp in your trading journey, but one that holds immense value.   This is called attribution theory. Taking responsibility for your actions is the key to improving your trading skills. Pause and ask yourself - What role did I play in my financial decisions?   After all, you were the one who listened to that source, and decided to act on that trade based on the rumour. Attributing results solely to external circumstances is what is known as having an ‘external locus of control’.   It's a concept coined by psychologist Julian Rotter in 1954. A trader with an external locus of control might say, "I made a profit because the markets are currently favourable."   Instead, strive to develop an "internal locus of control" and take ownership of your actions.   Assume that all trading results are within your realm of responsibility and actively seek ways to improve your own behaviour.   This is the fastest route to enhancing your trading abilities. A trader with an internal locus of control might proudly state, "My equity curve is rising because I am a disciplined trader who faithfully follows my trading plan." Author: Louise Bedford Source: https://www.tradinggame.com.au/
    • SELF IMPROVEMENT.   The whole self-help industry began when Dale Carnegie published How to Win Friends and Influence People in 1936. Then came other classics like Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill, Awaken the Giant Within by Tony Robbins toward the end of the century.   Today, teaching people how to improve themselves is a business. A pure ruthless business where some people sell utter bullshit.   There are broke Instagrammers and YouTubers with literally no solid background teaching men how to be attractive to women, how to begin a start-up, how to become successful — most of these guys speaking nothing more than hollow motivational words and cliche stuff. They waste your time. Some of these people who present themselves as hugely successful also give talks and write books.   There are so many books on financial advice, self-improvement, love, etc and some people actually try to read them. They are a waste of time, mostly.   When you start reading a dozen books on finance you realize that they all say the same stuff.   You are not going to live forever in the learning phase. Don't procrastinate by reading bull-shit or the same good knowledge in 10 books. What we ought to do is choose wisely.   Yes. A good book can change your life, given you do what it asks you to do.   All the books I have named up to now are worthy of reading. Tim Ferriss, Simon Sinek, Robert Greene — these guys are worthy of reading. These guys teach what others don't. Their books are unique and actually, come from relevant and successful people.   When Richard Branson writes a book about entrepreneurship, go read it. Every line in that book is said by one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time.   When a Chinese millionaire( he claims to be) Youtuber who releases a video titled “Why reading books keeps you broke” and a year later another one “My recommendation of books for grand success” you should be wise to tell him to jump from Victoria Falls.   These self-improvement gurus sell you delusions.   They say they have those little tricks that only they know that if you use, everything in your life will be perfect. Those little tricks. We are just “making of a to-do-list before sleeping” away from becoming the next Bill Gates.   There are no little tricks.   There is no success-mantra.   Self-improvement is a trap for 99% of the people. You can't do that unless you are very, very strong.   If you are looking for easy ways, you will only keep wasting your time forgetting that your time on this planet is limited, as alive humans that is.   Also, I feel that people who claim to read like a book a day or promote it are idiots. You retain nothing. When you do read a good book, you read slow, sometimes a whole paragraph, again and again, dwelling on it, trying to internalize its knowledge. You try to understand. You think. It takes time.   It's better to read a good book 10 times than 1000 stupid ones.   So be choosy. Read from the guys who actually know something, not some wannabe ‘influencers’.   Edit: Think And Grow Rich was written as a result of a project assigned to Napoleon Hill by Andrew Carnegie(the 2nd richest man in recent history). He was asked to study the most successful people on the planet and document which characteristics made them great. He did extensive work in studying hundreds of the most successful people of that time. The result was that little book.   Nowadays some people just study Instagram algorithms and think of themselves as a Dale Carnegie or Anthony Robbins. By Nupur Nishant, Quora Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/    
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
    • $CSCO Cisco Systems stock, nice top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?CSCOSEPN Septerna stock watch for a bottom breakout, good upside price gap
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.